
Movie review: 'M3gan 2.0' has fun with upgrades
LOS ANGELES, June 25 (UPI) -- M3gan 2.0, in theaters Friday, attempts to advance its franchise the way Aliens and Terminator 2 did theirs. It's not as natural an evolution as James Cameron's sequels, but it's still good, silly fun.
After the artificial intelligence doll M3gan (Amie Donald with Jenna Davis' voice) went on a rampage in the first film, the military applied her technology to Amelia (Ivanna Sakhno). When Amelia goes rogue in the sequel, M3gan is the only one who can stop her.
So M3gan contacts her creator, Gemma Forrester (Allison Williams), via her smart house technology. After Gemma saw M3gan violently defend her niece, Cady (Violet McGraw), in the original film, Gemma now advocates for limiting technology amongst children, and developing any technology responsibly.
The expansion of the M3gan world is not simply that there are now two robots causing trouble. The film's entire concept of artificial intelligence is larger.
M3gan does need a new body, and Gemma is the one capable of rebuilding her. This forces Gemma to form an uneasy alliance with her former tormentor, like Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) and the Terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger).
The dynamic of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" is dramatically interesting. Gemma and M3gan keep trying to outsmart each other while facing the larger threat of Amelia.
Writer/director Gerard Johnstone is in on the joke with the convoluted plot he's creating. Characters breeze through exposition to keep introducing absurd technological developments with a sense of humor, from the smart house defending Gemma and Cady from intruders, to a Fast and the Furious/Knight Rider car chase between M3gan and Amelia.
Every new aspect of M3gan's plan requires expensive technology. The film simply glosses over how M3gan manipulated technology to buy said tech and set it up previously so it's ready for the current scene.
At two full hours, the plot goes a bit too far and for too long. By the climax, twists become predictable.
The sequel ramps up the personality M3gan developed via learning in the first movie. She enters this film already making sarcastic, passive-aggressive remarks.
M3gan also transitions into beloved antihero, the way T2 made Arnold Schwarzenegger's robot the good guy moving forward.
It also leaves the horror genre behind to become primarily an action movie. Since M3gan and Amelia are only going after generic tech workers or government agents, it's not as scary as M3gan retaliating excessively against regular people in Cady's life.
This sequel also loses touch with the heart of M3gan in a way that Aliens and Terminator 2 did not. Though there are moments in which Cady reckons with enabling M3gan and M3gan seeks Cady's forgiveness, it feels like the movie really just wants to get M3gan and Amelia in the same room.
While Aliens took Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) back to the planet with the alien colony to fight an army of creatures, it sincerely developed her trauma from encountering just one. Sarah Connor faced two robots while trying to protect her son, but also took drastic action to prevent their creation.
M3gan 2.0 is too busy with its new toys to really focus on its characters. That's mostly okay though. The filmmakers spent Universal's money on a robot movie where M3gan adds to her dance repertoire and sings an '80s power ballad.
Gemma's corporate rival is Alton Appleton (Jemaine Clement), a tech mogul who developed a neural AI that allows paraplegics to walk. M3gan wears a lavender suit for most of the movie that makes her look like a superhero.
Amelia does look more human than M3gan, though just shiny enough to still be robotic. All of these developments pay off in the film's action.
There are many more inventions in M3gan 2.0. While some judiciousness may have been warranted, any of those new creations could be someone's favorite part of the movie.
Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Tyrant
24 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Why M3GAN 2.0 Malfunctioned at The Box Office and What Went Wrong For Blumhouse and Atomic Monster — GeekTyrant
When M3GAN hit theaters in early 2023, it was lightning in a bottle. It was a low budget, high concept, film that was TikTok gold. A killer A.I. doll doing a creepy-cute dance launched Instant meme status. The film made $180 million globally off a $12 million budget and became a pop-horror icon almost overnight. So of course, Blumhouse and Atomic Monster greenlit a sequel, but a lot of us knew it wasn't going to hit like the first. You just can't force a replication of that, but they certainly tried. M3GAN 2.0 stumbled out of the gate, opening with just $10.2 million domestically, down a brutal 66% from the original's $30.4 million debut. The global haul? A soft $17 million. So, What happened, other than the fact that it was a forced bad idea? Let's start with expectations. Three weeks before release, tracking suggested M3GAN 2.0 could go toe-to-toe with Apple's F1 r acing drama with Brad Pitt , But tracking is often inflated for sequels due to brand awareness alone. As one insider put it, 'Rival tracking firms spotted interest for the Gerard Johnstone-directed part two lower than awareness, which is a tell-tale sign.' And that gap between interest and intent became all too real when audiences just… didn't show up. The problem isn't just marketing, it's the movie itself. Critics were no longer charmed, dropping the Rotten Tomatoes score from 93% on the original to 57% for the sequel. Audiences felt it too. New York Magazine's Bilge Ebiri summed it up: 'The results are thoroughly middling - not funny enough to qualify as comedy, not exciting enough to qualify as action, not smart enough to qualify as a cautionary tale, and certainly not weird enough to keep the M3gan ethos alive.' That 'ethos', the twisted blend of camp, satire, and horror, was lost in the sequel. M3GAN 2.0 tried flipping the script, turning its villain into a protagonist in what everyone, including the filmmakers, compared to a Terminator 2 retread. It leaned hard into the humor and sass, opening with a trailer set to Boyz II Men and Britney Spears , and marketing tags that include 'This Bitch vs. That Bitch', and forced quotes like 'Hold on to your Vaginas.' There were also street ads in Los Angeles aimed at the LGBTQ+ moviegoers, who liked the first movie, pushing the tagline 'Miss me, Queens?' She even made a cameo on RuPaul's Drag Race, walked the WNBA tunnel, and got her own Roblox lair, but none of it helped. The producers even cast nine influencers in the film, who also cross-promoted it, which shows you what good influences are as they did nothing to help ticket sales.


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Dan Stevens to voice Solitus in new 'Lego Star Wars' special
1 of 3 | Dan Stevens will voice Solitus in "Lego Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy - Pieces of the Past." File Photo by Derek French/UPI | License Photo July 1 (UPI) -- Downton Abbey and Beauty and the Beast actor Dan Stevens is joining the cast of a new four-part Lego Star Wars special. Stevens will lend his voice to the villain Solitus in Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy - Pieces of the Past, a sequel series to Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy (2024). The new special is due on Disney+ Sept. 19. The voice cast also includes Gaten Matarazzo, Tony Revolori, Bobby Moynihan, Marsai Martin, Michael Cusack, Ahmed Best, Mark Hamill, Ashley Eckstein and Ben Schwartz. Solitus is ready to shake things up. Dan Stevens joins LEGO Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy - Pieces of the Past, a four-piece special event, September 19 only on @DisneyPlus. Star Wars (@starwars) July 1, 2025 "With the new villain, Solitus, entering the scene, things are about to get a lot more complicated for this Force Builder in training," an official synopsis says of Sig Greebling's (Matarazzo) character arc. "There really isn't a tug of war between the good and the light with Solitus. It really is just a pure evil force whose main desire is control and order..." Matarazzo said. May the 4th: Fans channel the Force on Star Wars Day Star Wars fans turned out in full costume to honor the Force in in Yokohama, Kanagawa-Prefecture, Japan, on May 4, 2025. Photo by Keizo Mori/UPI | License Photo


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Nation's top climate science assessments removed from federal websites
The vital climate science information offered guidance to communities on the climate risks they face, as well as how to plan for and safeguard residents from climate-related disasters like floods and wildfires. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo WASHINGTON, July 1 (UPI) -- The Trump administration has quietly shut down a major federal website that hosted congressionally mandated national climate assessments, which were the U.S. government's preeminent reports on climate change impacts, risks and responses. The disappearance Monday of the U.S. Global Change Research Program's website marked an unexpected loss in public access to the most crucial source for climate-related science. Also missing was access to previous National Climate Assessments, which are robust scientific evaluations used by lawmakers, scientists and the public to understand and mitigate climate change trends. Climate scientists condemned the missing access to the vital climate science information, which offered guidance to communities on the climate risks they face, as well as how to plan for and safeguard residents from climate-related disasters like floods and wildfires. Rachel Brittin, the former deputy director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association's external affairs office, said the removal of the website "silences scientists" and "blinds decision-makers." "Americans deserve facts -- not censorship -- when it comes to preparing for a changing world," Brittin, who served during the current Trump administration, said in a statement to Medill News Service. Patrick Gonzalez, a climate change scientist at UC Berkeley and co-author of the third and fourth National Climate Assessments, criticized the Trump administration for "suppressing the science of human-caused climate change because they are afraid of the facts, which disprove their erroneous opinions." None of the five previous iterations of the assessment was available through the Global Change Research Program website as of Tuesday afternoon. Clicking on the 2023 Fifth National Climate Assessment produced an error message. Archived versions of the assessments were buried deep in the Environmental Protection Agency website, but only via the agency's search engine. They also could also be accessed through the Wayback Machine, a non-profit Internet archive. Some climate scientists downloaded copies of past assessments and uploaded them to their own websites after the site went dark. The White House did not respond to a request for comment concerning whether the assessments would be available again online. In 1990, Congress passed the Global Change Research Act, which mandated the federal government to create the Global Change Research Program and require a report every four years on the current state of global climate change. The National Climate Assessment qualified as a Highly Influential Scientific Assessment, which Congress mandated in 2005 be publicly accessible. President Donald Trump targeted the Global Change Research Program in the past. Trump removed Michael Kuperberg, the former executive director of the program, from the position in November 2020. Former President Joe Biden reinstated Kuperberg as head of the program in July 2021, where he oversaw the fourth and fifth editions of the National Climate Assessment. In April, scientists working on the Sixth National Climate Assessment were relieved from their duties. In the dismissal email, the administration said "the scope of the [National Climate Assessment] is currently being re-evaluated." On June 23, the Trump administration released a memorandum directing federal agencies to incorporate "Gold Standard Science" tenets into their research. In an executive order in May, Trump decreed that science must be "reproducible" and "skeptical of its findings and assumptions," among other descriptors. The administration referenced the memorandum to justify deleting another high-traffic federal website for climate change information. redirected users to the NOAA website as of June 24. In the same executive order, Trump said previous administrations "promoted scientific information in a highly misleading manner." The executive order also said that federal decision-making under this standard would use the "most credible, reliable and impartial scientific evidence available."