
Major SALT Deduction Cap Boost Passes Senate. Here's Who Would Benefit
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. Senate has passed a significant expansion to the federal deduction for state and local taxes (SALT), more than tripling the cap from $10,000 to $40,000 starting in 2025.
Senators voted 50-50 on President Donald Trump's broad tax and spending bill on Tuesday, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tiebreaking vote.
The increased SALT deduction cap would phase out for those earning above $500,000 and increase 1 percent annually until 2029, then revert to the current $10,000 limit in 2030.
Why It Matters
The move marks a dramatic reversal in policy on SALT deductions, one of the most contentious features of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and has implications for millions of taxpayers, especially those living in high-tax states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois and California where property and income taxes often far exceed the old $10,000 cap.
Analysts have said the provision will most likely benefit wealthier Americans who have high property taxes, as taxes paid on income and property ownership are typically the largest for those who itemize their taxes.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (center), shown with Senator John Barrasso, the GOP whip (left), and Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, speaks to reporters after Senate passage of the budget reconciliation package of President Donald...
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (center), shown with Senator John Barrasso, the GOP whip (left), and Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, speaks to reporters after Senate passage of the budget reconciliation package of President Donald Trump's signature bill of big tax breaks and spending cuts, at the Capitol in Washington on July 1, 2025. More
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
What To Know
Prior to 2017, taxpayers who itemized deductions could fully subtract the amount paid in state and local income, property and sales taxes from their federal taxable income.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act imposed a $10,000 cap on these deductions, a limit that mostly affected residents of states with higher tax rates.
Along with raising the cap to $40,000 until 2029, the Senate bill also increases a tax break for pass-through businesses to 23 percent while clamping down on a frequently used tax loophole for certain pass-through businesses.
The House bill had proposed the same higher limit and $500,000 income phaseout but for a longer period of time, rising 1 percent each year from 2026 to 2033. The House also blocked certain white-collar professionals from being able to use a popular SALT deduction workaround.
While the Senate version appears to be cheaper for the federal government, given its shorter time frame, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) said that "it's actually far more generous."
The CRFB said the Senate's direct SALT relief is "roughly 10 percent larger than the House," adding that it estimated the Senate changes would cost $325 billion while the House bill would cost roughly $200 billion.
Affluent homeowners and high-income individuals stand to benefit the most from the expanded cap, according to the Tax Foundation's May analysis.
The Tax Foundation also warned that the Senate's provisions would cost about $320 billion more than an extension of the existing cap, and cost $150 billion more than a $30,000 cap.
"The bill is already suffering from a math problem," Tax Foundation analysts wrote. "This is a recipe for worsening deficits at a time when Congress needs to be more concerned about the country's fiscal outlook."
What People Are Saying
Owen Zidar, a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University, told Newsweek: "The broader bill and the SALT cap increase are a boon for high-income taxpayers, especially high-income private business owners who got a special loophole that lets them avoid the SALT caps. Millions are estimated to lose health insurance coverage. The bill is very irresponsible fiscally. It's mortgaging our future for our children.
"The increase in the deficits will put pressure on interest rates and crowd out productive investment, hurting economic growth."
What Happens Next
After being passed by the Senate, the GOP tax bill will now head to the Joint Conference Committee for reconciliation of differences between the Senate and House.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Solar stocks' nightmare year just got a plot twist
It's been a terrible ride for solar stocks this year. Heightened interest rates, surprise bankruptcies, and political gut punches have dished out a monumental beating on solar energy plays. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter However, if Wall Street's whiplash this week says anything, this industry still has a ton of fight. A fresh twist in D.C. has given beaten-down solar stocks a jolt of hope, though whether it sticks is another story altogether. Since January, the biggest names in solar have been under relentless pressure. Higher borrowing costs have slammed solar projects this year, leading to multiple bankruptcies from Sunnova to Solar Mosaic. Also, state moves like California's NEM 3.0 net-metering shakeup compounded sector woes. The cracks in the residential and community solar setups were laid bare by essentially gutting resale values. Consequently, we've seen the Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) lagging the broader market by roughly a third, while major players like First Solar (FSLR) , Enphase (ENPH) , and Sunrun (RUN) are trading deep in the red. Related: Solar stocks sent reeling by Congress Then came the massive policy earthquake. Senate Republicans slipped into the latest tax-and-spending bill an amendment to phase out all solar and wind tax credits by 2028. Those incentives include the 30% federal Investment Tax Credit for rooftop systems, and the Production Tax Credits (plus transferable ITCs) have effectively laid the foundation for solar's economics. More on Tech: Veteran Tesla analyst makes boldest robotaxi call yetApple could make big change to Siri, delight fansVeteran analyst offers eye-popping Nvidia, Microsoft stock prediction Without them, it undercuts developers' ability to secure financing while shrinking project returns in the process. Following the announcement, solar stocks plunged. In one brutal session, TAN nosedived about 10%, breaking below $32 while Enphase Energy skidded 26%. Similarly, Sunrun stock collapsed 42%, flirting with penny-stock territory, and First Solar tumbled 18%. Hence, Washington's push to kill off solar incentives has put the whole industry on notice. A twist on July 1 has thrown the sector a lifeline, though, at least for now. Solar stocks flipped from panic selling to a surprise rebound in virtually no time. Out of nowhere, Senate dealmakers decided to scrap that excise tax, which slapped hefty fees on panels with certain foreign parts. Late on July 1, the Senate signed off on the amended "Big Beautiful Bill," President Trump's big tax-and-spend plan. Surprisingly, it excluded the dreaded excise tax on solar and wind projects. GOP leaders were said to have scrapped it in cooling tensions on the Hill, flipping the market's mood from panic to relief. The bounce was emphatic. TAN stock led the charge, and individual stocks lit up the tape. Shoals Technologies leapt more than 18%, while Array Technologies added about 11%. Sunrun stock climbed 8.5%, and SolarEdge rose nearly 8%. Similarly, Enphase Energy and Maxeon Solar saw roughly 3% to 3.5% bumps. Surprisingly, even the larger utilities like NextEra Energy, Canadian Solar, and JinkoSolar popped by 2% to 3%. First Solar was the lone laggard, slipping a fraction. Related: Cathie Wood makes surprising chip bet as AI battle heats up Here's the downer: This quick fix didn't return the long-term tax credits that keep most clean-energy projects alive. Solar and wind tax perks will still start phasing out in 2026 and will go away by 2028, which means any new project needs to be up and running by the end of 2027 to cash in. Meanwhile, nuclear got its sweet deal until 2036, and hydrogen hangs on through 2028. Accordingly, industry leaders aren't exactly popping champagne, calling the development a temporary respite. Abigail Ross Hopper, who heads the Solar Energy Industries Association, said this does nothing about the bigger problem. Credits continue to dry up, and there's still not enough funds to help with local solar manufacturing. Now, the tweaked bill heads to a razor-thin House vote, which will shed more light on the future of American clean energy. On July 2, key solar stocks were firmly in the green during regular trading. TAN is up more than 6.2%, First Solar has jumped almost 9%, and Sunrun is up nearly 3%. Related: Tesla stock sinks fast as Musk-Trump clash turns ugly The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mike Johnson Panic Spirals as Republicans Revolt Over Trump Budget
It doesn't appear that the president's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will muster enough votes in time. Donald Trump has imposed a July 4 deadline on Congress to pass his signature legislative item, but actually meeting the due date has sent Republicans into disarray. By late Wednesday afternoon, House Speaker Mike Johnson had already laid bare that the process would make lawmakers, and presumably their constituents, unhappy. 'All of us have to give up on our personal preferences,' Johnson told reporters. 'That's what I think people are recognizing and coming to grips with.' The House Freedom Caucus had released a three-page memo earlier Wednesday heavily criticizing the Senate's version of Trump's exorbitantly expensive tax cut, flaming the Senate draft for adding pork where the House had proposed cuts. In their complaint, they advocated for more extreme slices from the federal budget. But the hardline fiscal conservatives aren't the only party members opposing the bill: moderates are worried about the high cost the legislation will have on safety-net programs, including some $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid, and swing-district Republicans are worried about political backlash in their Democrat-led states. Any of these groups have the muster to keep the bill from passing: Johnson can afford to lose just three votes if he wants to push the bill to the president's desk. By the afternoon, some lawmakers had gone public with their complaints about the fiasco. 'We aren't delayed because moderates whose constituents will be completely screwed are holding out,' posted Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell. 'We are delayed because the most extreme members who want to hurt MORE people are holding out.' Texas Representative Chip Roy, the policy chair of the House Freedom Caucus, told NBC News that the bill was not 'totally exciting' for his conference and that he wasn't sure if the bill would pass by the end of the week. He added that the half a trillion dollars in savings would have to come from somewhere else in the federal budget, though he wasn't committed to ironing out the details in this package. Congress is not supposed to be at the mercy of the president: the founding fathers drafted the Constitution to isolate three separate systems of government, intended to continually check one another's power. But that has not been the case since Trump resumed office with a conservative majority in both legislative chambers as well as the nation's highest judiciary. Instead, month after month, the federal government has seen lawmakers bend and capitulate to the president's will, buying into his 'mandate from the people' spiel, even when his policies cause direct harm to their constituents.


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Chip Roy says Senate's Medicaid cuts ‘a bit better' than expected
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said during a recent interview that Medicaid cuts in the Senate-passed 'big, beautiful bill' are a 'bit better' than what he expected, but added that he still has 'concerns.' 'I will note that I have now gotten a little bit more information on some of the Medicaid stuff that I feel like it's a little bit better than I originally anticipated, but I still have concerns,' Roy said during his Wednesday appearance on Fox News's 'The Will Cain Show.' 'I voted against the rule in the committee because I wasn't at a place where I felt like we should advance the product last night,' the Texas Republican told host Will Cain. 'I'm still in that place, right? I'm still looking through the bill. We got it yesterday. 'I asked every witness at the panel in the Rules Committee yesterday, if they'd read the bill, who were testifying on the bill and they haven't read it, Will. This is no way to do things, so I'm trying to go through the bill and understand it,' Roy said. The Senate passed the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act on Tuesday after Vice President Vance cast the tiebreaking vote, delivering a huge legislative win for President Trump. The Senate bill would mark the biggest cuts to Medicaid. Nearly 12 million low-income Americans would lose health insurance by 2034, the Congressional Budget Office projected. The legislation is now on the House side, where some moderate GOP members have expressed worry about the cuts to the social safety net. Roy, who called some of the last-minute changes senators made to the legislation before passing the package a 'travesty,' has previously voiced concerns about the spending levels within Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' On Wednesday, Roy told Cain he still has 'massive observations about the green new scam subsidies, and the overall spending level — so we're trying to work through those to see where we can go from here.'