GIC Boosts Americas Exposure to 49%, Eyes AI Deals in US
North and South America accounted for 49% of GIC's assets as of March, up from 44% a year earlier. Asia-Pacific assets fell to 24% from 28%, according to the fund's annual report released Friday. Europe, the Middle East and Africa were unchanged at 20%.
The shift comes as GIC expects a slowdown in the second half of the year alongside rising inflation and uncertainty driven by domestic and geopolitical pressures. The fund's annualized five-year return rose to 6.1% in nominal US dollar terms, up from 4.4% a year earlier. GIC doesn't publish yearly performance figures.
'The forces of change have clearly intensified and will be much harder to prepare for,' said Chief Executive Officer Lim Chow Kiat. He added in a letter accompanying the report that '2025 may be a turning point in markets — and in history.'
GIC, which consulting firm Global SWF estimates has assets under management of $936 billion, is aiming to ramp up deals in artificial intelligence. Lim cited the technology — and AI's effect on US companies in particular — as a reason why some of its geographic holdings may change.
Global SWF Managing Director Diego Lopez estimated that GIC's annual return was about 10.8%, which he said was 'good but not great.' The firm's 10-year annualized returns of 5% are slightly below average compared with the sovereign wealth funds it tracks, he said.
'It's also way below what a 60/40 traditional portfolio would've returned, which is 7.5% in this period of time,' Lopez said. 'The performance could be better.'
GIC's AI investments in the US include Atlan, and Ramp, a financial operations firm in New York.
'The US is a huge market, continues to be very innovative, and trends like AI benefits the US the most,' because there are many American companies that can leverage the technology, Lim said in an interview. 'To the extent that the US is allowing us to deploy more capital, the percentages in other regions will become smaller.'
Despite the shift away from Asia-Pacific, GIC still sees opportunities there. Group Chief Investment Officer Bryan Yeo said the fund expanded its investment team in Japan over the past year and continues to evaluate deals in India and China. GIC has also anchored several recent initial public offerings in Hong Kong as a cornerstone investor.
'Our base case is really lower growth and, on the margins, higher inflation,' Yeo added. 'We have to get over the higher valuations that we see in India — so it's always figuring out 'is the opportunity in India priced relative to its growth prospects?''
GIC reduced the level of detail it publishes about its investments. For the first time since it began issuing annual reports in 2008, the state-owned investor didn't provide the percentage of its total holdings in any specific country. Nor did it offer specifics on how much of its portfolio sits in developed versus emerging-market equities, private equity or real estate — which it provided in previous years.
Instead, all holdings were categorized by what it labels as equities, fixed income or real assets. GIC said these represent exposure to growth, income and inflation, respectively. That means an asset like gold can sit in a variety of categories depending on how it's used. Inflation-linked bonds — which made up 7% of GIC's portfolio last year — sit within the real assets category alongside property, and not in fixed income.
By these new measures, 'equities' rose to 51% of assets from 46% a year earlier, while 'fixed income' fell to 26% from 32% over the same period. 'Real assets' were largely flat at 23%. Within equities, the fund increased investments in the US, which remains its largest market by capital deployment.
The reduced disclosure from the firm, which doesn't reveal the value of its assets, comes as countries around the world increase scrutiny of foreign investors amid rising populism and national security concerns.
'It's most important to present information in a way that allows you to have a good idea of what GIC's portfolio is like,' said Lim. 'We believe that we are providing sufficient information for the understanding of our stakeholders.'
Lopez said the decrease in fixed income was likely due to the rising valuations of US 'Magnificent Seven' tech stocks and increased deployment in the private equity space across America. And the shrinking allocation to Asia-Pacific was probably from reductions in the value of assets in China and Japan, he added.
But he said GIC's decision to provide much less granular detail on its investments made it hard to be certain, and that its actions matched a trend started by some sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East — which earlier this year similarly cut back on the amount of detail they disclose about their portfolios.
'This reduction in information is quite concerning,' said Lopez. He said the Singapore investor is a signatory member of the Santiago Principles, which advocate for transparency and good governance, yet 'they're becoming less and less transparent with time.'
(Updates SWF's estimate of GIC's assets under management in the fifth paragraph, adds quotes and other details.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Asian stocks edge higher as China-US trade talks end without a deal
Shares in Asia were mostly higher on Wednesday after the US and China ended their latest round of trade talks without a deal. US futures edged higher while oil prices slipped. Beijing's top trade official said China and the United States agreed during two days of talks in Stockholm, Sweden, to work on extending an Aug 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on each other. The US side said an extension was discussed, but not decided on. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer says the American team would head back to Washington and talk to the president about whether that's something that he wants to do. A Friday deadline is looming for many of Trump's proposed tariffs on other countries. Several highly anticipated economic reports are also on the way, including the latest monthly update on the job market. Markets had been floating on a cloud of trade optimism first Japan, then the EU but the sugar high is wearing off. Now, with U.S.-China talks dragging on in Stockholm, there's a growing sense that the momentum is stalling, Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index shed 0.3% to 25,441.64 while the Shanghai Composite index gained 0.5% to 3,628.53. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index edged less than 0.1% higher to 40,687.17. Gains for electronics companies were offset by losses for major exporters like Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 climbed 0.6% to 8,759.20 and in South Korea, the Kospi gained 0.9% to 3,259.00. Taiwan's Taiex rose 0.9% while the Sensex in India edged 0.1% higher. On Tuesday, U.S. stock indexes edged back from their record levels as a busy week for Wall Street picked up momentum. The S&P 500 fell 0.3% to 6,370.86, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 0.5% to 44,632.99. The Nasdaq composite was down 0.4% at 21,098.29. SoFi Technologies jumped 7.4%, but Merck dropped 2.2% and UPS sank 9.2% following a torrent of profit reports from big U.S. companies. They're among the hundreds of companies telling investors this week how much they made during the spring, including nearly a third of the stocks in the S&P 500 index. UnitedHealth Group dropped 5.8% after reporting a profit for the spring that fell short of analysts' expectations. It also gave a forecast for profit over all of 2025 that investors found disappointing. The health care giant said it expected to earn at least $16 per share, when analysts were looking for something close to $20, according to FactSet. Shares of Novo Nordisk that trade in the United States tumbled 21.3% after the Danish company cut its forecast for sales growth this year, in part because of lower expectations for its Wegovy weight-loss drug amid high competition. Treasury yields sank as the Federal Reserve began a two-day meeting on interest rates. Despite pressure from President Donald Trump for lower rates, which would give the economy a boost, the widespread expectation is that the Fed will wait for more data about how Trump's tariffs are affecting inflation and the economy before making its next move. The U.S. economy appears to be slowing. One report on Tuesday said that U.S. employers were advertising fewer job openings at the end of June than a month before, though still more than economists expected. A separate report said confidence rose among U.S. consumers, but a measure of their expectations about the near term remains below the level that typically signals a recession ahead. In other dealings early Wednesday, US benchmark crude oil picked up 7 cents to $69.28 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international standard, was up 13 cents at $71.82 per barrel. The dollar fell to 148.13 Japanese yen from 148.48 yen. The euro rose to $1.1554 from $1.1546.
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tibet dam construction begins: How China's mega project could irreversibly change a fragile area
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads China is building the largest power plant the world has ever seen, in a very remote corner of Tibet. But the $167 billion hydropower dam has environmentalists and neighbouring countries the Big Take Asia Podcast, host Menaka Doshi speaks to Bloomberg's Dan Murtaugh about the engineering and geopolitical challenges, and the impact construction will have on the country's is a lightly edited transcript of the conversation:Earlier this month, China officially started construction on a massive hydropower dam in news anchor (in Chinese): Li Qiang announced the start of the hydropower project in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo river, and the construction of the project officially kicked dam, when completed, will be the biggest power plant on the three times bigger than the largest power plant in the world right now. It's more than all of the power plants in Poland combined.(Dan Murtaugh covers the energy industry for Bloomberg from Beijing.)The amount of cement they're estimating they'll need, it would be enough to fill more than 50 Hoover dams. And the amount of steel, it'd be enough to build 116 Empire State mega project comes with a mega price tag – $167 would be one of the most expensive undertakings for infrastructure in human history. More expensive than the International Space Station. You're looking at, you know, decades-long projects like building the US interstate highway system before you get to comparable amounts of says the dam will provide a major source of clean energy. More importantly, it will boost the country's slowing economy. But the project carries huge engineering and environmental risks and could strain relations with two of its neighbours, India and Indian government has been worried about, if China was able to build a dam, they would then be able to use sort of water access as a pain point if there was an eventual conflict between the countries. And there's gonna be all of this human activity in a place that's been remote for most of its history. You hope for the best, but human history has not been very kind to planet Earth. And you just have to wonder if they're gonna be able to, to reign in people from not damaging permanently this really unique is the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Menaka Doshi, filling in for Oanh Ha. Every week we take you inside some of the world's biggest and most powerful economies, and the markets, tycoons and businesses that drive this ever-shifting region. Today on the show — China bets big on a new mega dam. Why the project is raising alarm with its neighbours, and what its construction could mean for China's economy and its green energy it comes to building hydrodams, China's got plenty of experience. It operates two of the world's largest dams. That includes the world's biggest hydrodam – Three Gorges – which opened in central China in 2009. This new mega dam will be built in Tibet, a mountainous region just north of the border with in this bend on the Yarlung Tsangpo River that they call the Mêdog or Motuo Bloomberg energy reporter Dan Murtaugh says the dam is in an area that till recently was very difficult to get is a very, very, very steep drop. The river drops about 2,000 meters over a 50 kilometer stretch as it curves and bends through the mountains of the Himalayas. The county that it's at is up until 2013 didn't even have a highway that connected it. You'd have to walk a day, you know, or, or take a donkey or a horse to get to the river from the closest dams – like the Hoover dam – block the path of a river to create a reservoir. They then release the water, which turns turbines, and generates electricity. This Yarlung Tsangpo dam is they're trying to do here is a little bit more audacious. The idea is to drill a tunnel through the mountains down the steep, steep, steep gradient, and then divert some of the water from going around that big bend and instead go basically just vertically straight down the mountain. That steep gradient that this river moves on really allows you to get that water flowing at high enough speeds to be able to run the turbines to generate the the groundbreaking ceremony earlier this month, Chinese Premier Li Qiang called the Yarlung Tsangpo dam the 'project of the century.' State engineers have said it has the potential to generate as much as 70 gigawatts of electricity. That's enough to power the United three times bigger than the largest power plant in the world right now. It is a national country level type of a generating asset. But China's huge. China has about 4,000 gigawatts of total generating capacity right now. Its peak demand is about 1,450 gigawatts. And so this project isn't going to have a huge world-changing impact on China's power sector. But it does do a couple of different things that are gonna be really beneficial to China's attempt to clean up its energy sector and will help China meet its energy transition goals of peaking emissions by 2030, and then reaching net-zero emissions by still relies on coal-powered plants to back up its more sustainable energy sources like solar and and solar, while cheap and while abundant, only generate when the wind blows and it doesn't really allow them to replace coal plants because at the end of the day you still need, you know, backup generation to make sure that when there's a period where there's no sun out and the wind stops, that people can still turn on their lights. What hydropower does that wind, solar don't do is it's what we call, uh, a dispatchable source. You can use it when it's needed. You can hold it back when it's not. Now hydropower is not perfectly dispatchable. Like if you are using a fossil fuel power plant, a gas or a coal power plant, you can really just sort of turn it off and on as needed. Hydropower, there's still some external things like whether there's a drought, if there's, you know, too much water, there's rain, you know, you have to open the floodgates. It's not perfect, but it is a clean power source that allows the grid to be a little bit more flexible in terms of, you know, generating when it's needed and not just, when the supply's reliability and flexibility are just two of the reasons why building a hydroelectric dam is so expensive. The Yarlung Tsangpo dam will cost $167 billion – more than the International Space Station did. And Dan says, the power it generates will be several times more expensive than any other energy it ends up being about a 70-gigawatt project as we expect it to be, you're talking about $2.4 million per megawatt. Now that compares to, an onshore wind plant right now that China would spend about $600,000 per megawatt on, or a solar power plant that China would spend about $400,000 per megawatt on. China infrastructure projects never lack for lenders, but this is not a white elephant. This is gonna be a hydropower project that sells a lot of electricity, that electricity has value. And so they're gonna be able to go to their lenders and say, listen, over 20, 30 years, we're gonna make a ton of money and we're gonna have the revenue to pay you says there's another reason the Chinese government has greenlit the project – and that's the state of China's way I think about it is, this is less of a hydropower project that's gonna provide some economic stimulus and more of an economic stimulus project that at the end of the day we'll be able to produce some hydropower. We're in this new sort of era where China's economy has been stagnant since COVID. People have been waiting for a kind of stimulus boost to recover it. Sectors like cement, like steel, like construction, those have been particularly hard hurt by the burst of the property bubble. And so you've got this perfect storm here where there's this project that requires a lot of those materials that used to be seen as maybe a little bit risky and, and costly to do, but now it kind of fits this dual need of both providing some economic stimulus for some hurting sectors, while also eventually providing a really, really large source of clean project is estimated to generate 200,000 new jobs and boost China's GDP every year for the next estimated that it's likely bigger than multiple different monetary policy actions that the central bank has taken over the past few years. Uh, so it could really help reflate the economy as they try to do their supply side reform over the coming China plans to transmit all that clean energy -- and what the dam's construction means for simmering tensions between Beijing and New Delhi -- that's after the has been talking about building a mega dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river for decades. But construction was approved only in December last year. Bloomberg's Dan Murtaugh says that's largely because the challenges to the project are so past conversations I've had with people, they were a little bit, iffy on whether it would ever get built because this is an incredibly remote site. It's very, very far away from any major population centers. And so, you have to transport millions of tons of cement and sand and aggregate and tens of thousands of workers up to this remote project site is in a seismically active area. That means engineers will need to ensure that the dam is strong enough to withstand earthquakes. And then there's the question of how to get the power generated by the dam to the places that need it — Beijing. Shanghai. Hong Kong – They're all thousands of miles away. Which means this isn't just one massive infrastructure project: It's this year when China uh announced this project as part of their work plan for this year, they not only said we're gonna try to develop hydropower in the Yarlung Tsangpo river, but they said we're gonna try to build a power line from Tibet to the Hong Kong, Guangzhou, Shenzhen Bay area to transmit some of that. That itself is gonna be a major undertaking, it's gonna require lots of copper and aluminum and steel itself. Citibank has estimated just the transmission alone could be another 700 billion yuan, about a hundred billion dollars. And so that will also be a difficult domestic considerations in building this mega dam are considerable. But they might be overshadowed by international complications. Downstream from the site, the Yarlung Tsangpo river flows into India, and then into Bangladesh, and is critical to livelihoods in the China first announced back in December that they was gonna go forward with this, the Indian government reached out to the Chinese government. They raised alarm bells. They, uh, an Indian minister said in March that this was part of discussions the country's had in January. The Chinese government clearly thinks that they've told the Indian government, the downstream areas won't be affected. And they think that they've convinced Indian officials that, this is not a project that will harm the relationship between China and India has worsened in recent years after a long history of border disputes in the Himalayan is too early to say how this is gonna develop. Already, India has mooted building its own hydropower station across the border from this plant where they would be able to at least put in a little bit of their own control over the flow of the water and produce their own another complication – Tibet is a highly sensitive area. The region has long endured intense social, security, and religious controls under Beijing's policies. And though China has denied them – allegations of mass labor systems and political repression is a politically sensitive area. It's been in the sort of global crosshairs for decades. Tibet and and the Beijing government have a very long and fraught history. And, you know, frankly, as a foreign journalist, Tibet is an area that I'm not allowed to not just the political situation in Tibet, there are significant concerns around the environmental implications as is a really, really fragile area. It's a really unique, there, you know, you have this dry mountain air coming down from the Himalayas, meeting up with this, humid, uh, warm air coming up from the Indian Ocean. It's one of, you know, the most uniquely biodiverse spots in the world, and the idea of bringing tens of thousands of workers plus however many, tens if not hundreds of thousands more, will sort of pop up to create like the restaurants and food trucks and bars and karaoke and stuff to, to service these people. The idea that there's gonna be all of this human activity in a place that's been remote for most of its history. You hope for the best, but human history has not been very kind to planet Earth. And you just have to wonder if they're gonna be able to, to reign in people from not damaging permanently this really unique area.
Hans India
32 minutes ago
- Hans India
Microsoft, OpenAI Seek Decade-Long Alliance to Secure Future of AI Access Amid AGI Uncertainty
Microsoft and OpenAI are once again revisiting their partnership, exploring a new decade-long agreement that could redefine how both companies collaborate well into the future. As artificial intelligence technologies rapidly advance, particularly with the looming possibility of achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), both firms are pushing to lock in long-term assurances that suit their evolving ambitions. According to Bloomberg, the renewed discussions are centered on updating the terms of the current agreement, which could see Microsoft retain continued access to OpenAI's most powerful technologies—even if OpenAI eventually claims to have achieved AGI. This clause is crucial for Microsoft, given that its flagship AI-driven products, including Copilot for Word, Excel, and GitHub, are deeply integrated with OpenAI's GPT models. Under the present deal, Microsoft's rights to OpenAI's most advanced systems would diminish once AGI is officially declared. That's a major risk for the tech giant, whose generative AI efforts rely heavily on the consistent availability of those models. With OpenAI now nearing what it sees as AGI milestones, Microsoft is eager to renegotiate before reaching that tipping point. Meanwhile, OpenAI is looking to become a public-benefit corporation—a status that prioritizes public good alongside profit. However, to make that structural transition, the AI lab reportedly needs Microsoft's approval. In exchange for supporting the shift, Microsoft is said to be negotiating for greater equity in the restructured entity and an extension of its current AI access rights, which would otherwise expire in 2030 or earlier if AGI is declared. The heart of the debate lies in defining AGI itself—a feat that remains elusive and conceptually vague. What qualifies as AGI? A chatbot composing original symphonies? Explaining complex movie plots like Inception? Without a universally accepted benchmark, the AGI clause becomes a gray area, prompting months of back-and-forth between the two partners. Adding complexity to the negotiations, OpenAI has reportedly suggested to investors that Microsoft's share of its revenue will shrink over time. That prospect may not sit well with Microsoft, which has invested billions into OpenAI's success and relies on its models to power the Azure OpenAI Service. The partnership has faced strains before. In June, The Information revealed previous clashes over the AGI clause. More recently, OpenAI's move to diversify its cloud support—tapping into providers like Google, Oracle, and CoreWeave—has sparked further scrutiny about the long-term alignment between the two tech titans. Complicating matters even more is Elon Musk's ongoing lawsuit against OpenAI. Musk, a cofounder of the organization, has accused it of straying from its founding nonprofit ideals and becoming too aligned with Microsoft's commercial interests. For Microsoft, the timing of these negotiations is critical. With its quarterly earnings just around the corner, stakeholders will likely demand clarity on the future of its AI alliance with OpenAI—an alliance that could define the next chapter of the AI revolution.
