
In Spain, a chat on the doorstep is a custom worth preserving in the digital age
This plea for respect for the public space was hardly a draconian law and order crackdown: it was a reasonably worded reminder. 'We know that putting chairs or tables outside the door is a tradition in many towns,' it said, 'but public spaces are regulated. If the police ask you to remove them, do so out of respect and in the interests of coexistence.'
Unfortunately for the police, it was accompanied by a photograph not of 3am revellers or anyone engaging in antisocial behaviour, but six older women sitting outdoors on plastic garden chairs, enjoying what looks like a peaceful chat. The angry reaction ('Go and arrest drug dealers!', or 'All these women want is a quiet moment with their neighbours. Why don't you take care of real crimes!') was a reminder that in Spain, the authorities mess with community rituals involving older people at their peril.
Perhaps the reaction also betrayed a sadness that the custom of sitting outdoors chatting, still practised in villages and some small towns, especially in the hottest months, is slowly fading as rural Spain becomes increasingly depopulated.
In cities, you certainly don't see women or anyone else putting their own chairs on the pavement outside their front doors. But the routine of outdoor conversation and intergenerational use of public space is very much alive.
Sitting and talking in public spaces is a tradition that dates back centuries and is closely intertwined with the history of women's rights in Spain. Women's search for independence and common spaces to talk outside the home can be traced to the middle ages – from separate bourgeois parlours to artisan work conducted outdoors. And it was not confined to regions with warmer weather.
In León, a province in north-west Spain, people once gathered around the fireplace on bleak midwinter nights for the filandón, a session of storytelling named after the spinners who worked together while exchanging tales. This cherished oral tradition is now being revived in León, with local novelists holding events in nature reserves such as Babia, passing the filandón down to a new generation. In some villages in northern La Rioja, you still see women chatting as they sew espadrilles outside their shopfronts.
It is only natural in the digital age that such ways of living and communing fade, but there is still a strong appreciation in Spain for the value of a neighbourly gathering, wherever it happens. In cities, it might take place in the lobby of an apartment building, often around the doorman. In mine, I find comfort in seeing the same older women and men, often with a dog in their midst, sitting on a bench by the mailbox almost every day. The daily chatter proved very useful during the recent blackout, as neighbours readily shared tips, food and information. One of the regulars is a retired engineer who once worked for a major power company, and he gave us the clearest explanation of how the outrage would be resolved.
In town squares, it's common to see people of all ages sitting and chatting in the same space. Older women on the public benches, children running around them, teenagers kicking a football, all together and not necessarily drinking, as is often the case elsewhere. Summer heatwaves make late-evening gatherings outdoors a natural form of relief. Stepping outside for no particular purpose is often called tomando el fresco ('taking the breeze', if you are lucky to catch it).
In the biggest Spanish cities, newly pedestrianised areas offer convivial shared outdoor spaces all year round. More modest than Barcelona's superblocks, the newly refurbished and pedestrianised Olavide Square in central Madrid, for example, has become a model of the ideal public space. It has teenagers playing ping pong, kids and dogs running about, people of all ages reading or scrolling on their phones in deckchairs, occasionally browsing from a public library stand, and of course older women deep in conversation until late. Even in shabbier squares, people of all generations still gather in proximity with ease.
What is changing is that Madrid's conservative local government is increasingly promoting a privatised model of public space, with extended restaurant and bar terraces occupying most of the pavements, leaving little space for people to gather without being obliged to consume something.
Respecting public space, as the Santa Fe police requested, means keeping it truly public. And that is key to fostering conversation not just with friends, but with neighbours, casual acquaintances and strangers.
Conversation in public, shared spaces has a special power in these polarised, lonely, even dehumanising times. A sense of community requires much more than a few chairs on the pavement, but it is a good place to start.
María Ramírez is a journalist and the deputy managing editor of elDiario.es, a news outlet in Spain
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Corrupt police sanctioned over Channel migrant smuggling
Corrupt police will be among two dozen people smugglers named this week as subject to the first financial sanctions to combat Channel migrant crossings. The suspected criminals behind people smuggling into the UK and Europe will be sanctioned on Wednesday, enabling UK investigators to freeze any assets they have in Britain and those of any individual who supplies them with equipment or helps them financially. Like Russian oligarchs, they will also be banned from travelling to the UK under the new powers, which will be introduced in Parliament on Tuesday, 24 hours before the two dozen 'linchpins' in the illegal trafficking trade are named. At least two corrupt police officers are among those to be 'named and shamed' alongside the gangsters heading the people-smuggling networks, suppliers of dinghies, equipment and fake passports and middlemen who facilitate payments through the Hawala network. The Hawala system enables transfers of funds agreed between operators, or hawaladars, in different countries so no cash crosses borders.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The mask is finally off: ‘anti-Zionists' just hate Jews
During an anti-Israel rally in London on Saturday, some participants were heard to scream, 'F— your Jewish state'. On the face of it, this may seem alarming. In a way, though, I think we should be grateful to them. After all, their words should help awaken more people to what so much anti-Israel activism is really about. Most of the time, anti-Israel activists remember to employ the handy euphemism 'Zionist': a crucial tool in their efforts to persuade the public that they definitely, unequivocally, 100 per cent aren't anti-Semitic. But on this occasion, it would seem, some of them were so rabidly incensed by the arrival of a small band of pro-Israel counter-protesters, they forgot – and accidentally blurted out what they always really mean: 'Jewish'. Afterwards they must have been kicking themselves. What a careless lapse. Luckily for them, their words don't seem to have been reported by the Left-wing newspapers that so many of their sympathisers read. But on social media, where users are constantly exposed to stories from newspapers they don't normally read, there's a grave danger that the sympathisers will catch sight of the Telegraph 's story, which quoted the words 'F— your Jewish state' in the headline. Think how disgusted those sympathisers will be, at seeing the activists so foolishly give the game away. Of course, this isn't the first time an anti-Israel activist in Britain has made this unfortunate slip. At a rally held a mere month after October 7, 2023, a speaker disparagingly referred to Suella Braverman's 'Jewish husband' – before hastily correcting it to 'Zionist husband'. The anti-Israel movement surely can't afford too many more little slips of this kind. Of late, though, we appear to be seeing more and more of them. At the weekend, video footage circulating on social media showed a man on a bus in Ireland ranting about 'genocidal Jews'. Then, when a woman tried to intervene, he accused her of 'white-knighting for the Jew'. The man's manner suggested strongly that he'd been drinking. Sober, perhaps he would have been able to control himself, and remembered to say 'Zionists' instead. Meanwhile, the NASUWT teachers' union has just published the results of a survey, revealing that more than half of Jewish teachers in Britain have experienced anti-Semitism over the past two years. One teacher reported hearing a pupil shout, 'F— the Jews'. You can readily imagine the frustration of anti-Israel activists. ('It's 'f— the Zionists', you teenage idiot! Honestly, how many times!') At this rate, hitherto unsuspecting members of the public are bound to start asking some awkward questions. Are these endless protests really just about the actions of the Israeli government, and nothing more? Is 'anti-Zionism' definitely about ideology, and not ethnicity? And how come the people marching so righteously in solidarity with innocent Palestinians appear to have so little interest in the slaughter of the Druze by Syrians, just across the Israeli border? Naturally, therefore, anti-Israel activists will be anxious to avoid making the same mistake again. To that end, perhaps they should try using some form of aide-memoire. Before setting off on their next march, they could write the word 'ZIONIST' on the backs of their hands. Then again, there may be one small flaw in such a plan. Their fellow travellers might misunderstand, and beat them up. At last, the England team get off their knees The England women's football team – who play Italy in a Euro 2025 semi-final tonight – have decided to stop 'taking the knee' before matches. In a statement, they said football needs to 'find another way to tackle racism'. A sensible decision. The mystery is why they kept on doing it for so long. The players may have meant it as a protest against racism in general. In the eyes of most people, though, the gesture will always be inextricably linked to the murder of George Floyd in Minnesota in 2020. In short: it was an American response to an American crime committed by American police. It felt a touch odd, therefore, to see it adopted by sports teams in countries thousands of miles away. And it felt odder still when they continued to do it, long after American teams had stopped. Hence the bizarre spectacle before the match at the men's football World Cup of 2022, between England and the US. The England players took the knee – yet the US players (more than half of whom were black) didn't. Goodness only knows what viewers in America made of it. 'Say, honey? Remember that whole 'taking the knee' thing that was big a couple years back? Looks like the limeys have just got into it. Bless 'em. I know they always like to copy our trends. But I never thought they'd start mourning our murders.'


Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Brazil's top court threatens Bolsonaro with arrest, demands explanation for order breach
SAO PAULO, July 21 (Reuters) - Brazil's Supreme Court threatened to order former President Jair Bolsonaro's arrest unless his lawyers explain within 24 hours why he breached restrictions on his use of social media, a decision showed on Monday evening. The order summoning Bolsonaro's lawyers was issued by Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case in which Bolsonaro is accused of plotting a coup. Bolsonaro's lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside normal business hours. Moraes had on Friday ordered Bolsonaro to wear an ankle bracelet and banned him from using social media, among other measures - which were later upheld by a court panel - over allegations he courted the interference of U.S. President Donald Trump, who tied steep new tariffs on Brazilian goods to what he called a "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro. In an interview with Reuters on Friday, Bolsonaro described Moraes' decision to prohibit his social media use as "cowardice," and said he intended to continue engaging with the press to ensure his voice was heard. On Monday, Moraes said Bolsonaro breached the Supreme Court order when speaking with journalists earlier in the day, following a meeting with allies in the Brazilian Congress. The moment, which marked the first time Bolsonaro publicly showed his ankle bracelet, came hours after Moraes issued a clarification of Friday's ruling, which stated that Bolsonaro's use of social media included use through third parties. Moraes in his decision attached screenshots of several posts on social media, including on news outlets, that showed Bolsonaro "displaying the electronic monitoring device, delivering a speech to be displayed on digital platforms." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week called Moraes' court orders a "political witch hunt", responding on Friday with immediate visa revocations for "Moraes and his allies on the court, as well as their immediate family members." The court's crackdown on Bolsonaro adds to evidence that Trump's tactics are backfiring in Brazil, compounding trouble for his ideological ally and rallying public support behind a defiant leftist government. Hours before summoning Bolsonaro's lawyers, Moraes had issued a ruling that raised questions about whether the right-wing leader was allowed to talk to journalists. "Obviously, the broadcasting, re-broadcasting, or dissemination of audio, video, or transcripts of interviews on any third-party social media platform is prohibited," the judge said, in a clarification of Friday's ruling. The measure sparked debate in Brazil regarding the ruling's range. Bolsonaro on Monday canceled an interview with a news outlet that would have been broadcast live on social media. "The prohibition is that he communicates on social media; it is not a prohibition against third parties speaking about him, whether to praise or criticize," said Ivar Hartmann, a law professor at Sao Paulo business school Insper. He added that, in his view, interviews are permissible, provided they are not intended to circumvent the legal limitations, such as giving an interview to a supporter. But Vera Chemim, a São Paulo-based constitutional lawyer, said she believed the former leader is on shaky ground, noting that interviews, while not explicitly mentioned in the court order, could still be used to justify Bolsonaro's arrest. "Bolsonaro is now completely silenced," she said. "Any misstep could lead to a preventive arrest." The Supreme Court declined to comment or elaborate on the specifics of that decision. A spokesperson for Bolsonaro also declined to comment, but the former president has always denied any wrongdoing.