How Pakistan's military stacks up against India
The flare-up means that two of the region's largest militaries are again in face-to-face conflict.
The stand-off pits India, a global defence giant, against a country that may be much smaller, but is nevertheless heavily militarised and has dedicated a significant share of its resources to preparing for war.
As the world's most populous nation, India has one of the largest militaries, numbering around 1.4 million active service personnel, which include 1.2 million in the army, 60,000 in the navy and 127,000 in the air force. India also has 1.6 million-strong paramilitary forces and a reserve of 1.1 million.
The country is a defence expenditure heavyweight. Its defence spend reached £58 billion ($77.4 billion) in 2024, the second-highest outlay in Asia after China.
Members of the national cadet corps train in Kolkata, India - NurPhoto/Sudipta Das
Meanwhile, Pakistan's population is a fifth of the size and the country has been mired in an economic crisis for years.
Last year, Pakistan's defence budget was estimated to have been a 10th of that of its eastern neighbour.
Pakistan has become heavily militarised to fend off Indian control, which has come at great cost to its democracy.
The military exerts significant control over the civilian government, with Gen Syed Asim Munir, the head of the army, widely seen as the most powerful man in the country.
While India's military is increasingly deployed to face China, Pakistan has built up a defence posture and doctrine revolving almost entirely around India.
Pakistan fields a total of around 650,000 active service personnel, including 560,000 in the army, 23,800 in the navy and 70,000 in the air force. It also has 280,000-strong paramilitary forces, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
In limited exchanges, such as those seen in the past 24 hours, Pakistan can punch above its weight, though analysts say that Delhi's numerical and economic superiority could come to bear very quickly in a full-blown war.
Pakistan has leaned heavily in recent years towards China for its arms, shifting away from more costly Western suppliers.
India has significant quantities of equipment from Russia, but has begun buying more from France and America.
On the battlefield, India is thought to have around 3,100 main battle tanks, including Arjun, T-72 and T-90 models.
Smoke rises after a missile strike by India against a target in Pakistan - PUNIT PARANJPE/AFP
Pakistan has around 2,500, which include Al-Khalid, T-80, T-54/55, Type-59/Al Zarrar, Type-69 and Type 85 models.
Each country also has a significant air force. India has a mixture including Dassault Rafale fighters, Sukhoi Su-30s and MiG-29s, MiG-27s and MiG-21s.
Pakistan has Chinese J-10s and JF-17s, as well as American F-16s, Mirage 3s and Mirage 5s.
The two countries may be closer to parity in their nuclear weapons.
An explosion in the western Indian state of Rajasthan during an air exercise - Manish Swarup/AP
India conducted its first nuclear test in 1974 and Pakistan became a nuclear power in 1998.
India has never declared the size of its nuclear armament, but one assessment places the country's stockpile at 160 nuclear warheads, according to the Centre for Arms Control and Nuclear Proliferation. These can be deployed in land-based ballistic missiles, submarine-launched missiles and aircraft with nuclear bombs and missiles.
Pakistan is estimated to have around 170 warheads and nuclear-capable ballistic missiles of varying ranges. The country can also launch the weapons from planes. In 2017, Pakistan test-fired a submarine-launched missile, though this is not yet thought to be ready for use.
Even a small nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan could kill 20 million people in a week, according to the Centre for Arms Control and Nuclear Proliferation.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
ICE offering six-figure salaries and $50K bonuses as it ramps up hiring to fuel deportations
ICE is on a hiring spree with the tsunami of new cash from President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill — and some top recruits are getting $50,000 signing bonuses and six-figure salaries as the agency ramps up its mass deportation effort. The most lucrative payouts are going to retired agents — who are returning to work in droves to take advantage of the new incentives, many of them tell The Post. New recruits can expect to make a fair bit less —between $50,000 to $90,000 per year in base base. The agency is looking to hire 10,000 new agents with the flood of $75 billion in extra funding to carry out Trump's mass deportation effort. 3 Federal officers in tactical gear wait in a hallway outside a New York courtroom. AFP via Getty Images 'They're begging to come back because they believe in securing America, protecting kids, and supporting an undermanned force stretched thin by the prior administration's border chaos,' said Scott Mechkowski, the former assistant ICE chief for New York. One retired agent, who requested anonymity due to his pending application to return to ICE, told The Post he knows 'about four or five' other ex-feds 'that put in' for the opportunity to return to the force with salaries over $100,000 per year. Homeland Security agents — especially with Border Patrol — quit en mass during the Biden administration because they were so fed up with policies that allowed illegal migrants to pour into the US. Now, many are coming back to work. 'It's a great opportunity to get back into the mix and because a lot of us ended our career and we still felt like we had a lot more left,' the ex-agent said. 3 Retired officers and agents say they're ready to return to the force after the Trump administration increased recruitment bonuses. AFP via Getty Images ICE is offering a signing bonus of $10,000 upon returning to service; another $10,000 bonus for those who apply by Aug. 1; and annual $10,000 bonuses, for up to three years, for those who take part in Operation Return to Service. The agency has also said it will offer 'dual compensation waivers,' allowing former feds to retain pension payments and benefits if they come out of retirement. 3 ICE is seeking to recruit 10,000 new officers and agents with the passage of Trump's massive funding bill. Paul Weaver/SOPA Images/Shutterstock The surge of new officers and agents will help the agents meet the administration's ambitious 3,000-per-day arrest quota has filled detention centers to the brim. 'If you hire enough people to get back, then you can have people to do the investigations. Because right now you're robbing Peter to pay Paul by taking everybody off their own investigations,' said the retired agent. 'My biggest concern about the whole immigration push and using all the agencies and having everybody doing work in six days a week is you're going to have burnout,' he added.
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
New Speed Test Results Reveal AT&T Fiber as the Fastest Internet Provider in the US
There's been a lot of talk about internet speed lately. From various company taglines -- "Don't take slow for an answer" -- to the latest news about Japan's internet data transmission record, it's all about the speed. Today, Ookla released its Speedtest Connectivity Report for the first six months of 2025, and AT&T Fiber topped the list as the country's fastest fixed internet service provider. (Ookla is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.) What does that mean? Does it tell us that AT&T offers the fastest internet plan available to customers nationwide? No. This report doesn't look at an ISP's top speed (the fastest plan the company offers), but instead considers the average internet speed that subscribers experience across all levels of the provider's plans. Many variables exist (including the internet connection type), so when you sign up for internet service, you shouldn't assume AT&T will always be your fastest option. That said, Ookla's report shows AT&T Fiber at the top of its charts, registering a median download speed of just over 363 megabits per second in tests collected by Ookla from January through June 2025. It's the third Ookla speedtest report in a row in which AT&T Fiber has claimed the pole position. Overall, AT&T Fiber led Ookla's report with a 78.33 Speed Score, a unique metric the company uses to consider a provider's download and upload speeds and latency. Frontier Fiber, which is in the process of being purchased by Verizon, came close to nudging AT&T out of first place, recording a median download speed of 359Mbps and notching a Speed Score of 78.30. Third place was held by Verizon Fios, the company's own fiber internet service, while the cable internet providers Cox, Xfinity and Spectrum rounded out the rest of Ookla's list. Ookla Ookla is an internet speed-test company that collects data via its tool, which gathers insights from millions of daily customer uses. CNET frequently uses those findings to help inform our internet service provider reviews, as well as our city and state geo pages. Locating local internet providers Why do we care about speed tests? In CNET's ISP reviews, we stress that speed test data can be a helpful diagnostic tool -- a snapshot of your internet connection performance at any given moment. For example, it can help you pinpoint when and where your connection may be laggy. But it's not an exact science. Many things can affect a speed test, including whether or not you're using Wi-Fi or a hardwired Ethernet connection, the time of day you're running the test and so on. To be included in Ookla's Speedtest Connectivity Report, an ISP must appear in 3% or more of the data collected during the six-month window. That means some fiber-optic internet providers across the country might perform especially well, but if they're more regional and unable to hit that 3% minimum share of the national market, they won't appear in the top. Google Fiber is a good example. It was the fastest provider in nine of the country's top 100 cities (second only to AT&T Fiber), but it didn't reach enough households to meet Ookla's mark for national inclusion. Yes, nabbing the top spot is certainly something a company like AT&T can brag about. Last year, after the first of its three wins in a row, CEO John Stankey said in a press release, "The Ookla results confirm what we already knew in the market: the fiber experience wins by a mile. Pair our award-winning fiber with the largest wireless network in North America, and AT&T is the clear choice to connect customers anytime, anywhere.' But just because a company earns marks as the fastest ISP in the country -- or a particular state or city -- doesn't automatically make it the best internet provider for you. Though AT&T Fiber places highly in CNET's overall ISP rankings (and is tied with T-Mobile 5G Home Internet for the highest score among all internet providers in the most recent American Customer Satisfaction Index report), it might not be available in your area. There may also be a smaller or more regional provider that might make more sense for your business. Speed test results can be important factors when choosing a broadband provider, but they shouldn't be your only consideration.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
U.S. and EU scramble to strike a trade deal ahead of Aug. 1 deadline
The Trump administration and the European Union are racing to clinch a trade deal by the White House's self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline, with economists warning that a sharp hike in tariffs could raise costs for consumers and businesses. As the clock ticks down, a series of pacts with other U.S. trading partners in recent days have raised hopes of avoiding a potentially damaging trade war with Europe, with experts saying a deal with Japan announced on Tuesday could serve as a template for a deal with the EU. The U.S. has also recently announced the outlines of trade deals with China, Indonesia, the Philippines and U.K., though with many details still remaining to be finalized. For consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic, much is riding on the outcome of the trade talks. Absent a deal, President Trump has threatened to hit imports from the EU's 27 member countries with a 30% tax. In preparing possible countermeasures, the European Commission has said it would impose tariffs on more than $100 billion worth of U.S. goods starting Aug. 7, AFP reported on Wednesday. Negotiations are ongoing and a U.S.-EU trade war could yet be avoided. Citing EU diplomats, AFP also said officials with the trading block could be open to a 15% U.S. tariff rate, with potential carveouts for key sectors, according to the wire service. The White House did not immediately respond to questions about the status of talks with the EU, including whether the Trump administration expects to reach a trade deal by the Aug. 1 deadline. President Trump on Tuesday struck a trade deal with Tokyo that calls for a 15% tariff on Japanese imports. In return, the deal calls for Japan to invest $550 billion in the U.S. and further open its domestic market to U.S. exports, including cars and certain farm products. The 15% tariff rate on Japanese goods is five percentage points higher than a baseline tariff the Trump administration imposed on all foreign imports on April 2. But it is lower than the 25% he threatened against Japan earlier this month and the 24% duties his administration proposed in early April. "The Japan deal solidifies this pattern we've seen thus far, which is some market access relief, a commitment to purchase U.S. goods, and a slightly lower, but above the universal baseline, tariff level," Alex Jacquez, chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a public policy research firm, told CBS MoneyWatch. "The Japan deal certainly provides a framework of what [Mr. Trump] looking for," Jacquez said. "It's about accepting a baseline tariff at or above 10%, and then making purchase commitments." A key element of Mr. Trump's trade deals has been a commitment by other nations to invest in the U.S. The president has defended tariffs as a way to revive the country's domestic manufacturing base and make American exports more competitive, as well as to generate additional federal revenue. "We are learning that the promise of greater investment into the U.S. works well with the administration," EY Parthenon chief economist Gregory Daco said. "The promise to invest $550 billion was a big part of the Japan-U.S. trade deal. It was a key catalyst to securing a deal." The EU, whose member states have a combined gross domestic product of $20 trillion, could likely commit to a large investment in the U.S. because it could span a number of years and focus on key sectors, such as technology, energy or artificial intelligence, Daco added. Additional commitments by the EU to purchase American-made goods and to lower trade barriers to U.S. exports could also help close a deal, he said. "Those don't cost much, and they're an easy bargaining chip to put forward." Although a 15% baseline U.S. tariff on EU imports would represent a retrenchment from Mr. Trump's earlier threats, it would still drive up prices for U.S. businesses and consumers, according to Daco. "While it may seem like a great deal, it's still much higher than the tariffs that the U.S. was imposing at the end of 2024," he noted. "So there would still be a positive inflation shock because of higher tariffs. There would also be demand erosion coming from reduced business investment, hiring,and reduced consumer spending as a result of these higher tariffs." Currently, the average U.S. tariff rate on imports is around 15%, according to his analysis. If Mr. Trump's threatened tariffs go into effect, that rate would rise to more than 20%. If the EU agrees to a 15% tariff rate, however, the average U.S. tariff rate on imports from around the world would drop to 19.5%. "That's still a significant increase in the average rate," Daco said. "It's a lot higher than the 2.5% where we started the year." Because most U.S. imports from the EU include industrial inputs like components, raw materials and machinery, any added costs would take tie to work their way through the supply chain, according to Ryan Young, a senior economist at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a nonpartisan think tank. "It would affect manufacturing exports faster than it would affect American consumers, but it would raise prices all around," Young said. AFP contributed to this report.
