Why Krispy Kreme, Kohl's and other 'meme stocks' are exploding
The year was 2021. And suddenly, there was a stock market explosion over... GameStop? And then some other stocks that got a boost thanks to some folks on Reddit and social media sites who helped some companies like AMC and Bed Bath and Beyond to get a boost on the market.
Remember all that? Good. Let's fastforward to late July 2025. It's happening again.
There's another bunch of so-called "meme stocks" that are getting a boost with trading on Wednesday thanks to hype on Reddit and beyond. Let's run through who they are as it looks like some of these could be GameStop 2.0:
Krispy Kreme
The donut maker saw its price skyrocket.
GoPro
Yeah, remember GoPro and how those digital cameras were everywhere a while back? The price just EXPLODED.
Kohl's
See above.
Opendoor
Two home goods businesses that got a boost.
Is this due to Wallstreetbets on Reddit?
Yep. And it seems like because of reports of the same thing that was happening with GameStop -- what's called a short squeeze -- the Reddit community jumped on the bandwagon with these stocks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
44 minutes ago
- Engadget
People in the UK now have to take an age verification selfie to watch porn online
As of Friday, anyone trying to watch porn online in the UK will need to subject themselves to an awkward selfie or get their photo ID ready. The UK government announced it will start checking compliance with its Online Safety Act, which requires any website that publishes or displays pornographic content to implement a system for "highly effective age checks." Ofcom, the UK's media regulatory agency, offered a few methods for sites to provide more extensive age verification, including credit card checks, photo ID matching and even estimating a user's age with a provided selfie. Several popular porn sites, including the country's most-visited site PornHub, have agreed to the new regulations. Beyond popular porn providers, social media sites like Reddit and Bluesky, have already implemented an age verification system that complies with the Online Safety Act's rules. Savvy internet users are already circumventing the age checks by using a VPN, providing a fake ChatGPT-generated photo ID, or taking a high-quality selfie of video game characters. However, the UK's new law also makes it illegal for websites to promote VPNs that get around age verification. To make sure the Online Safety Act is effective, Ofcom will fine companies caught breaking the rules with fines of up to £18 million or 10 percent of their global revenue.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
From Krispy Kreme to GoPro, has meme-stock trading frenzy returned?
Shares in struggling retailers and ageing consumer brands surged, as amateur traders cast aside Wall Street's skepticism and mobilized online. It's like 2021 all over again. But the latest meme-stock rally could be even bigger than its predecessor four years ago, when investors piled into recognizable but unloved stocks, such as the video games retailer GameStop and the movie theatre chain AMC, according to the founder of the Reddit forum that helped whip up the frenzy. Retailer Kohl's, camera firm GoPro, fast-food chain Wendy's and doughnut chain Krispy Kreme each staged rapid rallies this week, driven by abrupt surges in trading volume reminiscent of the the meme-stock craze of 2021, when social media memes boosted a collection of struggling stocks, triggering extraordinary and volatile leaps in value. Actress Sydney Sweeney helped bring clothing retailer American Eagle Outfitters into the mania after it was announced the Euphoria and White Lotus star would front the brand's latest marketing campaign. The company's shares surged about 10% in trading on Thursday. Meme stocks are 'about to leap-frog in size and scope and scale, so that retail traders are going to redefine what matters', according to Jaime Rogozinski, founder of the wallstreetbets Reddit forum behind many of the volatile rallies. 'The world of finance is clearly changing, with blockchain technologies encroaching, and AI agents that trade on their own,' he said. 'And the collective of retail traders is adapting along with it.' Rogozinski founded wallstreetbets in 2012, but said Reddit ousted him as a moderator in 2020. His bid to sue the social media company for trademark infringement was dismissed by the US court of appeals for the ninth circuit last month. The forum's users home in on stocks and share their own research. 'It's a decentralization of power of who can be financial analyst,' said Noor Al, a moderator on wallstreetbets. 'Great ideas can now come from anyone, anywhere. 'We're seeing the power of retail push stocks, sometimes to the tune of billions of dollars, through the power of ideas, the power of community and the power of the people,' he added. The meme-stock craze of 2021, which produced stars such as Roaring Kitty, was a product of the Covid era, when many amateur traders were stuck at home and flush with pandemic stimulus cash. Whether this latest frenzy produces similar winners is not yet clear. Kohl's finished the week up 32%, GoPro was up 66% and Krispy Kreme was up 41%. The rallies show some investors are willing to take on more risk, as stocks scale record highs and the market, dominated by big tech, becomes harder to beat. Often, meme-stock bets are unbound from economic fundamentals, as investors move to support a brand for romantic or ideological reasons. Donald Trump's Trump Media & Technology Group, home to Truth Social, is valued at more than $5bn on quarterly revenue of about $1m. The wallstreetbets ethos 'has always to some extent been about flaunting and exploiting the ironies, relevance or irrelevance' of the stock market, said Rogozinski, who pointed to Wendy's, the hamburger chain, as a good example. 'Wendy's has always been a meme that goes back a decade. It brings a smile to my face, because on Reddit there's always been this thing where they say: 'Sir, this is a Wendy's.' 'It's an inside joke, and I don't even get where it started. It's just a meme,' he added. The stock's fleeting rise – it rallied 10% in two days, but finished the week broadly flat – shows some retail investors do not necessarily care about the typical factors that drive the market, such as tariffs and war in the Middle East. 'It's this ability for us to almost make fun of the financial system.' Long-term institutional players will always get the last laugh, Rogozinski conceded, because prices will return to normal valuations. 'But in the short term there's lot of money to be had with this volatility, and the fact that stocks are able to move up and down with such ease is but a mere showcase for how the financial system needs a facelift in relevancy.' Related: Bed Bath & Beyond sees 'meme-stock' surge – but is it too little, too late? While current market conditions do not replicate the low interest rates and retail investor buoyancy of the Covid era, market records and a robust economy have made meme stocks attractive once again for some. 'You see all these indications where this is full-blown meme mania,' Brent Kochuba, founder of derivatives-data firm SpotGamma, told Bloomberg. 'The macro economic environment really favors the retail and speculative plays,' agreed Al. 'I think were only going to see more speculation and excitement. It's a good time to tune in, because retail players can react and provide insight faster.' Days traders are not necessarily bothered by a company's financial performance, said Rogozinski. 'You have this activist, elective investor who is saying, 'I don't care what the financial statements look like, I don't care what the discounted cashflow is, I like the food, I like the video-game store, I like the meme. So dude, you can go back to Excel spreadsheets if you want, but I really like the chicken tenders,'' he said. There is now a 'third component' to investment, beyond supply and demand, he claimed, 'which is, 'dude, I don't care if you think it's going to go up or not, or if they have assets or liabilities. I care about this company and I'm going to help it out. I'm going to go buy my jeans from American Eagle.'' Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Backs Out of Group Trip. Now, Her Friends Want Her to Cover Everyone's Financial Loss
After pulling out of a group trip for personal reasons, a woman finds herself at odds with friends who now expect her to take on the entire financial loss A woman seeks advice from the Reddit community following a dispute with two friends over a canceled Airbnb trip. The original plan was simple: three friends would be splitting a $600 rental, each contributing $200, with one friend, referred to as Friend A, paying the full amount upfront. "Friend A was the one who made the reservation and paid in full so that me and friend B would give A our share ($200.00 each) later," the woman writes in her post. But plans changed when she decided not to go anymore, citing "personal and safety reasons." Although the rental host "would only give a 50% refund" if they canceled, "both friend A and friend B still wanted to go." Even though she backed out, the poster told her friends that she'd honor her part of the agreement. 'I said if they still wanted to go I would give my share ($200.00) since I took the responsibility of being part of it before,' she explains. However, things took a turn when Friend A demanded more than just her original share. "Friend A said that I should pay $300.00 because I was the one who didn't want to go, not them, and if they were to cancel it that would be the total loss," she explains. The poster didn't agree that she should be paying more than her portion, especially since the trip was still scheduled to move forward without her. 'Why would I pay for half of the trip when is not even canceled yet?' she questions, pushing back on what she saw as an unfair request. Friend A then mentioned they would try to invite someone else to take her spot. But they made it clear that if that person declined, the poster would be expected to cover the full $300 shortfall. The next day, Friend A messaged again with an update. 'They informed me that the other person they invited did not want to go and that they had cancelled the house,' the woman writes, adding that Friend A also sent proof of a refund. Now, with the Airbnb officially canceled, Friend A insisted she should be held fully responsible for the loss. 'They expected that I paid the full amount of $300.00 because I backed out first,' she explains, even though both friends ultimately decided not to go. What made the situation even more frustrating was Friend A's refusal to ask Friend B for their share "because they too wanted to go." "I told them that if they ask for person's B share or not is not my problem, my only responsibility now is paying my part," the woman replied. To her, the fair thing would be for everyone to pay based on the final outcome. 'Now that the refund was made I believe that the correct amount for each person to pay is $100.00,' she argues, since the Airbnb host only refunded 50% of the $600 total. She reiterates that she never asked the group to cancel. 'I never forced them to not go but actually said I would still pay MY part in full and they chose not to go,' she writes. From her perspective, she upheld her end of the plan, and what they did afterward was out of her hands. Despite the pushback from Friend A, she decided to settle what she believed was fair. 'I refused and sent $105.00 for my share and told them that was my share and that it would be all I was going to pay,' she shares, sticking firmly to her decision. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In an edit to the post, the woman shared that Friend A's "reasoning for not going through with the trip was because they didn't want to split food and gas into 2, but 3." Adding yet another layer of tension to the story, the poster revealed that the friend initially "wanted a bigger and prettier house that could fit 4-5 people, but I didn't want that one because it was too expensive (about $850)." The situation left her feeling stuck, unsure if setting boundaries over what she owes makes her selfish or simply fair. But one thing she's certain of is this: 'My only responsibility now is paying my part.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
