Rand Paul's latest comments on Trump's megabill
During a Tuesday Fox News appearance, Paul, a Republican with strong libertarian convictions, told Mornings with Maria host Maria Bartiromo that he was not voting for the bill. 'I'm enthusiastically for the tax cuts, I voted for them in 2017 I helped to formulate those tax cuts in 2017,' Paul stated.
'I will not be the deciding vote against this, I promise you that. If I'm the deciding vote against this, they will negotiate with me.' 'Right now they are not negotiating with me, because they don't think they need me, so I will not be the deciding vote. The bill will not fail because of me,' the Senator continued.
'But if it is up to me, and I am the deciding vote, there will be a negotiation, but there is going to be a conservative shift to the bill if they want my vote, thats what I should do as a conservative,' Paul concluded. At the start of June, Paul told Newsmax that if the only thing in the 'big, beautiful bill' was making the tax cuts permanent, he would back the legislation wholeheartedly. 'If the bill were solely about making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, I wouldn't be a yes; I'd be a hell yes,' Paul noted at the time.
'Unfortunately, that's not the reality with this bill. It includes the largest increase of the debt ceiling ever and will have the United States borrowing $5T over the next 2 years. This bill is the opposite of conservative, and we should not pass it,' Paul added. Republicans currently hold a majority in the Senate with 53 seats out of 100. That means Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune can afford to lose the support of up to four of his colleagues on the bill, in which case a 49-49 tied vote could be broken by Vice President JD Vance.
The U.S. House of Representatives passed their version of the government budget funding package back in May, ahead of the Memorial Day Recess. The Trump White House is keeping the pressure on senators to work out a version of the bill in their chamber, and send it back to the House for a vote, so that the president can sign it by the Fourth of July. Paul has drawn the ire of the White House several times in recent weeks.
Speaking to reporters out side of the Capitol last week, Paul shared that his invitation to the White House's congressional picnic had been cancelled. 'I've just been told that I've been uninvited from the [White House] picnic...every Democrat will be invited, every Republican invited, but I will be the only one disallowed. I just find this incredibly petty', Paul said. The president then responded to Paul's claim's saying that the senator was welcome to attend the picnic after all.
Trump contradicted his own White House last Thursday, indicating that 'of course' Paul and his family could attend, via a post made on Truth Social. 'Of course Senator Rand Paul and his beautiful wife and family are invited to the BIG White House Party tonight,' Trump wrote last week. 'He's the toughest vote in the history of the U.S. Senate, but why wouldn't he be? Besides, it gives me more time to get his Vote on the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill,' Trump wrote in a post on his social media site Truth Social on Thursday morning.
'It will help to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! I look forward to seeing Rand. The Party will be Great!' Trump concluded. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt is another member of the president's team who has recently thrown arrows at Paul. 'Well, anyone who votes against the one big, beautiful bill including Senator Rand Paul, will be voting for a tax hike of more than $4 trillion on the American people and their voters will know about it,' Leavitt warned earlier this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Partisan rancor in Congress raises risk of US government shutdown this fall
WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) - Growing Democratic rancor in the U.S. Congress over President Donald Trump's tactics on the federal budget is threatening the long legislative tradition of funding the government through bipartisan deals, while raising the risk of a partial shutdown this fall. Republicans stirred the Democrats' distrust by clawing back $9 billion of congressionally approved money at the White House's behest and discussing making further such rescissions. Some hardline Republicans have floated the unprecedented idea of bypassing Senate rules requiring 60 of the 100 members to agree on most legislation to pass a funding bill for the fiscal year beginning October 1 without any Democratic votes. "Republicans in Congress are bowing down to Donald Trump and ratifying some of his worst efforts," Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said in a floor speech outlining her unwillingness to cooperate on government funding without a Republican agreement not to rescind the money later. "The Trump administration is saying, loud and clear, Donald Trump makes all the decisions." The budgeting process has long been strained. For almost three decades lawmakers have failed to pass the 12 bills that are meant to detail the government's discretionary spending and the government has partially shut down 14 times since 1981 as lawmakers have missed deadlines. The annual battle over discretionary spending involves less than a third of the roughly $6.75 trillion federal budget, with funding for programs like building roads and supporting schools. The rest is mandatory spending including Social Security, Medicare and roughly $1 trillion of financing costs for the nation's $36 trillion in debt. As the Senate prepares to leave Washington for a month-long summer recess, Republicans have also hardened their rhetoric about government funding by trying to blame any future shutdown on Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. "If we end up with a Schumer shutdown at the end of the year, the Democrats are going to own that," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told a news conference. The last government shutdown, which stretched over 35 days from late 2018 into early 2019, occurred during Trump's first term in office. Polling at the time showed that voters blamed Republicans for the disruption. The task of keeping the government funded has historically fallen to bipartisan negotiators to find deals that can pass the House of Representatives and garner the 60 votes needed to approve most legislation in the Senate. "Budgeting is hard. Budgeting is governing. And the way things have been so politicized and partisanized, it makes it almost impossible for Congress to legislate effectively," said William Hoagland, a former Senate Republican aide and fiscal legislation veteran who is now at the Bipartisan Policy Center think tank. This time around, the challenge has been complicated by the aggressive tactics of Trump budget director Russell Vought, who has withheld funding appropriated by Congress, succeeded in getting Republicans to defund Democratic priorities including the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and threatened to use so-called pocket rescissions to withhold other allocated funds. Trump has also proposed a fiscal 2026 budget that calls for $163 billion in spending cuts. "We all want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process," Schumer told reporters. "The Republicans are making it extremely difficult to do that." Hardline conservative House Republicans have been discussing the possibility of setting a new precedent for partisanship by using the parliamentary process known as budget reconciliation to pass full-year 2026 funding legislation to reopen government agencies at lower spending levels in the event of a shutdown. The tactic was most recently used to pass Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill earlier this month. Democrats also used it under President Joe Biden to pass his domestic agenda. "It's not a serious discussion yet. But it might be as we get closer to September 30," said Representative Andy Harris, chair of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus. Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has floated the possibility of further reconciliation packages, said they have not considered the idea. Some traditional-minded Republicans have rejected it out of hand. "That's a bad idea," House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole said. "It means everything has to be partisan all the time. Appropriations, historically, is bipartisan." But hardliners who have seen their demands for deep spending cuts frustrated over the years say Republicans could need an alternative to the usual bipartisan path. "We'd all prefer that you do the appropriations process. So, we should keep trying to get that done. But if we can't, and we have to look at something else, we'll look at something else," said Representative Jim Jordan, a leading hardliner. "Whether we'll do that or not, I don't know. But it's already happened," the Ohio Republican said when asked about reconciliation as a way to reopen shuttered federal agencies. Experts say using reconciliation as a vehicle to reopen shuttered federal agencies may not be feasible, given that Congress would first need to pass a budget resolution that could take weeks or even months to craft. But hardliners say they are aware of that issue. "It's hard to do reconciliation at the last minute. That's the problem," said Representative Warren Davidson. Asked if the potentially long lead time ruled out its use, the Ohio Republican replied: "I hope not. We're trying to make sure it doesn't die."
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump warns Putin's right-hand man: ‘You're entering very dangerous territory'
Donald Trump issued a stern warning to 'failed' former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and urged him to 'watch his words' after he ridiculed the U.S. president on social media. ' Russia and the USA do almost no business together,' Trump said in a midnight Truth Social tirade, after attacking India's close ties with Russia and setting his sights on Medvedev. 'Let's keep it that way, and tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!,' he added Medvedev, who was handpicked by Vladimir Putin to serve as president in 2008 due to term limits, ridiculed Trump's recent ultimatum demanding Russia agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine. During his trip to Turnberry, Scotland, on Monday, the president said that Putin must agree to make progress toward ending the war in Ukraine within '10 or 12 days from today,' shortening it from a 50-day negotiating window. Hours later, Medvedev issued an equally scathing response on X to Trump, who repeatedly promised on the 2024 presidential campaign trail to end Russia's offensive in Ukraine on his first day in office. 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10… He should remember 2 things,' he tweeted. '1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.' Plucking a nickname from Trump's dictionary, Medvedev warned the president not to 'go down the Sleepy Joe road,' referring to former President Joe Biden, which he said could lead to direct conflict between Russia and the U.S. Hours later, Medvedev, who is currently the deputy chair of Russia's security council, took a jab at South Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham after the Republican demanded that the Russian politician 'get to the peace table.' 'It's not for you or Trump to dictate when to 'get at the peace table'. Negotiations will end when all the objectives of our military operation have been achieved,' he said. 'Work on America first, gramps!' Earlier Wednesday, Trump announced plans to penalize India for buying Russian arms and oil as part of a revived 'Liberation Day' tariff package that is due to kick in on Friday, along with doubling down on his threat to impose sweeping 25 percent levies on Indian imports. While he previously called India a 'friend,' Trump escalated his criticism against the country during his rebuke of Medvedev on Thursday. 'I don't care what India does with Russia,' he wrote. 'They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' 'We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World,' he added.
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
HF Sinclair beats second-quarter profit estimates on higher refining margins
July 31 (Reuters) - Refiner HF Sinclair (DINO.N), opens new tab beat Wall Street estimates for second-quarter profit on Thursday, helped by higher refining margins. Top U.S. refiners were expected to post higher second-quarter profits, rebounding from first-quarter losses as stronger-than-expected diesel margins lifted earnings. The improved margins helped peers such as Valero Energy (VLO.N), opens new tab surpass Wall Street estimates. Fuel makers have seen an unexpected boost in profits from key products in recent months, offering relief after earnings retreated from 2022 highs driven by a post-pandemic demand rebound and supply disruptions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The company's adjusted refinery gross margin per barrel was up at $16.50 in the quarter, compared with $11.33 from a year earlier. The company reported adjusted profit of $1.70 per share for the three months ended June 30, compared with analysts' average estimate of $1.02 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
