
What's at stake if Alberta removes certain books from its school libraries?
Social Sharing
Last week, the government of Alberta revealed plans to introduce new guidelines that will determine what books will be allowed on the shelves of school libraries across the province.
The province's education minister, Demetrios Nicolaides, invited Albertans to take part in an online survey to help shape the new rules that will take effect this fall.
The move comes after Nicolaides said he received complaints from parents about four particular books that concerned them: Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, Fun Home by Alison Bechdel, Blankets by Craig Thompson, and Flamer by Mike Curato. Three out of four of these discuss 2SLGBTQ+ themes, leading many advocates to worry that queer literature would be unfairly targeted under the new guidelines.
Today on Commotion, guest host Amil Niazi speaks with Mel Woods, senior editor at Xtra Magazine, and Laura Winton, president of the Library Association of Alberta, to discuss what's at stake for Alberta children and libraries.
We've included some highlights below, edited for length and clarity. For the full discussion, listen and follow Commotion with Elamin Abdelmahmoud on your favourite podcast player.
WATCH | Today's episode on YouTube:
Amil: Mel, there's 2,200 schools across Alberta. Those books that [Nicolaides] mentioned only appear in 58 schools, and those books are not new books. So why do you think this particular concern is happening right now?
Mel: Yeah, I think that's the biggest thing that we have to be really clear about with this, is that while the Alberta government has been framing this announcement as some discovery of this lewd material that's been unearthed, the only new thing here is the Alberta government's decision to care about this right now.
And we have to look at the larger political context at play here. Nicolaides was saying that he heard from concerned parents. Reporting from the Investigative Journalism Foundation last week showed that those concerned parents were the Christian advocacy group, Action4Canada, which was involved in the Freedom Convoy. And also played a huge role in getting the school pronoun policies in both Saskatchewan introduced and New Brunswick, and the gender-affirming care attacks that the Alberta government's already taken.
So this doesn't come in a vacuum. It's not just some genuinely, earnestly concerned parents calling up the government and saying, "Get these books out of libraries." There are coordinated movements and efforts to target these books in specific. These books on this list have been targeted in the States before. There are lists of these books that go around within these types of organizations, and they target specific governments who might seem willing to help them with those campaigns.
And we look at the larger political context of what's happening in Alberta right now. [Premier] Danielle Smith and her government are looking at these separatist folks to the further right, to the further socially conservative, and are worried about their base fracturing…. These groups and organizations are coming to governments with intent to get these sorts of policies introduced, and to stoke a culture war, and to stoke a moral panic.
We can never talk about these things and take what they're saying at face value and be like, "Oh, some genuinely concerned parents. We're just so worried about these lewd books." No, there are coordinated email writing campaigns. There are very influential political actors involved here, and that's an important context to have.
Amil: Laura, how would you have preferred the province initiate a discussion like this? Rather than just jumping to the survey, is there something the Library Association would have preferred to see first?
Laura: Yeah, absolutely. I think, first and foremost, we would have loved a conversation — at least a heads up. The Library Association of Alberta wasn't contacted. None of the public school boards were contacted as well. So this came as a total surprise to all of us. If the government had concerns about material that was in school libraries, it seems most appropriate to me that they would have approached school boards, potentially approached the Library Association of Alberta to get a bit more information on what the current processes look like, and then conversations could happen from there.
Amil: So the books that we're talking about include Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe, Fun Home by Alison Bechdel, and Flamer by Mike Curato, all of which discuss and depict 2SLGBTQ+ relationships…. The government's position is that certain books have no place in school libraries. What is the case for keeping books like the ones I mentioned on the shelves?
Laura: It's worth noting that these are all award-winning graphic novels. These have been reviewed in major publications. Here's a quote from Publishers Weekly about Gender Queer: "This heartfelt graphic memoir relates with sometimes playful honesty the experience of growing up non-gender-conforming. It's sure to spark valuable discussions at home and in classrooms."
So this material is intended to be put in front of children. One of the books, Blankets, I studied in library school years ago in a children's literature class. And what we were talking about in that class was very specifically, "How do we use this as material to help children understand their experiences?" So librarians know how to do this. We're thinking carefully about it. And there is consensus from experts on these books. This is not, as the minister has said, equivalent to a Hustler magazine. This is an award-winning text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
38 minutes ago
- CTV News
Why the Ontario government took over school boards across the province
Education Minister Paul Calandra on why the Ford government has taken over three schools board in the GTA: TDSB, TCDSB, and DPCDSB.

CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Is Canada now free of internal trade barriers? Not yet, says expert
Federal and provincial leaders are working to dismantle internal trade barriers that push up the cost of goods and make it harder to do business within Canada. But anyone expecting all of them to be gone by tomorrow should read the fine print, experts say. Throughout the spring federal election campaign, Mark Carney as Liberal leader repeatedly vowed to "eliminate" interprovincial trade barriers and create "free trade by Canada Day." The rhetoric has been at times confusing and the political scorecard on this one is hard to track. With July 1 just a day away, Carney's government has passed its planned changes into law — but it's more like the start of a conversation than the final word, says internal trade expert Ryan Manucha. "It's a starting gun and it's starting a lot more activity and work, which is honestly the really exciting part," said Manucha. "If any of this was easy, it would have been done." Manucha writes on the topic for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think-tank and authored the book Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Trade. "When I'm advising governments, I say, 'Don't think of this as a light switch,"' he said. "We are changing the way that everyone approaches the concept of regulation and risk here, and so it's going to take some time." The rush to break down internal barriers to trade comes in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war with Canada. One study estimates that existing internal trade hurdles cost the economy some $200 billion a year. Manucha said Canada has talked about this problem for decades but is only addressing it seriously now — and it would "never have happened had we not had Trump." He said the introduction of the Carney government's bill on internal trade was "incredible to see" because the idea was just "an academic theory maybe even as little as eight months ago." Bill C-5, the omnibus bill that reduces federal restrictions on interprovincial trade and also speeds up permitting for large infrastructure projects, became law on June 26. An analysis of the law by McMillan Vantage says that "this legislation would not achieve" the elimination of all internal trade barriers. Provinces hold power When Carney made his campaign promise, he was talking about cutting red tape put up by the federal government — not the rules set by the provinces, which have the most authority in this area. The prime minister described this effort as a sort of quid pro quo with the provinces. "We're getting rid of a bunch of duplicative federal regulations. We're going to have a principle of one project, one review — and in exchange, they're going to agree to eliminate all the barriers to trade and labour mobility," Carney said at a rally in Kitchener, Ont., on March 26. "The federal government committed that we will sweep away all of our impediments by Canada Day. Free trade by Canada Day." WATCH | Why are provincial trade barriers still a thing? Why are provincial trade barriers still a thing? 5 months ago Duration 7:10 More interprovincial trade is being touted as one potential countermeasure to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats, but complicated barriers stand in the way. CBC's Ellen Mauro breaks down why free trade within Canada is so difficult and what needs to happen to get more goods flowing across the country. But Canada's internal trade barriers won't all be eliminated by then — not even all the federal ones. Canada's supply management system for dairy products, which sets provincial production quotas, will remain in place. Quebec also retains language requirements that will stay in place. Credit unions have complained that the new law does not break down barriers to their expansion into multiple provinces. But just how many federal barriers does the bill eliminate? That's hard to sort out. A lot of the details will have to wait until regulations are drafted — a process that will involve consultations with affected industries. "I don't really know what this legislation could end up doing because a lot of veto power, a lot of discretion still rests with the regulatory authorities," Manucha said. "According to the text of that legislation, it would seem like meat inspection would come off. Is [the Canadian Food Inspection Agency] really going to allow for interprovincial trade and inspection of meat coming from non-federally licensed abattoirs? I don't know." Lack of consensus There is no comprehensive list of existing internal trade barriers. Even some lobby groups have told parliamentarians they don't know how many barriers their own industries face. There isn't even consensus on what all counts as a trade barrier. "In the provincial legislation in Ontario, they're talking, for many occupations, [of] having a 30-day service standard for how long it'll take for credentials to be recognized," Manucha said. "Nova Scotia, meanwhile, is on the 10-day turnaround time. That's less than a third. Can you call the 30-day versus 10-day a trade barrier?" Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has repeatedly stated that most of the barriers are at the provincial level, testified to the Senate that she will meet with her provincial counterparts on July 8 to discuss next steps. One major obstacle is in Freeland's crosshairs: Canada's patchwork of interprovincial trucking regulations. "One of three areas that I will be putting on the agenda at that meeting is trucking," she said on June 16. "It should be a lot easier than it is to drive a truck from Halifax to Vancouver. We need to get rid of conflicting requirements."


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
U.S. stocks add to their all-time high
NEW YORK — U.S. stocks are adding to their records on Monday as Wall Street nears the finish of a second straight winning month. The S&P 500 was 0.2% higher in early trading, its first trading after completing its stunning rebound from a springtime sell-off of roughly 20%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 142 points, or 0.3%, as of 9:35 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.2% higher. Stocks got a boost after Canada said it's rescinding a planned tax on U.S. technology firms and resuming talks on trade with the United States. On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump had said he was suspending talks with Canada because of his anger with the tax, which he called 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' One of the main reasons U.S. stocks came back so quickly from its springtime swoon has been hope that Trump will reach deals with other countries to lower his stiff proposed tariffs. Otherwise, the fear is that the trade wars could stifle the economy and send inflation higher. The United States is charging a 10% baseline tax on all imported goods, along with higher rates for Chinese goods and other import taxes on steel and autos. But many of Trump's additional, announced tariffs are currently on pause. They're scheduled to kick back into effect in a little more than a week. In an interview with Fox News Channel's 'Sunday Morning Futures,' Trump said his administration will notify countries that the trade penalties will take effect unless there are deals with the United States. Letters will start going out 'pretty soon' before the approaching deadline, he said. On Wall Street, GMS' stock jumped 11.3% after the supplier of specialty building products said it agreed to sell itself to a Home Depot subsidiary in a deal that would pay $110.00 per share in cash. That would give it a total value of roughly $5.5 billion, including debt. Less than two weeks ago, another company, QXO, said it was offering to buy GMS for $95.20 per share in cash. After the announcement of the Home Depot bid, QXO's stock rose 2%, and Home Depot's stock was flat. Hewlett Packard Enterprise rallied 12% and Juniper Networks climbed 8.4% after saying they had reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice that could clear the way for their merger go through, subject to court approval. HPE is trying to buy Juniper in a $14 billion deal. In the bond market, Treasury yields were easing a bit ahead of some major economic reports later in the week. The highlight will be Thursday's jobs report. It's often the most anticipated economic data of each month, and it will come a day earlier than usual this upcoming month because of the Fourth of July holiday. The job market has remained relatively steady recently, even in the face of tariffs, but hiring has slowed. Economists expect Thursday's data to show another slowdown in overall hiring, down to 115,000 jobs in June from 139,000 in May. Such data has kept the Federal Reserve on hold this year when it comes to interest rates. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has said repeatedly that it's waiting for more data to show how tariffs will affect the economy and inflation before resuming its cuts to interest rates. That's because lower rates can fan inflation higher, along with giving the economy a boost. Trump, meanwhile, has been pushing for more cuts to rates and for them to happen soon. Two of his appointees to the Fed have said recently they could consider cutting rates as soon as the Fed's next meeting in less than a month. The yield on the 10-year Treasury eased to 4.26% from 4.29% late Friday. In stock markets abroad, indexes dipped modestly in Europe following a more mixed finish in Asia. Stocks fell 0.9% in Hong Kong but rose 0.6% in Shanghai after China reported its factory activity improved slightly in June after Beijing and Washington agreed in May to postpone imposing higher tariffs on each others' exports, though manufacturing remained in contraction. ___ AP business writer Elaine Kurtenbach contributed. By Stan Choe