
"We were recalibrating our strategies": Shashi Tharoor on India adapting to China's technology during Op Sindoor
He highlighted India's ability to adapt and respond effectively to China's advanced systems. Tharoor mentioned China's 'kill chain' technology, integrating radar, GPS, planes, and missiles for instant reactions.
'The reassessment took place while the fighting was going on. When we saw what the Pakistanis were tempted to do using, as you say, Chinese technology, there's supposed to be something called a kill chain that the Chinese specialise in, wherein the radar, GPS, planes and missiles are all linked together, and they react instantly... We simply did things differently; otherwise, we wouldn't have been able to hit 11 airfields, and we wouldn't have been able to breach the Chinese supply to their defences. So it's clear that assessments were taking place while the fighting was happening and we were recalibrating our strategies to end as effectively as we were able to end...,' Tharoor emphasised that India assessed and recalibrated its strategies during the conflict to counter Chinese defences effectively and hit key targets.
Notably, during Operation Sindoor, India, in addition to eliminating over 100 terrorists, destroyed 11 air bases inside Pakistan and inflicted significant damage on their military capabilities. The air, land and sea operations were carried out with calibrated restraint, emphasising minimising civilian casualties.
Tharoor noted China's significant stakes in Pakistan, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative's China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, highlighting the complexity of the region's geopolitics.
'The fact is, China has immense stakes in Pakistan. The largest single project the Belt and Road Initiative is in Pakistan, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. So we have no illusions about the degree of commitment that China may feel towards Pakistan,' added the Congress leader.
Tharoor also acknowledged China's influence in the region, noting its role as a significant supplier of funds, often through loans that can lead to unsustainable debt obligations for recipient countries.
'China does come in and play a role. I mean, there's no doubt about that. China can be a fairly munificent supplier of funds. They are often loans and not grants, and some involve unsustainable debt obligations on the part of the recipients. Um, and so yes, you've implied there are specific issues we need to address,' said Tharoor.
He emphasised the importance of the neighbourhood to India, highlighting its responsibility to care for the well-being of its neighbours. 'We as a country have always appreciated that when we sit around the table with our neighbours, we account for 70% of the land mass and 80% of the GDP. I mean we have a responsibility to care for the well-being of our neighbours, and we are conscious of that,' he added.
Tharoor highlighted that Pakistan's obstructionism hindered regional cooperation efforts, particularly within the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC).
'We were trying to make a goal of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, but Pakistan obstructed that because they could not have these relationships blossoming as long as they had a grudge with India. And unfortunately, the South Asian Association worked on consensus so that nothing could get done,' said Tharoor.
He said India revived the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC), a sub-regional organisation that excludes Pakistan and focuses on cooperation with countries to the east.
'India has now revived another sub-regional organisation called BIMSTEC, which does not include Pakistan, and sadly, it doesn't include the Maldives either, because they're to the west of the Bay of Bengal, but all the countries to the east, including Thailand and Myanmar, are part of this initiative, so it's not that we are in any way backing off from regional cooperation. We want it, but there are specific challenges. However, we can go country by country at some point. I'm sure my colleagues in the Indian Embassy will happily help the US State Department on that.' (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.


India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
Why chase someone who won't fight: Smriti Irani's 'tone shift' on Rahul Gandhi
Union Minister Smriti Irani, once known for her fierce criticism of Rahul Gandhi, now appears markedly more conciliatory toward the Congress leader. In an exclusive interview with India Today Group's Anjana Om Kashyap, Irani was asked why she no longer takes an aggressive stance against Gandhi. Her response was direct and pointed: 'Because the Gandhi family refused to fight me in 2024.'advertisementIrani, who famously defeated Rahul Gandhi in 2019 in his long-held Amethi constituency, said that with Gandhi opting out of contesting from Amethi in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, there was no political battle to engage in.'If they aren't even stepping into the battlefield, what am I supposed to say? I can't go chasing after them,' Smriti Irani said. During the interview, Smriti Irani also pointed out that the Gandhi family moved to contest from Wayanad due to its favourable social demographics.'No intelligent leader willingly chooses a seat where defeat is certain,' she said. 'If a seat like that is given, it's only out of duty to the party. But in 2019, I turned the impossible into possible.'Irani also reflected on her journey and recalled her defeat in Amethi in 2014. She said that she spent the next five years working tirelessly on the ground.'I cleaned drains myself, brought electricity to villages, built over a lakh homes, set up a medical college, a 200 bed hospital, a collector's office, a police line and even a fire station,' she Anjana Om Kashyap asked whether Irani could have defeated Rahul Gandhi again if he had contested in 2024, Irani responded with a smile, 'Absolutely, that's why he didn't contest.'Irani also spoke about the emotional toll of being removed from Amethi, calling it a place she is deeply connected with. 'If I had not worked and people had said I did not deliver on my promises, that would have hurt more. But I did everything I could,' she asked why she lost, Irani responded, 'Because there's a diference between work and political equations. Those who are in politics understand this – electoral politics isn't the same as national service.'When asked whether stepping away from Amethi and the government left her feeling uprooted, she admitted, 'Maybe.''Because I defeated the national president of Congress, I had to tolerate a few barbs,' she Irani clarified that her return to television does not signal a retirement from politics. Dismissing speculation, she said, 'Who retires at 49? At 49, most people's careers are just beginning and I have already been a Member of Parliament three times,' she added with a Irani is making her comeback on the screen with the same show that made her a household name 25 years ago, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi.- EndsMust Watch


News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
PM Modi Lands In UK For Two-day Visit, Free Trade Agreement To Be Signed
Last Updated: Talks expected to focus on enhancing economic cooperation, with the proposed India-UK Free Trade Agreement likely to be a key agenda item Prime Minister Narendra Modi has arrived in London for his official visit to the United Kingdom from July 23 to 24. During the visit, PM Modi will hold comprehensive talks with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The leaders will discuss the full spectrum of India-UK bilateral ties and exchange views on pressing regional and global developments. The two sides will also assess the progress of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP), with key focus areas including trade and economy, defence and security, technology and innovation, climate action, health, education, and strengthening people-to-people connections. #WATCH | Prime Minister Narendra Modi lands in London, United Kingdom. He is on an official visit to the United Kingdom from 23–24 JulyPM Modi will hold wide-ranging discussions with UK PM Starmer on the entire gamut of India-UK bilateral relations. They will also exchange… — ANI (@ANI) July 23, 2025 Following this, the Prime Minister will proceed to the Maldives for a State Visit from July 25 to 26, during which regional maritime cooperation, security, and development partnerships are expected to top the agenda. During his two-day official visit to the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to engage in wide-ranging discussions with his British counterpart, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, covering the full spectrum of the India-UK bilateral relationship, as well as pressing regional and global issues, according to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). The India-UK partnership, once rooted in historical ties, has evolved into a robust, multi-dimensional and mutually beneficial relationship. The elevation of this partnership to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in 2021 marked a significant turning point. Over the past year, PM Modi and PM Starmer have met twice in person, once on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Brazil (November 2024) and again at the G7 Summit in June 2025, in addition to holding several telephonic conversations. One of the clearest indicators of the strength of bilateral relations is the presence of five Ministerial-level Institutional Mechanisms spanning strategic affairs, economy & finance, trade, energy, and science & technology. Recent high-level dialogues have included the Foreign Office Consultation, Defence Consultation Group, and the 2+2 Foreign and Defence Dialogue. On the economic front, bilateral trade reached a record USD 55 billion in 2024, representing a 10% increase over 2023. A major milestone in the relationship was the announcement of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on May 6, 2025, by both Prime Ministers. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.