We're not responsible for SANDF budget cuts: National Treasury
The Treasury said it was concerned by remarks made by the head of the navy, Adm Monde Lobese, who accused it of compromising national security by not providing the defence force with resources.
Lobese made the comments during a joint standing committee on defence meeting in parliament on Friday.
In response, the Treasury said in line with the constitution, withdrawing funds from the National Revenue Fund can only be done through an act of parliament.
'Final approval is by parliament and the National Treasury is then entrusted to ensure the implementation of parliament's decisions. It is therefore incorrect to suggest the National Treasury is responsible for budget challenges experienced by the SANDF,' it said.
Lobese told the committee it needs to take a stand against what he called the 'sabotage' of the defence force due to years of defunding.
'National Treasury for a change needs to be patriotic in how they address the funding of the SANDF. National Treasury can't be allowed to be a super department,' he said.
However, the Treasury said in terms of the Public Finance Management Act, the Treasury is responsible for managing the budget process and exercising control over the implementation of the national budget.
According to the Treasury, the 2025/2026 proposed defence allocation of R57.2bn in the Appropriation Bill was informed by the government's broader fiscal strategy, which aimed to stabilise public finances, reduce debt service costs and create space to invest in critical infrastructure and frontline services in support of higher growth.
'In this constrained fiscal environment, the department of defence has been allocated an additional R4.3bn over the 2025 medium-term expenditure framework to support priority needs — most notably, the orderly and safe withdrawal of troops and mission equipment from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), with other essential operational requirements.'
TimesLIVE previously reported that defence and military veterans minister Angie Motshekga said better funding could have allowed the defence force to handle the repatriation of troops deployed to the eastern DRC as part of the Sadc Mission in the DRC, avoiding trauma and logistical chaos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Market keeps eye on MPC rate decision this week
All eyes on the Reserve Bank's rate decision this week. Image: Bloomberg It was an interesting week with the JSE All Share index hitting 100 000 points on Wednesday morning and the gold price breaking through $3 400 an ounce again. Internationally, US President Donald Trump announced trade deals with Japan and with the Philippines, and there are reports that the EU and US are nearing a deal. In local news the Government of National Unity held together once more as the DA agreed to support the Appropriation Bill after President Cyril Ramaphosa dismissed Higher Education and Training Minister Nobuhle Nkabane. On Thursday, Trade, Industry, and Competition Minister Parks Tau said that a 'condition precedent document' has been signed as a precursor to finalisation of the trade negotiations with the US, but little details were available. It was reported that the Framework Deal aims to resolve long-standing market access issues that both sides are interested in and to promote bilateral investments in a mutually beneficial manner. It is unlikely that South Africa and the US will reach an agreement by the 1 of August, when 30% tariffs kicks-in. The key local indicator was the June Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation figure released on Wednesday. The inflation rate rose from 2.8% to 3%. The main driver was higher food prices, while lower year-on-year fuel prices helped to counter the increase. The inflation rate remains safely below the midpoint of the Reserve Bank's target band, and markets are still expecting one more 25 basis point cut to the repo rate this year. But will it happen at Thursday's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting? Based on the June inflation number and the outlook for inflation there is a strong case for a cut. Almost all models suggest that inflation will increase slowly during the rest of this year, but remain below the midpoint of the target band for the next year or two. The MPC has often argued that international uncertainty poses an upside risk and is an argument for keeping the repo, and our interest rate differential with the US, unchanged. The concern is that if we cut the repo rate while the Americans keep their policy rate unchanged, the rand-dollar exchange rate will weaken, increasing the cost of imported goods. This week the Federal Reserve meets the day before our MPC and their decision will play a role. They are waiting to see the inflationary impact of their tariffs and will probably keep their policy rate unchanged. Yet, from the South African point of view the dollar is relatively weaker, and the interest rate differential is less of a concern. Keeping the repo unchanged runs the risk of applying contractionary monetary policy in an economy that is barely growing. Another view is that repo rate decisions are no longer about the midpoint of the target band, but rather about the proposed new target of 3%. With a lower target in mind, it may not make sense to cut the repo rate just yet. I think the Reserve Bank has already made a strong case for the benefits of a lower target. Their models show that because inflation is already low, the cost of moving to a lower target is minimal. They don't believe interest rates will need to stay high for long, nor that much economic growth will be sacrificed in the process. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading However, their whole story rests on several assumptions, and recent research by Codera Analytics shows that there are many factors to consider. One question is how quickly inflation expectations can be anchored to the lower target. It's no use having a lower target if unions continue to base wage demands on historically higher inflation rates. Another question is whether fiscal policy can support the lower target. If public finances deteriorate, long-term interest rates on government debt will rise, and stimulatory fiscal policy could increase inflation. A lower target requires fiscal discipline. Lastly, the government as a price setter must also buy into the lower target. More than 30% of the CPI basket consists of administered prices, which in recent years have increased at rates far above the headline inflation rate. To achieve a lower average inflation rate while, for example, electricity tariffs, rates and taxes are rising steeply, those parts of the economy where prices are flexible will take interest rate strain at a high cost for the private sector. I don't think the MPC's decision will be driven by the idea of a new lower target. They need political buy-in and the inflation targets set for the next Budget cycle are at the 4.5% mid-point. But I also think that the decision about the target cannot be delayed much longer. Uncertainty does nothing to help manage expectations. Waldo Krugell is a Professor of Economics, North-West University, Potchefstroom. Image: Supplied Waldo Krugell is a Professor of Economics, North-West University, Potchefstroom. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL BUSINESS REPORT
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Why Parliament's buildings were uninsured during the devastating fire
The restoration and rebuilding work is set to be completed in November 2026 for the New Assembly building and the following month in the Old Assembly just in time for the State of the Nation Address in 2027. Image: Phando Jikelo / Independent Newspapers The buildings of Parliament were not insured when they were gutted by fire three years ago, Secretary to Parliament Xolile George said on Friday. 'The State does not insure immovable property to a large extent as we know, including movable property. There is no insurance. It covers that by placing funds to rebuild whenever there are issues or replaces those assets,' he said. George was responding to questions from MPs when implementing agent, the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) and Parliament briefed the Joint Standing Committee of Financial Management of Parliament on the rebuilding and restoration work. George also said the National Treasury had issued an instruction note in 2007 that clearly stated departments not to insure immovable properties. 'These buildings were not insured at the time of the fire. The replacement is done as per appropriation from the national fiscus to rebuild. We may not know the reasons for that, given the large scale of the portfolio of the state. It might have been informed by these considerations. I don't know,' he added. During the meeting, MPs heard that at least R574 million has been spent to date on rebuilding the buildings gutted by fire in January 2022. DBSA group executive for infrastructure delivery, Chuene Ramphele, said the cost of restoring and rebuilding the gutted buildings was R4.4 billion. 'We have already spent R574 million. These are reconciled by the National Treasury and Parliament,' Ramphele said. He told the MPs that the work done at the precinct had entailed five work streams that included enabling a work safe access route, MPs' offices, rubble removal, asset recovery, and spatial planning and designs, among other things. Ramphele also said the gutted buildings were a crime scene after the devastating fire until 2023. 'It was under police watch. That was lifted in February 2023. Technically, work started in March 2023,' he said. However, Ramphele said there was much significant work completed at that particular time. He said some of the achievements were the demolition work which came to the tune of R73m. The designs were completed in November 2023 and presented to the multi-party forum and chief whips in January 2024. The heritage application process, started in November 2023 in consultation with the South African Heritage Resource Agency, was approved in December 2024 following an intensive consultative process. Ramphele also said the construction and restoration have started after construction companies were appointed following the issuing of a work permit for construction by the Department of Employment and Labour. He said work was happening underground. 'You may not see things really happening. You see cranes. We started the kind of work happening in the basement,' he said. The presentation made to the committee showed that work in the New Assembly and Old Assembly would be completed in November 2026 and January 2027, respectively, just in time for the State of the Nation Address. Ramphele said they projected to commission, test, and hand over the New Assembly in November 2026. 'At that time, the building will be practically complete at 95%. It can really be used.' He stated that the building can be used around January 2027. Ramphele also said the Old Assembly will be commissioned, tested, and handed over in January 2027. He said they were monitoring the timelines closely. 'We really work hard with contractors, consultants, Parliament, and everyone involved to make sure these milestones are achieved and get these buildings completed,' Ramphele said. George echoed the sentiments of MPs that issues of weather could not be used as an excuse for not completing the project unless something unreasonable happened. However, George said a stream of ground was found under the Old Assembly buildings. 'It is known that the stream has always existed. I think the engineers, like any other, would find answers so that it does not materially impact the progress per set timelines. We will be watching that also to ensure the project is completed as planned,' he said. [email protected]
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Weekly economic wrap: local politics and US tariffs coming next week
While inflation remained low in June, the picture can change from 1 August if the US tariff on South Africa remains at 30%. It was another busy week on the local political front, with a minister fired, while on the international front countries are waiting to see if US president Donald Trump will TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) or stick to his guns and implement the tariffs he recently proposed. Lisette IJssel de Schepper, chief economist at the Bureau for Economic Research (BER) says while it was a big week on the local political front, there was some constructive momentum. President Cyril Ramaphosa dismissed higher education and training minister Nobuhle Nkabane who is facing accusations that she misled parliament. After Nkabane's dismissal, the DA agreed to support the departmental budget on higher education, essentially clearing the way for the Appropriation Bill to be passed. 'While this will not be the last test for the government of national unity (GNU), she says it is a welcome sign that Budget 3.0 can now be finalised, allowing attention to shift toward the October medium term budget policy statement (MTBPS),' De Schepper said. ALSO READ: 'Open our eyes and ears' – Ramaphosa on how to tackle US tariff hike on SA cars US tariffs: will Trump TACO? She said that ahead of next week's 1 August deadline, Trump announced another 'massive' trade deal. Japan and the US agreed on a 15% reciprocal tariff, rather than the 25% that Trump initially threatened. 'Reports suggest that the European Union and the US are nearing a deal, also for 15%, but this has not been confirmed. Unlike other nations or regions, the EU already announced that it has a retaliatory package ready to implement, if necessary, which puts the global economy at additional risk should negotiations fail. 'Trump has said that 15% will probably serve as a floor for reciprocal tariffs, which means the UK was 'lucky' to have been able to settle at 10% early on. In addition to Japan, a deal was reached with the Philippines, with tariffs at 19%, in line with Indonesia and just below Vietnam's 20%.' ALSO READ: JSE All Share Index hit 100k points Oil and gold lower as risk appetite increases Bianca Botes, Citadel Global director, commenting on commodities, says Brent crude breached $69/barrel as markets cheered progress on a US-EU trade agreement, anticipating that reduced tensions would spur global growth and oil demand. 'Supply-side forces further bolstered prices, including constrained Russian exports and tighter diesel markets due to new EU import restrictions and talks of sanctions on Russian oil. These factors offset demand concerns and underpinned the week's rally,' she said Botes saidgold hovered near $3 360 per ounce, consolidating earlier gains after a midweek pullback as risk appetite improved. 'Easing of global trade frictions and equity records prompted some investors to rotate out of safe haven assets, but gold still managed a 0.6% rise for the week, benefiting from lingering uncertainty around US Fed policy and geopolitics.' ALSO READ: Economists lower GDP growth forecast due to global and domestic risks Rand firmed against the dollar this week Turning to the rand, Botes says it firmed against the dollar, moving in tandem with rising JSE equities and elevated commodity prices. 'Steadiness in domestic bond yields, resilient mining sector profits and improved global risk appetite provided support for the currency, despite local growth and fiscal headwinds.' Busisiwe Nkonki and Isaac Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, said the rand gained strength on Wednesday, trading at R17.55/$ against the dollar, as inflation increased slightly, suggesting the Reserve Bank (Sarb) may proceed with further interest rate cuts. 'Renewed optimism on the GNU also supported the local unit. All parties in the GNU supported the 2025 Appropriation Bill, dampening earlier fears of a deadlock after the DA threatened to oppose the bill if the president did not act against a truant cabinet minister. 'However, the local unit surrendered some of the gains this morning to trade around R17.77/$ this afternoon.' ALSO READ: Inflation still low enough for repo rate cut, but only in September – economists Inflation edged up to 3% in June as expected Inflation edged up to 3% in June from 2.8% in May, driven by food and non-alcoholic beverages that increased by 5.1% and housing and utilities that increased by 4.4%. The increase in food inflation was mainly driven by an acceleration in meat prices (6.6%) amid supply chain issues due to avian flu and foot and mouth disease, Tshepiso Maroga, economist at the BER, says. Mamello Matikinca-Ngwenya, Siphamandla Mkhwanazi, Thanda Sithole and Koketso Mano, economists at FNB, say they see headline inflation rising to 3.6% in July, as utility and food costs ratchet up and fuel deflation moderates. For the year, they forecast average headline inflation of 3.5%. Nkonki and Matshego also said the increase was in line with their expectations. 'The food price increases were caused by temporary restrictions on poultry imports from Brazil due to avian flu, some tightening in local red meat supplies due to new outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease and the lingering impact of earlier floods on vegetable and fruit supplies.'
