Anti-rape laws: How many States passed them and have they been implemented?
'Increased rate of crime against women is an area of concern for the law-makers and it points out an emergent need to study in depth, the root of the problem and remedy the same through a strict law and order regime. There are a number of legislations and numerous penal provisions to punish the offenders of violence against women. However, it becomes important to ensure that gender justice does not remain only on paper,' wrote Justice Bhanumathi in her verdict upholding the death penalty for the Nirbhaya rape convicts in 2017. However, the apex Court's warning does not seem to have fructified.
Over the years, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Haryana, Arunachal Pradesh and West Bengal have passed Bills which mete out stricter punishment in rape cases. Here's a look at these bills and their ongoing journey to becoming law.
2013: Central law
Nation-wide protests erupted in the wake of the gang-rape of a 22-year-old medical intern in December 2012, spurring Parliament to pass the Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2013 in March that year. The revised Bill amended various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Indian Evidence Act and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, making punishment for sexual crimes more stringent.
The Bill sentences a rape convict to rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than 20 years, which may extend to life. For repeat offenders, the Bill allows the sentencing of the convict to death. Stalking and voyeurism were defined as non-bailable offences if repeated for a second time, while acid attack convicts could now be sentenced up to 10 years. Within a fortnight, the President gave his assent to the Bill, making it a law.
2017-2018: Bills in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana, Arunachal and Centre
Following rising rape cases and the quick passage of the above Act, several States passed their own amendments to the Indian Penal Code, bringing in more stringent punishment for rape cases.
In December 2017, Madhya Pradesh was the first to pass a Bill amending the Criminal Law Act, 2013, increasing imprisonment terms and permitting the death penalty to those found guilty of raping girls aged 12 and below. Bills with the same provision were passed by Rajasthan, Haryana and Arunachal Pradesh in March 2018.
Sensing the need for stricter legislation to protect minors, the Parliament passed the Criminal Law (Amendment), 2018 in August that year. The Bill increased the minimum punishment for rape from seven to ten years of imprisonment and awarded a minimum imprisonment of twenty years extendable to life or death, in cases where the rape victim was below twelve years of age. It also punished those convicted of raping girls below 16 years with imprisonment of twenty years or life. However, punishment for rape of boys remain unchanged. The Bill received the President's nod within a week, negating the need for the above-mentioned State-specific legislations.
2019: Bills in Andhra Pradesh
Following outrage sparked by the rape of a 26-year-old veterinarian on November 27, 2019, the Andhra Pradesh Assembly passed two Bills — the AP Special Courts for Specified Offences against Women and Children Act 2019, and AP Disha Act - Criminal Law (AP Amendment) Act 2019, within a fortnight.
These two bills constituted exclusive special courts in every district for speedy trial of specified offences against women and children and awarded upto (i) life imprisonment to those convicted for aggravated sexual assault on children, (ii) capital punishment if convicted for rape and murder of a woman. It also set a 14-day deadline for filing chargesheets and shortened the disposal time for appeals against such sentences to three months.
The Bill was passed unanimously on December 13, 2019 and then-CM Jagan Mohan Reddy lauded the Telangana Police for gunning down all four accused, a week prior to the Bill's passing. A Supreme Court-appointed commission concluded that the encounter was staged, recommending that all 10 police officers be booked for murder.
Despite constant lobbying by Mr. Reddy, both Bills await the President's assent. With the legality of the Bills in question, the current State government led by N. Chandrababu Naidu has launched the 'Shakti App' - a safety app for women in distress to access emergency services.
2021: Bill in Maharashtra
In 2021, amidst the furore over the gang-rape of a 15-year-old girl by at least 33 men, over a period of nine months, the Maharashtra Assembly passed the Shakti Criminal Laws (Maharashtra Amendment) Bill, 2020. The Bill introduced the death penalty for those convicted for rape, gang-rape and acid attacks causing severe harm. It also sets a 30-day deadline each for - (i) completion of investigation, (ii) filing chargesheet and (iii) day-to-day trial after filing of chargesheet and (iv) disposal of appeal against the verdict. The Bill also punishes false complaints, intimidation, and defamation of women.
After power changed hands from Uddhav Thackeray to Eknath Shinde, the Bill was sent to the President, and was returned with queries indicating that several Supreme Court judgements were overstepped by the Bill. In 2023, the Parliament passed three amended criminal laws —Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Bharatiya Sakshaya Act (BSA)— replacing the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and the Indian Evidence Act.
Following their their passage, the Centre has asked the current government, headed by Devendra Fadnavis, whether there is a need for the Bill. Mr. Fadnavis has stated that his cabinet will review the Bill, make amendments and retable it, if necessary.
2023: Central law
Replacing the British-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 was passed by Parliament, introducing significant changes to punishment for sexual offences and making the law more gender-neutral. Replacing 'minor girl' with 'child', BNS makes procuring those under the age of 18 for sexual exploitation a punishable offence. It classifies rape based on the age of the victim (whether under 18, 16 or 12), and introduces provisions meting out different senetences for convicts in each category. Rape of a minor girl by one or a group is punishable by life imprisonment or death.
Under the BNS, sexual intercourse with a woman by deceitful means or making false promises is punishable by up to 10 years in prison. While rape is punishable by up to ten years of imprisonment, aggravated forms of rape will be punished by imprisonment for 10 years or life.
The Act does not criminalise marital rape nor does it include men in its core definition of rape. Sexual offences against men and transgender people may be added later, Union officials have said.
This Bill, along with the other two criminal laws, was signed into law by President Murmu and is in effect since July 1, 2024.
2024: Bill in West Bengal
A month after a 31-year-old doctor was raped and murdered inside Kolkata's R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, the West Bengal Assembly passed the Aparajita Woman and Child Bill (West Bengal Criminal Laws and Amendment), 2024 in September last year. Amending three Central Acts (the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the POCSO Act 2012) for West Bengal, the Bill awards up to death penalty to perpetrators convicted for a rape which either resulted in the victim's death or left her in a vegetative state; and life sentence without parole for other perpetrators.
Similar to its sister legislations in Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh, this Bill sought to expedite investigations by introducing a limit of 21 days from the reporting of the crime, provided for the setting up of special courts to hear such cases speedily and introduced a fine on the convict which shall be 'fair and reasonable' to meet the medical expenses and rehabilitation of the victim. This Bill has been sent to President Droupadi Murmu for her assent. A delegation of TMC MPs, including Derek O'Brien, Sudip Bandyopadhyay, Protima Mondal, Dola Sen, Mahua Moitra and Sagarika Ghose, among others, met with the President in February, urging her to sign this Bill into law.
2025: Bill in Tamil Nadu
In January, the Tamil Nadu Assembly passed the Criminal Laws (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Bill, 2025 which proposed a minimum of 14 years of rigorous imprisonment for a rape convict. If the accused is a member of the police force, it seeks to double the minimum to rigorous imprisonment for 20 years. It also awards life term as the minimum punishment and death penalty as the maximum if the rape victim is a girl aged below 12 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Offence by Prajwal Revanna could be construed as offence against society at large: Court
The Special Court of Sessions for criminal cases against former and present MPs and MLAs while awarding 'imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life' to former Hassan MP Prajwal Revanna, said that the offence in this case 'could be construed as an offence committed towards the society at large wherein women are worshiped'. In his order, judge Santosh Gajanan Bhat further said that 'the question of commission of an offence by a legislator is a serious aspect'. Terming the case, where the victim is a former help at the accused's family farm as a 'David vs Goliath' battle, Mr. Bhat said that 'committing sexual offences against a maid and other women in society by showing disdain towards them due to their economic condition is a grave offence' and that 'the act of committing forcible sexual intercourse on the victim repeatedly would be more than committing of murder'. Quoting the Sanskrit saying 'Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitaha...', the judge said that 'dharma should not be destroyed so that we may not be destroyed as a consequence thereof' and awarded the maximum punishment under Section 376(2)(n) (repeated rape on the same woman) of Indian Penal Code for Prajwal Revanna. The judgment rejects appeals for leniency by the convict's counsel on the grounds that he has to look after his former Prime Minister grandfather and aging parents and that he had no criminal antecedents, among other grounds. Victim's statement key to conviction The 480-page judgment examines the victim's statement at length and considers depositions by multiple witnesses, including her sister who was working with her and other family members, Prajwal's driver Karthik, who allegedly copied the explicit clips from the MP's phone, to corroborate the same and rejected defence's arguments that there were contradictions in the same. The defence had argued that the victim had never worked at the Gannikada farmhouse and it did not belong to the Revanna family in 2021, when the crime was committed. It further argued that the victim was unable to tell the date of the crimes. However, the court concludes that the depositions by Karthik, the victim's sister and the victim's son studying at a school in Gannikada for three years, proved that she worked there. Further, the defence's contradictory stands itself indicated that they accepted that she worked at the farm, the court concludes. Further, the farmhouse belonged to Bhavani Revanna's brother Prakash since 2015 and was bought by Suraj Revanna in October, 2021 and the family, including Prajwal was using the same, the court concludes through multiple witnesses. Regarding the dates of the two sexual assaults, the court concludes that the victim being a rustic villager, also an illiterate, though may not have told the exact dates, was consistent with the timeline of events, as during COVID-19 lockdown and four years before she lodged the complaint. The court also quotes the statement of the victim's sister who was with her when she was abused at Basavanagudi, though the victim did not confide in her then. The sister told the court that on the third day of their visit to Basavanagudi, where the victim was raped, her sister was dull and upon enquiry, she was silently uttering that they cannot do anything. The court said this 'would become relevant because of the fact of the behaviour of the victim immediately after the incident'. Corroborative evidence Apart from the victim's statement, the judgment further relies on two scientific evidences. 'The prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt about the commission of the incident by placing corroborative evidence of the scientific experts in the form of DNA Examination Report wherein the stains found on the sari and other clothes of the victim matched with the DNA profiling of accused Prajwal Revanna. The prosecution has also proved the digital records in the form of videos which were circulated were not edited/morphed and also the male and female voice found in the videos matched with the sample voice of accused Prajwal Revanna and the victim,' the judgment said.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
After PM Modi, Amit Shah meets President Murmu amid Parliament logjam over Bihar voter list row
Union Home Minister Amit Shah called on President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan here on Sunday. The meeting came hours after Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on the President. The reasons behind the subsequent meetings of the prime minister and the home minister with the President were not known. "Union Minister for Home Affairs and Cooperation, Shri Amit Shah called on President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan," the Rashtrapati Bhavan wrote on 'X'. The back-to-back meetings come in the backdrop of the logjam in Parliament over the opposition demand for a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections in the state. Since the Monsoon session began on July 21, Parliament has seen little business except discussions in both Houses on Operation Sindoor. The prime minister's meeting with the President also came days after US President Donald Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on exports from India and an unspecified penalty because of New Delhi's purchases of Russian military equipment and oil. The prime minister's meeting with the President also came days after US President Donald Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on exports from India and an unspecified penalty because of New Delhi's purchases of Russian military equipment and oil. On Saturday, PM Modi visited Varanasi and released the 20th instalment of PM Kisan Samman Nidhi, transferring more than ₹ 20,500 crore into the bank accounts of 9.7 crore farmers.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Punjab: Sanjeev Arora resigns as Hampton Sky Realty MD
Agency: PTI Last Updated: Chandigarh, Aug 3 (PTI) Punjab Minister Sanjeev Arora on Sunday said that he has tendered his resignation as the managing director of Hampton Sky Realty Ltd. 'Pursuant to my appointment as a Cabinet Minister in the @PbGovtIndia and my election as a Member of the Legislative Assembly, I have formally resigned from the position of Managing Director of Hampton Sky Realty Ltd. and its wholly owned subsidiaries," said Arora in a post on X. 'This step has been taken to ensure that I can dedicate my complete focus and energy toward serving the people of Punjab with sincerity, transparency, and unwavering commitment. I thank the entire team at Hampton Sky Realty for their constant support during my tenure," he added. Arora, who was elected the MLA from the Ludhiana West seat in the bypolls held in June, is the state's Industry and Commerce, Investment Promotion and NRI Affairs minister. He wrote to the board of directors of Hampton Sky Realty Ltd regarding his resignation. 'It is with a deep sense of gratitude and respect that I tender my resignation from the office of Managing Director of Hampton Sky Realty Ltd. ('the Company"), with effect from August 03, 2025, pursuant to the provisions of Section 168 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the applicable rules made thereunder," said Arora in his letter. 'In light of the paramount public interest and constitutional responsibilities not only it is incumbent upon me, but it is even unequivocally untenable for me to continue holding the office of managing director in the company," he added. 'Accordingly, I hereby relinquish any association with the directorship(s) forthwith, as continuing to hold such office would be incompatible with the imperatives of my current constitutional duties, and may serve as a hindrance in fulfilment of my aspirations to serve the public at large," read his resignation letter. 'Also, I hereby tender my resignation from the Directorship(s) from the three wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company as well with immediate effect,"it said. Arora said that he always endeavoured to discharge his duty with diligence and integrity, adding he was confident the company will continue on its path of responsible growth under the current leadership's stewardship. The 61-year-old had defeated Congress candidate Bharat Bhushan Ashu by a margin of 10,637 votes in the Ludhiana West Assembly bypolls. PTI CHS AS AS view comments First Published: August 03, 2025, 20:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
