logo
Thousands in Oxfordshire pledge to keep children smartphone-free

Thousands in Oxfordshire pledge to keep children smartphone-free

BBC News29-05-2025
The parents of nearly 4,000 Oxfordshire children have pledged to deny them a smartphone until at least the end of Year Nine.It is part of the "parent pact" launched by campaign group Smartphone Free Childhood.The group warns that mobiles "can cause a whole host of problems, from triggering anxiety and eating disorders, to opening the door to cyberbullying or sexual predators".It comes alongside calls to ban mobiles in all Oxford schools, though studies are mixed on whether that would make a difference to grades and behaviour.
The idea behind the pledge is to have enough parents withholding phones that their children are not left out as only one in their classes without a device.So far, students at 270 schools in the county have been signed up, with Europa School UK in Culham garnering 204 pledges.
The group's spin-off campaign Smartphone Free Schools said that a ban on devices during learning hours would "boost learning, protect mental health, improve behaviour, create safer spaces [and] protect childhood."Will Orr-Ewing, who runs the Oxfordshire branch of the campaign and works in education, said that having mobiles in lessons was extremely distracting."The average child in the UK receives 237 notifications per day. If you scale that to a class of 30 kids, that's a phone pinging every few seconds," he said."It's now known that smartphones are heavily implicated in the catastrophic decline in young people's mental health over the past decade."If young people can access inappropriate content and apps during the school day then, unintentionally though it may be, schools are neglecting the welfare of their students."Meanwhile, schools across Oxfordshire are introducing policies to restrict phone access.Students at Aureus School in Didcot have to stow their phones in a lockable pouch every day before they enter the school.
Reflecting on the change it has made, head teacher Kirsty Rogers said: "It's incredible. The lack of disruption to lessons now is huge."The school's previous policy was to confiscate phones when they were spotted in lessons, but Mrs Rogers said teachers were wary of doing this "through fear of what was going to happen". "Students are absolutely addicted to these phones, and so you don't know how they're going to react to you when you say you need to confiscate them," she said. The lockable pouches were unpopular when they were first introduced, but many students have now said they have got used to them."People used to get sad and angry because of something on their phone," one student said. "But now their presence of mind is in school and they can study better.""When I'm studying, I feel more comfortable leaving it out of my reach and focusing on my education more," another added.
Studies are divided on whether prohibiting phones in schools helps studying, however.Research by the Policy Exchange found that children at schools with an effective ban achieved GCSE results one to two grades higher than those at other schools.But a University of Birmingham study found such bans were not linked to better grades, mental wellbeing, sleep or classroom behaviour.Importantly, though, they noted that spending longer on smartphones and social media in general was linked with worse results for all of those measures.The conclusion of lead author Dr Victoria Goodyear was "those bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts"."We need to do more than just ban phones in schools," she said.
'Everyone is on side'
Currently, there is no legislation enforcing a phones in school policy. It is down to individual head teachers what they do.But for Oxford City councillor Jo Sandelson, that is not enough.She has put forward a motion to the council calling for it to support an outright ban on smartphones in all Oxford schools for under-16s.Though the council has no powers to enforce such a ban, she said "key messages coming out from the city would really show everyone is on side"."Everyone is saying the same thing. These children are better off without the distraction of smartphones at schools," she said. "What Eric Smit, the ex-boss of Google, says is why would we run such a large, uncontrolled experiment on the most important people in the world? Which is the next generation."In March, the government said it believed head teachers already had the power to ban phones in schools, with its official guidance saying "schools should develop a mobile phone policy that prohibits the use of mobile phones" during lesson time.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump showed ‘willingness' to move on whisky tariffs during meeting
Trump showed ‘willingness' to move on whisky tariffs during meeting

North Wales Chronicle

time18 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Trump showed ‘willingness' to move on whisky tariffs during meeting

Scotland's First Minister met the president ahead of the opening of a second course at his Aberdeenshire golf club, where he pressed him on the 10% levy on Scotland's national drink. The tariff, it is believed, costs the sector £4 million per week, with distillery bosses keen to reach an agreement as part of the US-UK trade deal. Speaking to the PA news agency after the opening of the course, the First Minister said: 'I think there's a willingness for President Trump to look at the issues that I've set out to him. 'I don't think that was the position a few days ago, because I think President Trump was of the view that the trade deal was done and dusted and that was an end of the matter.' Mr Swinney told Mr Trump Scotch whisky was 'unique' to Scotland and the tariff was a 'significant impediment'. 'I think there is an opportunity for us to make progress,' he added. 'I wouldn't have expected to be able to get an outcome in the course of the discussion I had yesterday and this morning with President Trump, but we will follow this up with the US administration, follow up with the United Kingdom Government, to make the progress that I think Scotland would expect on this matter.' The president was asked about whisky tariffs by journalists at his Ayrshire golf course on Monday, where he appeared not to know there was an issue. 'We'll talk about that, I didn't know whisky was a problem,' Mr Trump said. 'I'm not a big whisky drinker but maybe I should be.'

Trump showed ‘willingness' to move on whisky tariffs during meeting
Trump showed ‘willingness' to move on whisky tariffs during meeting

Rhyl Journal

time18 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Trump showed ‘willingness' to move on whisky tariffs during meeting

Scotland's First Minister met the president ahead of the opening of a second course at his Aberdeenshire golf club, where he pressed him on the 10% levy on Scotland's national drink. The tariff, it is believed, costs the sector £4 million per week, with distillery bosses keen to reach an agreement as part of the US-UK trade deal. Speaking to the PA news agency after the opening of the course, the First Minister said: 'I think there's a willingness for President Trump to look at the issues that I've set out to him. 'I don't think that was the position a few days ago, because I think President Trump was of the view that the trade deal was done and dusted and that was an end of the matter.' Mr Swinney told Mr Trump Scotch whisky was 'unique' to Scotland and the tariff was a 'significant impediment'. 'I think there is an opportunity for us to make progress,' he added. 'I wouldn't have expected to be able to get an outcome in the course of the discussion I had yesterday and this morning with President Trump, but we will follow this up with the US administration, follow up with the United Kingdom Government, to make the progress that I think Scotland would expect on this matter.' The president was asked about whisky tariffs by journalists at his Ayrshire golf course on Monday, where he appeared not to know there was an issue. 'We'll talk about that, I didn't know whisky was a problem,' Mr Trump said. 'I'm not a big whisky drinker but maybe I should be.'

Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology
Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Farage labels Kyle's comments ‘below the belt' and reiterates call for apology

Nigel Farage has reiterated his demands for a Cabinet minister to apologise for accusing him of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'. A row broke out on Tuesday morning after Peter Kyle said the Reform UK leader is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile' over the party's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act. Mr Farage labelled Technology Secretary Mr Kyle's remarks as 'below the belt' and 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief', and urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed. Former Reform chair Zia Yusuf said on Monday that the party would repeal the legislation if they got into Government. 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws,' Mr Kyle told Sky News. 'So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Responding to Mr Kyle on a live stream on Tuesday morning, Mr Farage said: 'Just how low can the Labour Government sink in its desperation? 'Yes, of course they're in trouble. They're well behind us in the opinion polls. But frankly, to say that I would do anything that would in any way aid and abet people like Jimmy Savile, it's so below the belt it's almost not true.' He also reiterated his demand for an apology and added: 'We're not going to get one. I think perhaps the best thing we can do is to sign the petition to repeal the Online Safety Act. That's what I'm going to do today. I think it makes sense. I'm deeply worried about the implications for free speech.' Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Mr Yusuf has said that the laws work to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-Government speech'. After being asked by Mr Farage to apologise on social media, Mr Kyle doubled down on his comments, claiming that wanting to 'overturn' the Act puts somebody 'on the side of predators'. Mr Yusuf has claimed that Mr Kyle's remarks showed 'how deeply unserious' the Government was about child safety, adding: 'Talking about Jimmy Savile in that way does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.' He told Sky News that the comments are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember. And that's quite a high bar, frankly.' Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone. 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store