
Thousands in Oxfordshire pledge to keep children smartphone-free
The idea behind the pledge is to have enough parents withholding phones that their children are not left out as only one in their classes without a device.So far, students at 270 schools in the county have been signed up, with Europa School UK in Culham garnering 204 pledges.
The group's spin-off campaign Smartphone Free Schools said that a ban on devices during learning hours would "boost learning, protect mental health, improve behaviour, create safer spaces [and] protect childhood."Will Orr-Ewing, who runs the Oxfordshire branch of the campaign and works in education, said that having mobiles in lessons was extremely distracting."The average child in the UK receives 237 notifications per day. If you scale that to a class of 30 kids, that's a phone pinging every few seconds," he said."It's now known that smartphones are heavily implicated in the catastrophic decline in young people's mental health over the past decade."If young people can access inappropriate content and apps during the school day then, unintentionally though it may be, schools are neglecting the welfare of their students."Meanwhile, schools across Oxfordshire are introducing policies to restrict phone access.Students at Aureus School in Didcot have to stow their phones in a lockable pouch every day before they enter the school.
Reflecting on the change it has made, head teacher Kirsty Rogers said: "It's incredible. The lack of disruption to lessons now is huge."The school's previous policy was to confiscate phones when they were spotted in lessons, but Mrs Rogers said teachers were wary of doing this "through fear of what was going to happen". "Students are absolutely addicted to these phones, and so you don't know how they're going to react to you when you say you need to confiscate them," she said. The lockable pouches were unpopular when they were first introduced, but many students have now said they have got used to them."People used to get sad and angry because of something on their phone," one student said. "But now their presence of mind is in school and they can study better.""When I'm studying, I feel more comfortable leaving it out of my reach and focusing on my education more," another added.
Studies are divided on whether prohibiting phones in schools helps studying, however.Research by the Policy Exchange found that children at schools with an effective ban achieved GCSE results one to two grades higher than those at other schools.But a University of Birmingham study found such bans were not linked to better grades, mental wellbeing, sleep or classroom behaviour.Importantly, though, they noted that spending longer on smartphones and social media in general was linked with worse results for all of those measures.The conclusion of lead author Dr Victoria Goodyear was "those bans in isolation are not enough to tackle the negative impacts"."We need to do more than just ban phones in schools," she said.
'Everyone is on side'
Currently, there is no legislation enforcing a phones in school policy. It is down to individual head teachers what they do.But for Oxford City councillor Jo Sandelson, that is not enough.She has put forward a motion to the council calling for it to support an outright ban on smartphones in all Oxford schools for under-16s.Though the council has no powers to enforce such a ban, she said "key messages coming out from the city would really show everyone is on side"."Everyone is saying the same thing. These children are better off without the distraction of smartphones at schools," she said. "What Eric Smit, the ex-boss of Google, says is why would we run such a large, uncontrolled experiment on the most important people in the world? Which is the next generation."In March, the government said it believed head teachers already had the power to ban phones in schools, with its official guidance saying "schools should develop a mobile phone policy that prohibits the use of mobile phones" during lesson time.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sir James Cleverly to make frontbench comeback as Kemi Badenoch reshuffles team
Sir James Cleverly is expected to return to the Conservative front bench as Kemi Badenoch makes changes to her senior team. The Leader of the Opposition is expected to reshuffle her shadow cabinet on Tuesday. A Conservative source said: 'The Leader of the Opposition will be making some changes to her frontbench team today. 'The changes reflect the next stage of the party's policy renewal programme and underline the unity of the party under new leadership. 'Sir James Cleverly is expected to return in a prominent frontbench role to take the fight to this dreadful Labour Government.' Sir James served as both foreign secretary and home secretary when the Conservatives were in power. He stood as a candidate in last year's Conservative leadership election, but lost out on the Tory top job ahead of the final heat between Mrs Badenoch and her now-shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick. Since the leadership contest, Sir James has returned to the Tory back benches as the MP for Braintree. He has used his influential position as a former minister to warn against pursuing populist agenda akin to Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Appearing at the Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) think tank last week, the senior Tory hit out at calls to 'smash the system' and 'start again from scratch', branding them 'complete nonsense'. He also appeared to take a different position on net zero from party leader Mrs Badenoch in a recent speech, urging the Conservatives to reject climate change 'luddites' on the right who believe 'the way things are now is just fine'. A list of full changes to the Conservative frontbench team will be announced on Tuesday afternoon. Allies of shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride believe he will remain in his post, while attention will be focused on whether Mrs Badenoch keeps Mr Jenrick in his current role. The former leadership contender has strayed well beyond his justice brief, building a prominent social media presence with campaigns on a range of issues from tackling fare dodgers on the London Underground to the impact of immigration on housing.


Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour voters back plans to stop wealthy non-doms fleeing Britain
Labour voters would back plans to stop ultra-wealthy individuals fleeing the UK after Rachel Reeves's tax raid prompted thousands to leave. On Tuesday, research published by think tank Onward found that nearly three-quarters (69pc) of Labour supporters would back the Government if it exempted the richest from some taxes in return for them paying a small lump sum in cash and investing in the UK economy. Under Onward's proposal, wealthy residents could be exempt from taxes on foreign income, capital gains, and inheritance for 15 years in return for paying a flat £300,000 fee. They would also have to invest £3m into one of the Government's industrial priorities, such as life sciences, clean energy and financial services, to qualify for the tax break. Sir Simon Clarke, the director of Onward, said: 'It is crazy for us to chase wealthy people out of this country when they could be both paying tax and making a hugely important wider economic contribution here.' The proposal comes as Ms Reeves faces mounting pressure from Labour backbenchers and union backers to make the rich pay more. Ms Reeves has already increased taxes since coming to power last year. These include abolishing the non-dom status and tightening inheritance tax rules, along with tax rises on business. However Labour backbench MPs have increasingly called for a wealth tax from the Chancellor to fix Britain's finances. Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said recently that the public was 'fed up' with the richest going 'unscathed'. He said imposing a 2pc tax on asset values above £10m would deliver £10bn to £11bn for the Treasury. However, Lord Mendelsohn, Labour's former business spokesman, said: 'A small group of wealthy individuals pay a significant proportion of the tax we rely upon. I do not agree with some colleagues that we should wave goodbye to the wealthy.' Many wealthy figures have already left Britain, including Goldman Sachs' most senior UK banker Richard Gnodde, Aston Villa co-owner Nassef Sawiris and Charlie Mullins, the founder of Pimlico Plumbers. Henley & Partners, an advisory firm, expects the UK to lose more millionaires than any other country this year as high taxes drive away the wealthy. According to its research, 16,500 millionaires will leave the UK in 2025 - up from 10,800 last year. Andrew Griffith, shadow business secretary, said: 'There is nothing good about wealth creators fleeing the country leaving the rest of us to pay higher taxes or have worse public services.' Last night, a Treasury spokesman said: 'The UK remains highly attractive. 'Our main capital gains tax rate is lower than any other G7 European country and our new residence-based regime is simpler and more attractive than the previous one, whilst it also addresses tax system unfairness so every long-term resident pays their taxes here.'


BreakingNews.ie
23 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Views sought on plans to criminalise deepfake images of adults
Views are being sought on proposals to criminalise deepfake images of adults in Northern Ireland. Stormont Justice Minister Naomi Long described such images as 'abhorrent behaviour which can have devastating consequences'. Advertisement A public consultation has been launched on proposals to criminalise the creation and sharing of sexually explicit deepfake images of adults in an effort to protect the public from growing issues relating to the use of deepfake technology. Ms Long said it is an issue that can ruin lives. 'I am proposing to criminalise the increasingly prevalent and despicable behaviours of creating and sharing sexually explicit deepfake images, where somebody's image is inserted into sexually explicit content without their consent,' she said. 'It is abhorrent behaviour which can have devastating consequences for those whose identities are misused, the overwhelming majority of whom are women. Advertisement 'Victims report feeling embarrassed, humiliated, violated and unsafe, they can suffer from anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, and some people even consider suicide because of their experiences. 'In short, this is an issue which can ruin lives, which is why we are proposing to criminalise the creation and sharing of sexually explicit deepfake images.' The consultation includes consideration of the sentences that should be available to judges should the creation and sharing of a sexually explicit deepfake image become a criminal offence. Ms Long said deepfake images are another form of sexual abuse. 'The creation of these new offences will add to a suite of measures already in place to protect people from intolerable sexually motivated behaviours and eradicate violence against women and girls,' she said. 'In 2022, I introduced a number of offences to deal with downblousing, upskirting and cyberflashing. 'Sexually explicit deepfake images are another form of sexual abuse and exploitation. I will continue to react and respond to enhance legislation relating to those who misuse developments in technology in such a way.' The consultation will close on October 6 2025.