Great Exhibition Road Festival: What is the weirdest thing in the universe?
For ICL research fellow Mariana Carrillo Gonzalez, the answer is to be found far away from our own planet."My object is black holes," she says.Black holes are regions of space where matter has collapsed in on itself, meaning they have such strong gravity that not even light can escape them.But there's a key problem with them for scientists, explains Mariana."We still have no clue how they work."We can't observe them, we just observe the effects of a black hole. We observe the light that goes around the black hole and we observe how it deforms space and how things move... but we really can't see it because there's nothing that can escape from a black hole."We can prove they are there, we just have no idea what's inside," she adds."I think that's just a very weird thing."
Nevertheless, Rita Ahmadi argues her research specialism is even more bizarre - "Quantum physics, by which I mean the physics of subatomic particles."They have behaviours that are different from the classical physics that you see around yourself, so the rules are different," the postdoctoral researcher explains.Such rules include that "they can be observed in two different states at the same time, which is called superposition", while they also have an unusual problem when trying to observe them as "any interaction with a quantum system changes the state of the quantum system".Rita says such peculiarities mean "we know that the mathematics of quantum mechanics work properly so we know that the model works... but still we cannot make sense of that".Even so, quantum science is still seen as hugely important for the future."My research is quantum computing and I'm building devices out of that even without understanding if it makes sense."
The other researcher taking part is Fernando Ernesto Rosas De Andraca whose area of expertise is another one full of conundrums."I took human consciousness as the weirdest thing I can think of," he says."Our best guess is that consciousness is somehow generated by the brain but most people would argue that single neurons are not conscious."So you have these little parts that are not conscious, you put them together and they are conscious and that's very strange."He also points to other arguments such as "the only thing you cannot doubt is your consciousness, but at the same time consciousness is this thing that nobody else can see so everybody else can doubt it".Elaborating further, Fernando brings up artificial intelligence (AI), declaring it as something he has become "completely obsessed" with."Most people believe that current AI systems are not conscious... but I think most people agree that there is no fundamental limits to say it will never be conscious so then the question is at one point it might become so," he says."We then get into a different arena that we have to be concerned about things like creating a system that can suffer."
The reason for such existential arguments is the festival, which seeks to celebrate science and the arts for people of all ages through activities like insect yoga, quantum discos and robotics."We're always trying to find different and creative ways of exploring some of the topics that we study at Imperial," says James Romero, who is one of the festival organisers for the university."In this case it's challenging the researchers to tweak the public lecture format into a different format and introducing a competitive element into it."Once the three researchers have presented their arguments, a vote will be held with those in the crowd deciding which phenomena should be considered the weirdest in the universe."We thought that the researchers might be too polite to be competitive but clearly that's not necessarily the case," says James, having listened to their arguments."I came from Oxford," replies Rita. "I take debates very seriously."The Weirdest Object in the Universe debate is free to attend and will take place in the Sir Alexander Fleming Building at Imperial College London at 15:30 BST on Saturday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Weedkiller ingredient widely used in US can damage organs and gut bacteria, research shows
The herbicide ingredient used to replace glyphosate in Roundup and other weedkiller products can kill gut bacteria and damage organs in multiple ways, new research shows. The ingredient, diquat, is widely employed in the US as a weedkiller in vineyards and orchards, and is increasingly sprayed elsewhere as the use of controversial herbicide substances such as glyphosate and paraquat drops in the US. But the new piece of data suggests diquat is more toxic than glyphosate, and the substance is banned over its risks in the UK, EU, China and many other countries. Still, the EPA has resisted calls for a ban, and Roundup formulas with the ingredient hit the shelves last year. 'From a human health perspective, this stuff is quite a bit nastier than glyphosate so we're seeing a regrettable substitution, and the ineffective regulatory structure is allowing it,' said Nathan Donley, science director with the Center For Biological Diversity, which advocates for stricter pesticide regulations but was not involved in the new research. 'Regrettable substitution' is a scientific term used to describe the replacement of a toxic substance in a consumer product with an ingredient that is also toxic. Diquat is also thought to be a neurotoxin, carcinogen and linked to Parkinson's disease. An October analysis of EPA data by the Friends of the Earth non-profit found it is about 200 times more toxic than glyphosate in terms of chronic exposure. Bayer, which makes Roundup, faced nearly 175,000 lawsuits alleging that the product's users were harmed by the product. Bayer, which bought Monsanto in 2018, reformulated Roundup after the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a possible carcinogen. The new review of scientific literature in part focuses on the multiple ways in which diquat damages organs and gut bacteria, including by reducing the level of proteins that are key pieces of the gut lining. The weakening can allow toxins and pathogens to move from the stomach into the bloodstream, and trigger inflammation in the intestines and throughout the body. Meanwhile, diquat can inhibit the production of beneficial bacteria that maintain the gut lining. Damage to the lining also inhibits the absorption of nutrients and energy metabolism, the authors said. The research further scrutinizes how the substance harms the kidneys, lungs and liver. Diquat 'causes irreversible structural and functional damage to the kidneys' because it can destroy kidney cells' membranes and interfere with cell signals. The effects on the liver are similar, and the ingredient causes the production of proteins that inflame the organ. Meanwhile, it seems to attack the lungs by triggering inflammation that damages the organ's tissue. More broadly, the inflammation caused by diquat may cause multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, a scenario in which organ systems begin to fail. The authors note that many of the studies are on rodents and more research on low, long-term exposure is needed. Bayer did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Despite the risks amid a rise in diquat's use, the EPA is not reviewing the chemical, and even non-profits that push for tighter pesticide regulations have largely focused their attention elsewhere. Donley said that was in part because US pesticide regulations are so weak that advocates are tied up with battles over ingredients like glyphosate, paraquat and chlorpyrifos – substances that are banned elsewhere but still widely used here. Diquat is 'overshadowed' by those ingredients. 'Other countries have banned diquat, but in the US we're still fighting the fights that Europe won 20 years ago,' Donley said. 'It hasn't gotten to the radar of most groups and that really says a lot about the sad and sorry state of pesticides in the US.' Some advocates have accused the EPA of being captured by industry, and Donley said US pesticide laws were so weak that it was difficult for the agency to ban ingredients, even if the will exists. For example, the agency banned chlorpyrifos in 2022, but a court overturned the decision after industry sued. Moreover, the EPA's pesticides office seems to have a philosophy that states that toxic pesticides are a 'necessary evil', Donley said. 'When you approach an issue from that lens there's only so much you will do,' he said.
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Toxic metals found in UK peatlands could pose health risk
"Cutting edge" research by a team at Queen's University Belfast (QUB) has found toxic heavy metals stored in peatlands across the say wildfires - and the effects of climate change - could see decades' worth of pollutants like lead, arsenic, mercury and cadmium, released into our water scientists say the findings make re-wetting and restoring peatlands even more vital, to protect environmental and human are well-known carbon sinks, locking away greenhouse gases in their watery depths. They have also been absorbing the industrial pollution that humans have been generating for two centuries. The QUB team, led by Professor Graeme Swindles, has been examining cores from across the UK, Ireland and further afield, as part of a global study with many other pollution has even been found in samples from the remote Northern Arctic."It's quite staggering to find such high levels in our peatlands that you think are these incredibly pristine places in many ways," said Prof Swindles."But no - they have been affected by our pollution." PhD student Ellie Purdy "jumped" at the chance to work on the project."It's basically just about how what we're doing is affecting the environment."And even though these contaminants were once stored in these peatlands they're now being released under climate warming," she said it is a cause of concern for the future. She has been looking specifically at cores from Ellesmere Island in the Canadian High Arctic. Finding heavy metal contamination in "an extremely remote area with little civilisation around", it has been "eye-opening" for her."It just shows how connected we are throughout the globe," she said. Peatlands cover around 12% of Northern Ireland. In good condition, they form new peat at a rate of just 1mm a more than 80% of them are in a poor or degraded state, largely due to burning or being drained for peat in the QUB labs evaluate how a changing climate might affect Richard Fewster has focused on the potential impact of three likely scenarios - a warming climate, wildfires and summer all three affect how peat behaves, burning has potentially the greatest impact. He said: "We're seeing that burning actually mobilises some of the metals within the peatland much more rapidly, in a sort of a 'big pulse' event early on in the experiment that we don't see in cores that are left intact.""So one of the really early findings that we have is that protecting our systems in a wet, stable, intact condition is really important for locking these peat metals, these pollutants, away in our peatlands and preventing them from being released," Dr Fewster said.A long-awaited peatlands strategy from the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs requires Executive draft Climate Action Plan says Northern Ireland "will have to dramatically increase its annual peatland restoration activity" to meet Climate Change Committee recommendations of restoring 10,000 hectares by 2027. At Garry Bog near Ballymoney in County Antrim, more than 3,000 dams have been created to block drains and raise the water table back peat here runs to a depth of at least nine metres, which means it has been forming for more than 9,000 years and sequestering carbon for all that Devenney from Ulster Wildlife has been leading the restoration work at the said peatlands are our most significant, most impactful, terrestrial carbon sinks."So the fact that we have 12% cover in Northern Ireland of peatlands - deep peat in a lot of cases that's greater than 50 centimetres - there's a huge scope of work that can be done."Northern Ireland has a big part to play in tackling climate change," Mr Devenney Swindles said the message from the work of his team in the lab at QUB could not be starker."It's really clear we need to ensure these peatlands are kept wet. We need to restore them, rehabilitate them, block drains."And we need to stop burning peatlands," he said.
Times
7 hours ago
- Times
Weight-loss injections could make you fitter without exercise
Weight-loss jabs could help people become fitter by making their muscles work more efficiently, evidence suggests. Anecdotally, there is concern among people who use treatments such as Mounjaro that weight loss will make them less muscular, toned and strong. However, a study analysing the body composition of more than 200 people with type 2 diabetes, found they lost no more muscle after a weight-loss jab than if they had lost weight by other means. Meanwhile, they shed significantly more fat from within their muscles than they would have done losing weight another way. • The weight-loss drugs guide: how to avoid the side effects The loss of fat from the muscles after taking tirzepatide, the prescription injection sold as Mounjaro, could also boost someone's capacity to do physical activity. That is because 'ectopic' fat found within the body, which gets into muscles and wraps in and around other organs, has been linked with poorer muscle strength and physical performance in both men and women. Naveed Sattar, the lead author of the study and a professor of metabolic medicine at the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences at the University of Glasgow, said: 'For the majority of people using the weight-loss injection tirzepatide, they experience an increase in their capacity for activity, meaning they can often walk for longer or be more active than before. 'Having less muscle fat usually means the remaining fat muscle cells are more efficient in generating power, which could explain the boost to people's exercise abilities. These results are hugely encouraging as less muscle fat is also linked to a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in many studies. 'However, we don't yet know how weight-loss injections remove additional muscle fat, and more evidence is needed to understand the mechanisms involved.' Fat streaks within the muscles tend to increase when someone is more overweight or sedentary. They can be reduced through aerobic exercise such as jogging, walking and cycling. But the use of weight-loss injections to achieve a similar result could be useful for people who are unable to be as active because of their excess weight. • 'After taking weight-loss drugs, my life fell apart' The research, published in the journal The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, looked at 246 people given varying doses of tirzepatide, or insulin in a previous study. An MRI scan was used to quantify the amount of muscle and fat each person had in their thighs before the treatment, and a year after starting it. The amount of muscle lost by people using tirzepatide was compared to typical muscle loss in people of the same age and sex, losing the same amount of weight. Muscle loss was broadly similar for both groups. However, the percentage of fat lost from their muscles was 0.5 per cent higher if they took tirzepatide than would be expected from losing the same amount of weight without the drug. Researchers worked this out using data for almost 3,000 people taken from the long-running UK Biobank health study. It may be that tirzepatide not only makes people feel fuller for longer and less hungry, but also removes ectopic fat from different parts of the body better than conventional weight loss. That could help to explain evidence suggesting weight-loss injections may reduce the risk of diabetes and many other chronic diseases.
