T.N.'s success in education is a result of Dravidian policies, says Udhayanidhi
At an event organised to launch the Kalloori Kanavu (College Dream) 2025 scheme as part of the Naan Mudhalvan programme, Mr. Udhayanidhi said the thrust on education by the Dravidian Movement over the years under leaders such as Periyar E.V. Ramasamy, C.N. Annadurai and M. Karunanidhi had led to outcomes such as reservation that helped spread education far and wide in the State. The national-level GER stood at 29%, and it would take about 10-15 years for the rest of the country to catch up with Tamil Nadu, Mr. Udhayanidhi said.
The government scheme, he said, was aimed at identifying one lakh students who were victims of circumstances, guiding them through the process and enrolling them in institutions of higher learning. This year, 50 youth came out with flying colours in the UPSC exam, while 58 passed competitive exams conducted by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC), the Railway Recruitment Board (RRB) and the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS), he said. 'Your success will encourage many more students undergoing training at government coaching centres across the State,' Mr. Udhayanidhi said.
The inaugural event was streamed live.
Minister for School Education Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi said that beyond the high GER, it was important that the candidates receive quality education and find meaningful employment. 'The Naan Mudhalvan scheme ensures that,' he added.
Health Minister Ma. Subramanian, Special Programme Implementation Secretary Pradeep Yadav, School Education Secretary B. Chandramohan, Managing Director of Tamil Nadu Skill Development Corporation Kranti Kumar Pati, and Mission Director of Naan Mudhalvan Competitive Exams Vertical C. Sudhakar were present.
The 58 students who cleared the competitive exams were among the 510 youth trained in three residential facilities set up in Chennai, Srivilliputhur and Salem at a cost of ₹4.28 crore. Of them, 37 cleared the banking exam, 19 cleared the SSC exam, and two cleared the RRB exam. The candidates underwent coaching for six months before writing the exams.
Two of the candidates – K. Bhuvaneshwari of Dharmapuri and K. Alagu Anish of Tirunelveli – shared their experience of the coaching programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Deputy CM distributes certificates under CM's Green Fellowship Programme
Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin on Monday distributed certificates to candidates who took part and completed the Chief Minister's Green Fellowship Programme. A total of 40 candidates completed the programme. Minister Thangam Thennarasu and senior officials were also present.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
What's in Delhi govt's new private school fee regulation bill & why are parents concerned
The new bill aims to ensure uniform fee regulation for all private unaided schools, including minority institutes, as well as those not allotted any government land. Till now, fee regulation in Delhi has applied only to private schools operating on land allotted by the Delhi Development Authority. The bill also prohibits schools from harassing students over unpaid or delayed fees, including measures such as striking off names, withholding results, denying access to classes, or public humiliation. On Monday, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta and Education Minister Ashish Sood introduced the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Act, 2025. The move comes three months after they first announced the bill amid a wave of protests by parents over fee hikes by several private schools at the start of the academic session in April. New Delhi: Calling its bill to regulate fees in private schools 'historic', the Delhi government Monday introduced the much-awaited draft legislation in the assembly as parents raised concerns over several of its provisions, including the requirement of at least 15 percent of parents uniting to challenge any fee hike by private schools, terming the condition as 'impractical'. Speaking to the media, ahead of the assembly session, Sood said, 'Today marks a golden day in the history of Delhi's education system. For the first time in 27 years, a historic bill will be introduced in the assembly under the leadership of Chief Minister Rekha Gupta.' The bill was 'aimed at ending the exploitation, pressure, and mental harassment faced by parents over school fees', added Sood. ThePrint explains what the draft bill is and why parents remain unconvinced that it will resolve the issue. How will fee approvals work now? According to the bill, each private school will need to form a School-Level Fee Regulation Committee annually. Constituted by 15 July of every academic year, the committee will include five parents from the Parent-Teacher Association (PTA), as selected in a draw of lots. It must also include at least two women and at least one other member from the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, or socially and educationally backwards classes. Additionally, a representative from the Directorate of Education (DoE) will be part of the committee. The chairperson will be a representative of the school management. Once the committee is in place, the school management should submit the proposed fee structure and all other relevant records, considering 31 July as the deadline to do so. For the next three academic years, the fee structure will stay fixed. The committee will have the authority to review and approve the fees, but cannot approve an amount higher than the one proposed by management. It may revise the amount downward. The committee must decide on the fee within 30 days of receiving the proposal. Once approved, the fee structure will be on the school notice board in Hindi, English, and the medium of instruction. If the school has a website, the approved fee must also be published there. What the School-Level Fee Regulation Committee approves will be binding on the school for the next three academic years. The committee will also specify the various heads under which private schools can charge fees. Also Read: Two realities of NEP: Sensory classrooms & hi-tech labs, to kids sitting on floor & no teachers What happens if parents aren't satisfied? The bill mandates that any challenge to the decision of the School-Level Fee Regulation Committee must come from an 'Aggrieved Parents Group', comprising at least 15 percent of the total number of parents in the school. Only when supported by at least 15 percent of the parent body, a fee-related grievance will be considered. When it wishes to challenge the School-Level Fee Regulation Committee, the 'Aggrieved Parents Group' can approach the District Fee Appellate Committee—constituted by the Director of Education, chaired by the district Deputy Director of Education, and including representatives from the school management and the parent-teacher association, and a chartered accountant. The District Fee Appellate Committee must communicate its decision on any fee dispute within 30 days of receiving the appeal, and no later than 45 days within the same academic year. If it fails to do so, the matter will automatically be referred to the Revision Committee, as specified in the Act. If the 'Aggrieved Parents Group' or school management is dissatisfied with the decision, they could file an appeal before the Revision Committee within 30 days. The Revision Committee will be notified by the government and chaired by an eminent person with notable contributions in the field of education. It will also have representatives from the parents and the school. The bill proposes strict penalties for non-compliance, with fines ranging from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 10 lakh. In cases of non-payment, the government can seize and sell the movable or immovable property of the school management, appoint a receiver to manage assets, or take any other recovery action, as prescribed in the bill. However, it will not impose a penalty without hearing both parties and giving adequate time. Sudha Acharya, principal of ITL public school, said the school has already constituted the school level committee. 'We will try to take parents on board right from the beginning so that there is no need to go to the district committee. It's too early to comment on the bill. Let it first be pass and come into effect,' she said. Why are parents raising concerns? Among the various concerns parents are raising over the proposed bill, the most important is how the bill defines 'aggrieved parents'. It would deprive individual parents of their right to raise a complaint, they argue. 'Requiring a minimum of 15 percent of a school's parents to challenge the school-level Fee Regulatory Committee's decision before the district committee is nearly impossible. It effectively denies parents the right to contest arbitrary fee hikes,' said Ashok Agarwal, chairperson of All India Parents Association. Parents are also raising concerns over the selection process for parent representatives in the school-level committee. 'Why cannot there be elections instead? Who will ensure the draw of lots is fair and free from discrepancies? How do you guarantee transparency?' asked Shikha Bhagga, a lawyer and member of the Forum of Indian Parents. Bhagga also questioned the criteria to determine fees. 'Infrastructure should not be a factor in deciding the fee—it is the school's asset, not the responsibility of the students. Both the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court have held in several cases that infrastructure has no direct bearing on fees,' she said. Moreover, parents are showing concern over one of the clauses—the fees, which schools will charge, starting 1 April 2025, will be the proposed fee for the 2025–26 academic year. 'Many schools hiked fees illegally this year without any approval, and they continue to charge them. The bill not only allows that but effectively legitimises it,' Bhagga added. Questioning the bill, AAP's Atishi called it a deliberate attempt by the BJP government to protect the interests of private schools, rather than those of the students and parents. 'The government intentionally delayed the bill from April to July, allowing schools to hike fees unchecked and extort money from parents. The biggest concern is that the bill includes no provision to roll back these fee hikes, effectively legitimising them. This bill serves private school owners, not the public,' she said in a press conference. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: 'Honest history, not ideology'—NCERT social science panel chief on changes in Class 8 textbook
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
SSC Chairman Admits To Mismanagement, But Says Exam Won't Be Cancelled
New Delhi: "If even one candidate has been wronged, we will conduct the exam again for them," the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) Chairman, S Gopalakrishnan, told NDTV at the backdrop of mounting protests over alleged discrepancies and technical issues in the recently conducted SSC Selection Post Phase 13 examination. The Chairman on Monday dismissed the possibility of cancelling the exam. However, he indicated that a rescheduled test may be held for candidates who did not get a "fair chance" during the original test window due to disruptions. While the Chairman admitted to the mismanagement citing computer system failures, mouse malfunctions and the allocation of distant exam centres to candidates, he also mentioned that the body has written to Eduquity Career Technologies-which was awarded the tender to conduct the exams- asking them to address the reported lapses for the exams held from July 24 to August 1. "Penalties are also likely for failures such as system crashes and hardware malfunctions", added the Chairman. Despite growing calls from candidates to scrap the examination and change the vendor, Gopalakrishnan ruled out both. "On the basis of one test, I cannot remove them. I would need to float a fresh tender which could take until December. How will I conduct exams in the meantime?" he asked. Some of the most serious disruptions occurred at two centres-Pawan Ganga in Delhi and Educasa in Uttar Pradesh-where tests were entirely cancelled, affecting about 2,500 students. Originally scheduled to end on August 1, the examination had to be extended to August 2 in three shifts to compensate for disruptions reported at 20 centres. But attendance was barely 60 per cent, with only 8,048 of the scheduled 16,600 candidates turning up. Speaking to NDTV, the Chairman acknowledged "teething issues" with the new vendor. He assured that "corrections" would be made in the coming months. "We are analysing logs, CCTV footage, and electronic data to ensure accountability. We have seen an improvement in the company's functioning over the past one week. There were issues on the first few days, and then they resolved them," Gopalakrishnan added. Regarding student concerns over the use of Artificial Intelligence for questionnaire preparation, the SSC clarified that only a basic AI tool is used to avoid repetition, with each question tagged with metadata. The SSC, in collaboration with the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (CDAC), monitors the exam process through a network system installed on each desktop to ensure the integrity of its examinations using logs, CCTV footage, and electronic data analysis. "We are hopeful the upcoming exams scheduled between August 6 and 8, involving around 3.5 lakh candidates, will be smooth," said Gopalakrishnan. The Chairman maintained that while there were issues with the exam, it was not "totally unfair" to merit cancellation and promised that all existing issues would be fully addressed within a month. The exam, conducted from July 24 to August 1 across 194 centres in 142 cities, was marred by abrupt cancellations, software failures, biometric mismatches, and erroneous centre allotments. Around 5 lakh candidates had registered for the recruitment test. The last-minute changes and repeated technical failures sparked protests across Delhi last week, with hundreds of aspirants taking to the streets and social media platforms to express outrage. The backlash has led SSC to re-examine its exam protocols. The SSC is a statutory authority responsible for conducting recruitment examinations for positions across central ministries, departments, and other government bodies.
