Azharuddin Says India 'Too Much Dependent On Bumrah.. Should Play Kuldeep Yadav'
Last Updated:
Mohammad Azharuddin cited India's reliance on Jasprit Bumrah for their loss to England and suggested including spinner Kuldeep Yadav.
After India's five-wicket defeat to England in the first Test at Headingley, Leeds, former India captain Mohammad Azharuddin cited the team's excessive reliance on pace bowler Jasprit Bumrah as a crucial factor in the loss.
Azharuddin emphasised the need for a more balanced bowling attack and recommended including spinner Kuldeep Yadav in the second Test starting Wednesday at Edgbaston in Birmingham, where the dry surface could benefit the left-arm wrist spinner.
'They are too much dependent on Bumrah. It's not that easy because you need more experienced bowlers, and they should play Kuldeep Yadav," Azharuddin was quoted as saying by PTI Videos from Hyderabad.
Despite a strong start with a first-innings total of 471—thanks to centuries from Shubman Gill (147), Yashasvi Jaiswal (101), and Rishabh Pant (134)—India experienced a dramatic collapse, losing their last seven wickets for just 41 runs. This trend continued in the second innings as well.
'We lost because of batting collapse, but anyways now they have to pick the right players and bowling has to be perfect," Azhar noted.
Azharuddin also defended debutant Test captain Shubman Gill, who faced scrutiny after the loss regarding his bowling changes during the game.
'This is his just first match as a captain, you just can't talk about captaincy, it's too early to talk about captaincy," he remarked, urging fans to give Gill time to grow into the role.
'We should give him a fair chance and he has just taken over, so you should give him a lot of time and support also. We cannot just complain and criticise players like that," he concluded.
Jasprit Bumrah for the remainder of the Test series. Initially, it was decided that Bumrah would participate in only three of the five Tests in this ICC World Test Championship series to manage his back issue. According to Gambhir, India's narrow five-wicket loss to England in the series opener has not prompted any changes to this plan.
'For us, managing Bumrah's workload is crucial because there's a lot of cricket ahead and we know what he brings to the team," said Gambhir.
'Before this tour, it was agreed that he would play three Test matches, but we will monitor his condition. However, we haven't yet decided which other two Test matches he will play," he added.
(With inputs from Agencies)
First Published:
June 29, 2025, 17:08 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
ABD Criticises India For Bumrah's Workload 'Mismanagement', Cites Steyn Example
Last Updated: AB de Villiers believes Jasprit Bumrah should have played all five Tests in the series against England, comparing his workload management to Dale Steyn. Jasprit Bumrah is the best bowler in the world and arguably Inida's best cricketer for India across all formats. Managing his workload, though, has proved to be a significant challenge for the Indian men's cricket team. As India look to come back in the five-Test series against England for the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, former South African captain and Indian Premier League (IPL) legend AB de Villiers feels that Bumrah should have been prioritised to play in all five matches, rather than the pre-planned three set by the Indian management. 'He is probably the top bowler in the world in all formats right now. So, it's very difficult to decide a way to rest him," De Villiers was quoted as saying on his YouTube channel. 'In my opinion, Test cricket is the ultimate form of the game. This Test series, in particular, would've been the one to get him ready for all five matches." The 40-year-old, who faced Bumrah towards the end of his career, compared the situation to how South Africa managed Dale Steyn, a bowler with a similar pedigree and injury history. 'That's what we used to do with Dale. Rest him in less important T20 and ODI series and prepare him for the big Test series against Australia, England, and India away from home… New Zealand to some extent, depending on the rankings at that time," he explained. Is Bumrah's Workload Being Mismanaged? Jasprit Bumrah 's potential absence in India's second Test against England at Edgbaston has sparked debate, especially given the importance of the series and the conditions that favour his skills. While De Villiers was uncertain about the nature of the decision, he did not rule out the possibility that it stemmed from medical advice. 'So, I don't know if it was mismanagement or if it was because he recently returned from injury and saw the IPL as a warmup phase," he said. 'Maybe, he consulted a surgeon who advised him against playing all five Test matches. You have to respect that, and ultimately, it's up to Team India to manage him well," he added. De Villiers added a sharp observation, saying: 'It doesn't get bigger than this, except perhaps the WTC final." First Published:
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Leather hunt, some redemption, wasted chances: A look at Indias winless Test journey in Birmingham
Edgbaston [UK], June 29 (ANI): Team India will play their second Test of the five-match tour of England at Edgbaston in Birmingham, where they have yet to secure a win. The match at Birmingham will kick off on Wednesday. Team India trails by 0-1 in the series, failing to defend 371 runs against a Ben Duckett-charged England during the first Test at Leeds. The left-hander poured a heavy dosage of reverse sweeps on Team India's plans, completing the Three Lions' second-best run chase in Tests. Indian fans and players alike would not like to see their record at Edgbaston, where they are yet to win a match. Seven out of eight matches have been lost, while one has ended in a draw. In their previous match at Edgbaston back in July 2022, the rescheduled fifth Test of the 2021 series, India, under stand-in skipper Jasprit Bumrah, looked like a highly proud unit till the fourth innings. With centuries from Rishabh Pant (146) and Ravindra Jadeja (104) taking India to 416 from a shaky situation of 98/5 and pacers firing all cylinders, a defeat looked certain for England chasing 378 runs as they slipped to 109/3 despite a century partnership between openers Alex Lees and Zak Crawley. However, centuries from Jonny Bairstow and Joe Root left India searching for answers, hunting for red cherry in every corner of the ground. The hosts pulled off their highest-ever run-chase in Tests and showed the Indians what the hype of their 'Bazball' school of cricket under skipper Ben Stokes and coach Brendon McCullum was all about. The series ended in a 2-2 draw. During the 2018 tour, the biggest story was that of a superstar making up for a major career slip-up in England during his initial years. Questioned about his ability against moving deliveries of James Anderson and Stuart Broad, Indian skipper Virat Kohli defended, survived edges and half-chances and drove to perfection, scoring his first Test ton in England, a blistering 149, a major chunk of which was made along with the tail end. With a loud roar and a kiss to his wedding ring, the 'King Kohli' gave it back in style. However, despite his lone warrior batting effort and the sheer excellence of his bowlers, particularly Ishant Sharma and Ravichandran Ashwin, the team could not chase down 194, being bundled out for 162 despite Virat's second-innings fifty, which helped England take a 1-0 lead. During the 2011 horror tour, when India was far from their usual competitive selves, Alastair Cook's marathon 545-ball 294 outclassed, tired out, and depleted Indian bowling and batting morale. India conceded 710/7, the highest Test total at the venue and faced a crushing loss by an innings and 242 runs. India lost the series by this point. Sachin Tendulkar's classy 122 in 1996 during an eight-wicket loss and crushing losses by 132 runs in 1967 (during which India was skittled out for 92), innings & 78 runs in 1974 and innings & 83 runs in 1979 are some other memories fans will keep with themselves forever. The innings losses saw double tons coming from David Lloyd and David Gower (1974 and 1979, respectively), which rattled Indian bowlers.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Give Shubman Gill a fair chance… India are too much dependent on Jasprit Bumrah': Azharuddin tears into critics
Since India's defeat in the opening Test vs England in Leeds, new captain Shubman Gill has fallen victim to criticism from certain sections of fans and experts. India put in a dominant batting display, where Gill, KL Rahul and Yashasvi Jaiswal got centuries, amd vice-captain Rishabh Pant smacked twin tons. Despite the centuries, fielding errors and a weak bowling attack saw England win the Test by five wickets. Shubman Gill and Jasprit Bumrah in action during the first Test.(AFP/Reuters) Former India cricketer Mohammed Azharuddin rushed to Gill's defence, claiming that it was very early to talk about his captaincy and he still needs some time. 'This is his just first match as a captain, you just can't talk about captaincy. It's too early to talk about captaincy,' he said. 'We should give him a fair chance and he has just taken over. So, you should give him a lot of time and support. We cannot just complain and criticise players like that.' 'Too much dependent on Jasprit Bumrah' He also pointed out India's overreliance on Jasprit Bumrah and urged Gill to include Kuldeep Yadav in the playing XI for the second Test. 'They are too much dependent on Bumrah. It's not easy because you need more experienced bowlers, and they should play Kuldeep Yadav,' he said. The second Test is scheduled to begin on July 2, in Birmingham. The defeat in the first Test saw Gill become the sixth Indian Test skipper to begin his tenure with a loss. Recently, former India player Sanjay Manjrekar also criticised Gill's captaincy approach and pointed out his defensive fielding tactics. He also slammed Gill's personality and leadership style. 'Whether they would have taken wickets or not, Kohli would have made it clear to the opposition that he's actively trying to get them out. Gill doesn't have that kind of personality or leadership style. However, perhaps being a bit less defensive and not pre-empting things would have been better,' he said.
