Legault says he's energized by public's disapproval of CAQ government
QUEBEC — Premier François Legault acknowledged Wednesday that the people are disappointed in his government, but insisted poor polling numbers inspire him to keep trying.
There was also a slice of good news for the Coalition Avenir Québec government on Wednesday: the Moody's credit rating agency opted not to downgrade Quebec's rating despite the province's projected historic deficit of $13.6 billion for 2025-26.
'I am well aware that many Quebecers are disappointed in our government,' Legault said Wednesday as he arrived for his last in-person cabinet meeting before the summer. 'But for me, it gives me energy. It makes me want to fight during the year and a few months that remain (before the next election) to deliver still more results to Quebecers.
'In October 2026, it will be up to Quebecers to decide if they want to keep me or not.'
Legault was reacting to a new Pallas Data/L'actualité/Qc125 poll showing the CAQ has placed third in voter support for the second time in two months. In the previous poll, done by Léger for Le Journal de Montréal in May, the CAQ was bleeding support to the benefit of the Parti Québécois.
The Pallas Data poll is different because it shows the CAQ losing support to the Quebec Liberals and the party's new leader, Pablo Rodriguez, who was elected to the top job Saturday. The poll was conducted just after Rodriguez won the leadership over second-place Charles Milliard.
According to the poll, the PQ still leads in voter intentions with 31 per cent, but the Liberals under Rodriguez are not far behind with 26 per cent, up four points from the previous Pallas poll in March.
The CAQ has fallen to third place with 15 per cent, 11 points less than the Liberals.
For the Liberals, this is the best poll they have had since 2022.
The Quebec Conservatives are fourth with 14 per cent and Québec solidaire is at 12 per cent.
The Pallas poll was conducted from June 14 to 16 and is based on a sample of 1,085 Quebecers.
The poll comes as Rodriguez is to meet Thursday with the entire 19-member Liberal caucus for the first time as leader. He will hold an afternoon news conference after the meeting.
Legault also got more bad news Wednesday: Quebec's anticorruption squad UPAC announced it conducted searches Wednesday of the Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec's headquarters in connection with the SAAQclic fiasco, which the Gallant inquiry is investigating.
The CAQ government did, however, get one tidbit of good news as Quebec enters the summer holiday season: A second credit rating agency, Moody's, which is based in New York, has decided not to downgrade Quebec's credit rating.
In a statement issued Wednesday, Moody's maintained the rating at Aa2 with a 'stable' perspective.
'The stable outlook reflects our forecast that risks to the province's budget and fiscal plan are broadly balanced,' Moody's says. 'Despite the widening deficits in the near term, driven by the economic uncertainty of U.S. trade tensions, we expect the province's strong fiscal management will mitigate risks where possible.
'While the debt and interest burdens will rise, we expect they will remain with levels recorded by the province of the past decade.'
The Moody's decision to maintain Quebec's credit rating follows that of DBRS on June 9. DBRS decided to maintain Quebec's rating at AA (low) with a 'stable' perspective.
The two contrast with a decision in April by S&P, which lowered Quebec's credit rating from AA- to A+. It was the first time in 30 years that Quebec's credit rating was lowered.
The latest decision is 'a positive sign,' Finance Minister Eric Girard said Wednesday on his way into the cabinet meeting. 'If you look at Moody's, they took a long-term perspective. They recognized that the current situation is difficult, but they are more positive in the long term.'
This story was originally published June 18, 2025 at 3:42 PM.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
27 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Drimonis: Children's book club is latest target of CAQ's identity politics
Books and public libraries were my gateways to other worlds as a child. It's understandable, then, why I'm such a fan of the TD Summer Reading Club, a national program involving 2,200 public libraries, celebrating local authors and inspiring children to read. The club is free, all materials and book lists are bilingual across Canada, and since 2008 it's worked hard to provide original French content. It was this club that Quebec Francization Minister Jean-François Roberge decided to criticize on social media for the simple reason that one of the many illustrations it uses to promote its cross-country activities features a girl in a hijab. 'Many Quebecers have expressed their discomfort with this poster for a book club held in a public library,' Roberge said on X last month, 'which depicts a young girl wearing a hijab. This type of poster does not promote the coexistence we want to promote in Quebec. The principles and foundations of the new law on integration into the Quebec nation must ultimately guide us to avoid this kind of blunder.' How many Quebecers 'expressed their discomfort,' we'll never know, but what 'blunder' is Roberge alluding to exactly? A little girl being interested in reading? Improving her French? Feeling like she belongs to a larger, inclusive Quebec? Making friends with other cultural communities? Or does Roberge only see a hijab? Some people's vision of vivre-ensemble appears limited to an 'ensemble' that only looks like them. In an effort to erase what the government considers undesirable from public spaces, the Coalition Avenir Québec is not above scapegoating children. I fail to see how that strengthens state secularism. Mouvement laïque québécois and the secular feminist organization Pour les droits des femmes du Québec shared their discomfort, noting the illustration depicts a minor wearing the hijab, not an adult with full agency. Yet the same groups and various pundits made no such distinction last year when they denounced an illustration of a woman in a hijab at Montreal City Hall's entrance, demanding the city remove it. The hijab is what ultimately bothered them. Disappointingly, the city caved. If organizers — receiving pressure to conform to the CAQ's limited vision of inclusion — simply pull the book club from Quebec, what would be accomplished other than depriving thousands of Quebec kids of a free reading program? Do Quebec's public libraries belong to all Quebecers or do they not? Only months ago, a Montreal public library told a writer trying to book a space to host his English book club that he couldn't, because Quebec's vague new language law was creating unnecessary confusion. Why are we making access to culture more difficult for some Quebecers? With the Legault government slashing school budgets and last year's reports of problems accessing francization courses, and with literacy rates lagging, one would think a francization minister would not only welcome outside assistance, but praise it. No such luck. Identity politics above everything else. Once again, the CAQ has chosen to single out a religious minority in order to showboat secularism. It's performative at best. While I don't support hijabs on children, neither do I believe that targeting those who wear them supports state secularism. It's just bullying. The CAQ says the book club's illustration 'does not promote the coexistence we want to promote in Quebec.' What kind of coexistence is that? The kind that marginalizes religious and cultural differences to such an extent that we can no longer even tolerate a mere illustration of a hijab for a free book club? The kind that selectively chooses to focus on some religious traditions while conveniently ignoring others? All young Quebecers — without qualifiers — should feel welcome in our public spaces and cultural institutions. That's the kind of coexistence I can get behind.
Montreal Gazette
an hour ago
- Montreal Gazette
Language complaints soar in Quebec as English service eclipses concerns about signs
Quebec News By Quebec just recorded a historic high in language complaints, exceeding 10,000 and tripling the total from 10 years ago. Despite Premier François Legault's new focus on English storefront signs, complaints about signage have plummeted, while those about language in customer service have risen sharply, a Gazette analysis shows. In 2024-25, 10,371 complaints were filed, a 14 per cent jump over the previous year, according to recent statistics from the Office québécois de la langue française. A decade ago, the language watchdog received 3,159 complaints. The OQLF's latest figures cover April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025, with complaints alleging violations of the Charter of the French Language, commonly known as Bill 101. By far the largest category of complaints — 40 per cent — concerned language of service. A decade ago, only 18 per cent of complaints addressed this issue. Under the charter, 'consumers of goods and services have a right to be informed and served in French.' The OQLF does not provide specifics regarding language-of-service grievances. One high-profile flashpoint, however, has been the bilingual greeting Bonjour-Hi — a sore point for the Legault government, which briefly considered banning the phrase. 'Commercial documentation' was the second-highest source of complaints. At 24 per cent, it was around the same level as 10 years ago. This category includes websites, publications, job applications, invoices and contracts. The language of public and commercial signs was the third-largest topic. Eighteen per cent of submissions targeted signs, down from 31 per cent a decade ago. Seven per cent of reports of non-compliance focused on product packaging, down from 13 per cent. However, complaints about signs and product packaging are expected to rise this year due to new rules that came into effect on June 1, part of the Legault government's effort to reinforce the French language. Under the sign changes, companies with names or trademarks in English or another language must add enough French wording so that French occupies twice the space of the other language. Retailers call the rule onerous and say they had too little time to adapt. Many retailers, both large and small, do not appear to have updated their signs to meet the new requirements. Regarding packaging, under the new measure, 'the generic or descriptive elements of a trademark (such as ingredients, colour, scent or other characteristics of the product) must ... appear in French.' Some music and hobby stores say the packaging rule is unrealistic and will drive them out of business. They say many of their specialized products are available only with English-language labels and suppliers aren't interested in translating them. A majority of 2024–25 complaints — 53 per cent — involved situations in Montreal, home to Quebec's largest concentration of English speakers and immigrants. That percentage represents a low over the past decade. More complainants are targeting the Montérégie and Quebec City regions. Of the complaints filed during the latest period, 36 per cent led to the situation being corrected, while in 25 per cent of cases, the OQLF offered proactive guidance to the subject of the complaint. Another 22 per cent of complaints were deemed unfounded or inadmissible. Since January 2024, Quebec courts have imposed $12,000 in fines on six businesses found guilty of language law violations, the OQLF says. Last year, a Gazette analysis found that complaints about alleged language law violations have rocketed since the Legault government began allowing anonymous grievances and protection for whistleblowers. Anonymity became an option in 2022 after the National Assembly passed Bill 96, the Coalition Avenir Québec government's extensive overhaul of the language charter. Complaints are filed via a form on the OQLF website. A whistleblower who fears reprisals for divulging privileged information can ask that their identity be kept confidential. Under recent changes, a tipster can file a complaint even if they are bound by 'a contract or a duty of loyalty or confidentiality.' Previously, statistics showed the average number of complaints filed per individual. For example, in Montreal during 2021-22, complainants filed 2.7 complaints on average. This calculation is no longer possible, as the OQLF does not have the addresses for those filing reports anonymously.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
The Conservative war on EVs is bound to fail
You might think the 2025 federal election would have taught the Conservative Party of Canada a few lessons. Chief among them would be the need to break with Trumpism and avoid investing their political capital in an issue — like the carbon tax — that can be eliminated with the stroke of the prime minister's pen. Instead, Pierre Poilievre's party seems destined — and determined — to learn these lessons again. Its renewed attack on the federal government's electric vehicle mandate is a case in point here. In an email sent to supporters last month, CPC co-deputy leader Melissa Lantsman said that 'the radical Liberals are planning to make your gas-powered vehicles ILLEGAL. They will FORCE you to buy an expensive electric vehicle.' This is obvious nonsense, since existing gas-powered vehicles sold up to 2035 would be allowed to operate for as long as a mechanic could keep them on the road. And while it's true that the up-front cost of electric vehicles is still higher than gasoline-fueled ones, that won't be the case for long. The ongoing developments in battery technology mean that so-called 'up-front price parity' — that is, an equivalent cost, without subsidies, for electric and gasoline versions of the same vehicle type — is a question of when, not if. That may arrive far sooner than Canada's Conservatives want to believe. Chinese automaker BYD and its ultra-low-cost EVs absolutely dominate the ever-expanding Chinese market, and it's rapidly winning hearts and market share in places like Europe and South America. Its new generation of solid-state batteries could lead to both a major increase in range and a major decrease in price. It's not alone in developing these new batteries, either: Nissan Canada has said that solid-state batteries can be produced 'at a lower cost than conventional lithium-ion batteries,' while Toyota and Volkswagen are also betting heavily on them. In time, then, and not that much of it, electric vehicles could enjoy an up-front cost advantage over gasoline-powered vehicles. That's without factoring in the far lower costs of operating an EV, which can amount to thousands of dollars per vehicle per year, according to the Canadian Automobile Association. If Canada follows through with its electric vehicle mandate, it's expected to save Canadians approximately $36.7 billion in costs by 2050. So why are Canada's Conservatives picking this particular hill to fight on? In part, it's because it allows them to play their greatest hits and try to recapture some of the political energy they generated with their campaign against the consumer carbon tax. Andrew Scheer, for example, got to break out his ample supply of political tinfoil in claiming that the EV mandate — one designed and implemented by the previous prime minister — is really a sop to Brookfield, the company Carney chaired before entering politics. 'Brookfield is heavily invested in the EV supply chain. If this prime minister refuses to reveal his financial interests or self-admitted conflicts — isn't it true that this isn't about the environment, this is about the bottom line for Brookfield?' More importantly, they're also doing this because Canada's Conservative movement remains incapable of tacking against the political winds of Trumpism. As Trump has turned ever-more aggressively against electric vehicles, and particularly the ones sold by his former best friend Elon Musk, so too have leading Canadian Conservatives like party leader Pierre Poilievre and Melissa Lantsman. It seems almost inevitable now that electric vehicles will become part of the ongoing culture war there, and that any rational attempt to help the automotive industry adapt to the changing global landscape will be subsumed into Trump's fight with Musk. It seems almost inevitable now that electric vehicles will become part of the Conservative Party of Canada's ongoing culture war, writes Max Fawcett. It's reasonable, and maybe even rational, to re-assess some of the near-term targets in Canada's EV regulation, given the threats posed by Trump to the very existence of Canada's auto sector. But the longer-term objectives here should remain in place, and the Carney government should be willing to fight hard for them. The transition away from fossil fuels and gasoline-powered vehicles is a question of when, not if. As the New York Times reported recently, 'auto executives are nearly unanimous that, even in the United States, electric and hybrid vehicles will eventually displace gasoline-powered vehicles.' Just ask Musk, who shared a post about Norway's June car sales figures — 97 per cent of which involved EVs — and added his own commentary. 'Combustion engine cars will be like the steam engine — quaint, but primitive.' On this, at least, he's correct. Not even Donald Trump can stop the global transition to electrification, and Canada needs to remain focused on the longer-term trajectory here, both for its domestic auto sector and the consumers who buy their products. The Conservative attack here is the very definition of a rearguard battle, one that confirms its enduring loyalty to the oil and gas industry and its economic interests. It's also another reminder that the leadership team that blundered away a 20-point lead heading into the last election might not be fit to win the next one.
