How 'Queen of the Clean' Kim Woodburn became a beloved TV star at 50
The legendary Kim Woodburn, who first soared to fame over 20 years ago, has died at the age of 83.
Following her death, fans and peers in the entertainment industry have been remembering milestone moments of her professional life, having become one of the UK's most beloved stars.
After becoming a household name on How Clean Is Your House?, she went on to star in reality TV shows including Celebrity Big Brother and I'm A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!
In the tribute sent to Metro by her representative, they remembered her for being an 'incredibly kind' person, as well as for the 'amazing' accomplishments of her career.
'It is with immense sadness that we let you know our beloved Kim Woodburn passed away yesterday following a short illness,' the statement read.
'Kim was an incredibly kind, caring, charismatic and strong person. Her husband Peter is heartbroken at the loss of his soulmate.
'We are so proud of the amazing things Kim achieved in her life and career. We kindly ask that Kim's husband and close friends are given the time and privacy they need to grieve. We will not be releasing any further details.'
From working as a cleaner to becoming the 'Queen of the Clean', revered by fans across the nation, here's how Woodburn became one of the UK's most beloved celebrities.
Woodburn found stardom later in life when she was 50, on a Channel 4 show called How Clean Is Your House?
Channel 4 contacted a cleaning company looking for a cleaner with a fun personality for their show. At the time, she was working for the company as a live-in cleaner for a family in Kent.
After meeting with the producers – and clearly impressing them with her cleaning aptitude and personality – she signed on and quickly became the star of the programme alongside Aggie MacKenzie, and became a star.
With her hair immaculately coiffed into her signature plaited bun, pearls in place, and one-liners at the ready, the star would immerse herself in some messy homes, creating absolute TV gold.
The series ran for six years until 2009, and Woodburn gained international fame as the show aired on BBC America. She also appeared in the Canadian cleaning show Kim's Rude Awakenings.
The show led to major fame and cemented her as a fantastically entertaining TV personality with a quick wit and a sharp tongue.
Woodburn and MacKenzie had a falling out after their series was cancelled, with the latter describing their partnering as 'chalk and cheese'.
Paying tribute to her late friend, MacKenzie told Metro: 'Kim was a tormented soul, but now she's finally at peace. We clashed often.
'Behind the fierce persona was deep pain and incredible strength. She survived because she had to. I hope she's resting now.
'She was an unforgettable woman.'
Soon after their cleaning show was cancelled in 2009, Woodburn went straight into the jungle.
Woodburn was a contestant for the ninth series of I'm a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here!
She finished as runner-up to Gino D'Acampo and appeared in the jungle with Sam Fox, Sabrina Washington, Katie Price, and Stuart Manning.
The star didn't hold back when it came to voicing her opinion and quickly became a fan favourite with her hilarious takes and comments.
Speaking to Metro in 2024, she reflected that it was 'horrific, dirty and frightening, but well-paid'.
I had the pleasure of interviewing Kim for a piece about I'm A Celebrity last year.
As a former columnist for Metro, she was in a prime position to give her razor-sharp two cents about the cast.
I hadn't spoken to her before, so I was delighted to find she was a sweetheart and was completely disarmed by her self-deprecating humour.
She was upfront about how her reality TV show appearances had helped her have a financially comfortable life, and then also encouraged me to sign up for I'm A Celebrity if the opportunity ever presents itself (unlikely, but I appreciated her support nonetheless).
Of the many celebrities I've spoken to, she was among the friendliest and least pretentious. She was worlds away from the savage viral edits of her that constantly crop up on social media, and in my opinion, a lovely woman.
Following her stint in the jungle, the star made various appearances on different reality TV series.
She appeared in Celebrity Come Dine With Me, was a panellist on Big Brother's Bit on the Side, was a contestant on Let's Dance for Comic Relief, and appeared on the celebrity version of The Chase.
But one of her biggest and most memorable appearances came in 2017, when she appeared in Celebrity Big Brother.
Woodburn came in third place in Celebrity Big Brother, placing after Jedward, and winner Coleen Nolan.
The star-filled series included Calum Best, Heidi Montag, Spencer Pratt, Chloe Ferry, and James Jordan. It was a series with constant fallouts.
Woodburn entered the house on day 11 and fell out with many fellow castmates, alleging that Jamie O'Hara was an 'adulterer' in the heat of the moment.
'You're an adulterer… You two-timed your wife, and she's got three kids!' she told him.
The moment went viral and secured her in the hearts of the nation.
Woodburn not securing the winning title was a travesty to some, with many saying that she made the series and was the perfect injection of entertainment that the reality series needed.
After appearing on the show, she famously clashed with Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield while appearing on This Morning and discussing her time in the house.
This was the start of quips about the former ITV presenting duo, with the star also memorably falling out with members of the Loose Women cast.
The star left the panel show after a segment as the panellists, including Linda Robson, Janet Street Porter, quizzed her about her Big Brother fallouts.
The moment received 8,000 Ofcom complaints, with some suggesting that the star was bullied.
Later in her life, she appeared in Loose Women, various pantomime performances, and in 2022 appeared in the E4 cooking competition Celeb Cooking School. More Trending
In 2022 and 2023, she also made various appearances on the GB News show Tonight Live with Dan Wootton.
During her life and early career, Woodburn also released four books, three of which were focused on cleaning and were published with MacKenzie, and one was an autobiography.
The 2006 book titled Unbeaten: The Story of My Brutal Childhood details how her life transformed from a tough upbringing with an alcoholic mother and an abusive father to stardom later in life.
View More »
Woodburn is remembered by her husband Peter Woodburn, whom she married in 1979.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
MORE: Project Runway star Arthur Folasa Ah Loo fatally shot at anti-Trump protest
MORE: Lilo & Stitch actor David Hekili Kenui Bell dies weeks after film's release
MORE: Nightcrawlers songwriter and DJ John Reid dies 'suddenly' aged 61
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Holidaygoers swear swimsuit 'fits like a glove' and 'hides back fat'
The best-selling swimming costume has medium coverage, a scoop neck silhouette and adjustable straps - six hues available Kim Kardashian's Skims brand is most notable for its shapewear, but it also designs swimsuits, including a one-piece with hundreds of reviews and ratings. The Signature Scoop Neck One Piece has been described by holiday-goers as 'fitting like a glove' and covering certain parts of the body that some shoppers feel conscious about, such as the back and tummy area. Priced at £96, it is at the higher end of most consumers' budgets for a swimming costume. However, it's a good option for fashion fans who are hoping to invest in a one-piece that will last them for some years. The Signature Scoop Neck One Piece comes in several sizes, starting from XXXS up to XXXL. There are six colours available, including black, blue, orange, egret crocodile print, champagne tiger print, and dune crocodile print - size availability varies depending on which hue buyers choose. Kim's Signature Scoop Neck One Piece One has an overall customer satisfaction rating of 4.6, based on 468 reviews. One shopper said they were 'apprehensive' about buying the swimming costume but were 'suitably impressed' afterwards. They went on to say: "I ordered it on Saturday and received it by Tuesday. I tried it on, and it fit like a glove! It takes a little stretching, and it does not have nip covers, so wear it at the right time and place. I have a little belly, but it helped hide some of it, and it sits quite high on the hip, giving a sexy leg exposure. Wore it in Mexico. Don't recommend beach volleyball in it! I got a medium." A second purchaser rated it three stars, as they didn't like the material: "A little too shear, no boob support area but fits really cute probably shouldn't get in white." Another shopper described the swimsuit as 'super flattering', before adding: "The way the fits is perfect to hide my roll of backfat. I'm always self-conscious of. This fit is a home run!" An additional customer added: "I'm very happy with my purchase, and it was a bonus being on sale! The way the suit snatches your body, it gives you more confidence wearing a bathing suit in public." Alternative swimsuits are available on the high street, including this tummy-control option from Next (£29). The shape-enhancing swimsuit is made from a firm-support material, has thick straps, and has a deep neckline. Choose from sizes 6-26. For colourful printed options, look to New Look where this pink and orange ombre one-piece is on sale for £30.99. Shaped with a V-neckline, it has adjustable side seams and ruched sides. Choose from sizes 6-18. Back to the reviews for the Skims swimsuit, another customer said: "This was such an amazing swimsuit! It fits perfectly and shapes your body. I loved this outfit - it hugged my figure so well." An additional buyer added: "I love these suits. I need to get in line faster so I can get more colours!" Another concludes: "I love these suits. I need to get in line faster so I can get more colours!"
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE BBC staff are in 'open revolt' after Channel 4 said it would screen axed Gaza doctors documentary, insiders say - claiming Beeb bosses who refused to screen film are 'out of touch with reality'
BBC staff are in 'open revolt' about top bosses meddling with the channel's journalism 'for political reasons', MailOnline can reveal. Yesterday, it emerged that Channel 4 will show a documentary about Gaza commissioned and then scrapped by the BBC. Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, which was made by two Emmy award-winning filmmakers, was originally commissioned by the BBC more than a year ago. However, the corporation paused its production in April following the launch of an investigation into another documentary Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone, which starred the son of a leader of Hamas - a fact that film failed to mention. Now, Channel 4 has announced it will instead be broadcasting Gaza: Doctors Under Attack on Wednesday, July 2, at 10pm. But BBC staff are said to be in uproar over the decision not to show the programme on its channels, which is thought to have been made by director general Tim Davie. More than 300 people have allegedly signed an open letter directed at the corporation's bosses, which raises concerns about 'censorship' at the BBC when it comes to reporting about Israel. The letter also branded the decision not to show the documentary about medics in Gaza as 'political' and 'nothing to do with the journalism of the film'. An insider with knowledge of the situation told MailOnline: 'The people at commissioner level who are experienced journalists and take these decisions on an almost daily basis are being overruled by people who are pretending to be journalists. There's open revolt [at the BBC]. '[Bosses] approved the film multiple times and then delayed it at least five times but confirmed in emails that it would go out and that the delays were not due to the Johnstone report into Gaza: How to survive in a war zone. 'They said this [new documentary] was a vital film that exemplified ''public interest journalism'. 'After these multiple delays over six weeks they then apologised and said, ''Sorry, it is because of the Johnstone report''.' Gaza: Doctors Under Attack is a one off-documentary that examines allegations that Israeli forces have repeatedly targeted hospitals in breach of international law. The programme was made by two-time Emmy-winning journalist Ramita Navai, fellow two-time Emmy-winning director Karim Shah and ex-Channel 4 News Editor Ben De Pear, who is the executive producer of Basement Films, which was commissioned by the BBC to create the film. The source said more than 40 people from BBC Eye, who were involved in the documentary, had signed a letter of protest against the corporation's. They said the open letter had more than 300 signatures. The insider continued: 'We had to handle the duty of care for a dozen doctors and medics we had spoken to who couldn't understand why their interviews - in which they talked about the deaths of their children when their homes were bombed, or colleagues when their hospitals were attacked, had not gone out. 'We made this point repeatedly and at length to the BBC but they ignored these concerns.' Channel 4 said it had fact-checked the documentary, Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, to ensure that it meets its editorial standards and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. The film reports that every one of Gaza's 36 main hospitals has now been attacked or destroyed by Israel, with people forced to evacuate and healthcare workers reportedly killed, imprisoned and tortured. Louisa Compton, Channel 4's head of news and current affairs and specialist factual and sport, said: 'We are showing this programme because we believe that, following thorough fact-checking and verification, we are presenting a duly impartial view of a subject that both divides opinion and frequently provokes dispute about what constitutes a fact. 'Channel 4 has a strong tradition of putting uncomfortable reporting in front of our audiences. 'In doing so, we know we will antagonise somebody somewhere sometime. But we do it because we believe it is our duty to tell important journalistic stories – especially those that aren't being told elsewhere.' Basement Films added: 'This is the third film we have made about the assault on Gaza since October 7th at Basement Films, and whilst none of them have been easy this became by far the most difficult. 'As ever we owe everything to our Palestinian colleagues on the ground; over 200 of whom have been killed by Israel, and the doctors and medics who trusted us with their stories. 'We want to apologise to the contributors and team for the long delay, and thank Channel 4 for enabling it to be seen.' The BBC announced that it would not be broadcasting Gaza: Doctors Under Attack on June 20. 'We wanted the doctors' voices to be heard,' the broadcaster said in a statement. 'Our aim was to find a way to air some of the material in our news programmes, in line with our impartiality standards, before the review was published. 'For some weeks, the BBC has been working with Basement Films to find a way to tell the stories of these doctors on our platforms.' But, the corporation added: 'Yesterday it became apparent that we have reached the end of the road with these discussions. 'We have come to the conclusion that broadcasting this material risked creating a perception of partiality that would not meet the high standards that the public rightly expect of the BBC. 'Impartiality is a core principle of BBC News. It is one of the reasons that we are the world's most trusted broadcaster. 'Therefore, we are transferring ownership of the film material to Basement Films.' Previously, critics were enraged by the BBC's failure to disclose that the narrator of Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone was the son of a senior member of the Hamas terrorist group. It was originally broadcast on February 17 on BBC Two with the aim of showing a 'vivid and unflinching view of life' in the strip. The documentary was made by two producers based in London who remotely directed two cameramen on the ground over nine months. However, independent investigative journalist David Collier claimed one of the child narrators, Abdullah, was the son of a Hamas government minister and grandson of one of Hamas's founding members. Using Facebook and publicly available data online, Mr Collier claimed the show's young star is the son of Gaza's deputy minister of agriculture Dr Ayman Al-Yazouri. This would mean his grandfather would be the Hamas founder Ibrahim al-Yazouri, who has previously been jailed by Egypt and Israel for involvement in proscribed groups. The BBC apologised for the inclusion of the documentary's young star, with a spokesperson for the corporation saying: 'Since the transmission of our documentary on Gaza, the BBC has become aware of the family connections of the film's narrator, a child called Abdullah. 'We've promised our audiences the highest standards of transparency, so it is only right that as a result of this new information, we add some more detail to the film before its retransmission. We apologise for the omission of that detail from the original film.' MailOnline has approached the BBC for comment. The open letter to the BBC in full An open letter to BBC Management, written by BBC Journalists and signed by media industry professionals We're writing to express our concerns over opaque editorial decisions and censorship at the BBC on the reporting of Israel/Palestine. We believe the refusal to broadcast the documentary 'Gaza: Medics Under Fire' is just one in a long line of agenda driven decisions. It demonstrates, once again, that the BBC is not reporting 'without fear or favour' when it comes to Israel. We understand that a decision not to broadcast the investigation has been taken by senior BBC management despite the film's content being signed off in accordance with BBC guidelines and editorial policy. This appears to be a political decision and is not reflective of the journalism in the film. A recent statement from the BBC said broadcasting the film 'risked creating the perception of partiality'. This illustrates precisely what many of us have experienced first hand: an organisation that is crippled by the fear of being perceived as critical of the Israeli government. We are not asking the BBC to take a side. We are asking to be allowed to do our jobs in delivering facts transparently and with due context. For many of us, our efforts have been frustrated by opaque decisions made at senior levels of the BBC without discussion or explanation. Our failures impact audiences. As an organisation we have not offered any significant analysis of the UK government's involvement in the war on Palestinians. We have failed to report on weapons sales or their legal implications. These stories have instead been broken by the BBC's competitors. This hasn't happened by accident, rather by design. Much of the BBC's coverage in this area is defined by anti-Palestinian racism. The inconsistent manner in which guidance is applied draws into focus the role of Sir Robbie Gibb, on the BBC Board and BBC's Editorial Standards Committee. We are concerned that an individual with close ties to the Jewish Chronicle, an outlet that has repeatedly published anti-Palestinian and often racist content, has a say in the BBC's editorial decisions in any capacity, including the decision not to broadcast 'Gaza: Medics Under Fire'. This conflict of interest highlights a double standard for BBC content makers who have themselves experienced censorship in the name of 'impartiality'. In some instances staff have been accused of having an agenda because they have posted news articles critical of the Israeli government on their social media. By comparison, Gibb remains in an influential post with little transparency regarding his decisions despite his ideological leanings being well known. We can no longer ask license fee payers to overlook Gibbs' ideological allegiances. Since October 2023 it has become increasingly clear to our audiences that the BBC's reporting on Israel / Palestine falls short of our own editorial standards. There is a gulf between the BBC's coverage of what is happening in Gaza and the West Bank and what our audiences can see is happening via multiple credible sources including human rights organisations, staff at the UN and journalists on the ground. Whilst there has been some exceptional content from some areas of the BBC (within documentary and from some individual correspondents for example), news in particular has failed to report the reality and the context of the war on Palestinians. All too often it has felt that the BBC has been performing PR for the Israeli government and military. This should be a cause of great shame and concern for everyone at the BBC. Despite these failings, there has been a major shift within public discourse in recent months. Increasingly the scale of Israel's crimes against the Palestinians are being understood by the public as well as many of our parliamentarians. The BBC's editorial decisions seem increasingly out of step with reality. We have been forced to conclude that decisions are made to fit a political agenda rather than serve the needs of audiences. As industry insiders and as BBC staff, we have experienced this first hand. The issue has become even more urgent with recent escalations in the region. Again, BBC coverage has appeared to downplay Israel's role, reinforcing an 'Israel first' framing that compromises our credibility. We, the undersigned BBC staff, freelancers and industry figures are extremely concerned that the BBC's reporting on Israel and Palestine continues to fall short of the standards our audiences expect. We believe the role of Robbie Gibb, both on the Board, and as part of the Editorial Standards Committee, is untenable. We call on the BBC to do better for our audiences and recommit to our values of impartiality, honesty and reporting without fear or favour.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Sunday Brunch host issues apology to Aisling Bea after 'boring' mum question
Sunday Brunch hosts Tim Lovejoy and Simon Rimmer issued an apology to comedian Aisling Bea after they asked her a 'boring' question about motherhood Sunday Brunch hosts Simon Rimmer and Tim Lovejoy playfully said sorry to comedian Aisling Bea after they quizzed her on her personal life. The Irish comedian made an appearance on the Channel 4 morning show alongside guests like Big Zuu, with Kat Sadler and Lizzie Davidson from Such Brave Girls. Almost immediately into the show, Tim disclosed a backstage chat with Aisling, prompting a cheeky apology from him. He explained: "Aisling, this morning you came in and I said to you, 'How is it being a mum?' and then Simon said to you, 'Congratulations, I've not seen you since becoming a mum,' and you said, 'Simon, the boring thing and being a mum is that everyone keeps asking about it'." "So I apologise for that," he said with a chuckle: "But how is it being a mum?" reports the Manchester Evening News. Aisling responded with playful repartee: "Thank you for apologising, I'll work on forgiveness but I can't guarantee it." She continued: "I still identify as a child-free, single lady because of the vibe but I do have a baby and a boyfriend." With her signature wit, Aisling commented on "rival show" Saturday Kitchen, saying her little one "couldn't get her head around it" so she likely wasn't watching her mum today. Opening up about motherhood, she added: "I feel like I'm not a mum yet, at the start you're just like dealing with a new person in the house, I think it'll be a while before that feels like I'm a mother." Aisling revealed that she and her partner Jack Freeman became parents for the first time in August last year, after getting celebrities like Paul Rudd and Travis Kelce to announce her pregnancy news months earlier. She took to Instagram to share the birth of her baby, posting a series of photos showing her growing bump, ending with a final snap of her cradling her newborn daughter in hospital. In a playful post, she wrote: "Trip advisor review of Pregnancy One star," and listed a series of "negatives" such as it being "expensive" and leaving her feeling "very unrested". "Not as described online or in pictures. Reminded me of the Glasgow Willie Wonka experience. Towards the end of my stay I was repeatedly kicked in the nuts," she continued. She then went on to list: "UTIs, bleeding, depression, cramps, insomnia, nosebleeds, sinus blockage, migraines, vomiting, being randomly touched by people without asking, bones mushing, organs moving, skin stretching, being told that you'll forget all the pain/that it's a privilege / that it will all be "worth it" in the end, heightened awareness of climate change and worst of all- boredom- all described as « normal » and was repeatedly recommended « a nice bath » as a fix to all of the above." Aisling also shared the "positives", saying she enjoyed the bath at the end and appreciated the help with her bags, adding: "Before checking out, nearby kebab shop man provided free extra chips and quite a flirty wink, which I appreciated. Was given a little gift at check out which is, admittedly, quite cute. " Sunday Brunch airs from 10am on Channel 4.
