Bomb threat diverts plane of hajj pilgrims in Indonesia
17 Jun 2025 04:56pm
Drone footage captured today, 12 Dhu Al-Hijjah (June 8, 2025), at approximately 4pm, shows footage of the Grand Mosque in Makkah. - Photo by Bernama
JAKARTA - A plane carrying hundreds of hajj pilgrims back from Saudi Arabia was diverted in Indonesia on Tuesday after an email bomb threat was sent to authorities, Indonesia's aviation body said.
The Directorate General of Civil Aviation said it received a report from Indonesia's airport operator "regarding a bomb threat sent by an unidentified person via electronic mail".
The email at 07:30 am (0030 GMT) contained a threat to "blow up" Saudia Airlines flight SV 5276 which was flying from the Saudi city of Jeddah to the Indonesian capital Jakarta, it said in a statement. Pilgrims from around the world made their way to the Jamrah to perform the stoning ritual. - Photo by Bernama
After 10:00 am the pilot diverted the plane from its destination of Jakarta's Soekarno-Hatta International Airport to Kualanamu International Airport in Medan, a city on Sumatra island in western Indonesia.
The flight was carrying 442 hajj pilgrims, including 207 men and 235 women, it added.
"Upon identifying security and safety threats, the pilot decided to divert the landing to the nearest airport," said InJourney Airports, Indonesia's airport operator.
A transport ministry official told AFP the plane was still in Medan and Flightradar24 showed the plane there.
The airport evacuated the pilgrims and a bomb disposal unit swept the plane for explosive devices, the aviation body said in its statement. - AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Prabowo reconciles with opposition through pardons
JAKARTA: President Prabowo Subianto has taken a major stride to reconcile with two convicted opposition figures by granting them clemency and eliminating their prison sentences, a move widely seen as an effort to curb dissent and stabilise his first term in office. In an unexpected move, Prabowo submitted a request with the House of Representatives requesting abolition for former trade minister Thomas Lembong as well as amnesty for 1,116 convicts, including Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) secretary-general Hasto Kritiyanto. Thomas was sentenced for 4.5 years in prison after the court found him guilty in a corruption case pertaining to raw sugar import. Meanwhile, the Jakarta Corruption Court sentenced Hasto last week to 3.5 years in prison over bribery pertaining to a 2019 legislative seat appointment scheme. House Deputy Speaker Sufmi Dasco Ahmad and Law Minister Supratman Andi Agtas, both from Prabowo's Gerindra Party, announced on Thursday (July 31) night that the legislature approved the proposal following consultations between the government and House party factions. Supratman confirmed that he initiated both clemency requests, citing 'national interest, political unity and the individuals' past contributions' to the country. 'This is about thinking in terms of the republic. Both individuals have demonstrated service to the nation, and the priority now is to strengthen our cohesion,' he told reporters during the briefing at the Senayan legislative complex in Jakarta. Deputy State Secretary Juri Ardiantoro reiterated national unity as the motivation behind the decision: 'If we want to move forward, it must be together through mutual cooperation.' He dismissed notions that Prabowo was seeking to interfere with the legal process, stressing that all Indonesian citizens are entitled to equal treatment under the law. Analysts called Prabowo's clemency for Thomas and Hasto a politicization of the justice system, warning that the decision risks eroding judicial independence and weakening Indonesia's anticorruption efforts. Constitutional law expert Bivitri Susanti slammed the move as a form of 'legal politicisation' with legal matters being settled through political means. She warned that such actions could undermine the rule of law. 'It may appear to solve problems for [Thomas and Hasto] as well as their supporters. But this is still political interference. It could create a dangerous precedent for antigraft efforts,' Bivitri said. She added that normal legal avenues, including appealing the court verdict, were still available, as legal teams of both convicts indicated that they had planned to file a petition with the appellate court. Lawyers of both convicts welcomed Prabowo's decision to give their clients pardons. Hasto's legal representative Ronny Talapessy insisted that the case was 'politically charged since the beginning', while Thomas' legal team said that the abolition should not be seen as 'acknowledging wrongdoing'. Both Thomas and Hasto's camps claimed both cases were politically motivated and driven by their criticism toward former president Joko 'Jokowi' Widodo, who tacitly backed Prabowo in last year's election. Thomas served as a co-captain of failed presidential candidate Anies Baswedan's campaign in the 2024 election. Meanwhile, PDI-P, the only de facto opposition party in the legislature, has repeatedly said the probe into Hasto was an effort to target him for being critical to Jokowi, a former member of the nationalist party. With both convicts pardoned, analysts see the chance of a strong opposition emerging against Prabowo's administration growing slim, as an amnesty for Hasto may influence how PDI-P may decide its stance towards Prabowo's administration. Political analyst Kennedy Muslim from Indikator Politik said the move was 'part of Prabowo's natural inclination to build a giant coalition' to 'balance power among parties so that none become too dominant, except for the President himself.' 'It's a small price to pay compared to giving PDI-P a clear 'brand' as an opposition party for the next four years,' Kennedy said. 'They are poised to reap the political benefits should Prabowo's administration underperform.' Prabowo might also be trying to ease political friction and maintain stability as well as cooperation between the government and opposition-leaning forces, said Arya Fernandes of Jakarta-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). An expected political reconciliation following the pardon suggests legal proceedings will be used as leverage in elite political negotiations, a trend which developed during Jokowi's administration and now persists under Prabowo, according to Ian Wilson, a senior fellow at the Indo-Pacific Research Centre at Murdoch University in Australia. 'It less sets a precedent than constitutes a continuation of the political weaponization of corruption charges seen in the previous administration,' Wilson told The Jakarta Post. He suggested the pardon had shifted the country's political landscape, pointing out PDI-P chair Megawati Soekarnoputri's call for members during a party event on Wednesday to back Prabowo's government for 'stability', despite the party having yet to take an official stance towards the administration. 'Pressure will now be on Anies to do something similar,' Wilson said, 'and abandon his opposition movement-building efforts such as through mass organisation.' Senior PDI-P politician Said Abdullah denied claims that the recent amnesty for Hasto was part of a political deal, stressing that such practices did not align with the party's principles. 'There was absolutely nothing transactional about it,' Said told reporters. 'Let's not jump to such conclusions. It's not in the character of our party, let alone Ibu Megawati.' - The Jakarta Post/ANN
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Three Bangladeshi men killed in highway crash at LPT1 near Kuantan
KUANTAN: Three Bangladeshi men were killed and two others injured after the multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) they were travelling in skidded off the road at KM200.8 of the East Coast Highway (LPT1) near here yesterday. Acting Kuantan police chief Supt Mohd Adli Mat Daud said the crash occurred around 7:30 pm, claiming the lives of driver Md Sabber Hasan, 30, and passengers Md Jahid Hasan, 21, and Abdullah, 24. Initial investigations revealed the Toyota Avanza was heading from Kuantan to Kuala Lumpur when the driver lost control, causing the vehicle to skid left. Two other passengers, Md Habib Bissas, 45, and Maniram Chandra Bas, 40, were injured and taken to Tengku Ampuan Afzan Hospital (HTAA). Mohd Adli confirmed the driver lacked a valid license, and the vehicle's road tax had expired since May 2025. The case is being investigated under Section 41(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987. - Bernama
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Tesla ordered to pay US$242mil over fatal Autopilot crash
NEW YORK: A Florida jury on Friday ordered Tesla to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to plaintiffs who blamed a deadly 2019 crash on the company's "Autopilot" driver assistance technology. The jury found Tesla's system partly responsible for a crash in Key Largo that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, according to attorney Darren Jeffrey Rousso, a partner at the law firm that represented Angulo and Leon's family. The plaintiffs had alleged that Autopilot was to blame when driver George McGee's Tesla careened into a Chevrolet sport utility vehicle, killing Leon and injuring Angulo. The jury awarded US$200 million in punitive damages, plus US$59 million in compensatory damages to Leon's family and US$70 million in damages to Angulo, according to court records. Since the jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla, the compensatory damages will be reduced, Rousso said, with the total impact of the jury award totalling US$242 million after these reductions. "Justice was done," Rousso said. "The jury heard all the evidence and came up with a fair and just verdict on behalf of our clients." Tesla will appeal the decision, according to its defence attorneys. "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeapordise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," Tesla said through its legal team. "The evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator – which overrode Autopilot – as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road," Tesla said. "To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash. This was never about Autopilot."--AFP
