D.C. Republicans pile on Nashville mayor over ICE response — and imply more action in city
After Ogles — flanked by several state lawmakers and Metro Nashville Council Member David Benton — reasserted a previous call to investigate O'Connell during a Memorial Day news conference, an official with the Trump administration is now weighing in. Tom Homan, the White House's executive associate director of enforcement and removal operations or 'border czar,' appeared on Fox News on May 27 to criticize O'Connell.
'I've said from day one — you can not cooperate with ICE if that's what you want to do, but you can't get in our way and you can't impede our efforts,' Homan said. 'If you cross that line, we'll seek prosecution.'
Those comments stem from the mayor's Executive Order 30, which lays out a process and timeline for city departments to report communications with federal immigration authorities to the mayor's office. O'Connell amended the executive order in the middle of a weeklong ICE operation in Nashville in early May, adjusting the timeline so that the mayor's office is notified within one business day rather than within several.
Homan also seemed to point toward another escalation in immigration enforcement in Nashville, saying he would 'flood the zone' with agencies including the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, ICE and U.S. Marshals.
'If he wants to push back and support sanctuary cities, that means we 'flood the zone,'' Homan continued. 'We'll flood the zone in the neighborhoods to find the bad guy, we'll flood the zone at work sites to find the bad guy, but we're going to do it and he's not going to stop us.'
Nashville is not a sanctuary city, nor is any city in the state of Tennessee. In fact, sanctuary cities are banned outright in Tennessee and have been for about seven years. The Tennessee legislature passed another law during a special session at the start of 2025 that, in part, criminalizes local officials who support sanctuary policies for immigrants.
Asked whether O'Connell would be charged with obstructing ICE officials, Homan said, 'We'll see.' Homan confirmed the congressional investigation Ogles has called for and said he 'cannot confirm or deny' if ICE is also investigating O'Connell. Homan added that he planned to come to Nashville himself 'in the near future' and said he'd be open to meeting with O'Connell.
During the appearance, Homan was also briefly critical of The Belonging Fund, which was established in the midst of the Nashville ICE operation to provide financial support to nonprofit organizations offering emergency assistance to immigrant families. That fund is not city-run but instead facilitated by the Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee, which notes on its website that donations to the fund are made possible solely by individual donors and private organizations, meaning no government contributions are included. Benton, the Metro Nashville Council member, called for a state or federal audit of the fund during his Memorial Day appearance with Ogles.
On May 28, the Metro Nashville Council's Immigrant Caucus issued a news release condemning Benton's remarks on Memorial Day, calling them "racist propaganda," "inaccurate" and "inflammatory." The caucus also called for Benton, who represents part of Antioch where the ICE sweeps were focused, to resign.
'Councilmember Benton does not deserve to hold public office,' the release reads. 'His conduct and comments are unbecoming of an elected official, particularly one representing a district with a significant Latino population.'
The mayor's office has a history of publicizing Community Foundation funds established to respond to particular events or crises, like the Nashville School Violence Support & Healing Fund created to support victims of the January 2025 Antioch High shooting.
O'Connell, for his part, repeatedly stated during the operation that the amended executive order likely wouldn't have changed the city's response in any way, nor would it have empowered the city to share details publicly on a looming immigration enforcement operation beyond communications between city departments.
O'Connell's office had not responded to The Tennessean's request for comment by early afternoon on May 28. O'Connell has previously declined to comment on Ogles' earlier calls for an investigation.
Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), a member of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, also made an appearance on Fox News to criticize O'Connell on May 28, albeit more briefly than Homan. Biggs called the executive order 'outrageous' and said it incentivizes people to 'not cooperate with ICE.'
Biggs said that makes ICE operations 'more dangerous' for both federal agents and neighborhoods, since 'ICE is going to have to go into those neighborhoods' to find people that, purportedly, are 'hiding out there.'
'It's actually going to result in more arrests and deportations because if they get there and there's a bad guy and they happen to be with people that we wouldn't even be looking at, they're going to get arrested as well if they're illegally in the country,' Biggs said.
Austin Hornbostel is the Metro reporter for The Tennessean. Have a question about local government you want an answer to? Reach him at ahornbostel@tennessean.com.
Get Davidson County news delivered to your inbox every Wednesday.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: D.C. Republicans pile on Nashville mayor, imply more ICE action
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Number of Democratic voters who are ‘extremely motivated' to vote in next election skyrockets
Nearly three-quarters of Democratic voters say they are 'extremely motivated' to cast their ballots in the 2026 midterm elections, a dramatic uptick from four years ago, polling shows. Just six months after Republicans took control of the White House and Congress, 72 percent of Democrats and Democratic-aligned voters say they are 'extremely motivated' to vote in the next election, a CNN poll conducted by SSRS this month found. By contrast, only 50 percent of Republicans say the same. Democrats are now looking to enter midterm elections in 2026 under similar circumstances as 2018 in an attempt to break up the GOP's control of both chambers of Congress and the White House. During the 2018 elections, voters dealt a massive blow to President Donald Trump's first-term agenda, with House Democrats gaining 23 seats to take control of the House. In October 2022, two years into President Joe Biden's term when Democrats narrowly controlled the trifecta, just 44 percent of Democratic voters expressed the same motivation to vote in the midterm. That figure was just slightly higher for Republicans, with 48 percent saying they were eager to vote. In that election, Republicans clinched the House of Representatives while Democrats retained control of the Senate. Still, the poll shows Democrats could have some work cut out for them. Just 28 percent of respondents said they view the Democratic Party favorably. Meanwhile, 33 percent expressed a favorable view of the Republican Party. 'I think that the Democratic Party, we have a lot of work to do to make sure we are meeting voters where they are, listening to what they have to say, and talking to them about issues that they want us to take action on,' Virginia Democratic Congresswoman Jennifer McClellan told CNN in response to the poll. "What's going to matter is what we're doing on the ground in these districts.' Recovering from Kamala Harris' defeat to Trump in 2024, Democrats are looking to harness an electorate that they lost in the last election. A separate poll by Lake Research Partners and Way to Win analyzed 'Biden skippers,' those living in battleground states who voted for Biden in 2020 but sat out of the 2024 presidential election. The survey poked holes in the idea that Harris was 'too far left.' Progressive lawmaker Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez topped the list of public figures respondents viewed positively, with 78 percent having a favorable view of Sanders and 67 percent having a favorable view of Ocasio-Cortez. Republicans are also making moves ahead of the 2026 midterms. The White House is already strategizing to ensure the GOP retains the trifecta. The plan reportedly includes Trump returning to the campaign trail as well as him having a hand in advising which candidates run and which 'stay put' in the upcoming election, sources told Politico.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's approval tanks amid Epstein fallout - now less than 30% of independent's approve
President Donald Trump's approval rating has tanked, amid the Jeffrey Epstein files fallout, with less than 30 percent of independents approving of the way the president is handling his job. A new Gallup poll shows Trump's overall approval rating at 37 percent. When broken up across political affiliation, 89 percent of Republicans approve of the job the president is doing. For independents, 29 percent approve of the president's performance and only 2 percent of Democrats approve. The 37 percent approval rating is the lowest of Trump's second term and mere points away from his all-time worst rating of 34 percent at the end of his first term. When it comes to specific issues, just 38 percent of Americans approve of Trump's handling of immigration, and 37 percent approve of his handling of the economy, two major issues of the president's campaign. The poll was taken between July 7 and 21, after Trump signed his 'big, beautiful bill,' which extended his 2017 tax cuts and increased border security funding while cutting welfare programs such as Medicaid and SNAP. Trump's victory lap on the legislation came to a crashing halt after the Justice Department and FBI came out with a memo stating there was no client list from Epstein, the wealthy financier and convicted sex offender who died in jail in 2019. The White House has faced backlash, notably from its own base, after Trump had promised to release the files, and then the feds effectively said the matter was closed. Trump had asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'produce any and all pertinent' grand jury testimony from Epstein's case, 'subject to Court approval,' citing the 'ridiculous amount of publicity' over the case. But the court denied that request. The president's past relationship with Epstein has also been at the center of controversy. The Wall Street Journal reported Trump had been told in May by Attorney General Pam Bondi that his name appeared in the Epstein Files 'multiple times'. The president denied such claims to reporters earlier this month. Appearing in the files does not indicate an individual has committed any wrongdoing and Trump has not been accused of misconduct in connection with the Epstein case. While respondents in the Gallup poll were not asked about the Epstein drama, a poll conducted by The Economist and YouGov from July 11 to 14 found 67 percent of Americans believe the government is hiding evidence related to the sex offender. When asked if the government should release all documents relating to the feds' Epstein case, 79 percent of respondents said it should.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Gov. Hochul's latest redistricting threat is dangerous and undemocratic
Gov. Kathy Hochul and fellow Democrats are again threatening to rig New York's congressional voting-district maps to win seats for their party. And in mid-decade, no less, in clear violation of the state Constitution. It's sleazy, anti-democratic — and illegal. Even Hochul admits it, but suggests Dems may do it anyway since Texas and Ohio are moving to draw up new districts in their states. Gov. Kathy Hochul and Democrats are again threatening to rig New York's congressional voting-district maps, writes The Post Editorial Board. Andrew Schwartz / 'All's fair in love and war,' she huffed last week. 'If there's other states violating the rules and are trying to give themselves an advantage, all I'll say is, I'm going to look at it closely.' Huh? If Texas and Ohio rig their maps, that doesn't give Hochul & Co. the right to break New York's laws — even if her goal is to offset any advantage Republicans get in those states. Note, too, that Hochul is huffing not about protecting New York's influence in Congress but her party's. And at the expense, presumably, of Republican voters in New York, since the goal would be to draw district lines favorable to Democrats. True, Texas and Ohio Republicans are expected draw lines they hope will favor them. But if those states cheat their Democratic voters, those voters can sue. Hochul and her party are worried that if more Republicans are elected from those states, it'll make it harder for Democrats to win control of the House in next year's midterms. But again, if the donkeys think those states are breaking any laws, they can go to court, too. Meanwhile, if Hochul tried to gerrymander in time for the midterm, she'd be doubly violating the state Constitution. First, redistricting can take place only once every 10 years, after the Census, not mid-decade. Second, in 2014 New Yorkers passed a constitutional amendment that empowered an independent decennial redistricting commission and specifically banned partisan gerrymandering. But Democrats ignored the amendment and tried to gerrymander anyway a few years ago, and it took a ruling by the state's top court to stop them. We don't condone gerrymandering, by either party, in any state. It cheats voters, skews representation and undermines democracy. As even Democratic boss Jay Jacobs warns, 'We need to be careful about democracy,' adding, 'You don't change the rules of the game to your advantage just because you can.' Given the tight timeframe, it's unlikely Democrats could pull this off. But then, if New York Dems were willing to violate the Constitution before, who can be sure they won't 'break the rules' again to push through corrupt new district lines in time? New Yorkers of both parties should demand Hochul take back her threat and obey the law.
