
McGregor whiskey trial deferred after former friend comes across new information
The trial of a multi-million euro lawsuit taken against Conor McGregor by his former friend and sparring partner Artem Lobov over the creation of a whiskey brand will not now go ahead next week.
An eight-day High Court case was due to get under way on Tuesday.
But that date was vacated yesterday by Mr Justice Brian Cregan after lawyers for Mr Lobov said their client wished to amend his pleadings.
The eleventh-hour intervention came after Mr Lobov came across new information and wished to change the date he believed an alleged oral agreement with Mr McGregor had been discussed.
While Mr Lobov's side wished to go ahead with the trial as scheduled, following an objection from lawyers for Mr McGregor, they consented to the trial date being vacated.
The court will now hear an application to change details in the plenary summons and statement of claim next Wednesday. It is unclear when the trial might now take place.
Millions of euro are at stake in the case, which was set to be heard just six months after another high-profile civil action involving Mr McGregor.
Dublin hair stylist Nikita Hand was awarded close to €250,000 in damages last November after her successful civil rape case against the former UFC champion.
Mr McGregor is appealing the outcome and is seeking a retrial.
Mr Lobov (38), a mixed martial arts fighter known as 'The Russian Hammer', claims to have been the initial creator and co-founder of the whiskey that became Proper No Twelve.
He alleges Mr McGregor (36) reneged on an oral agreement to pay him 5pc of proceeds from the sale of the whiskey brand. The claims are disputed by Mr McGregor.
In legal filings, Mr Lobov said he accepted the alleged offer made by Mr McGregor while they were in a gym in Dublin in September 2017, and that there were three others present when this occurred.
But his counsel Andrew Walker SC told the court yesterday that his client had discovered an old phone 'which gave him further clarity on the date' and Mr Lobov now said the oral agreement was reached within a six-day period in October 2017.
Mr Walker sought leave to bring a motion for the amendment of the pleadings, to change the date of the alleged agreement.
Were the court to side with Mr Lobov, Mr McGregor could be ordered to pay him close to €6m
Shelley Horan BL, for McGregor, said if the application was made, her side would not be in a position to go ahead with the trial on Tuesday.
'We have a number of witnesses lined up to meet a particular type of case, which would change if the amendment is granted,' she said.
Ms Horan also said her side's discovery requests had extended only to the end of September 2017.
Mr Walker said the amendment would not change things because there was no memo of the agreement. However, Mr Justice Cregan said he was 'not impressed'.
'It is quite clear the defendant is prejudiced by this application. Whether it is successful or not successful, your witness is now going to give evidence about a completely different date and the defendant needs time to prepare its defence for that date,' the judge said.
Mr McGregor is reputed to have been paid $130m (€116.1m) when he and two other shareholders subsequently sold their stakes in the whiskey to Proximo Spirits, owners of Jose Cuervo tequila, for a reported $600m in 2021.
Were the court to side with Mr Lobov, Mr McGregor could be ordered to pay him close to €6m.
Mr Lobov claims he suggested in late 2016 that Mr McGregor develop a whiskey
Russian-born Mr Lobov, a retired professional fighter with a master's degree from DCU in finance and capital markets, claims he came up with the whiskey brand idea after studying the liquor market in university.
He alleges that in a gym, Mr McGregor orally agreed that he would receive 5pc of the proceeds of the whiskey.
Mr McGregor later offered to pay him $1m for what he claims was Mr Lobov's 'limited involvement in prior events', but denies any such agreement existed. Mr Lobov refused to take the money.
In the proceedings, Mr Lobov claims he suggested in late 2016 that Mr McGregor develop a whiskey and that he was authorised by him to investigate potential deals.
Artem Lobov and Conor McGregor
News in 90 Seconds - May 18th
This, Mr Lobov says, culminated in him identifying West Cork Distillers and Malones Whiskey as potential partners in a deal that would have seen Mr McGregor retain 100pc ownership of the brand and a company incorporated to sell the whiskey, with profits split on a 50-50 basis with the distillers.
However, Mr McGregor instead incorporated a company called Éire Born Ventures with sports agent Audie Attar and businessman Ken Austin, which entered a joint venture with Proximo Spirits.
At a previous pre-trial hearing, Liam Bell BL, for Mr Lobov, told the court his client's case was that he was, in essence, 'muscled out by the parties and wasn't paid what he was due'.
Mr Lobov is suing for the specific performance of the alleged agreement or damages; that is, he wants the court to order Mr McGregor to pay him 5pc of the sale proceeds received by the former UFC champion or to pay damages for breach of agreement, misrepresentation and breach of his economic interests.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
34 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Worker who suffered brain injury after being hit by steel jack settles case for €4.75m
A man who suffered a traumatic brain injury when he was allegedly struck by a steel jack that dislodged when a car drove by road works has settled a High Court action for €4.75 million. Karam Ali (25) was a general operative laying ducts on Shantalla Road in Galway city when the incident happened five years ago, the court heard on Wednesday. Edward Walsh SC, for Mr Ali, said a car struck a steel jack, which then collided with Mr Ali. Counsel said liability was conceded last year and the case was before the court for assessment of damages only. The settlement was reached after mediation. READ MORE He said Mr Ali suffered an acquired brain injury and now has difficulty with concentration, excess fatigue and other problems. He had been in this country for eight months when the incident occurred. Mr Ali, with an address in Bradford, England, had sued car driver Mohamed El Helali of Barnacranny, Bushy Park, Galway, as a result of the incident on May 1st, 2020. It was claimed that the car suddenly and without warning struck a steel jack, which in turn hit Mr Ali, and he suffered catastrophic injuries. Mr Ali was wearing a safety helmet, which it was claimed was knocked off. It was also claimed there was a failure to appreciate the presence of Mr Ali on the roadway and a failure to appreciate that works were ongoing. It was further claimed that the driver allegedly neglected to look where he was driving and allegedly failed to drive with due care and attention and to proceed cautiously past the works where Mr Ali was working. There was, it was claimed, a failure to take account of the roadworks and traffic conditions at the time, and to take heed of Mr Ali on the public road. Mr Ali sustained fractures to the skull and was taken to hospital in Galway. He was later transferred to Dublin, where he had to have an operation to remove part of his skull to manage brain swelling due to severe traumatic brain injury. His family travelled to Ireland to be at his bedside and he was later transferred to a British hospital. Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Paul Coffey said it was fair and reasonable.


Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Final cost of INM High Court inspection was €5.82m
The bill includes €481,000 of legal and other costs in 2024, the year the long running corporate probe ended with the publication of an 868-page report. It does not include costs to other parties involved in the case. The costs include fees paid to Irish barrister Sean Gillane SC and UK solicitor Robert Fleck, who as inspectors investigated a series of claims including that Leslie Buckley, as INM's then chairman, acted improperly in ways to benefit businessman Denis O'Brien, who was then a 29.9pc shareholder in INM. Concerns raised at the time the report was published suggesting the final cost to taxpayers might multiply proved wide of the mark, according to Ian Drennan, CEO of the Corporate Enforcement Authority (CEA). He was writing in the introduction to the agency's annual report for last year which was published on July 2nd. 'In the immediate aftermath of the publication of the Inspectors' Report, it was suggested in media commentary that the Inspection might ultimately cost the State in excess of €40m. The actual cost of the Inspection was €5.82m and no additional expenditures or liabilities that might increase that amount in any meaningful way have eventuated since that time,' he wrote. The CEA took the decision not to bring any enforcement action against any of the people who's actions at the then stock market listed INM had been subject to the inspection. However, in his report, Ian Drennan said that would not mean his agency is less likely to seek a similar process in future in relation to another company where it believed its powers of investigation fell short of what was required to investigate potential corporate wrongdoing. 'Should circumstances arise in the future in which the CEA were to take the view that an application to the High Court for the appointment of Inspectors was warranted, the CEA would not hesitate to do so,' he wrote. The final inspectors report included important lessons on the standards of governance expected by the law, he said. The six-year investigation by High Court inspectors into allegations of wrongdoing at Independent News and Media (INM) ultimately found its former chairman. Leslie Buckley, did pass confidential information to Denis O'Brien in a way that was not compliant with the company's policies and the terms of a memorandum he signed in 2016 but that he did not break company law. The probe was launched after allegations made by INM's then former CEO Robert Pitt, and Ryan Preston, its chief finance officer, about Mr Buckley's conduct as INM chairman. The inspectors' report made some criticisms of Mr Buckley's conduct but did not uphold the allegations that he broke company law or had tried to use INM resources to benefit Mr O'Brien to the detriment of INM's other shareholders.


RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Ex-swim coach Gibney faces 79 charges over alleged abuse of four girls
Former Irish national and Olympic swimming coach George Gibney is facing 79 charges in connection with the alleged sexual abuse of four girls in the 1970s and 1980s, according to court documents filed in the United States. Mr Gibney was remanded in custody by a judge in Orlando and is due back in court next Friday week. The 77-year-old was arrested on foot of international arrest warrants seeking his extradition back to Ireland to face the charges of alleged historical sexual abuse. Legal documents filed in the US District Court show Mr Gibney is wanted to face 78 counts of indecently assaulting the four girls and one count of also attempting to rape one of them. Mr Gibney was the alleged victims' coach at the time, and they were aged between eight and 15 years old according to the documents filed with the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Mr Gibney appeared at a brief hearing yesterday before Judge Daniel Irick and was remanded in custody to appear again in court for a detention hearing on Friday week, the 11 July. He submitted a financial affidavit and was granted a public defender. The US documents also show that the Dublin District Court issued 79 warrants for Mr Gibney's arrest on 6 June 2023, one for each of the alleged offences. The Irish Embassy in Washington formally requested his extradition in October last year. The 300-page court filing also says all four alleged victims contacted the gardaí between 2020 and 2022, after the BBC Podcast "Where is George Gibney" was broadcast and that the complaints were made on 4 February, 2 August and 29 September in 2021, and 20 July 2022. The alleged victims were not part of the earlier case against Mr Gibney when in 1994 he secured a High Court injunction preventing the DPP proceeding against him.