logo
Colorado Democrats gut Uber and transgender bills ahead of adjournment

Colorado Democrats gut Uber and transgender bills ahead of adjournment

Axios08-05-2025
Colorado lawmakers blared " Final Countdown" from the state Senate's speakers and rushed three dozen bills to the finish line Wednesday before adjourning at 7:22pm.
Why it matters: The last day of the legislative session is the most important — the make-or-break moment for hundreds of proposed new laws.
State of play: The rush rescued legislation for K-12 school funding and free school meals, but required Democrats to make compromises on other flagship legislation.
Case in point: The sponsors of a measure to address safety concerns on ride-sharing platforms, like Uber and Lyft, gutted their own legislation at the behest of the companies that called the new rules unworkable.
The version approved along party lines in the final hours no longer requires in-ride audio and video recordings and removes most of the provisions holding the companies legally liable for bad actors.
Bill sponsor Sen. Jessie Danielson (D-Wheat Ridge) acknowledged the "drastic changes and compromises" but asked her colleagues "to stand with the survivors … to help regulate these companies in the name of safety, real safety."
The bill still would require ride-share companies to prohibit drivers from sharing food or drinks with passengers and force companies to conduct driver background checks every six months.
The companies and Gov. Jared Polis are still expressing concerns about the language, making its future uncertain.
Friction point: Two bills approved to protect transgender individuals also came down to the wire and survived hours of opposing debate from Republicans.
A weakened House Bill 1312 would add gender identity to the current anti-discrimination law and prohibits deadnaming.
Other provisions require schools with policies on names to consider transgender students and allow students to choose either option available in a school dress code.
The second bill would put a current rule that insurance companies cover gender-affirming care into state law. The move is designed to protect against adverse federal action on the topic.
The other side: Republicans argued the transgender bills involve "experimental medicine" and infringe on the role of parents.
"We should be uniting families, not driving wedges between them," Sen. Scott Bright (R-Platteville) said during the debate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge
DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge

Axios

time38 minutes ago

  • Axios

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge

The Department of Justice filed a misconduct complaint against federal Judge James Boasberg"for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration," Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Monday. The big picture: The D.C.-based U.S. District Court chief judge has previously angered the Trump administration with his rulings on deportations. Boasberg has been the target of an impeachment effort by Trump and House Republicans after the George W. Bush-appointed judge questioned the administration's decision to disregard an order against the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelans. Driving the news: Bondi said on X that she had directed the DOJ to take the action because the judge's comments "have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that." Representatives for the DOJ did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on what the complaint specifically refers to and Boasberg's chambers did not immediately respond to Axios' Monday night phone message seeking comment on the matter. Catch up quick: Boasberg raised the ire of the administration in March when he ordered that flights deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members should turn around. The White House said it ignored the judge's order because it was issued after the flights had already departed and left U.S. jurisdiction. The Trump administration defended its decision to follow through with the deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th century war time law. The president said Boasberg "should be IMPEACHED" over the matter — prompting Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare statement saying that impeaching a federal judge is "not an appropriate response" to disagreeing with a ruling. Meanwhile, Boasberg said in April that he found probable cause to hold the administration in contempt for defying his order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store