Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs as tech giant continues automation wave
Speaking to NewsWire in Japan this week, Amazon's global head of PR for robotics and AI, Xavier Chao, compared AI robots and sorting machines to offices having a coffee machine and snacks close to the desks.
'Retention is very, vitally important for us if we want to continue to manage and sustain our business and grow; we have to retain our workforce,' Mr Chao said.
'And so we think that innovation is part of the solution of creating a nice workplace that attracts people, and retains staff.'
Australia has eight Amazon 'fulfilment centre' warehouses; seven of these do not have Amazon's robots. The custom designed and built robots operate using AI, moving stacks of products for humans to pick and put into boxes.
Australia's robotised Amazon warehouse is at Kemps Creek in Sydney, and employs about 2500 workers.
With Australia's comparatively low-tech Amazon facilities - compared to warehouses in comparable countries - retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots has stalled.
In June, Amazon announced it would be investing $20bn in data centres in Australia, reiterating concerns about the e-commerce company's entrenchment in the Australian economy.
Anthony Albanese faces internal pressure from high-ranking Labor MPs, The Australian reports, over accusations Amazon undermines labour laws and employs tax avoidance tactics.
These criticisms are echoed by unions - the ACTU, TWU and the SDA - who claim Amazon Australia's workplace practices are unethical.
Asked if operating in countries with relatively strong workplace protections was tough for Amazon, Mr Chao said 'Right now, what we're really hyper-focused on is can these systems actually benefit our frontline workers, and getting feedback from them'.
He argues wide-scale automation is good for workers.
'If we can create the most innovative workplace that we possibly can, we want to try to do three things.
'Safety … Ease - all of us want to have an easier job.
'And then three, it's exposure. So a lot of people who come and work at an Amazon facility, you know, there are people from all walks of life.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
To buy, or to rent? How housing affordability stacks up across the states
To buy, or to rent? How housing affordability stacks up across the states Published 4 July 2025, 8:16 am It's an age old question: is it cheaper to buy or rent? A new report by property group Domain has revealed that servicing a mortgage on a house is cheaper in 6 per cent of suburbs around the country. For units, it's almost 23 per cent. But in Perth, nearly 83 per cent of apartments are cheaper to buy than rent. And while that may be a win for buyers, it highlights the struggles for those in the rental market.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Criterion: Buy, hold or sell CBA? Investors face their NFY resolution
The CBA clearly is overvalued on conventional metrics, but selling is not as simple as that 'Expensive' stocks can remain so for months – or even years The CBA's worthy peers could be cheaper alternatives Happy New Financial Year (NFY) – a time of quiet reflection on the next fiscal stanza between scrambling for receipts to justify Netflix as a tax deduction. As part of their soul searching, investors may resolve to take profits on shares that have done well. Like the New Year's resolution to drink only on weekends rather than days ending with a 'y', NFY intentions dissipate just as quickly. But there's one decision that won't go away – and its got nothing to do with joining a gym. Should they sell their shares in the Commonwealth Bank (ASX:CBA) after last financial year's shock 48% share romp? With the stock down about 5% over the last week, some investors already have lightened up on the bank, rather than with the barbells. Trapped in a 'virtuous cycle' A chorus of expert voices has decried the CBA is chronically overvalued: mainly the fund managers who sold too soon and trashed their 2024-25 performance. In summary, the world's most expensive bank is such because overseas institutions like Australia. The CBA – also the biggest ASX stock- is the obvious proxy for our great nation. As more instos pile into the CBA, there's more buying because of the need to maintain index weighting. The CBA now accounts for 10% of the ASX200 index. This is all very well until a typical bank-like event – such a housing downturn – disrupts this self-reinforcing loop. In the words of Atlas Funds Management's Hugh Dive: 'it's a virtuous cycle until it isn't'. One pillar, three 'stumps' CBA's $300 billion valuation makes its Four Pillars peers look more like three 'stumps'. On Morgan Stanley's numbers, the CBA trades on an estimated current-year earnings multiple of 29 times, compared with 20.4 times for its Westpac (ASX:WBC), National Australia Bank (ASX:NAB) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ASX:ANZ). This compares with a sector average multiple of 12.5 times over the last decade. Of course, most retail investors hold the banks for their franked dividends. On this note, the banks trade on an average forward yield of 4.8%, or 5.8% grossed up (accounting for the franking). The CBA's yield has declined to a mediocre 2.7% (3.9% grossed up). Put in context, a risk-free 12-month CBA term deposit pays 4%. The case for buying To be fair, the CBA has kept its nose out of trouble – and inarguably it's one of the world's best managed banks. Our 'stronger for longer' housing boom sure does help. 'Expensive' shares can remain so for years. This is evidenced by this year's record-breaking run of radiology imaging play ProMedicus (ASX:PME). Or, globally, AI hero Nvidia. So is the next stop for CBA is $200 per share. Or why not $300? The CBA's valuation could be supported if the Goldilocks economy thesis pans out, with tempering inflation enabling more rate cuts (as is expected). Meanwhile, the other three 'Four Pillars' have taken in turns to court disaster and controversy or lose share in the key home mortgage market. Banking on better returns elsewhere That said, the 'three stumps' are excellent banks by global standards. They also have a solid track record of recovering from despite their whoopsies. For those seeking consistent income, they work on a September balance date so pay their divs at a different time to the June-balancing CBA. Still unconvinced? The non-Big Four banks could be a credible alternative. That said, they may lack the relative prudential strength and have a higher cost of capital. Investors in the out-of-sorts Bank of Queensland (ASX:BOQ) enjoyed a 40% bounce share bounce last financial year, secondly only to the CBA's 49% surge. MyState (ASX:MYS) is an exposure to the gentrifying Tasmania market, as well as the Rockhampton and Bundaberg regions. A pure-play business lender Judo Capital Holdings (ASX:JDO) enjoys higher interest margins than on a mortgage, but its risk managers need to be on top of their game. So far, they have been. PNG bank Kina Securities (ASX:KSL) trades on a PE of eight times and an 8% yield. Perversely for the impoverished island nation, Kina has capital adequacy that would put the Big Four to shame.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
An expert has quit over the government's planned social media ban, what now?
One of the experts advising the teen social media ban's tech trial has resigned over concerns about its planned 'age assurance' technology. Between uploading government ID documents to US tech companies and using AI to scan and identify people's ages, it's still unclear how this ban is going to be enforced. Is there a better solution we're missing here? Also, how can we ban social media if we can't decide what it actually is? YouTube has been classified and de-classified as social media throughout the process of developing the bill, and the definition may be more important than we realise when it comes to drawing a technological line in the sand for this ban. Plus, remember the metaverse? The non-Zuckerberg version of the Metaverse is back in the news this week with a new Standard out that could drastically impact teenagers safety online. GUESTS: Emily van der Nagel , lecturer in social media at Monash University , lecturer in social media at Monash University Jocelyn Brewer, founder of Digital Nutrition and psychologist This episode of Download This Show was made on Gadigal land and in Naarm. Technical production by Ann-Marie de Bettencour and Ross Richardson.
