Should You Buy Lucid Stock While It's Below $2.50?
The electric vehicle maker is steadily working to expand its business.
Lucid stock is only appropriate for risk-tolerant investors.
10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group ›
Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) is a startup automaker attempting to take on industry giants. That's a tall order, and as such, most investors are probably better off watching this company from the sidelines. However, for more aggressive investors, the company's award-winning technology in what is still a relatively new electric vehicle (EV) niche could make it worth the risk, particularly while the stock is trading below $2.50 per share.
Here's what you need to know.
The first step for Lucid was to create an electric vehicle that customers would want to buy. It did that, and it has won industry accolades along the way. One of the biggest selling points for Lucid vehicles is the range that they offer -- concerns about being able to travel long distances are among the most notable worries for potential buyers of electric vehicles (EVs).
The only problem is that having the best technology doesn't always lead to business success. The typewriter keyboard is a great example: Most still use the QWERTY configuration, despite the fact that more efficient keyboard configurations were developed -- they just never took off. The VCR versus Betamax battle was another example of the "best" technology not winning out. And Lucid, despite having great technology, is still losing money.
Yes, Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) attempted to do the same thing and succeeded. However, when Tesla did it, the competing legacy automakers weren't making many EVs. The field was wide open. Now, all of the major automakers are making EVs, and a host of other EV makers have debuted around the world. The playing field Lucid is trying to maneuver within is much more crowded.
That said, if Lucid does manage to expand its footprint in the EV industry significantly, there would be material upside potential for the stock. Even if it never matches the gains achieved by Tesla, just half of those gains would still leave investors with huge returns if they buy Lucid now.
But don't jump until you have a clear understanding of the risk. For example, Tesla sold around 337,000 EVs in the first quarter of 2025. Lucid delivered around 3,100 -- barely even a rounding error relative to Tesla's total. The contrast makes it crystal clear just how early Lucid is in its development. Moreover, that 3,100 figure was up by more than 50% from the roughly 2,000 vehicles it delivered in the first quarter of 2024.
Of course, that growth in deliveries also shows the progress that Lucid has been making on the production front. So, too, does the $366 million it lost in the first quarter of 2025 -- as massive as that figure is, it was down sharply from the $681 million loss it booked in the same quarter a year earlier. And yet the red ink is still material, and highlights the risks investors must accept to own this stock.
If you are a risk-averse investor, you should not buy Lucid Group stock right now, no matter what the price is. It is a high-risk upstart, and there's a very real chance that it will never scale up far enough to become sustainably profitable. However, Lucid is making slow and steady progress as a business. Given the capital-intensive nature of manufacturing, that is basically all one can expect.
And yet, if it keeps making slow and steady progress, its chances of success increase. For risk-tolerant investors, it could be worth further research and potentially opening a position in Lucid now. Just go in knowing that a positive outcome is uncertain, and that even if it does achieve one, there are likely to be many more bumps along the way.
Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,010,880!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025
Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Should You Buy Lucid Stock While It's Below $2.50? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) Sustain its Dividend Amid Market Uncertainty?
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (NASDAQ:KMB) is included among the 10 Best Passive Income Stocks to Buy Now. A stack of disposable diapers in the foreground with a mother and her baby in the background. Kimberly-Clark Corporation (NASDAQ:KMB) stands out as a strong income stock, having increased its dividend every year for 53 straight years, a track record that places it among the elite group of Dividend Kings. While past performance doesn't guarantee future increases, this consistent history reflects the company's dedication to rewarding shareholders. With a payout ratio of approximately 67%, the company appears to have enough financial flexibility to continue boosting its dividend in the years ahead. Kimberly-Clark Corporation (NASDAQ:KMB)'s cash position remained strong in the first quarter of 2025. The company reported an operating cash flow of $327 million, and its capital spending came in at $204 million. It remained committed to its shareholder value, returning $466 million to investors through dividends and share repurchases. Kimberly-Clark Corporation (NASDAQ:KMB) currently offers a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.83%, as of July 10. The Texas-based consumer goods company is best known for its well-established brands such as Huggies, Kleenex, and Kotex. The company focuses on essential personal care and household products and operates across international markets. While we acknowledge the potential of KMB as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Design Was Key When Building This Revolutionary Bioscience Company
Ben Lamm Ben Lamm CEO of Colossal Biosciences, Ben Lamm, is focused on is finding a new way, beyond the tried and true strategies of conservation, to stop the extinction of up to fifty percent of all animal species by 2050 — a figure released by the IUCN that could have damaging long term impacts for humanity. Lamm and his team have most famously brought back the mythical direwolf from extinction and created a woolly mouse, but not without a slew of controversy. 'Listen, if everyone liked what we are doing then I would think that we weren't trying hard enough to deliver the breakthrough technology the planet needs,' Lamm said. 'I'm not everyone's flavor, but I don't have to be. The problem is the focus, not making everyone happy,' A board member of the famed Explorer's Club, Lamm is known for his wild ideas which are primarily focused on addressing planetary dangers, bringing what was once considered fringe science to the forefront. 'Everything was fringe science at one point. Microwave ovens; electric cars; the internet,' he explained. 'We don't need to be afraid of fringe ideas. What we should be afraid of is when we stop entertaining fringe ideas and instead double down on only those technologies and solutions that have only worked in the past that we know don't scale or will eventually fail,' And while Lamm revolutionized the world of science and nature while building up his business to become the success it is today, design has been fundamental in each step of the way. 'Design was fundamental to creating Colossal. We knew that if we were successful in our mission, that Colossal had the chance of inspiring the next generation of scientists and conservationists, he explained. 'We really wanted a brand that was approachable to all, fun, educational and full of energy. We settled on this idea that we wanted to build a brand that was old school MTV-meets-Harvard. Since we are creating and evolving life, we wanted that energy to flow through the creative and even colors and copy we chose,' Colossal Biosciences When developing Colossal's digital presence, Lamm and the design team, which consists of an internal creative team and partner agencies, wanted to make something that tied back to CRISPR and genome engineering. 'That is where the Colossal "C" came from. We then really focused on the color palette and messaging to create the 'science streetwear' vibe that the brand evokes,' Lamm said. 'This had to flow through to everything from copy to apparel to web to social and all the content we create,' According to Lamm, part of the job of anyone who wants to educate younger generations on hard science or systems involves distilling the information into core concepts and find a way to present those concepts in a digestible fashion. 'We are now in the attention economy and science has to compete with the latest celebrity gossip, fashion trend or meme,' he explained. 'We need to create content in a way that excites the next generation about science and gives them hope for the future,' Ben Lamm And the company's eye-catching design and inspiring content is working, as hundreds of young people have written to Colossal to express their admiration for the company. 'We get letters from kids inspired by our work — our science, conservation efforts, and commitment to bettering the planet,' explained Dr. Beth Shapiro, Chief Science Officer at Colossal. "I worry about them losing hope when they see how women in science are often treated.' MORE FROM FORBES Forbes This Female Scientist Brought The Dire Wolf Back From Extinction By Emma Kershaw Forbes The Science Of De-Extinction Is Providing Hope For Nature's Future By Emma Kershaw Forbes Billionaire Eugene Shvidler Revealed As The Artist Behind ES23 By Emma Kershaw

Wall Street Journal
27 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
From Joe Lieberman to Elon Musk
Elon Musk and the America Party he announced July 5 promise a well-funded challenge to the two-party status quo. My late father, Joe Lieberman, spent much of his last energy on preparing a third-party challenge in 2024. Known as the No Labels Insurance Policy, the effort would have run a bipartisan unity ticket for president and vice president if the two major parties produced candidates that most Americans could do without. The unity ticket didn't materialize, largely because both parties—mainly the Democrats—thoroughly demonized the effort. They called it a threat to democracy because they thought it could lead to Mr. Trump's election. No Labels employees were publicly identified and doxxed. Donors grew leery. Potential candidates were openly threatened with political oblivion if they became part of the bipartisan effort.