logo
Minuteman III vs Yars: US ICBM Passes Test Days After Russian Launch Flops

Minuteman III vs Yars: US ICBM Passes Test Days After Russian Launch Flops

Miami Herald22-05-2025
The United States has conducted another successful test of an unarmed but nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), while Russia reportedly canceled its own test.
The U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command said Wednesday's test launch demonstrated the nation's nuclear deterrent is "safe, secure, reliable, and effective" in deterring 21st century threats.
Newsweek has reached out to the Russian Defense Ministry for comment by email.
Both Washington and Moscow have maintained a complete "nuclear triad" since the Cold War-consisting of ICBMs, ballistic missile-armed submarines, as well as bomber and fighter aircraft-to deter adversaries and be prepared to respond should deterrence fail.
The Pentagon defines an ICBM as a long-range missile with an estimated range of more than 3,400 miles, capable of launching a global nuclear strike from one region to another. This type of missile can carry more than one warhead, also known as the reentry vehicle.
Prior to the most recent U.S. Minuteman III ICBM test launch, which involved a flight from California to the Central Pacific Ocean, Ukrainian intelligence claimed earlier this week that Russia aborted a "combat training" launch of its Yars ICBM after something "went wrong."
The U.S. operates only one type of ICBM: the Minuteman III, which has a stated range of over 6,000 miles. A total of 400 missiles are deployed in silos across Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Wyoming, and are assigned to three Air Force missile units.
While the Minuteman III missile is capable of carrying up to three nuclear warheads, it is currently equipped with only one. The U.S. ICBM fleet occasionally conducts test launches involving multiple unarmed reentry vehicles, the Federation of American Scientists said.
Last year, the U.S. Air Force conducted three successful flight tests of the Minuteman III missile. Of the four tests carried out in 2023, one unarmed missile was forced to terminate its flight over the Pacific Ocean because of an anomaly, a table published by Newsweek shows.
According to a report prepared by the Federation of American Scientists, the Yars is one of several Russian ICBMs currently in service. The land-based nuclear missile, which has an estimated range of over 6,500 miles, can be launched from either silos or mobile platforms.
The American think tank also estimated that, as of March, Russia possessed a total of 206 Yars missiles. Each missile can carry up to four warheads, available in two variants: "light warheads" and more powerful, medium-yield warheads designed to strike hardened targets.
Like its U.S. counterpart, the Russian military often test-fires its missiles, with the most recent publicized Yars launch taking place last October during a strategic deterrence forces drill. Since 2022, the Yars missile fleet has been test-launched approximately twice a year.
The U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command said: "The ICBM test launch program demonstrates the operational capability of the Minuteman III and ensures the United States' ability to maintain a strong, credible nuclear deterrent as a key element of U.S. national security and the security of U.S. allies and partners."
The Federation of American Scientists commented: "Russia also appears to be in the early stages of development on at least two new ICBM programs, as well as on various hypersonic glide vehicles that could be fitted atop modified ICBMs. There is significant uncertainty, however, regarding the various designations and capabilities of these systems."
Both the U.S. and Russia are likely to conduct further ICBM tests this year. It remains to be seen whether China, another major nuclear power, will carry out its second ICBM test since September 2024.
Related Articles
Chinese Satellites Capture US Bombers and Jets at Island Air BaseNew US-Iran Nuclear Talks as Tensions RiseUS Stealth Jet Carrier Patrols Waters Near ChinaUS and Russia Flex Military Muscles on Same Stage
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin's attempt to 'play Trump' on Ukraine will fail, former national security advisor says
Putin's attempt to 'play Trump' on Ukraine will fail, former national security advisor says

Fox News

time41 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Putin's attempt to 'play Trump' on Ukraine will fail, former national security advisor says

Russian President Vladimir Putin is intensifying his assault on Ukraine, despite previously signaling to President Donald Trump that peace might be on the table. But one former Trump advisor says Putin's strategy is unlikely to succeed. "I don't think he can play Donald Trump," retired Gen. H.R. McMaster, who served as Trump's national security advisor from 2017 to 2018, told "The Brian Kilmeade Show" on Wednesday. "You saw what happened with the Iranians. He gave them 60 days, right? And they went to 61, and he acted." Russia launched its largest aerial strike on Ukraine since the start of the war this week, marking an escalation in the conflict. McMaster said this is part of a calculated attempt by Putin to project power and reshape his image. "This is Putin's ruse. He's trying to look strong," McMaster told the "Brian Kilmeade Show." "He's throwing it all in right now because he thinks we don't have the will to support Ukraine." The increase in Russian aggression comes as the Pentagon has paused some weapons shipments to Ukraine. The scrapped deals included Patriot missile interceptors and artillery shells. U.S. officials have justified the delay by blaming it on dwindling stockpiles and concerns the United States could need them to defend itself. While Putin is projecting strength, McMaster argued the Russian leader is far weaker than he appears. "Putin is really in a hurt, in terms of his economic situation," he said. "He's not pulling as much out of the ATM as he's been able to pull," noting that declining oil prices and skyrocketing military expenses have taken a toll on Russia's economy. According to McMaster, these developments could push Trump to take a firmer stance if peace talks continue to falter. "President Trump is [going to] come to the conclusion it's time to put more pressure on Putin, and that includes sustaining support for the Ukrainians." Last month, Trump proposed taking a step back in ceasefire negotiations, likening Russia and Ukraine to two children fighting. He suggested the U.S. take a step back in negotiations until both countries are willing to come to the table. "Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart," remarked Trump in early June. Some leaders have countered the president's strategy, saying U.S. support is critical to the Ukrainian resistance. On Wednesday, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte emphasized that Ukraine cannot win without American aid. "A secure Europe also means a secure U.S.," Rutte told "Fox & Friends." The Dutch leader also noted that a larger Russia that's closer to Europe could pose more of a risk to U.S. interests.

Trump is crushing conservative anti-war dissent over his Iran strikes
Trump is crushing conservative anti-war dissent over his Iran strikes

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump is crushing conservative anti-war dissent over his Iran strikes

The rift within President Trump's MAGA movement over his decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities is deepening. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) described the airstrikes as 'not constitutional' and denounced Trump's comments about regime change in Tehran, posting, 'This is not America First folks.' Trump responded with a broadside on Truth Social in which he described Massie as a 'simple minded 'grandstander'' who is 'disrespectful to our great military.' Trump has been sparring with the isolationist wing of his own movement over military action in Iran since Israel started bombing. In a conversation with Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson claimed that Trump's coalition is 'being blown up over this war on Iran.' Trump responded, 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) defended Carlson and complained that 'The Uniparty is out to politically destroy me for opposing regime change in Iran.' Pundit Charlie Kirk worried that the war will 'cause a massive schism in MAGA.' Conservative critics of the president's decision to join Israel's assault on Iran have long presented Trump as a courageous peacemaker standing up to a warmongering establishment in Washington. They celebrated when Trump declared that the U.S. would abandon Ukraine. Trump blamed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and NATO for the Russian invasion and drastically reduced U.S. military support for Ukraine. He then attempted to force Kyiv into accepting a terrible deal that would end Ukraine's right to join the alliances of its choosing and consign millions of Ukrainians to permanent occupation, while asking for nothing in exchange from Putin. Massie boasts that he's the 'only member of Congress who never voted for Ukraine funding.' Carlson has openly declared that he supports Russia over Ukraine. Greene describes Zelensky as an 'actor wearing army green every day, fully funded by U.S. warmongers,' claims he controls a 'Nazi army,' regurgitates Russian propaganda and calls Zelensky a 'little dictator.' It is no wonder that Trump's most rabid 'America First' acolytes believed his absurd promises about ending the Ukraine war in '24 hours.' The tension between Trump and some of his loudest supporters over the Iran strikes is the result of shattered illusions across the MAGA-verse. Many Trump supporters really believed that the president had a principled opposition to war, but he has always been a simple opportunist who scored political points by attacking what he views as a hated 'neocon' establishment in Washington. While pundits within Trump's base are free to attack Trump for what they view as a deviation from America First orthodoxy, self-described anti-war members of the administration are in a trickier spot. Vice President JD Vance has spent years pouring scorn on what he regards as a sinister warmongering elite in Washington. But he has been reduced to cheerleading for Trump's latest military adventure, which he surely would have indignantly denounced if it was launched by a Democratic administration. 'We're not at war with Iran,' Vance recently said. 'We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' Vance would have mocked this sort of Orwellian doublespeak in any other context. In a lengthy post on X, the vice president attempted to reconcile Trump's belligerence toward Iran with his constant promises to end wars rather than start them. 'Of course,' Vance wrote, 'people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.' He continued: 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue.' In other words, Trump's attack on Iran is exactly the sort of foreign entanglement he has spent years decrying, but he's unwilling to say so because he is 'admittedly biased towards our president.' Vance isn't the only member of the administration forced to bend flimsy principles into an entirely new shape to fit Trump's latest diktat. In March, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to Congress that U.S. intelligence 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.' Trump dismissed the assessment of his own DNI to reporters: 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one.' Like Vance, hostility toward 'warmongers' in the 'elite' has long been a major feature of Gabbard's political career. She blamed the war in Ukraine on NATO and the Biden administration, which allegedly failed to acknowledge 'Russia's legitimate security concerns.' She has echoed Russian propaganda about Ukraine. Gabbard was fiercely critical of Trump's first-term decision to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal negotiated by the Obama administration, and she has spent many years attacking U.S. military involvement in the Middle East. Vance and Gabbard have discovered the one iron law of contemporary American politics: Joining forces with Trump means discarding your deepest principles to remain in good standing with the boss. Those who have attempted to give Trump's movement some coherent intellectual and ethical shape have made a similar discovery. As Trump recently claimed, 'America First' means whatever he says it means. Either submit to the new orthodoxy, or get out. Matt Johnson is the author of the book 'How Hitchens Can Save the Left: Rediscovering Fearless Liberalism in an Age of Counter-Enlightenment.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store