BN Confident Cooperation With PH Will Result In GE16 Victory
He said it was based on observations and results of the Mahkota and Ayer Kuning by-elections, and pointed out that BN had secured the Mahkota seat with a majority of 5,166 votes in the 15th general election (GE15), but managed to win with a majority of 20,648 votes in the by-election, thanks to the partnership with PH.
'The same with Ayer Kuning, during GE15, we won with a majority of 2,213 votes then when the by-election happened, we won with a majority of 5,006 votes. That's the type of increase we can see from the cooperation with PH,' he said during his speech at the officiation of the Gopeng UMNO Division Delegates' Meeting here today, in the presence of Perak UMNO chairman Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad and Gopeng UMNO Division chief Datuk Hang Tuah Din.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Anwar in Paris: Recalibrating the terms of engagement
IF the French were expecting a deferential guest, they did not get one. When Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim rose to speak at the Sorbonne on Friday, his address was both a nod to France's intellectual tradition and a measured challenge to its strategic assumptions. Woven with references to Sartre and Montesquieu, Camus and Tocqueville, and the Pirenne thesis to boot, it was a tour de force in intellectual diplomacy — at once appreciative and unsparing, gracious, yet audacious. The visit, the first by a Malaysian leader to France in 15 years, was a success by most diplomatic metrics. There were new Airbus orders, deeper energy cooperation with Petronas, joint ventures in AI and carbon capture, and warm nods to rising student exchanges. But the real significance lay in Anwar's message, and its subtext: Southeast Asia is done being spoken for, let alone spoken down to. If Europe wants to be present in the Indo-Pacific, it must learn to listen. Anwar is no stranger to rhetorical flourish. But behind it was a sharp proposition: Europe must stop seeing Southeast Asia as a theatre for its anxieties — about China, about global disorder, about the fraying of Pax Americana — and start engaging it as a self-assured, diplomatically agile region that neither courts conflict nor shirks complexity. The Sorbonne speech was neither anti-Western nor triumphalist. It was something rarer: calibrated, with measured cadence. "We are used to being described," the prime minister said. "We are less accustomed to being heard." In one line, he captured decades of misapprehension. From colonial missions civilisatrices to the strategic templates of today's think tanks, Southeast Asia has often appeared in Europe's imagination as either a developmental ward or a geopolitical flank. Yet Asean, as Anwar reminded his audience, is the world's fifth-largest economy and a laboratory of democratic metamorphosis — not perfect, but incrementally improving. He did not shy away from hard topics. On Ukraine, he upheld international law but cautioned that "our region — and Asean in particular — is not a geopolitical mirror to be held up to another's crisis". On Gaza, he called the war a "collapse of conscience" and criticised the selective application of humanitarian concern. On Iran, he backed non-proliferation but insisted that dialogue, not double standards, must anchor global order. President Emmanuel Macron received the message with composure. At their joint press conference, he echoed Anwar's call for a ceasefire in Gaza, reaffirmed France's support for a two-state solution, and condemned Israeli strikes on Iran as lacking legal basis. He also nodded to the broader point: that universal values must not be applied selectively. Sure, not all that glitters is gold but it was still a rare moment of moral convergence, if not full alignment. But it was in trade — not war — where Anwar delivered his firmest message. Europe, he implied, cannot ask for deeper economic ties while clinging to regulatory structures that feel increasingly skewed. For many in Southeast Asia, the EU's standards — however well-intentioned — function less as neutral guardrails and more as protectionist obstacles. Agricultural exports, processed foods and pharmaceuticals face layers of certification and restrictions. European negotiators tend to arrive assuming their standards are not just high, but self-evidently the model for others to adopt. That presumption is now being met with measured resistance. Malaysia, like many of its peers, is not asking for lower standards. It is asking for honest conversations about the practical effects of high ones. Patent terms, for example, are contentious. The EU seeks longer periods of exclusivity. In developing countries, this affects access to life-saving medicines. And that we cannot, and must not, do. The imbalance goes deeper. Southeast Asian nations are expected to meet stringent environmental, labour and governance criteria, yet often find little flexibility in return. There is little allowance for differences in legal systems, social compacts or development stages. The European position thus begins to resemble leverage masquerading as principle. "That means seeing regulation as dialogue to come to a formula for mutual gain, not fiat pointed at the head for capitulation," Anwar said. "Let us be clear: we do not ask for indulgence. We ask only that Europe meet us where we are, not where its models presume we ought to be." Europe hopes that bilateral deals, like the one still under negotiation with Malaysia, will evolve into a full Asean-EU free trade agreement. But that ambition may remain stalled if the substance of the relationship lags behind its symbolism. "Consensus ad idem is as crucial in geoeconomics as it is in geopolitics, and some say even more," Anwar quipped, invoking a legal phrase meaning meeting of minds. Still, the mood in Southeast Asia is shifting. Engagement will remain strong, but deference is no longer part of the deal. Condescending collocutors, vous n'êtes pas le bienvenu. Anwar said: "We welcome partners. But we welcome them as equals." Europe should take note. In an increasingly multipolar world, engagement is not a favour bestowed but a partnership earned. If the after-dinner tête-à-tête, originally set for 10 minutes, but which lasted three-fold longer, is anything to go by, then somewhere along the way, Anwar and Macron must have struck the right chords. Tocqueville once wrote that democracy is not just a system of rules but also a habit of the heart. And so, increasingly, is diplomacy.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Corporate manslaughter law
The Road Transport Department is on the hunt for bus passengers who don't belt up, fining them RM300. But what about the two-thirds of bus and lorry operators who failed RTD's safety audit recently? Out of 133 audited, 85 — 43 lorry operators and 42 express and tour bus operators — were found to have committed a range of offences: failure to appoint safety officers; not installing GPS; failure to monitor GPS data; not keeping records of driving hours; and not having safety plans. They were among the 500 operators flagged for outstanding RTD and Land Public Transport Agency (APAD) summonses. If not for the summonses, the rogue operators might not have been discovered. How long they have been flouting the law is anybody's guess. Call them profit-before-people operators. This is why our authorities shouldn't depend on self-policing. Robust enforcement and punitive punishments are two critical ways to curb road tragedies. We know that the RTD has forwarded the list of 85 errant operators to APAD, recommending that it suspend or revoke their licences. APAD will do well if it makes its decision public, and soon. It did revoke the licence of the operator of the lorry involved in the collision with the Federal Reserve Unit truck in Teluk Intan on May 13, where nine police personnel were killed and seven others injured. The range of offences of the lorry operator, as disclosed by APAD, was similar to those discovered during the recent RTD audit of 133 operators. Transparency and speed are of utmost importance, especially so when many road tragedies have been caused by buses and lorries in a span of just months. Absent both, the public will lose confidence in the authorities. Regulators and enforcers must also make it hurt for errant transport firms. One way to hurt them is to pass a corporate manslaughter law, similar to the United Kingdom's Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, as suggested by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reforms) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. But the UK law comes designed with a limitation: individuals such as directors are not in the crosshairs of the law, but companies and organisations are liable for gross failures in health and safety management that lead to death. The UK has other laws — such as the common law offence of manslaughter — to hold individuals like directors accountable if the offence was committed with their knowledge or neglect. Malaysia, too, has laws to hold corporate individuals accountable, but proving personal culpability in a corporate environment isn't easy, a motivation for the UK to focus on companies. The question is, should Malaysia replicate the UK model or incorporate individual liability as well, at least at the senior management level? This requires serious study. Undoubtedly, there will be resistance from the industry, accusing the government of over-criminalising senior managers of companies. To the operators in the industry, we say this: if you aren't rogue operators like the 85, you are as safe as houses. Whatever our lawmakers decide, they need to acknowledge that Malaysia is in serious need of a corporate manslaughter law that hurts the company coffers of rogue operators. Dollars for sense, if you like.
Borneo Post
4 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Ahmad Zahid: BN confident cooperation with PH will result in GE16 victory
Ahmad Zahid Hamidi gestures during his speech at the officiation of the Gopeng UMNO Division Delegates' Meeting today. – Bernama photo GOPENG (July 6): Barisan Nasional (BN) is confident that the cooperation with Pakatan Harapan (PH) can ensure that they retain the seats won in the last general election, its chairman Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said. He said it was based on observations and results of the Mahkota and Ayer Kuning by-elections, and pointed out that BN had secured the Mahkota seat with a majority of 5,166 votes in the 15th general election (GE15), but managed to win with a majority of 20,648 votes in the by-election, thanks to the partnership with PH. 'The same with Ayer Kuning, during GE15, we won with a majority of 2,213 votes then when the by-election happened, we won with a majority of 5,006 votes. That's the type of increase we can see from the cooperation with PH,' he said during his speech at the officiation of the Gopeng Umno Division Delegates' Meeting here today, in the presence of Perak Umno chairman Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad and Gopeng Umno Division chief Datuk Hang Tuah Din. He said that the cooperation with PH should be a guide and reflection for leaders and the grassroots as the strategy is sound and suitable to retain existing power. 'We cannot be proud and arrogant and want to go solo. This is the current reality and in this way, we can also become dominant in the national political arena,' he said. Meanwhile, Saarani said Perak Umno will focus on attracting support from non-party members as its main strategy in maintaining BN's wins in GE16. – Bernama ahmad zahid hamidi barisan nasional general election politics
