
Opinion: As Trump Basks In Fordow Afterglow, Kremlin Has A Counterpoint
Russians believe Trump will scramble for peace in a hurry to hog credit for stopping Israel-Iran war. But Iran will invest all its energies to get past nuclear line in minimum time
When bombs drop on the nuclear kitchens of the Ayatollah Khameini regime in Iran, billions rejoice. Some openly, some (especially the fast-transforming Sunni Arab powers) privately. Iran is a ruthlessly violent regime which has killed and targeted thousands of its own women for merely refusing to wear the hijab; runs terror proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis; and is widely seen as the biggest destabilising force in the Middle East. It has richly earned its comeuppance.
But then the man who ordered the early morning bombings on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear facilities is one who believes that jumping into every global conflict and claiming credit for solving those has earned him about five undelivered Nobel Peace Prizes so far.
It is true that American B-2 stealth bombers have dropped six GBU-57, the deepest bunker-busting bomb in the world. Developed in the early 2000s, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) weighs 13,600 kg, is 6 meters long, has a diameter of about 80 cm, and contains nearly 2,500 kg of explosives. It can target structures up to 60 metres under the ground.
The B-2 bombers flew non-stop for around 37 hours from its base in Missouri, US, refuelling several times mid-air. The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) acknowledged the strikes. But it has downplayed these as superficial. No nuclear contamination detected after US strikes, it said.
No changes in background radiation were detected in Saudi Arabia or other Gulf Arab states, the Saudi Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission (NRRC) confirmed.
Russia, Iran's steadfast ally, remains unimpressed by the airstrikes. Russian news agencies mocked Trump through its X handle.
'Force far greater than what was witnessed tonight," boasted Trump — the man who thinks he deserves FIVE Nobel Peace Prizes," Sputnik posted.
But sources close to the Kremlin break down the US airstrikes more technically. Since Russia is Iran's biggest backer and has helped set up its nuclear infrastructure, there could be bias in its analysis. But it is nevertheless worth considering because beyond Trump's narcissistic boasts and the democratic world's confirmation bias to believe Iran's Ayatollah regime's nuke toys are finished, there could be a reality check.
Six GBU-57 bombs (some now say 12) pounded Iran's Fordow nuclear plant. They rely on mass, not firepower. Imagine 30,000 pounds of tungsten, delayed fuses, inertial guidance, and geological stress sequencing.
But Fordow was built for this, the Russians say.
It is designed to counter the MOP. Hence the curved tunnels, offset caverns, anti-penetration strata, and layered redundancy across ventilation. Fordow apparently has C2 and IR-6 centrifuge chambers. A single hit does not affect much, but two strikes can open up a tunnel mouth.
To truly destroy the core, you would need tight sequencing, vector convergence, telemetry confirmation, and real-time damage layering, says the source close to the Kremlin. That apparently didn't happen. At most, the American bombs sealed an entrance, he argues. Iran has so far reported no core disruption, no enrichment halt, and no internal collapse.
Russians estimate that to drop six GBU-57 bombs, three B-2 stealth bombers together or two conducting multiple flyovers deep in contested airspace flew in without strike escort in one of the most monitored radar corridors on earth. If Fordow was gone, you would see craters, electromagnetic rupture, emergency airlifts, seismographs lighting up, and infrared flares beneath the mountain, they say.
Tomahawk missiles on Natanz and Esfahan add nothing, they claim. Cruise missiles are subsonic, non-penetrative, and designed for surface-level disruption. 'You don't decapitate nuclear infrastructure with Tomahawk Block IV missiles. You flick switches. You scorch perimeters," the source says. 'A thousand-pound warhead does not cut into fuel halls or disrupt cascade chambers beneath 20 meters of hardened casing."
This was bravado by Trump aimed at placating pro-Israel pressure groups, Russians believe. Apparently Jewish groups in the US have been long pressing Washington to join the war.
'As of now, there is no synthetic aperture radar (SAR) confirmation. No crater clustering. No multispectral flash analysis. No underground fire signature. No battle damage assessment (BDA) loop," says the Russian source.
The Russians believe Trump will now scramble for peace in a hurry to hog credit for stopping the Israel-Iran war. But Iran will invest all its energies to get past the nuclear line in the minimum time now. And Russia is likely to help it.
The last quip is particularly acerbic: 'If the centrifuge of Fordow still spins tomorrow, Washington just pulled off the most expensive influence op in bunker-busting history, only to watch Tehran climb the escalation ladder unscathed."
top videos
View all
Although Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Trump and America, he would not be pleased if the airstrikes serve only as Trump's headline and photo-op and makes Iran even more determined to procure the Bomb.
Abhijit Majumder is a senior journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
First Published:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
23 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US may lose 150,000 international students this fall, risking $7 billion in revenue
Agencies American universities may see international student enrollment decline by as many as 150,000 this fall, a development that could cost the US higher education sector nearly $7 billion and threaten over 60,000 jobs. This estimate comes from a new analysis by NAFSA: Association of International Educators and JB International, based on recent data from the US Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) and the State Department. The report attributes the expected drop to recent visa disruptions, executive orders, and scrutiny measures introduced by the Trump administration. Unless student visa issuances rebound sharply by August, the study warns of a 15% drop in total international enrollment. In the academic year 2023–24, US colleges hosted 1,126,690 international students — the highest number recorded, according to the Institute of International Education's Open Doors report. These students made up 6% of the total US college population and included those on optional practical training (OPT), who stay for temporary employment related to their studies. International student numbers had recovered post-pandemic, increasing by 200,000 since the 2020 decline. But the new forecast signals that this growth could reverse. Key states face major financial losses According to the NAFSA report, a 30–40% drop in new foreign students would significantly impact several US states. California alone could lose over $1 billion, while New York's losses may be close to that figure. Illinois, Massachusetts, Ohio, Texas, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Florida could each see losses exceeding $200 million. Four factors behind the projected fall: Suspension of Visa Interviews: Student visa interviews were suspended between May 27 and June 18, 2025 — a peak period for issuances. Interviews have resumed, but consulates are now directed to scrutinize applicants' social media accounts more closely. Appointment Shortages: Limited or no visa appointments were reported in countries that are key sources of international students — including India, China, Nigeria, and Japan. Declining Visa Issuance: F-1 visa grants fell 12% year-on-year from January to April 2025 and 22% in May. Though June data is pending, a decline of up to 90% is anticipated. Visa Bans: A presidential executive order issued on June 4, 2025, imposed restrictions on applicants from 19 countries. A further 36 countries may be added, the report highlighted that international students often pay full tuition fees at private institutions and out-of-state fees at public universities. Their financial contribution helps US colleges subsidize costs for domestic said, 'The projected losses confirm higher education leaders' concerns that anti-immigration policies would have a chilling effect on enrollment and revenue.' Trump vs international students In the past few months, the Trump administration has revoked or terminated visas of hundreds to thousands of international students, particularly those perceived as sympathetic to pro‑Palestinian viewpoints. By April 2025, over 1,000 visas had been canceled, and the administration implemented a 'catch and revoke' strategy—scrutinizing social media for signs of support for groups like Hamas or antisemitic activity—to revoke existing student visas and block renewals. One high‑profile case involved Palestinian student Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident, who was arrested by ICE without a warrant, drawing criticism for potential First Amendment late May 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the US would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those connected to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,' accompanied by enhanced social media vetting for F, M, and J visa applicants. At US consulates, student visa interviews were suspended temporarily during late May–mid June re‑opening with stricter rules, such as requiring applicants to make their social media profiles public for government review. These policies have heightened fears among prospective and current international students and contributed to a chilling effect on international academic engagement in the US. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Can Coforge's ambition to lead the IT Industry become a reality? BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? Amazon is making stealthy moves in healthcare, here's why! The trader who blew the whistle on Jane Street Stock Radar: Globus Spirits breaks out from 9-month consolidation; check target & stop loss for long positions Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus These large-caps have 'strong buy' & 'buy' recos and an upside potential of more than 25% Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 36% in 1 year


Economic Times
26 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trade tariff uncertainty & US Fed rates led to volatile swings in bullion
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel The month of July 2025 displayed a two-way trend for bullion, offering both buyers and sellers opportunities to book profits. Bullion began the month in a range-bound manner as investors assessed US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's cautious stance on rate cuts. Meanwhile, a weaker US Dollar Index lent support to the greenback-priced the trend shifted, and gold prices reacted sharply to a series of unexpected announcements from US President Donald prices surged after the US Senate, controlled by Republicans, passed a wide-ranging tax-cut and spending bill, dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill.' The bill proposed significant cuts to several social service programs and was projected to add $3 trillion to the fiscal deficit over the next decade. This raised fiscal concerns and drove investors toward the safe-haven asset— addition, President Trump rattled global markets by announcing a wave of tariffs on various countries: 50% on US copper imports, 35% on imports from Canada, blanket duties of 15–20% on most other trade partners, and 30% on imports from Mexico and the European Union, all effective from August 1. These measures followed failed trade negotiations with major US European Union and Mexico called the tariffs unfair and disruptive, with the European Commission preparing to target $84.1 billion worth of US goods for potential retaliatory tariffs if talks failed. To add to the uncertainty, President Trump publicly expressed a desire to fire Fed Chair Jerome geopolitical tensions escalated as Israel launched powerful airstrikes in Damascus, damaging the Defence Ministry and striking near the presidential palace. The attack increased geopolitical worries and further supported demand for gold. In Japan, the ruling coalition lost control of the upper house, weakening Prime Minister Ishiba's authority as the US tariff deadline developments caused jitters in the markets and pushed safe-haven demand sharply higher. Both MCX Gold and Gold Spot surged, touching Rs 100,329 per 10 grams and $3,431 per ounce, what goes up must come down. The final week of July brought an abrupt reversal. Both MCX Gold and Gold Spot fell sharply—by over 2%—after President Trump clarified that he was not planning to fire Powell, though he continued criticizing him for not cutting interest Trump struck a trade deal with Japan to lower auto tariffs, marking the most significant agreement since the tariff announcements in April 2025. Similarly, the US reached a framework trade agreement with the European Union, imposing a 15% import tariff on most EU goods—thus averting a major trade war between the two global trading month-end, the Federal Reserve kept interest rates unchanged and gave little guidance on potential cuts, reducing the appeal of the zero-yield the US and Mexico agreed to extend their existing trade deal by 90 days to allow more time for negotiations toward a new agreement. This further dampened gold's safe-haven the near term, MCX Gold October Futures (CMP: Rs 98,700) is expected to decline towards Rs 96,500 per 10 grams.(The author is DVP- Research, Non-Agri Commodities and Currencies, Angel One Ltd : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
What does US import from Russia as Trump rants about India's oil trade?
As Trump threatens steep tariffs on India over its Russian oil imports, data reveals the US quietly continues to import billions worth of palladium, uranium, and fertilisers from Russia. While Washington criticises New Delhi's energy ties with Moscow, its own trade in strategic commodities with Russia raises questions about economic double standards read more Daily newspapers with covers, dedicated to the recent phone call of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, are laid out at a newsstand in a street in Moscow, Russia, February 13, 2025. File Image/Reuters US President Donald Trump has been threatening India with steep tariffs over its oil imports from Moscow even as trade data shows that the United States continues to engage in selective but significant imports from Russia — a country Washington has otherwise sought to isolate since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Most recently, Trump, in a series of online statements, accused India of buying heavily discounted Russian oil and profiting by reselling it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He threatened a hike in tariffs on Indian exports to the United States, going as far as proposing a 25 per cent duty and promising additional penalties. India reacted firmly to this public criticism. According to a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), India began purchasing oil from Russia only after its traditional energy suppliers diverted output to European markets post-2022. 'The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the statement noted. 'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion.' India has repeatedly justified its energy trade with Russia as necessary for maintaining stable and affordable energy costs for its domestic consumers. Hardeep Singh Puri, India's Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas, remarked in a recent CNBC interview: 'If people or countries had stopped buying at that stage, the price of oil would have gone up to 130 dollars a barrel. That was a situation in which we were advised, including by our friends in the United States, to please buy Russian oil, but within the price cap.' Even former US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti had stated at a public event last year that 'we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil,' acknowledging Washington's prior encouragement of Indian purchases to stabilise global markets. The Indian government highlighted the continuing trade relationships between Russia and the United States, as well as the European Union, despite sanctions and political rhetoric. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Official data confirms that Europe and America have maintained selective imports of high-priority goods from Russia over the past few years. European Union-Russia trade The European Union's trade with Russia remains substantial. The EU's goods trade with Russia amounted to €67.5 billion ($78.1 billion) in 2024, and trade in services was worth €17.2 billion in 2023. E uropean LNG imports from Russia hit a record 16.5 million tonnes in 2024, surpassing the previous record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022. Europe's commercial interactions with Russia cover a wide range of sectors including liquefied natural gas, fertilisers, mining products, industrial chemicals, iron and steel, and transport equipment. US-Russia trade The United States also maintained imports from Russia, particularly in strategic areas like nuclear fuel, precious metals, and agricultural products. American imports from Russia totalled approximately $3 billion in 2024, down from $36 billion in 2021, but key items continue to flow. According to the US International Trade Commission: Fertilisers : $1.1 billion in 2024. Palladium : $878 million. Uranium : $624 million. Aircraft engine parts: $75 million. Trade in services, on the other hand, showed resilience. In 2024, US services exports to Russia amounted to $1.3 billion, while imports were $384 million — resulting in a services trade surplus of $873 million, a 43 per cent rise over the previous year. From January to May 2025, US imports from Russia grew 23 per cent year-on-year to reach $2.1 billion, with palladium imports up 37 per cent, uranium up 28 per cent, and fertilizers up 21 per cent. Even the US Trade Representative acknowledges that critical imports such as uranium and palladium are shielded from full sanctions due to the lack of viable alternatives in the global market. A granular look at trade data reveals that the United States continues to purchase a wide range of products from Russia. These include industrial commodities, precious metals, chemicals, and agricultural items. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to customs and trade databases, the following were among the top imports in 2024: Fertilisers (urea, potassium chloride, and others) – $1.3 billion Precious metals (palladium, platinum, etc.) – $878 million Inorganic chemicals, including radioactive materials – $695.7 million Uranium hexafluoride for nuclear fuel – $624 million Aircraft parts and components – $75 million Wood and wood products – $89.4 million Machinery and reactors – $80.8 million Animal feed, residues from food processing – $39.9 million Base metals and cermets – $37.3 million Iron and steel products – $13.1 million Edible vegetables, fruits, and preparations – multiple categories totalling over $15 million Rubbers, plastics, and chemicals – Over $10 million Pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and essential oils – Over $2 million Footwear, textiles, toys, and watches – Combined total over $10 million Aluminum, copper, and nickel – Over $28 million combined Other miscellaneous imports – From raw hides to printed books and even live animals Despite claims that the United States and Russia conduct minimal business today, the facts reveal that trade persists in key areas. Also Watch: Fertiliser imports from Russia are also on the rise. Between January and May 2025 alone, the US brought in $806 million worth — 60 per cent more than during the same period in 2021. Uranium imports, too, were 147 per cent higher compared to early 2021, showing no signs of being phased out. 'Russia and the USA do almost no business together,' Trump had claimed. But the numbers tell a different story: trade has narrowed in scope, not vanished. While American imports of Russian crude oil — once valued at over $17 billion in 2021 — have nearly ceased, other categories like fish, nickel, and lead have also dwindled or stopped. Nevertheless, around 90 per cent of what the US still imports from Russia consists of just three categories: fertilizers, palladium, and uranium. With inputs from agencies