logo
These Texas Democrats are at risk under proposed GOP maps

These Texas Democrats are at risk under proposed GOP maps

Yahoo2 days ago
Texas Republicans on Wednesday unveiled a proposal for new congressional maps after President Trump called for the Lone Star State to create five new House seats ahead of the midterms.
The proposed maps, filed as Texas lawmakers meet for a special session initially called after Gov. Greg Abbott (R) vetoed a ban on THC, could help Republicans protect their narrow 219-212 House majority by redrawing some Democrat-held seats to incorporate far more Republican voters.
If Republicans succeed, they would also, in a reprise of the pivotal redistricting campaign of 2003, destroy the districts of a cadre of progressive Democratic leaders.
The GOP already holds 25 of the state's 38 congressional seats, but the changes could boost them to a 30-8 red advantage — though the draft could change as it works toward approval in the state chambers and faces pushback from Democrats.
It would also have ramifications for the balance of power within Texas, at least as it pertains to the state's relationship with the federal government. That's because the new map strips one Congressional seat each from the Democratic-controlled urban powerhouses of Houston, Dallas and Austin-San Antonio — cities that offer the main locus of opposition to the state's Republican leaders and Congressional majority.
Here are some of the Texas Democrats and districts that could be impacted by the proposed lines:
Greg Casar & Lloyd Doggett
Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, speaks during a news conference about the threat of default with members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Wednesday, May 24, 2023, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
One of the biggest changes to the map is in Rep. Greg Casar's (D-Texas) 35th Congressional district around Austin and San Antonio, which went to former Vice President Harris by 33 points in November — while the state went to Trump by 14 points overall.
Since his election to Congress in 2022, Casar, a former labor organizer and Austin city councilman, has emerged as part of a new generation of progressive leaders and currently chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
The new map would take Casar's district out of his Austin power base, creating a new +10 Trump district outside of San Antonio, according to analysis on X by Dave Wasserman, the senior editor of Cook Political Report. But while that 'nukes' Casar's district, he argued that in a good midterm year Democrats could still hold that seat.
Casar, who has referred to redistricting as a 'five alarm fire,' called the destruction of his district 'illegal voter suppression of Black and Latino Central Texans, Casar said on X.
The changes could set up a potential primary matchup with Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D), who leads what's currently the 37th District.
'By merging our Central Texas districts, Trump wants to commit yet another crime— this time, against Texas voters and against The Voting Rights Act,' Casar said.
Doggett said on X that his 'sole focus' at this point is 'defeating this Trump-imposed gerrymandering.'
'Trump is taking a hatchet to chop up Austin and our state with the sole objective of maintaining his one-man rule.'
Julie Johnson & Marc Veasey
Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) on Tuesday, June 24, 2025.
The new map reshapes Texas's 32nd and 33rd Congressional Districts, currently held by Democratic Reps. Julie Johnson and Marc Veasey, respectively.
The shift creates a new Dallas Fort Worth-area +18 Trump seat in the 32nd, according to analysis by Wasserman, on X — a strong pickup opportunity for the GOP.
Tarrant County, the urban county that includes Fort Worth and is split between the 32nd and 33rd, is the last of Texas's major urban counties that is controlled by Republicans and a bastion of the state's far right, with whom Veasey has been locked in a contest as part of a broader Democratic attempt to flip the county.
Veasy's district would remain blue under the new proposal, according to the analysis from the Texas Tribune, but lose his Fort Worth hometown.
In a scathing statement on Wednesday, Veasey blasted the proposed maps as 'part of a long, ugly tradition of trying to keep Black and brown [Texans] from having a voice' and underscored Trump's push for the changes.
'Republicans are bending their knee to a wannabe king, drawing maps in backrooms to appease a man who tried to overthrow an election and now wants to overthrow the will of Texans.'
Johnson called the map a 'disaster' and a 'desperate move from a party losing its grip on a changing state.'
Part of Johnson's district would also shift to Texas's 30th, held by Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), according to analysis from The Texan. Crockett on Wednesday blasted the proposed lines that 'cut 5 Democratic seats out of thin air,' calling it 'a power grab to silence voters and suppress votes.'
Henry Cuellar & Vicente Gonzalez
Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), left; Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), right.
The Republican map is kinder to conservative Democrat Rep. Henry Cuellar, one of Congress's last anti-abortion Democrats, whom the national party backed in his exceedingly narrow victory over progressive challenger Jessica Cisneros in 2022.
Under the new map, Cuellar's 28th Congressional District would move to a slightly stronger Trump district — from +7 to +10, according to Wasserman.
Rep. Vicente Gonzalez's (D-Texas) seat in the 34th Congressional District would similarly shift from a +5 to +10 Trump district.
But the changes for both Cuellar and Gonzalez 'are potentially survivable given ancestral Dem ties & a midterm without Trump on the ballot,' the analyst said on X.
A campaign spokesperson told The Hill that Cuellar 'looks forward to continuing to serve the people of South Texas in Congress and advancing the issues that matter most to them.'
'What they forget is that I'm still a lawyer,' Gonzalez said in a statement. 'We will fight this disgraceful attempt to cheat Lone Star State voters in Federal Court, and will win again in an era where Trump is deeply underwater.'
Al Green
Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) speaks during a House Financial Services Committee hearing on oversight on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Among the proposal's dramatic shifts, Rep. Al Green's (D-Texas) seat in the 9th Congressional District would also merge with the empty Democratic slot vacated by the late Rep. Sylvester Turner.
That would yield a safe Democratic seat in the 18th, offset by a new 9th in the more conservative suburbs east of Houston that Wasserman said could be 'a pretty safe GOP pickup.'
A special election is ongoing to fill the vacancy for Turner's former seat.
'Let's call this what it is: Greg Abbott and Texas Republicans are trying to wipe Black and Brown communities off the political map. It's a slap in the face to the very folks who built this state,' said Christian Menefee, a former Harris County Attorney who's considered the favorite for Turner's old seat, in a statement.
'We're not backing down. We'll fight like hell to stop it,' Menefee said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he 'had to' move nuclear submarines after 'threat'
Trump says he 'had to' move nuclear submarines after 'threat'

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he 'had to' move nuclear submarines after 'threat'

STORY: :: Trump says he 'had to' move nuclear submarines after a 'threat' from Russian ex-leader Dmitry Medvedev :: August 1, 2025 :: Washington, D.C. Security analysts called Trump's move a rhetorical escalation with Moscow, but not necessarily a military one, given that the United States already has nuclear-powered submarines that are deployed and capable of striking Russia. Medvedev on Thursday said Trump should remember that Moscow possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort, after Trump had told Medvedev to "watch his words." He did not specify what he meant by "nuclear submarines." Submarines may be nuclear-powered, or armed with nuclear missiles. It is extremely rare for the U.S. military to discuss the deployment and location of U.S. submarines given their sensitive mission in nuclear deterrence. The U.S. Navy declined comment. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

How JD Vance's Approval Rating Has Changed Since Becoming Vice President
How JD Vance's Approval Rating Has Changed Since Becoming Vice President

Newsweek

time6 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How JD Vance's Approval Rating Has Changed Since Becoming Vice President

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Since taking office as vice president in January, JD Vance's favorability has steadily declined, according to tracking data from Civiqs. On January 20—the day of Vance's inauguration—43 percent of registered voters viewed him favorably, while 51 percent held an unfavorable view, giving him a net approval rating of -8. As of August 1, those numbers have worsened. Just 42 percent now view Vance favorably, while 54 percent view him unfavorably, widening his net disapproval to -12 points. Other polls reflect the same trend. Atlas showed that Vance's favorability fell from 49 percent in January to 44 percent in July, with unfavorability rising to 55 percent. YouGov/Economist also reported a decline, from 39 percent favorable and 45 percent unfavorable in January to 37 percent favorable and 51 percent unfavorable in July. Newsweek has contacted the vice president's office for comment via email. File photo: JD Vance speaks at the Metallus plant, Monday, July 28, 2025 in Canton, Ohio. File photo: JD Vance speaks at the Metallus plant, Monday, July 28, 2025 in Canton, Ohio. Lauren Leigh Bacho/AP Polarization Drives Decline Among Key Voter Groups Polling data suggests that Vance's falling favorability is the result of a sharply polarized political climate in which his appeal is hardening among conservatives but eroding among moderates, liberals, younger voters, and communities of color. In the YouGov/Economist polling, unfavorable sentiment surged by 9 and 12 points respectively among liberals and moderates, while conservative support rose slightly to 80 percent. The trend is similar in Civiqs polling, with 89 percent of Republicans viewing him favorably, while Democrats overwhelmingly disapprove—just 3 percent favorable and 95 percent unfavorable. Both polls also show strong support for Vance among older and white voters, who are key to the GOP's base. White voters remain Vance's strongest racial group, with 50 percent of white voters viewing him favorably in Civiqs polling and little change reported in YouGov's data. And Vance has favorability ratings of 48 percent in both the 50-to-64 and 65+ groups, according to the Civiqs data. Youth, Independents, and Voters of Color Turn Away But, outside of those groups, Vance's support is slipping. Independent voters, long seen as a key swing bloc, are turning away: Civiqs finds independents more negative than positive toward Vance, while YouGov reports a 6-point increase in unfavorable sentiment and a slight drop in favorability. Among younger voters—those aged 18 to 34 in Civiqs and 18 to 29 in YouGov—Vance's numbers are sharply negative, reflecting a generational divide that continues to widen. The data suggests that younger Americans, whose values tend to lean more progressive on cultural and economic issues, are increasingly resistant to Vance's messaging and policy positions. The racial gap in perception is just as stark. Civiqs shows only 10 percent of Black voters view Vance favorably, while 85 percent view him unfavorably. The YouGov/Economist poll shows Black voter favorability dropping from 26 percent in January to just 16 percent in July, while unfavorable views surged to 65 percent. Hispanic voters also trended more negative in both surveys, signaling a broader pattern of disengagement among communities of color. Trump Fallout Adds to Headwinds Polls have shown Trump's popularity drop to an all-time low in recent weeks amid backlash over the Jeffrey Epstein files and pessimism about the economy. Inflation rose to 2.7 percent in June, and job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added—down from 147,000 the previous month, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.2 percent, though it remains near historic lows. At the same time, a bipartisan majority of voters now believe that the government should release all files related to Epstein, with many suspecting a cover-up. Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, died by suicide in jail in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. There is no evidence that Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes. Trump has acknowledged knowing the man in the 1990s and early 2000s but maintains that he cut ties with him well before Epstein's 2006 arrest. A recent Wall Street Journal report uncovered a 2003 birthday card Trump allegedly sent to Epstein. The card included a drawing of a naked woman and the message: "We have certain things in common … may every day be another wonderful secret." Vance has dismissed reporting by the Wall Street Journal, calling the report alleging that President Trump once sent a "bawdy" birthday card to Epstein "bogus." Vance also alleged the Wall Street Journal was coordinating an attack to damage Trump's character, calling the report "fake news." Nonetheless, the Epstein allegations have created rare tension between Trump and Vance and their supporters, according to Professor William Hall, an adjunct professor of political science and business at Webster University in St. Louis. "The highly sensitive nature of the allegations—involving abuse of children and a possible cover-up—has triggered an unusual level of friction between Trump and his supporters, something we haven't seen before," Hall told Newsweek.

Trump's Warm Embrace of India Turns Cold
Trump's Warm Embrace of India Turns Cold

Wall Street Journal

time6 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Trump's Warm Embrace of India Turns Cold

WASHINGTON—In just a matter of months, President Trump has gone from praising India as a major strategic partner to saying he wouldn't care if its economy implodes. The Trump administration still values the U.S.-India partnership, officials say. But ties between Washington and New Delhi have steadily soured over disputes about trade, Russia and whether Trump deserves credit for brokering a cease-fire following a four-day conflict in May between India and its rival Pakistan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store