Popular home goods chain files for bankruptcy due to ‘rapidly evolving trade environment'
Popular home goods chain At Home has filed for bankruptcy, with its chief executive citing a 'rapdily evolving trade environment' as President Trump's tariffs hammer the retail sector.
The Dallas-based chain, which boasts 260 stores across 40 states, said it would continue to operate as usual during the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.
At Home, which is backed by private equity firm Hellman & Friedman, has entered into an agreement with its lenders that 'will eliminate substantially all' of its roughly $2 billion in debt and provide $200 million in new funding, the company said.
3 Popular home goods chain At Home has filed for bankruptcy.
UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
CEO Brad Weston, who joined the company last year and previously ran Party City Holdings, blamed the chain's struggles on 'an increasingly dynamic and rapidly evolving trade environment as we navigate the impact of tariffs.'
The Chapter 11 process 'will improve our ability to compete in the marketplace in the face of continued volatility and increase the resilience of our business for the long term,' Weston added.
At Home did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.
The chain plans to close approximately 20 stores as part of the bankruptcy process, The Wall Street Journal recently reported. At Home did not announce store closures on Monday.
The home goods industry has been suffering from a slump in sales after consumer sentiment remained stubbornly low for months as Trump's trade war fueled uncertainty.
The Container Store, Bed Bath & Beyond and Big Lots have all filed for bankruptcy. Home Depot and Lowe's have also reported shaky earnings as customers hold off on home improvement projects.
Consumer sentiment bounced back in June as a 90-day tariff deal with China eased tensions, according to the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers.
3 A shopper browses garden decorations in an At Home store.
MediaNews Group via Getty Images
At Home, meanwhile, has faced liquidity constraints for months. It has roughly $17.3 million available under its asset-based lending facility, sources told Bloomberg in May.
Its $600 million first-lien term loan is trading at distressed levels – most recently quoted at just 38 cents on the dollar – as the retailer has been seeking to restructure its balance sheet, according to the Bloomberg report.
Trump's tariffs haven't helped the chain, which relies heavily on China for imports of furniture and home decor.
At Home started shifting its production away from China ahead of Trump's announcement in April, which levied taxes as high as 145% on Chinese goods.
3 A customer enters an At Home store in Queens, New York.
UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
The president has since lowered those rates to 30% as part of a deal with China.
In May 2023, At Home enjoyed a liquidity boost when it raised $200 million through the sale of five-year senior secured notes and exchanged $442 million in unsecured bonds for toggle notes.
But it wasn't enough for the retailer to maintain revenue growth as customers pulled back on spending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Democrats accuse GOP of nuking Senate rules to pass Trump megabill
Senate Democrats on Sunday accused Republicans of 'going nuclear' to blow up the Senate rules so they can make President Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. The heated moment on the Senate floor came as Democrats made several parliamentary inquiries of the Senate's presiding chair to lay the groundwork to challenge Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) use of a 'current policy' budget baseline to score the extension of the 2017 tax cuts as not adding to the deficit. 'This is the nuclear option. It's just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C., lingo,' Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, declared on the Senate floor. Republicans pushed back on that claim. Graham argued that Democrats have previously used current-policy baselines to score bills. He pointed to former Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad's (D-N.D.) use of a current policy baseline to pass a farm bill. Democrats, however, say that was done on a bipartisan basis and not for something as monumental as extending trillions of dollars' worth of tax breaks. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) pointed out that President Obama's budget office in 2012 argued that the extension of the expiring Bush tax cuts should be scored as a continuation of current policy and as not adding to the deficit. Democrats say that Congress has never before used a current policy baseline to score tax cuts in budget reconciliation package as not adding to future deficits. They are pushing for the bill to be scored on a 'current law' baseline. Under current law, the 2017 Trump tax cuts would expire at the end of 2025. The Congressional Budget Office scores the extension of Trump tax cuts as adding to the deficit under a current-law baseline. But under a current-policy baseline, which Republicans are using for the bill, the CBO scores the extension of the Trump tax cuts as not exceeding the bill's reconciliation instructions or adding to federal deficits after 2034. If extending the Trump tax cuts is scored as budget neutral, then the bill complies with the Senate's Byrd Rule, which determines what legislation can pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote. If Democrats win the procedural argument, the bill would have to be rewritten and the 2017 Trump tax cuts would have to be offset with huge additional spending cuts to comply with the Senate's Byrd Rule. If Republicans win the procedural argument, then they will be able to make the expiring portions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent — a major policy victory. Wyden, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and other senior Democrats made parliamentarian inquiries on the floor Sunday afternoon to set up a later challenge to the Republican baseline. Merkley asked the presiding chair, who was freshman Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), if the House reconciliation bill used current law as the operative baseline when it was first laid before the Senate. The chair answered 'yes.' Then Schumer asked if the Senate had ever used a baseline other than current law for a reconciliation measure, and the chair responded 'no.' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee, asked if the nine titles of the Senate bill other than the Finance Committee's portion, used current-law baselines. Moreno answered 'Yes.' Wyden then asked if the Finance title of the legislation relied on two different budgetary baselines, both current-law and current-policy baselines, and the chair acknowledged that is true. Those answers prompted Murray, the longest serving Democratic member of the Budget panel, to accuse Republicans of 'ignoring precedent, process and the parliamentarian.'
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Plan to sell off public land in the West nixed from ‘big, beautiful bill' amid GOP backlash
A controversial plan to sell hundreds of thousands of acres of public land across Western states — including California — was axed from the Republican tax and spending bill amid bipartisan backlash, prompting celebration from conservationists. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who spearheaded the proposal, announced he was pulling the provision on Saturday night on the social media platform X. Lee had said the land sale was intended to ease the financial burden of housing, pointing to a lack of affordability afflicting families in many communities. 'Because of the strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to BlackRock and not to any foreign interests,' he wrote in the post. For that reason, he said, he was withdrawing the measure from the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that Trump has said he wants passed by July 4. Lee's failed measure would have mandated the sale of between roughly 600,000 and 1.2 million acres of Bureau of Land Management land in 11 Western states, including California. The areas available for auction were supposed to be located within a five-mile radius of population centers. The effort represented a scaled-back version of a plan that was nixed from the reconciliation bill on Monday for violating Senate rules. The initial plan would have allowed for the sale of up to 3.3 million acres of land managed by BLM and the U.S. Forest Service. Lee's decision to scrap the proposal arrived after at least four Republican senators from Western states vowed to vote for an amendment to strike the proposal from the bill. At lease five House Republicans also voiced their opposition to the plan, including Reps. David Valadao of California and Ryan Zinke of Montana, who served as the Interior secretary during Trump's first term. The death of the provision was celebrated by conservationists as well as recreation advocates, including hunters and anglers, even as they steeled themselves for an ongoing fight over federal lands. The Trump administration has taken steps to open public lands for energy and resource extraction, including recently announcing it would rescind a rule that protects 58.5 million acres of national forestland from road construction and timber harvesting. Some critics saw the now-scrapped proposed land sale as means to offset tax cuts in the reconciliation bill. 'This is a victory for everyone who hikes, hunts, explores and cherishes these places, but it's not the end of the threats to our public lands,' said Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program, in a statement. 'Donald Trump and his allies in Congress have made it clear they will use every tool at their disposal to give away our public lands to billionaires and corporate polluters.' Chris Wood, president and chief executive of Trout Unlimited — a nonprofit dedicated to conserving rivers and streams to support trout and salmon — described protecting public lands as 'the most nonpartisan issue in the country.' 'This is certainly not the first attempt to privatize or transfer our public lands, and it won't be the last,' Wood said in a statement. 'We must stay vigilant and defend the places we love to fish, hike, hunt and explore.' Lee, in the Saturday X post, suggested the issue remained in play. He said he believed the federal government owns too much land — and that it is mismanaging it. Locked-away land in his state of Utah, he claimed, drives up taxes and limits the ability to build homes. 'President Trump promised to put underutilized federal land to work for American families, and I look forward to helping him achieve that in a way that respects the legacy of our public lands and reflects the values of the people who use them most.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Says Group Of 'Very Wealthy People' Looking To Acquire TikTok
President Donald Trump told Fox News that a group of 'very wealthy people' are in place to buy hugely popular video app TikTok, telling Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo that he will unveil the identities of the investors in about two weeks. He also noted that the deal would likely require approval from the Chinese government but predicted Chinese President Xi Jinping would probably approve it. More from Deadline Korea's 'Doubt' & Spain's 'Celeste' Win Big at Italian Global Series Festival Mark Hamill Recalls His Idea For Luke Skywalker's Tragic Backstory In 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' Henry Golding Explains Why James Bond Role Is "Every Actor's Kind Of Nightmare" His comments mark the latest twist in the long saga of TikTok in the U.S. A ban, or a sale to U.S. interests, of its business Stateside was voted into law by Congress, signed by former president Joe Biden and upheld by the Supreme Court early this year. The legal deadline for the shutdown or sale was Jan. 19, the day before Trump took office. Biden punted to Trump. and the current POTUS, as one of his first acts in office, immediately stayed law in what many considered to be a legally dubious move. TikTok had shut down very briefly in the U.S. at time before resuming business as usual Trump's third and latest stay on the ban runs through September 17. 'We have a buyer for TikTok,' Trump told Bartiromo. 'I think we'll probably need China approval and I think President Xi will probably do it.' Asked when he'd reveal the buyers, he said, 'I'll tell you in about two weeks.' TikTok is owned by Chinese company ByteDance and U.S. policymakers on both sides of the aisle fear that it can be a conduit for the Chinese government to data on millions of U.S. consumers. The ban or sale was based on national securities concerns. TikTok and ByteDance both deny this. A potential TikTok deal became entangled in broader hostilities in recent months with China amid Trump's aggressive stance on trade that levied stiff tariffs on Chinese goods. The two countries are currently in a truce with most import tax temporarily lowered as they negotiate a broader trade deal. They said recently they had agreed on a framework. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
