
Democrats accuse GOP of nuking Senate rules to pass Trump megabill
The heated moment on the Senate floor came as Democrats made several parliamentary inquiries of the Senate's presiding chair to lay the groundwork to challenge Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) use of a 'current policy' budget baseline to score the extension of the 2017 tax cuts as not adding to the deficit.
'This is the nuclear option. It's just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C., lingo,' Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, declared on the Senate floor.
Republicans pushed back on that claim.
Graham argued that Democrats have previously used current-policy baselines to score bills. He pointed to former Senate Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad's (D-N.D.) use of a current policy baseline to pass a farm bill.
Democrats, however, say that was done on a bipartisan basis and not for something as monumental as extending trillions of dollars' worth of tax breaks.
Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) pointed out that President Obama's budget office in 2012 argued that the extension of the expiring Bush tax cuts should be scored as a continuation of current policy and as not adding to the deficit.
Democrats say that Congress has never before used a current policy baseline to score tax cuts in budget reconciliation package as not adding to future deficits.
They are pushing for the bill to be scored on a 'current law' baseline.
Under current law, the 2017 Trump tax cuts would expire at the end of 2025.
The Congressional Budget Office scores the extension of Trump tax cuts as adding to the deficit under a current-law baseline.
But under a current-policy baseline, which Republicans are using for the bill, the CBO scores the extension of the Trump tax cuts as not exceeding the bill's reconciliation instructions or adding to federal deficits after 2034.
If extending the Trump tax cuts is scored as budget neutral, then the bill complies with the Senate's Byrd Rule, which determines what legislation can pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote.
If Democrats win the procedural argument, the bill would have to be rewritten and the 2017 Trump tax cuts would have to be offset with huge additional spending cuts to comply with the Senate's Byrd Rule.
If Republicans win the procedural argument, then they will be able to make the expiring portions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent — a major policy victory.
Wyden, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and other senior Democrats made parliamentarian inquiries on the floor Sunday afternoon to set up a later challenge to the Republican baseline.
Merkley asked the presiding chair, who was freshman Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), if the House reconciliation bill used current law as the operative baseline when it was first laid before the Senate.
The chair answered 'yes.'
Then Schumer asked if the Senate had ever used a baseline other than current law for a reconciliation measure, and the chair responded 'no.'
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee, asked if the nine titles of the Senate bill other than the Finance Committee's portion, used current-law baselines. Moreno answered 'Yes.'
Wyden then asked if the Finance title of the legislation relied on two different budgetary baselines, both current-law and current-policy baselines, and the chair acknowledged that is true.
Those answers prompted Murray, the longest serving Democratic member of the Budget panel, to accuse Republicans of 'ignoring precedent, process and the parliamentarian.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures rise as Trump's tax bill heads to House
US stock futures rose as President Trump's sweeping spending bill headed to the House after narrowly passing the Senate. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) ticked up 0.2%. Futures attached to the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) rose 0.3%. On Tuesday, stocks were mixed as Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" cleared the Senate, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The bill now heads to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson aims to pass the legislation by Thursday, July 4. Economists estimate the bill's final price tag could top $4 trillion. Meanwhile, Trump's pause on his "reciprocal" tariffs is set to expire on July 9, and the president has said he isn't considering an extension. The administration is now reportedly trying to close smaller trade deals before the deadline, after which the president has said he will send letters to countries assigning tariff rates. "I'll be writing letters to a lot of countries," Trump said on Tuesday. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Finally, Wall Street is looking forward to the release of the June jobs report on Thursday as investors bet a rate cut from the Federal Reserve could land sooner rather than later. Any labor market weakness will be closely watched as it could strengthen the case for a cut. Markets across the Asia-Pacific region saw mixed trading early morning on Wednesday, with investors eyeing the potential of US interest rate cuts and the fast-approaching July 9 tariff deadline for deals to be struck between the US and major trading partners worldwide. Singapore's benchmark, the Straits Times Index (^STI), gained 0.5% to hit a record high of 4009.15 points as of 00:20 (UTC-4). The move saw the index crossing past the 4000 threshold for the second time on record. Australia and Hong Kong led gains as Australia's S&P/ASX 200 (^AXJO) rose 0.4% and the Hang Seng Index (^HSI) popped 0.7%. Japan saw loss in the country's major gauge as the benchmark Nikkei 225 (^N225) slipped 0.7%. Korea's Kospi (^KS11) cratered 1.2% as Trump ratcheted up pressure on the country to finalize a trade deal. Mainland China's CSI 300 ( hovered near the baseline. Reuters reports: Markets across the Asia-Pacific region saw mixed trading early morning on Wednesday, with investors eyeing the potential of US interest rate cuts and the fast-approaching July 9 tariff deadline for deals to be struck between the US and major trading partners worldwide. Singapore's benchmark, the Straits Times Index (^STI), gained 0.5% to hit a record high of 4009.15 points as of 00:20 (UTC-4). The move saw the index crossing past the 4000 threshold for the second time on record. Australia and Hong Kong led gains as Australia's S&P/ASX 200 (^AXJO) rose 0.4% and the Hang Seng Index (^HSI) popped 0.7%. Japan saw loss in the country's major gauge as the benchmark Nikkei 225 (^N225) slipped 0.7%. Korea's Kospi (^KS11) cratered 1.2% as Trump ratcheted up pressure on the country to finalize a trade deal. Mainland China's CSI 300 ( hovered near the baseline. Reuters reports: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Authoritarianism Expert Reveals 'Chilling' Phrase Trump Used During New Threat
Authoritarianism expert Ruth Ben-Ghiat warned that President Donald Trump is taking things to a 'chilling' new level with his latest rhetoric. Trump on Tuesday threatened to strip U.S. citizens of their nationality and then deport them if they commit certain crimes ― including some who were born in the United States. 'They're not new to our country. They're old to our country. Many of them were born in our country. I think we ought to get them the hell out of here, too, if you want to know the truth,' he said during a visit to a new migrant detention facility. 'So maybe that will be the next job that we'll work on together.' The comments echo what Trump said in April when speaking of deportations to El Salvador. 'The homegrowns are next,' Trump said during a meeting with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele. Ben-Ghiat, the author of 'Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present,' responded on X about Trump's comments: Trump's latest comments came after NPR reported that the Justice Department was 'aggressively prioritizing' efforts to revoke the status of naturalized citizens who commit certain crimes. On Tuesday, he said that could include citizens born in the United States who 'whack people over the head with a baseball bat from behind when they're not looking and kill them' or 'knife you when you're walking down the street.' However, Trump also indicated that category could be far broader, at least with naturalized U.S. citizens such as former ally Elon Musk. After his latest falling out with Musk, Trump said he said he would 'take a look' at deporting the tech billionaire.


CNN
37 minutes ago
- CNN
Paramount settles Trump's dubious ‘60 Minutes' lawsuit with $16 million payout and no apology
CBS News parent Paramount Global has agreed to pay $16 million to resolve a legally dubious lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump over a '60 Minutes' news report last fall. The long-gestating and highly controversial settlement payment was announced by Paramount late Tuesday night. Paramount said the $16 million sum 'includes plaintiffs' fees and costs,' and will not be paid to Trump directly, but instead will be allocated to Trump's future presidential library — mirroring a settlement agreement that Disney's ABC struck with Trump last December. 'The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret,' Paramount specified. The announcement also said that 'in the future, '60 Minutes' will release transcripts of interviews with eligible U.S. presidential candidates after such interviews have aired, subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns.' Legal experts maintained that Trump's suit was frivolous and that CBS was on solid ground to fight and win the case in court. Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. But corporate priorities trumped journalistic principles. Paramount has been trying for months to complete a lucrative merger with Skydance Media, and the deal requires approval from the Trump administration, in part because CBS owns local stations that are licensed by the government. This gave Trump a form of leverage over Paramount — and may have put more pressure on the company to pay up. Paramount said Tuesday night that 'this lawsuit is completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process. We will abide by the legal process to defend our case.' FCC chair Brendan Carr has also repeatedly said that his merger review process is separate. But before being promoted to chairman, the Trump appointee said complaints over the '60 Minutes' edit would be 'likely to arise' as part of the FCC's merger review. Trump filed the lawsuit before winning reelection. His complaint was about a single question and answer in a lengthy '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. He claimed without evidence that the Harris exchange was deliberately edited to benefit the Democratic candidate and hurt him. Conservative media watchdogs had noticed that CBS aired two different soundbites from Harris in response to correspondent Bill Whitaker's question about the Biden administration's relationship with Israel amid the war in Gaza. One clip aired on 'Face the Nation' and another clip aired on '60 Minutes,' which generated confusion on the part of the viewing public. As criticism mounted and Trump threatened to sue, CBS said it merely edited the vice president's answer for time, in accordance with television news standards, and it declined to release the full transcript. Trump went on the warpath, claiming 'election interference' and calling it 'the biggest scandal in broadcast history.' He accused CBS News of violating a Texas consumer protection law and demanded $10 billion in damages. His lawyers later raised the total to $20 billion. Legal experts slammed the suit as 'frivolous and dangerous,' and CBS defended '60 Minutes' on First Amendment grounds. Under pressure from the FCC last winter, CBS released the tapes and transcript of the interview, and the raw materials confirmed that it engaged in normal editing, not any nefarious activity like Trump alleged. Nevertheless, the lawsuit posed a serious problem for Paramount, especially its controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, who stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars through the Skydance deal. So once Trump took office for a second term, Paramount executives sought to make the lawsuit disappear by pursuing a settlement. Critics of the effort, inside and outside CBS, used words like payoff and bribe to describe the proposed settlement. At '60 Minutes,' 'everyone thinks this lawsuit is an act of extortion, everyone,' a network correspondent told CNN earlier this year. Several Democratic lawmakers even raised concerns that a settlement might run afoul of anti-bribery laws. The media company seems to be sidestepping those concerns by paying the same amount as Disney. Trump's CBS lawsuit was part of his larger and ongoing effort to attack major media organizations he deemed unfavorable to him. He sued The Des Moines Register and pollster J. Ann Selzer last December over a pre-election survey that showed Harris leading Trump in Iowa, which he ultimately won by double digits. Trump claimed the poll violated consumer fraud protections; the Register is currently fighting the suit in court. He also sued ABC News, alleging that anchor George Stephanopoulos defamed him, and the network ultimately settled that case, creating a blueprint of sorts for the Paramount agreement. In recent months, the CBS newsroom has been consumed by Trump's pressure, the prospect of a settlement and the corporate maneuvering aimed at securing the merger's approval. That internal strife spilled out into the public view in late April when '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens resigned, citing a loss of editorial independence. Days later, '60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley called out Paramount on-air, revealing that executives 'began to supervise our content in new ways' amid the pending merger. 'No one here is happy about it,' he said. A month later, Wendy McMahon, the executive in charge of CBS News, also resigned. She alluded to a 'challenging' past few months in her farewell memo to employees, adding that 'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward.' All the while, '60 Minutes' kept producing substantive investigations about Trump and other subjects, including a probe of his efforts to punish law firms he dislikes.