logo
Police Scotland doesn't even log the sex of suspects properly

Police Scotland doesn't even log the sex of suspects properly

And whilst there are far fewer of them on the roads, a vehicle fleet in which hardly an engine gets the chance to go cold from one end of the day to the next is also likely to have the odd metal-on-metal encounter with others. Paying out for such things is to be expected.
If that were the end of it, I suspect the vast majority of us would shrug our shoulders and take a pragmatic view that there wasn't really much to see here. But as with so many things in policing, that is a long way short of the whole story — and the service's approach to dealing with these incidents, and the inevitable questions the payments invite, points to something altogether more concerning.
Read more
Our police service has wholeheartedly embraced a sackcloth-and-ashes approach to institutional failings of misogyny, racism, and sexism. Our Chief Constable was barely a few hours into the job when she told us all she agreed with her predecessor — who himself had had a Damascene conversion on this just before he retired.
Indeed, such was the speed with which Jo Farrell was able to weigh up the evidence for herself that you have to wonder how it took so long for the Branchform inquiry into the SNP finances to come to a close.
On top of that, the service is never shy to remind us how it fails the LGB and TQIA+ community, and has apologised for upholding the law as it now seeks to incorporate as many rainbows as possible into life as penance for its past misdeeds.
Self-evidently, these kinds of pronouncements grab headlines and create a feeding frenzy of manufactured outrage, as well as cottage industries, pledges, and even more corporate jargon that allows a feeling of righteousness to wash over those at the top. New posters on walls, mandatory re-education for "wrong-think", and countless meetings to give the impression of action — all add to the necessary cleansing, and most crucially of all, serve to distract from the one true failing in the police: that of institutional dishonesty.
Informed by the maxim of never asking a question you don't already know the answer to, I recently FOI'd our national service to ask how many policies, procedures, and guidance documents had been changed since Iain Livingstone told us this was where many of the institutional failures lay.
Many of the claims made against the service are filed by its own officers, says Calum Steel, a former leader of the Scottish Police Federation (Image: free) Whilst I'm still in the FOI war of attrition awaiting the outcome of an appeal to get the service to properly respond, I already know the answer is none.
In fact, the best one deputy chief constable can muster as evidence to support the institutional punishment-beating being meted out is that the resuscitation dummies used to practise first aid skills are all white! Now, that would be funny enough if it were true — but it's hilarious because it is not.
The desperation to manufacture evidence to support the claims, and the corporate industry it now sustains, has been there from the get-go. The very day Iain Livingstone rang the bell and shouted "unclean", the service's own equality advisor was in front of the cameras declaring that the data held by the service proved there was a disparity in the service provided to some sections of the community. Cue another FOI to reveal that there was, in fact, no data — but by that time the seeds had been sown and the damage done.
Police station closures are met with fantastical claims of improving officer morale and service to the public, while cutting the number of road policing officers is packaged as delivering intelligence-led patrols on targeted routes — even though road deaths are increasing.
The shocking state of police morale and ever-increasing sickness rates are body-swerved with pledges that well-being is prioritised, despite HMICS investigations 'finding no recognition or reference to areas of significant stress in any of the work being undertaken in relation to well-being.'
And best of all, the decline in the quality of recruits to the service is sold as evidence of a steadfast commitment to standards — despite one in five now failing vetting, against a historic position of one in fifty.
Read more
You'd like to believe that such a casual relationship with the truth would have some serious consequences for the service, or at least raise the curiosity of its oversight body— but so ingrained is this institutional duplicity that it passes entirely without comment.
It is against this backdrop that we have to look at the compensation numbers and ask why it is that the service doesn't give even broad details of what the payments were for. After costing the public purse some £18 million, a smidgen of openness shouldn't be demanded — it should be automatic.
The hard truth is, many of the claims made against the service are made by its own officers. If made public, they would point to a service which treats its own people deplorably and is never held to account for doing so — such is the consequence of the confidentiality clauses which accompany nearly all settlements.
This is what lies behind the endemic confusion within the service on how to deal with issues of sex and gender, which allows the Chief Constable to say one thing while allowing her officers to do the opposite. It is an abdication of leadership and serves only one purpose: the continuing prioritisation of feelings over facts.
Calum Steele is a former General Secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, and former general secretary of the International Council of Police Representative Associations. He remains an advisor to both
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

John Swinney: SNP will protect welfare system despite what Labour does
John Swinney: SNP will protect welfare system despite what Labour does

The National

time32 minutes ago

  • The National

John Swinney: SNP will protect welfare system despite what Labour does

I firmly believe that investing in social security is key to reducing the number of children born into poverty and building a brighter future for the next generation, coupled with ensuring people can access the support they need, when they need it. This is in stark contrast to the approach being taken by the UK Government. Despite the last-minute concessions they have made to their welfare reforms, if the UK Government presses ahead with cuts to disability support, they risk plunging more people into poverty and introducing a two-tier system. That is unconscionable. I want to reassure families that we will not take forward harmful welfare changes in Scotland. READ MORE: Richard Murphy: Benefits boost the economy. It's the rich who are the problem The additional powers secured by the Scottish Government following the 2014 referendum have allowed us to take a different approach to social security and protect people from the worst of UK Government austerity. We have used these new powers to build a social security system that is unashamedly built on fairness, dignity and respect for those who need our support. Since becoming First Minister, I have worked tirelessly to ensure resources are directed towards those who need them most. This year, we're investing £6.9 billion in our social security system – which is almost £1.3bn more than we receive from the UK Government for social security through the block grant. This includes investment of £638 million in our package of benefits and payments only available in Scotland, one of which is the Scottish Child Payment. That payment is forecast to be supporting the families of around 330,000 children this year. SNP leader John Swinney has pledged to end the two-child benefit cap in Scotland (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) We're also working at pace to build the systems needed to mitigate the UK Government's two-child benefit cap for families – a cap which has been kept in place by the current UK Government. Our new benefit – the Two Child Limit Payment – will begin accepting applications in March next year. These measures will help provide much-needed support to families who need it most, especially during this ongoing cost of living crisis. Investing in tackling poverty also brings wider benefits across society and provides value for money for taxpayers. READ MORE: Labour's £46-billion problem: How to find the 'record-high' missing tax Keeping families out of poverty and providing support in line with our cost of living guarantee means that our economy is able to grow. More people are able to work and take advantage of opportunities to access training. Growing the economy in turn helps us deliver public services, including the NHS, for the benefit of everyone in Scotland. Meanwhile, the UK Government's approach to cutting vital benefits demonstrates our starkly different values when it comes to social security. Scotland's Adult Disability Payment will not be cut, and we will not attempt to balance the books at the expense of disabled people. My government will continue to unashamedly protect and invest in the social security system. We will not cast aside those most in need of our support.

Scottish Labour MP calls for third UK Government U-turn over Waspi women compensation
Scottish Labour MP calls for third UK Government U-turn over Waspi women compensation

Daily Record

time38 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Scottish Labour MP calls for third UK Government U-turn over Waspi women compensation

Douglas McAllister said "an apology is not enough" and urged his party's government to "get around the table with the Waspi women and avoid years of court battles". A Scottish Labour MP has called for the UK Government to make a third U-turn and compensate Waspi women. Douglas McAllister said "an apology is not enough" and urged his party's government to "get around the table with the Waspi women and avoid years of court battles". ‌ The SNP also called for the UK Government to go for a hat trick of U-turns and pay the women. ‌ The Labour Government decided against reimbursing women born in the 1950s affected by the changes to state pension age. This was despite a recommendation from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's (PHSO) to give the women between £1,000 and £2,950 each. It would have costed between £3.5 and £10.5 billion, according to the UK Government. It comes after Labour was recently forced into U-turns over its winter fuel payment and disability benefit cuts. West Dunbartonshire MP McAllister said during a debate in the House of Commons on Thursday: "The UK Government were right to recognise the injustice suffered by Waspi women in the statement to the House on 17 December, and to apologise for the maladministration that affected women across the UK. "Of course, the steps set out by the Government to ensure this does not happen again are welcome, but we must learn the lessons and always set a clear timetable for notice of any future state pension age changes. "However, an apology is not enough. I urge my Government colleagues to look again at the ombudsman's report and all its recommendations. ‌ "Ignoring key elements of the report, by refusing to comply with its instructions and refusing to set up a compensation scheme for maladministration, not only undermines its role and function, but is unprecedented and sets us on a very dangerous path." He added: "I suggest that we should avoid unnecessary court action. Let us get around the table with the Waspi women and avoid years of court battles, similar to other scandals over the past few decades. "Let us urgently review and explore what schemes this Government can consider, and offer financial redress to the 1950s women who deserve justice and to be properly compensated for past Government maladministration." ‌ Some Scottish Labour MPs suggested earlier this year that they would vote against the Government on Waspi compensation if they get the chance in the Commons. More than 330,000 women were impacted in Scotland - 5,000 of which were in McAllister's constituency. The welfare reforms U-turn earlier this week came after a potential rebellion from backbench Labour MPs. ‌ SNP MSP Clare Haughey said: 'Labour's U-turns on Winter Fuel Payments and disability cuts show they can be forced into doing the right thing. The SNP will continue to hold Sir Keir Starmer's government to account – and now is the time for Westminster to do the right thing for WASPI women. 'Over 330,000 women in Scotland have been left in the dark by unfair and poorly communicated Westminster changes to their pensions. Labour promised action, but now they've gone silent. 'After one year in office, Labour need to deliver justice for the WASPI women in Scotland and across the UK.'

An SNP MP tried to align our party with Keir Starmer. Why?
An SNP MP tried to align our party with Keir Starmer. Why?

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

An SNP MP tried to align our party with Keir Starmer. Why?

Normally the policy formulation dimension represents tweaks to existing policy. On occasion though, more pressing issues are debated. The National Council meeting on June 21 in the Perth Concert Hall was of the latter type. In the background, subsequently confirmed days later, was the prospect of the US weighing in on the Israeli side in their war with Iran. An act, as the general secretary of the UN pointed out, that ran a coach and horses through the international rules-based order. READ MORE: Keir Starmer backs US strikes on Iran ahead of Nato summit In Perth, on the auditorium screen was a topical motion on the issue in the name of Stephen Gethins MP. Had it passed unamended it would have upended SNP policy in several areas. Not only on the party's position on international nuclear disarmament treaty architecture, but broader issues of national security and indeed adjacent economic policy. Unamended, it would have positioned the SNP Group at Westminster behind Keir Starmer and David Lammy's position on the Israel-Iran crisis. It would have also represented a softening of the tone, possibly even the substance, of the critical statements made by other SNP parliamentarians at Westminster and in Holyrood. The unamended motion read: MIDDLE EAST SITUATION National Council abhors the ongoing violence in the Middle East and that destabilisation in the region is a threat to us all; calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and full access for humanitarian relief; further agrees that Iran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons but that the best means of stopping that and finding a sustainable solution is through diplomatic means. Stephen was not in attendance, so his motion was subsequently moved by another delegate. I proposed that three words – 'be allowed to' – be excised. In the end, my suggestion was acceded to and political embarrassment averted. Other amendments pertaining to the, frankly, barely condemnatory tone on what is going on in Gaza, would have been appropriate, but timescales and procedures precluded that. At first, I wanted to accept the cock-up theory. However, after a few days of reflection and being faced with some irrefutable facts, the record needs to be put straight. This must be reflected upon by SNP spokespersons who speak on the members' behalf, particularly on matters of war and peace. Fact one: the motion only mentioned Iran and not Israel. Fact two: it was presented in the name of a former professor of international relations. Fact three: if passed unamended, the SNP position on the subsequent bombing would have been in lock step with Starmer and Lammy. It's interesting how in the repertoire of those who used to promote a 'rules-based order that's not the United Nations' they and the mainstream media are very quick to gaslight anyone who says that historical context is important. However, when the historical airbrush is to be applied to the signature diplomatic achievement of President Barack Obama I must speak out. US president Donald Trump (Image: Getty) The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the deal that ensured Iran gave up any notion of developing nuclear weapons, was ditched by Donald Trump. My 'textual amendment' reaffirmed SNP adherence to the spirit of the Obama plan. During his first term as president, Trump of course trashed the JCPOA. Now bizarrely, he appears to want to bomb Iran into a JCPOA-without-the-safeguards. The Scottish National Party seeks to achieve the restitution of a sovereign Scottish state. It will be a small state and, as such, on the journey to independence the recognition of the United Nations will be indispensable. READ MORE: Richard Walker: Good journalism has never had a more vital role However, I am no naïve idealist when it comes to matters of international relations. The world is indeed a dangerous and uncertain place, particularly when you share a border with the Russian Federation or Israel. Only politicians with links to the arms trade would want to use fear as a key electoral driver. Arguing that man-made global dangers and instability are uniform throughout the world is an understandable though rather unethical marketing tool for arms companies. The truth is, in the bigger scheme of things, some places are a bit safer than others, and Scotland is one of those places. A fortunate reality that the independence movement should unapologetically make more of it. Bill Ramsay is the SNP Trade Union Group convener and sits on the party's National Executive Committee.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store