These states could redraw their House maps before the 2026 elections
The White House is encouraging at least one other state - Missouri - to join Texas in redistricting, while Democrats in California, New York and elsewhere are weighing how to respond if Texas lawmakers do finalize a new map.
If Texas Republicans meet their own goal, the House GOP could be poised to win up to five additional seats just from the Lone Star State next year, which could be an important buffer as the party seeks to hold on to its slim majority.
Some Democratic leaders have argued that they need to respond in kind.
"We will fight them politically. We will fight them governmentally. We will fight them in court. We will fight them in terms of winning the hearts and minds of the people of Texas and beyond," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Thursday at a news conference in the Lone Star State, flanked by Texas Democrats.
Here's a rundown of the states that are considering redrawing their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 elections or that have been mentioned as potential spots for mid-decade redistricting:
Texas
Texas Republicans unveiled a draft map Wednesday that would shift several districts currently held by Democrats near the state's major cities and in South Texas.
Such changes would bring more Republican-leaning voters into Democratic Rep. Julie Elizabeth Johnson's district northeast of Dallas and condense Democratic-leaning voters into just two districts in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez's South Texas districts, which both went for Donald Trump last fall, would become more Republican-leaning. And the map would also dismantle a Democratic-held seat in Houston and another that stretches from Austin to San Antonio.
All told, the five redrawn seats would each have backed Trump by at least 10 points in last year's election, according to an analysis by Sabato's Crystal Ball.
Under Texas' current map, Republicans hold 25 House seats to 12 for Democrats, with one vacancy following Democrat Sylvester Turner's death in March.
Besides legal challenges, Democrats in the Texas Legislature are also weighing a plan to deny their Republican counterparts a quorum to pass a redrawn map by fleeing the state, The Texas Tribune reported.
State lawmakers are in special session until Aug. 19, which is essentially their deadline to approve a new map.
Missouri
The White House has reportedly urged Republicans in Missouri to alter the state's House map, under which the party currently holds six of eight seats.
GOP Rep. Eric Burlison told St. Louis Public Radio that Trump wants state lawmakers to target Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II's seat in the Kansas City area.
That would be doable, according to Republican Rep. Jason Smith.
"There's some crazy jagged edges - in St. Charles County, in Clay and Jackson County near Kansas City," Smith told Punchbowl News. "And so I think that you could have a more compact map."
Gov. Mike Kehoe, who would need to call a special session to redraw the map, has said officials in the state were weighing their options.
"I think it's safe to say that in Missouri, along with other states, we're always trying to make sure that we have as much Republican representation because we believe that's who we are," he said, according to Ozarks Public Radio.
Florida
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is also among the Republican governors talking up the prospects of mid-decade redistricting, in what could be an effort to squeeze in at least one more GOP-favored district in the Sunshine State.
He said Wednesday that redistricting "was something that we're looking at very seriously," though he admitted he hadn't yet talked to any members of the GOP-controlled state Legislature about it.
His comments come after the Florida Supreme Court recently upheld the state's current map, which DeSantis had pushed through and that dismantled a Black-majority seat in northern Florida. Republicans currently hold 20 of the state's 28 House seats.
Indiana
In GOP-controlled Indiana, Republicans currently hold seven of the state's nine House seats, and Punchbowl News reported that Trump's allies are hoping for a mid-decade redraw to pick up at least one of the Democratic seats. Rep. Frank Mrvan's right-trending 1st District in the state's northwest corner could be a target.
But to attempt such a redraw, Republican Gov. Mike Braun, a former senator, would need to call the legislature in for a special session, which he hasn't yet said he's planning to do. The state may also need to enact a law to allow mid-decade redistricting, according to The Downballot. Politico Playbook reported this week that there appeared to be "little-to-no appetite for remapping" among Indiana Republicans.
California
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has spoken openly about the prospects of redrawing his state's congressional lines in an effort to blunt the effects of the new Texas maps on the 2026 landscape.
A retaliatory move wouldn't be as simple as what's playing out in Texas. Newsom and California Democrats would likely need to put the issue on the ballot to bypass the state's independent redistricting commission, which drew the current House map.
Newsom said Thursday he is eyeing a November special election for voters to weigh in on any redrawn map that could help elect more Democrats in response to the efforts in Texas.
"We will go to the people of this state in a transparent way and ask them to consider the new circumstances, to consider these new realities," Newsom said, according to CalMatters.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, told KCRA 3 that such a plan would be defendable in court.
The regular session of the California Legislature ends Sept. 12, meaning state Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers, have ample time to come up with a plan without a special session.
California Democrats already hold a strong advantage in the state's House delegation under the commission-drawn map, holding 43 seats to Republicans' nine. Some Democratic lawmakers have expressed a willingness to run in more competitive seats if it would mean increasing the party's pickup opportunities under a new map.
New York
Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has been open to a redraw of the state's congressional map to favor her party.
"I won't sit by while Donald Trump and Texas Republicans try to steal our nation's future," she posted Wednesday on X in response to the release of the draft Texas map.
New York Democrats currently hold 19 House seats to seven for the Republicans under a map that was approved by the Democratic-controlled state Legislature after making modest changes to lines drawn by New York's independent redistricting commission.
Legislative Democrats unveiled a measure this week that would amend the state constitution to allow New York to redraw its district lines mid-decade if another state did so first. But the legislation has a long path to becoming law, NBC News reported. Lawmakers would need to approve the measure in two consecutive sessions before it went to voters as a ballot measure.
That would likely mean that any new map wouldn't take effect until the 2028 elections.
Maryland
The eight-member House delegation in deep-blue Maryland is, unsurprisingly, dominated by Democrats, with Rep. Andy Harris holding the lone Republican seat on the state's Eastern Shore.
Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon has said he is drafting legislation to allow the state to respond to Texas by attempting its own redrawing, The Baltimore Banner reported.
But during the last round of redistricting after the 2020 census, a state judge rejected a Democratic effort to make Harris' district more competitive as a "product of extreme partisan gerrymandering" that violated the state constitution.
The Maryland legislature isn't expected to meet again until next year, according to the Banner.
Illinois
Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker met with Texas Democrats last week and suggested a redraw could be in the cards for his state in reaction to what transpires in Austin.
"So as far as I'm concerned, everything's on the table in reaction to that. But I'd like them to understand that if they're going to take this drastic action, then we also might take drastic action to respond," Pritzker said, according to WLS.
But that could be complicated because the current Illinois map already advantages Democrats, who hold 14 of the state's 17 seats - though Thursday's announcement that longtime Democratic Rep. Danny K. Davis will not seek reelection to his deep-blue Chicago-area seat could give the party an opportunity for some reconfiguration.
Ohio
Ohio was already set to see its congressional map redrawn this fall before the redistricting conversation went national.
The Buckeye State is required under state law to redraw its lines before next year's elections, as its current map was crafted by the GOP-controlled Redistricting Commission without bipartisan support. Ohio Republicans hold major sway over the redistricting process. The GOP-led state legislature and the redistricting commission could each get a shot at redrawing the map with bipartisan support. But if bipartisanship proves elusive, Republicans would be able to pass a map on party lines, subject to certain restrictions.
Ohio's House delegation currently includes 10 Republicans and five Democrats. Districts thought to be potential targets for Republicans include the ones represented by Democrats Marcy Kaptur, Emilia Sykes and Greg Landsman.
Louisiana
The Supreme Court punted on a decision on Louisiana's congressional map earlier this year and is set to rehear a challenge to the lines when it returns for its next term in the fall. That means it is possible there could be a third set of maps in three elections in the Bayou State by 2026.
The map that the Supreme Court allowed to be used in 2024 created a second Black opportunity district. Democrat Cleo Fields won the seat and returned to the House nearly 30 years after his previous congressional stint.
Wisconsin
Opponents of Wisconsin's congressional map have launched more legal challenges since the state Supreme Court's liberal majority declined in June to hear a pair of lawsuits that called for a redrawing of district lines.
Wisconsin Republicans hold a 6-2 advantage in House seats despite the state being a perennial battleground that sees some of the closest elections in the country.
The current map, approved by the state high court's then-conservative majority in 2022, was submitted by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers under "least change" guidelines set by the court. The guidelines required mapmakers to hew as closely as possible to the previous map, which had been drawn by Republicans.
Utah
In Utah, there's ongoing litigation over whether the current district lines, put in place after the 2020 census, should have been drawn by an independent commission pursuant to a 2018 ballot initiative.
Republicans control all four of the state's House seats after GOP state lawmakers split the Democratic-leaning Salt Lake City area between the four districts.
Other states
Several other states have earned mentions as places that could redraw their congressional lines, but prospects here appear remote.
Kentucky and Kansas have lone Democratic representatives who could be targeted, and Republicans hold legislative supermajorities in both states. But the states' respective Democratic governors would be unlikely to call for a special session this year to redraw the maps.
In New Jersey, where Democrats hold a governing trifecta, Gov. Phil Murphy is not ruling out a response to the action in Texas, but there seem to be no immediate plans to pursue efforts to target any of the Garden State's three Republican House members. The state may also be nearly out of time for voters to amend its Constitution and allow for mid-decade redistricting before the 2026 elections.
Democrats in Washington state, where they also hold full control, have said mid-decade redistricting is almost certainly unlikely to happen, the Washington State Standard reported. Democrats already dominate the state's House delegation - holding eight of 10 seats, including one that Trump carried - under a map drawn up by a bipartisan redistricting commission.
In Democratic-leaning Colorado, an independent redistricting commission, created by voter-approved 2018 constitutional amendments, drew the state's current map. The House delegation is currently evenly split between the parties, with four seats each. Former Rep. Yadira Caraveo, who is seeking a comeback in the competitive 8th District, has called on Gov. Jared Polis to take steps to scrap the redistricting commission in response to Texas. But such a move would face multiple hurdles, as Colorado Pols reported.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Builds $274 Million War Chest Ahead of Midterms
(Bloomberg) -- Billionaires Elon Musk and Jeff Yass along with crypto industry donors helped President Donald Trump raise $236 million for his political operation in the first six months of 2025 — an unprecedented sum for a second-term president. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance The latest filings to the Federal Election Commission show that the fundraising haul, which includes donations to three leadership political action committees, joint fundraising committees and an allied super PAC, leaves Trump with $274 million cash on hand. It's a massive war chest he can deploy on behalf of Republican House and Senate candidates in the midterm elections, when the incumbent president's party generally loses seats, and it highlights the continued grip Trump retains on the GOP. Trump's super PAC, MAGA Inc., provided the biggest draw for campaign cash, taking in $177 million. The president has held four $1 million-per-plate dinners for MAGA Inc. donors as well as a $1.5 million-per-plate event for entrepreneurs and investors in cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, two emerging technologies that have been a focus for his administration. While the FEC disclosures don't indicate whether a donor attended an event or simply wrote a check, they do reveal support from executives in tech, finance and energy for Trump. Yass, the co-founder of trading firm Susquehanna International Group and a major shareholder in TikTok parent ByteDance Ltd, gave $16 million. Pipeline billionaire Kelcy Warren and his company, Energy Transfer LP combined to give $25 million. Crypto industry donors poured money in as well. Foris DAX Inc., parent of exchange gave $10 million, while Inc. gave $5 million. Venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz each gave $3 million, while billionaire twins Tyler Winklevoss and Cameron Winklevoss combined to give just over $2 million. MAGA Inc. got a $5 million donation from Musk, a close Trump ally who fell out with the president after leaving his role overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency in late May. Musk has criticized Trump and Republicans over their signature tax and spending bill. Musk's donation hit on June 27, the same day he gave $5 million checks to two super PACs that back Republican candidates in the House and Senate. Musk in July vowed to create a third party. Earlier: Musk Gave His Super PAC $45.3 Million in First Half of 2025 While the money doesn't guarantee that Republicans will hold onto their narrow margins in the House and Senate, it gives them a major financial advantage over Democrats, who don't have a single leader to rally around or to spearhead fundrasing. The Democratic National Committee has raised $69 million, while Future Forward, the party's main super PAC, recevied donations of about $1 million. Big-Dollar Donors While big donors continued to power Trump's fundraising — about 70% of his haul came from contributors who gave $1 million or more — his small-dollar donor support, the backbone of his political operation, slowed. He raised $22 million from contributors donating less than $200, with most of that raised by Trump National JFC, which splits donations between the Never Surrender PAC, formerly his presidential campaign committee, and the Republican National Committee. Never Surrender and his other leadership PACs — Save America, which he's used to pay legal bills, and Make America Great Again PAC — ended June with $41 million cash on hand. The three committees combined to spend $26.5 million, with $6 million of that amount going to legal fees. Trump is still trying to overturn his 2024 conviction on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records to cover up hush-money payments to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels. He's also fighting a judgment of civil fraud and a fine that now tops $500 million from a suit over his real estate valuations, as well as an $83.3 million award to writer E. Jean Carroll for defamation. (Removes characterization of unpublished DNC report on 2024 election in ninth paragraph.) How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada holds out hope of trade deal as US talks tough on tariffs
Canada said it was hopeful it can still strike a deal with the US to bring down its tariff rate even as the Trump administration denied Sign in to access your portfolio


Time Business News
26 minutes ago
- Time Business News
India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination: MEA Bold Response to White House Peace Claims
Source – LegalPress New Delhi – The official India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination response emerged on Friday when the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) diplomatically sidestepped questions regarding the White House's aggressive campaign for President Donald Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. This measured diplomatic response reflects India's careful approach to addressing American claims about conflict resolution. During a press briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal was directly questioned about the India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue, specifically regarding White House assertions that Trump had ended several global conflicts, including the dispute between India and Pakistan. The spokesperson's response demonstrated India's preference for avoiding direct engagement with controversial American political narratives. Diplomatic Deflection Strategy The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination query received a characteristically diplomatic response from Jaiswal, who stated, 'It is better to take this question to the White House.' This carefully crafted deflection avoids both endorsement and criticism of American claims while maintaining India's traditional non-interference stance in foreign political processes. This approach to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects New Delhi's broader strategy of avoiding entanglement in American domestic political debates, particularly those involving disputed claims about international diplomatic achievements. The MEA's response maintains diplomatic neutrality while neither validating nor challenging White House assertions. White House Claims and International Conflict Resolution The context surrounding the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination stems from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's comprehensive advocacy for Trump's Nobel Peace Prize candidacy. Leavitt claimed that Trump had 'ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia.' The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign specifically highlights alleged American mediation in the India-Pakistan conflict as evidence of Trump's peace-making credentials. According to White House calculations, Trump brokered approximately one peace deal monthly during his six months in office, making him deserving of international recognition. Leavitt's statement that 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize' directly incorporates the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination narrative as supporting evidence for this assertion. This claim positions the alleged India-Pakistan ceasefire as a significant diplomatic achievement worthy of Nobel recognition. India's Historical Position on Bilateral Negotiations The India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue highlights a fundamental disagreement between New Delhi and Washington regarding the nature of India-Pakistan conflict resolution. India has consistently maintained that the cessation of hostilities between the two nations was achieved through bilateral negotiations rather than external mediation. New Delhi's rejection of Trump's mediation claims creates complications for the India On Trump Nobel Prize Nomination narrative promoted by the White House. This disagreement represents a significant diplomatic challenge, as India's official position directly contradicts the foundation of American Nobel Prize advocacy. Despite repeated assertions from Trump linking trade deals to conflict resolution, India's stance on the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination remains unchanged. The government continues to emphasize bilateral diplomatic processes rather than acknowledging American intervention in regional peace initiatives. Pakistan's Contrasting Position While India maintains diplomatic distance from the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign, Pakistan has embraced and actively supported Trump's candidacy. Islamabad has publicly thanked Trump for allegedly brokering the India-Pakistan deal, creating a stark contrast with India's position. In June, Pakistan formally nominated Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, specifically citing his 'diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' during the India-Pakistan crisis. This Pakistani endorsement adds complexity to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination debate by providing official support from one of the alleged beneficiaries. The Pakistani government's statement declared: 'Government of Pakistan Recommends President Donald J. Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The Government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J. Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis.' International Recognition and Norwegian Nobel Committee The India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign faces the ultimate test of international legitimacy through the Norwegian Nobel Committee's evaluation process. Despite various endorsements and advocacy efforts, the Committee has maintained its traditional silence regarding Trump's candidacy. The Norwegian Nobel Committee's approach to the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects their standard practice of avoiding public commentary on potential candidates. This institutional discretion means that public advocacy campaigns, regardless of their intensity or political backing, do not necessarily influence final selection decisions. Geopolitical Implications and Diplomatic Complexities The India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination issue illustrates broader challenges in contemporary international diplomacy, where domestic political narratives intersect with complex international relationships. India's careful response demonstrates the delicate balance required when addressing claims that involve multiple stakeholders with differing perspectives. The ongoing debate surrounding the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination reflects deeper questions about conflict resolution attribution, the role of external mediation in bilateral disputes, and the intersection of international recognition with domestic political objectives. Future Diplomatic Considerations As the India on Trump Nobel Prize Nomination campaign continues, India's diplomatic strategy will likely maintain its current trajectory of non-engagement with American political narratives while preserving bilateral relationship stability. This approach allows India to protect its sovereignty over conflict resolution narratives while avoiding unnecessary diplomatic friction with the United States. TIME BUSINESS NEWS