Gen Z More Concerned About Political Differences in Dating Than Millennials
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Gen Z really prioritizes a certain compatibility factor when it comes to dating, a new study has revealed.
The generation born between 1997 and 2012 stands apart from older generations in the dating landscape, exhibiting a higher concern for political alignment in potential partners, according to a study from eHarmony. This shift suggests that for many young adults, political views are not a preference, but a fundamental compatibility factor.
Newsweek spoke to clinical psychologist Dr. Hannah Holmes about the findings and how she sees them reflected in her own practice.
Stock photo: A couple watches a news broadcast together.
Stock photo: A couple watches a news broadcast together.
gorodenkoff/Getty Images
The study, which surveyed 500 people "open to dating," explored main dealbreakers in dating across the U.S. and found that "28 percent of Gen Z said having different political views could lead them to turn down a date," compared to 21 percent of millennials and 21 percent of Gen X. This notable difference highlights a generational divide in what is considered a "dealbreaker" in romantic relationships.
Holmes shed light on why Gen Z might be more sensitive to political alignment.
"Gen Z grew up hearing stories about couples—or even seeing their own parents or family members—separating due to differences in political and social beliefs," she said. "Many of them see it as a serious sign of lack of compatibility, rather than a minor difference in opinion."
This trend, Holmes suggested, comes down to the integration of politics and core values and beliefs for the younger generation.
"Politics aren't just abstract concepts for many Gen Z-ers, but instead ways of understanding reality, with real-world consequences," she said. "Understandably, this means that a misalignment in politics is understood as a misalignment of core values, which is typically considered a relationship dealbreaker."
Other Dealbreakers in Dating
Beyond politics, the eHarmony study also uncovered other generational differences in dating priorities.
Millennials and Gen X appear less willing to relocate to find love compared to Gen Z—19 percent of both millennials and Gen X said they are not willing to relocate anywhere for love, compared to 12 percent of Gen Z.
Furthermore, Gen Z have a higher preference to date within their social circle compared to millennials.
Regarding the importance of political compatibility in long-term relationship satisfaction, Holmes noted scientific research to support that political compatibility leads to more satisfaction in relationships.
However, she emphasized that "political agreement is not the final word on compatibility, and with good communication and mutual respect, there are couples with differing political views who can have happy and satisfying relationships."
For those who discover political differences early on with someone they like, Holmes advised caution rather than an immediate dismissal.
"Generally, if a person meets someone great who is politically different from them, I would recommend proceeding with caution instead of immediately jumping ship," she said. Key considerations include "what are the specific disagreements? Do they fundamentally misalign with your view of the world and morality, or are they minor differences of opinion?" Holmes added. "Whether or not they respect your views and communicate maturely about political topics is...[a] crucial consideration for whether they'll ultimately make a good romantic match."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
42 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Social Security Responds to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has celebrated the passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, describing it as "landmark" legislation that provides "long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans." On Thursday, Congress passed the legislation in a 218-214 vote in the House, and the bill now awaits Trump's signature in a White House ceremony on Friday. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act will ensure that almost 90 percent of Social Security recipients will no longer be required to pay income taxes on their benefits, according to the SSA. "This is a historic step forward for America's seniors," Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano said in a news release. "For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned." Why It Matters The SSA's response comes amid fierce political debate over the bill's long-term consequences for retirees and the federal budget. While Trump initially promised to nix Social Security federal income taxes for beneficiaries, the SSA confirmed that the bill instead creates a targeted deduction that varies by income. What To Know The SSA specified that the legislation enacts a $6,000 tax deduction for individuals aged 65 or older with income up to $75,000—or up to $150,000 for married couples. Above these thresholds, the deduction phases out, ending at incomes of $175,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples. The deduction is temporary and set to expire after 2028 unless extended by lawmakers. On X, formerly Twitter, the White House said on Monday that under the bill, 51.4 million seniors—88 percent of all seniors receiving Social Security income—would not pay any tax on their benefits income as a result of the change. The "big, beautiful bill" also drew intense criticism for its sharp cuts to Medicaid and other low-income programs, components that Democrats say threaten essential safety nets that millions rely on for basic health and nutrition. The bill's overall fiscal impact, according to the Congressional Budget Office, is projected to result in $3.3 trillion in additional deficit spending over the next decade. Social Security Administration office in Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 11, 2023. Social Security Administration office in Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 11, 2023. GETTY What People Are Saying President Donald Trump said in Iowa on Thursday after the bill's passage: "I think when you go over the bill, it was very easy to get them to a 'yes.' … Biggest tax cut in history." Karla Dennis, an enrolled tax agent and the CEO of the tax strategy firm KDA Inc., told Newsweek: "I really believe we need lasting change for seniors, not just quick fixes or one-time payments that grab attention but don't solve anything long term. We should stop taxing Social Security for people who are living on moderate incomes. Seniors making under $100,000 a year should not be taxed. The way Social Security is taxed today doesn't match how people earn income in retirement today." What Happens Next Trump is scheduled to sign the "One Big Beautiful Bill" into law in the Oval Office at 5 p.m. ET on Friday. The new Social Security deduction provisions are set to take effect in tax year 2026 and remain in effect through 2028.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
How Trump 2.0 Protests Compare to His First Term
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. It's been nearly six months since the reelection of President Donald Trump, and so far during his second term, the headlines have been filled with news of protests across the country. From "Not My President's Day" demonstrations in February and the coordinated "No Kings Day" protests in June, which coincided with the president's 79th birthday, to anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles last month, thousands of people have turned up at demonstrations across the country. But how do these protests compare with those during Trump's first term? With sweeping "Free America" protests due over the July 4 weekend, Newsweek spoke to experts to find out more about activism under Trump 2.0. How Have Protests Movements Changed Under Trump 2.0? "The simplest thing is, a much larger number of protests," Sid Tarrow, an associate member of the law faculty and Maxwell M. Upson Professor Emeritus Government Department at Cornell Law School, told Newsweek in a phone call. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/AP/Canva Dana Fisher, director of the Center for Environment, Community & Equity and a professor at America University, echoed this, telling Newsweek via email that although "Resistance 2.0 has taken longer to build momentum," there have been "more protests during the first six months of Trump 2." These have also been widely attended. The American Civil Liberties Union estimated that over 5 million people attended "No Kings" protests, of which it was an organizer, on June 14. The ACLU also reported that there were 2,100 protest events on that day alone. G. Elliot Morris, former editorial director of political polling website FiveThirtyEight, reported in a post on his Substack that there have been nearly triple the number of political protests at this point in Trump's second term than there were the first time around—15,395 in 2025 compared with 5,043 in 2017, according to data he cited from Crowd Counting Consortium. A Trump balloon floats above a "No Kings" protest on June 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. A Trump balloon floats above a "No Kings" protest on June 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, data from the American National Election Studies survey points to a general increase in protest participation from 2016 to 2020. It looked at youth participation and found that 18 percent of people aged 18 to 34 had participated in a protest, with another 29 percent saying they would do so in the future. Fisher told Newsweek that protests and resistance movements are often made up of people who are older and highly educated, with less of a change in this respect this time around. "Resistance 1 was clearly made up of highly educated, middle aged white women (and men)," Fisher said, adding: "Resistance 2.0 continues to be peopled by the same demographic, but more so: the participants are less diverse and more highly educated than Trump's first term." Meanwhile Asef Bayat, a professor of sociology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, highlighted a difference in the background to protest movements. "What distinguishes his second term is an unprecedented repression U.S. has seen in the recent decades. Americans cannot simply take for granted the kind of freedom of expression and protests they once had," Bayat told Newsweek. The Trump administration has taken measures to crack down on protests during his second term, including deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles in June, without the consent of California Governor Gavin Newsom, as protests against immigration raids escalated. The president has consistently defended these crackdowns and emphasized a need for law and order. The Issues Driving The Action "Young people's participation in protest movements is driven largely by a major dissatisfaction with the state of politics and democracy," Alberto Medina, communications team lead at the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), told Newsweek via email. "Only 16 percent of youth (ages 18-29) think democracy is working well for them," Citing Medina said, citing research from CIRCLE, adding: "There is also major distrust in institutions—especially major national institutions like the presidency, Congress, and the major political parties." "Young people are seeing a democracy that they don't believe is working and institutions that they don't trust to fix it, so they're taking to the streets to express their dissatisfaction, exert political pressure, and demand change." "The topics of protests are much, much broader," Tarrow said of the drivers under Trump 2:0. "It was as if people were waiting for the policy shoe to drop in order to protest against it." "The repertoire of contention has considerably broadened compared to Trump's first term." In June, there were anti-war protests following the U.S. strike on Iran. March brought Stand Up for Science rallies in response to cuts on science research funding. In May, tens of thousands of people demonstrated against the Trump administration's labor and immigration policies. People protest the involvement of the U.S. in Israel's war against Iran near the Wilshire Federal Building on June 22, 2025, in Los Angeles, California. People protest the involvement of the U.S. in Israel's war against Iran near the Wilshire Federal Building on June 22, 2025, in Los Angeles, California."The widened range of the protest movements against Trump are direct response to the widened and the more rapid range of policy moves that the Trump administration has made," Tarrow said. Whereas there was "a real focus on large centrally coordinated demonstrations" during Trump's first term, Fisher said. However, this time around, "The focus has been on more distributed actions that connect local people who are embedded in their communities," Fisher said, adding that "this structure makes it harder to see how big the mobilizations" are, apart from when they are "huge, like during the No Kings day of action." One thing that has remained consistent is the tactics of the protests, which—despite some instances of violence—"continue to be focused on peaceful activism," according to Fisher. How Might Protest Movements Continue To Evolve Throughout Trump 2.0? Tarrow said that while it's hard to predict events over a three-and-a-half year period, the key date to observe will be the 2026 midterm elections. "Protests will become more and more institutionalized, more and more aimed at particular Republican politicians," he said. However, he said: "The magnitude of the threat has been perceived and worried about by people who are generally not protesters," adding, "I think we need to understand better, the degree that there's a transfer of protest energy into electoral energy, which I think there will be in November 2026." Bayat shared a different possibility. "If repression continues, we might even see the rise of some kind of 'hidden sphere' (as opposed to public sphere) where people might remain silent or pretend to comply in public, but act or express views the opposite in private." "This would have serious implications for political process," he added. Fisher, meanwhile, said that while "Resisters the first time around thought that electoral politics could fix everything and that Trump 1 was a just a blip in the system or a mistake," this time round "everyone realizes that Trump's success was the product of a political system" and society "does not grant equal access to everyone." "Fewer people are speaking about how [an] election will solve the problem this time around. Instead, the focus is on the need for systemic changes that fix the system that is not working for the majority of Americans and has expanded inequality in our country," Fisher said.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Hamas Gives Position on Trump's Gaza Ceasefire Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Hamas said it is seeking an end to the war and the unrestricted entry of humanitarian aid as it is expected to announce a decision on a new U.S. ceasefire proposal to which U.S. President Donald Trump said Israel had agreed. Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. Department of State and Hamas officials for comment. Why It Matters Momentum for a ceasefire is mounting as the U.S. has stepped up diplomatic efforts in recent weeks, applying pressure to both Israel and Hamas to reach an agreement that also includes a mechanism for the release of the remaining Israeli hostages held in Gaza. The United States says it is offering an opportunity for peace in the Middle East and is also pushing for more countries to join Abraham Accords agreements with Israel, which is difficult while it continues to wage the devastating was in Gaza Strip since the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023. Smoke billows after an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 28, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas militant group. Smoke billows after an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 28, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas militant group. Photo by BASHAR TALEB/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Hamas said it is holding consultations on the latest 60-day ceasefire deal and will publicly announce a decision afterwards. "As part of the movement's keenness to end the Zionist aggression against our people and to ensure the free entry of aid, the movement is holding consultations with leaders of Palestinian forces and factions regarding the proposal it received from the brotherly mediators," it said in a statement on Thursday. A source close to Hamas told Reuters the group is seeking assurances that the new U.S.-backed proposal for Gaza would ultimately result in a permanent end to the war. Reaching an agreement has been stalled for months over key disputes on the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza and Israel's demand for the removal of Hamas from the strip. As of early July 2025, over 56,000 Palestinians have been killed and more than 133,000 injured in Gaza, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack killed about 1,200 people in Israel, and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) reports 891 soldiers killed since then. People in Tenafly, N.J., watch a live broadcast in anticipation of the release of Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander, a Tenafly native, from Hamas captivity in Gaza, on Monday, May 12, 2025. People in Tenafly, N.J., watch a live broadcast in anticipation of the release of Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander, a Tenafly native, from Hamas captivity in Gaza, on Monday, May 12, 2025. Ted Shaffrey/AP Photo What People Are Saying Hamas statement Thursday, broadcast on Telegram in Arabic: "The movement will deliver its final decision to the mediators after the consultations conclude and will announce it officially." President Donald Trump in Tuesday statement: "I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter." Non-Resident Fellow, Middle East Council on Global Affairs Mouin Rabbani told Newsweek: "I think [Hamas] will primarily depend on whether they feel they have achieved their core demands, or a credible pathway to achieving them: a durable ceasefire, withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, and unrestricted entry of aid." U.S. State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters Wednesday: "So the Middle East changed dramatically. This is the – an opportunity in the midst of this new world to make a different kind of decision." What Happens Next President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will discuss Gaza in a White House meeting next week. Israel is wary of accepting any agreement that would leave Hamas in power, allow it to claim victory and remain a threat to Israeli security.
