logo
One London airport's plan to dramatically boost traveller numbers

One London airport's plan to dramatically boost traveller numbers

Independent10-06-2025
London Stansted airport has applied to Uttlesford District Council to increase its annual passenger capacity to 51 million over the next 20 years by making the 'best use of its existing single runway' by the 2040s.
The proposals do not require increasing the number of flights or expanding the existing airport boundary.
If approved, the plans will create 4,500 new jobs, invest in reducing congestion to M11 Junction 8, fund local bus services, and improve the Stansted Express.
The airport intends to double the size of Stansted Airport College to train more local young people and relieve pressure on nearby roads by encouraging passengers to travel by public transport.
Almost 2,000 of the 2,800 respondents in the area backed Stansted's consultation, with Managing Director Gareth Powell stating the plans will help create more jobs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Costly mistake' that some holidaymakers are making when travelling abroad
‘Costly mistake' that some holidaymakers are making when travelling abroad

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

‘Costly mistake' that some holidaymakers are making when travelling abroad

Going without cash when abroad could be an expensive mistake for some holidaymakers, according to research, with more than one in three having found themselves caught out when needing physical money. Some 39% of holidaymakers have found themselves in unexpected situations where cash was required while they were abroad, according to a survey commissioned by website Be Clever With Your Cash. The most common expenses included tipping, taxi fares and shopping at local or independent retailers, according to the research. Prepaid and specialist travel cards can make it easier to rely less on physical cash while travelling overseas. But those suddenly needing that cash could end up paying extra costs, the survey carried out by Opinium, among 2,000 people across the UK who have travelled abroad, indicates. The research found some people who had to make an emergency cash machine withdrawal on their last trip overseas were charged an ATM fee. Some people also said they turned to airport exchange desks for last-minute cash, even though they may potentially be getting a worse deal than if they had shopped around for their travel money and planned ahead. The website said that stepping outside major cities can also present challenges, as rural and remote areas in some countries could be less likely to accept cards. Amelia Murray, a money expert at Be Clever With Your Cash, said: 'There's still a blind spot when it comes to cash. Many people assume that having a fee-free card is enough, but that can be a false economy if you end up using an ATM abroad that charges or get stung by poor exchange rates. 'It's not about carrying wads of cash, it's about being prepared for those moments when a card simply won't cut it.' Ms Murray suggested packing a 'cash cushion' – a small amount of local currency that could be useful for tipping, local travel, or if holidaymakers end up somewhere that does not accept cards. She also suggested that holidaymakers make sure they understand their card's policy on fees and currency conversion before they travel. People may also want to check how much they would be covered for by their travel insurer if their cash is lost or stolen while they are abroad. Research released by financial information business Defaqto in May indicated that 91% of annual and 86% of single trip policies included cash cover as standard. Just over a third (35%) of single trip travel insurance policies covered as much as £200 to £299, while a quarter (24%) covered between £300 to £399, according to Defaqto's analysis.

The best travel accessories to make holiday packing a breeze
The best travel accessories to make holiday packing a breeze

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

The best travel accessories to make holiday packing a breeze

Faithful to the fold? A strategic roller? Or a last minute thrower-inner? Whatever your approach to packing, chic travel kit can make the process a whole lot more pleasurable. From space-maxing suitcases to stylish add-ons, your luggage has never looked better. Let's start with the absolute essential: a suitcase. Here, investment in a good one cannot be underestimated. The style set is committed to Rimowa, and while silver is the colour choice of many, we're currently coveting this aluminium version with a bronze finish. A portable charger is another modern-travel must-have. Burga's fit into the palm of your hand, plus they come in a range of stylish prints to boot. • Read more fashion advice and style inspiration from our experts As for a way to make the actual packing a breeze, say hello to modular storage solutions. Cadence is the name to seek out here, of particular note the nifty honeycomb set that features pick-your-own compartments in a range of sizes and colours (which certainly beats putting suncream in a knotted supermarket carrier bag). A hand-held clothes steamer is also a godsend if you're travelling to an event such as a destination wedding — or you simply love linen (and hate ironing). For your absolute essentials though — aka your passport and money — Aspinal's luxe leather travel wallet is just the ticket. Ready for departure? You are now. • This article contains affiliate links that can earn us revenue From leftLarge duffel bag, £65, steamer, £120, tag, £95, Reusable water bottle, £35, power bank, from £78, travel wallet, £165, AirTag key ring, £40, vanity case, £475, travel container honeycomb kit, £152, check-in suitcase, £1,340,

Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour
Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour

It is more than a quarter of a century since Tony Blair complained about the 'scars on my back' from two years of trying to reform the public sector. As the Cabinet Office supremo, Pat McFadden, noted in a speech on the same subject in December, Blockbuster Video and Toys R Us were still in operation at the time of Blair's comments, while Airbnb, WhatsApp and Spotify had yet to be born. Twenty-six years later, creative destruction has reshaped the private sector, in some ways unrecognisably, but the same old arguments swirl about modernising government. The case for public sector reform has become more urgent after the reversals of the past few weeks. A partial U-turn on cuts to winter fuel payments, at a cost of almost £1.3 billion, turned out to be a mere appetiser for a near-total capitulation on attempts to cut welfare by nearly £5 billion. Those surrenders, plus a possible downgrade of the independent fiscal watchdog's productivity forecasts and other revisions, could blow a £30 billion hole in the public finances. After £40 billion of tax rises in October's budget — which put the UK on course for a record postwar haul of 37.7 per cent of GDP — the drums are beating to the rhythm of more taxes this autumn. Breaking a manifesto promise not to increase the burden on 'working people' could cost the chancellor her job. Cranking up taxes even further on businesses — which have swallowed £25 billion of extra national insurance contributions — and on capital gains, carried interest and inheritances would place another drag on already sluggish growth. Labour may have been handed an ugly fiscal picture by the Conservatives last year, but it is getting worse. Much valid criticism has been made of Rachel Reeves, Sir Keir Starmer and ­senior colleagues for their failure to persuade a recalcitrant parliamentary party of the need for realism in spending cuts. Although the winter fuel business was handled badly politically, reducing payments was right in principle, and £5 billion should have been just the start in controlling a benefits bill that is predicted to swell to £378 billion by 2030. The simple fact is that Labour is showing itself incap­able of getting the nation's costs down, and higher taxes would stifle the eco­nomy. Sharpening public sector productivity is the only plausible third way. Three articles we carry today offer a way forward. Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, argues that the present model of 43 county-based forces has not been fit for purpose 'for at least two decades' and should be replaced by 12 to 15 regional forces. He says this would reduce back-office duplication and allow the enlarged groups to make better use of technology. Rowley also makes the point that creaking social services are frequently forcing police officers to take on the role of social workers, especially in cases of children missing from local authority care. Penny Dash, the new chairwoman of NHS England, says the health service's dysfunctional bureaucracy makes her 'just want to cry'. There are examples of brand-new scanners lying idle, unused buildings on the NHS estate, operating theatre times routinely slipping and appointment letters being sent out to patients after they were due to be seen. Dash wants to open up data on NHS performance, including on individual doctors and teams, saying the institution should go 'really big on transparency'. Today we also report on the scandal of HS2, a rail project that could end up costing more than £100 billion despite suffering repeated delays. We reveal how contracts were struck with the private sector, on behalf of the taxpayer, that contained no element of risk. This meant that there was no incentive for many of the contractors to operate efficiently, as they were safe in the knowledge that if the costs over-ran, the taxpayer would pick up the tab. The new boss of HS2 has pledged to re­negotiate the contracts. His approach should be replicated across Whitehall. In truth Labour has so far taken the easy options for improving public sector performance, awarding workers above-inflation pay rises and increasing capital budgets. Sensible cabinet ministers now accept in private that those pay deals should never have been struck without some kind of union commitment to workplace reform. The next steps will now be harder, involving confronting vested interests, including Starmer's own backbenchers. Blair, with his record landslide in 1997, was prepared to sustain scars in pursuit of reform — and even he made ­limited progress. The big question is whether Starmer and his team are up for and up to the challenge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store