Operation Sindoor: Paradigm shift from candle lights to BrahMos
A humiliated Pakistan lost all its senses and struck through LeT's proxy TRF at the unguarded tourist spot in Pahalgam. Worse, it killed tourists after checking their religion and confirming that as mandated by Islamic theology, which governs Pakistan, they killed only Kafirs, that is Hindus. Their theology did not say they should do it in front of the victims' wives and children. But they did that too. Modi vowed India will chase the beastly terrorists, their backers and funders to the ends of the earth and bury them in the soil – an open political direction to the Indian defence, intelligence and diplomatic community. It needed no political pundit to deduce that the PM's direction was to hit terrorist camps in Pakistan. The heart-rending terror left no option to the political system and the leadership but to declare an open war against terror. But this was unlike the US-led war on terror directed against a state – the invasion of Afghanistan. Our war on terror was not to be and could not be an open war against the state of Pakistan. But technically any attack on the terror camps in Pakistan, which are an extension of the state and the army, was an attack on the state of Pakistan itself. Modi knew that attacking the terror bases in Pakistan would invite a war with the mad Pakistan with nukes in its hands. Yet he decided to initiate that war by his open direction to hit the terror bases, which was like declaring a war and notifying Pakistan 'we are going to hit you'. To execute an openly declared mission, which deprived the Indian army of the surprise element needed for the attack to succeed, was indeed a daunting challenge, as the enemy would be fully prepared to thwart it. Also since it was an openly declared cross-border attack, besides military preparation, it called for extremely skilful diplomatic manoeuvre to gain the support of the major powers of the world for the operation and to minimise opposition.
Within 15 days of the Pahalgam slaughter, Team Modi comprising the tri-forces, intelligence and diplomacy spectacularly accomplished the explicitly declared mission by hitting nine terror bases in Pakistan and killed over 100 jihadis. This time, it was no gun shot as in PoK. No aerial bombing as in Balakot. Modi upgraded his response to the barbaric Pakistan terror to another level — to BrahMos missiles.
How could Modi transform the anti-terror mission, kept secret to launch surprise attacks on terror camps in PoK in 2016 and in Balakot in 2019, into an open and notified mission in 2025 and succeed in it? His preparations for 2025 started after Balakot in 2019 when he realised that an altogether new non-contact war model was needed to target not just terror but its sponsor, Pakistan. The next part is about how the Indian army, air force and navy masterfully and professionally executed that openly declared mission against terror and how they excelled even Israel in an Israel-model attack.
S Gurumurthy
Editor, Thuglak Tamil Magazine. Chairman, Vivekananda International Foundation Strategic Think Tank.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
Barred in own constituency, Manipur Congress MP slams buffer zone enforcement
Congress MP from Inner Manipur, Angomcha Bimol Akoijam, has criticised what he called an "unconstitutional and imaginary buffer zone" enforced by security forces in parts of the conflict-hit at his residence in Imphal on Tuesday, Bimol raised serious concerns about being denied entry into a locality within his own constituency, alleging that such actions were violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Congress MP said he was stopped on June 29 by security forces while trying to visit Phougakchou-Ikhai Makha Leikai Keithel in Bishnupur district, an area that falls under his parliamentary constituency. "Stopping an Indian citizen - especially an elected Member of Parliament - from moving freely within his own constituency is a direct violation of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution," Bimol said, calling the move an example of growing authoritarianism and institutional bias. He alleged that security forces, particularly the 6 Assam Rifles, were actively enforcing a non-existent buffer zone that had originally been put in place in May 2023 to curb mob violence. According to him, the so-called buffer zone is now being used selectively to prevent Meitei individuals, including elected leaders, from entering certain areas while members of other communities are allowed free is not just about me being stopped. It's about covert, communal segregation being carried out under the guise of security. It's creating a dangerous precedent," Bimol said. Taking to social media, he highlighted the incident, arguing that such enforcement amounts to institutionalised discrimination between the Meitei and Kuki pointed to recent incidents of violence and obstruction against Meitei farmers, including an alleged attack in Imphal East on June 16 and another in Phubala on June 20, where farmers were reportedly prevented from accessing their land. Bimol claimed these actions reflect a coordinated attempt to intimidate Meiteis and deter them from farming on their own dismay, he stated that such barriers only serve to divide the people of Manipur and increase communal mistrust. "Manipur is not divided by communal ideology. The continued enforcement of this so-called buffer zone only deepens mistrust and weakens unity," he of now, there has been no official response from the security forces to the allegations made by the Congress MP.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
NSUI protests against UP govt's school merger plan, claims move will shut over 27,000 rural schools
LUCKNOW: The National Students' Union of India (NSUI) held a protest on Tuesday against the Uttar Pradesh government's recent decision to pair primary and upper primary schools with fewer than 50 students with nearby institutions, a move that NSUI claims will effectively shut down over 27,000 schools. Led jointly by NSUI's Central Zone president Anas Rehman and Eastern Zone president Rishabh Pandey, hundreds of students marched from the Congress office toward the Vidhan Sabha. Tensions escalated when police tried to stop them, leading to a brief scuffle between the protesters and the security personnel. Speaking to reporters, Anas Rehman said, "In welfare states, governments aim to provide quality education to all children. Instead of upholding this, the BJP-led government wants to deprive rural students of education to suppress dissent." He added that if the decision is not rolled back, the NSUI, the Congress' students' wing, will launch a major protest in the next 25 days, which will be joined by national president Varun Chaudhary. Pandey accused the Yogi Adityanath government of favouring private schools. "While private schools admit children at three to four years, government schools accept them at six. Once a child enters a private school, there's no going back," he said. He also claimed that the Right to Education Act is being flouted by granting recognition to private schools within a one-km radius of the government schools, undermining public education. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
BJP MPs protest parliament panel inviting Prakash Raj, Medha Patkar; meeting cancelled
A parliamentary committee meeting ended abruptly on July 1 as Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MPs protested against the panel's decision to hear activist Medha Patkar and actor-turned-activist Prakash Raj. The Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, headed by Congress MP Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, had called Patkar and Raj to hear her views on the implementation and effectiveness of the land acquisition law enacted by Parliament when the Congress-led UPA government was in power in 2013. Patkar had led protests against raising the height of Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat and is accused by the ruling party of working against the country's development interests in the name of public and environmental causes. Former Union minister and BJP MP Parshottam Rupala was joined by other lawmakers from his party as they walked out of the meeting, with some dubbing Patkar as "anti-national". A BJP MP wondered if leaders from Pakistan could also be called to such a meeting, news agency PTI said, Ulaka, the panel's chairperson, however, defended the decision, saying that it is standard practice for a parliamentary committee to hear civil society members and other stakeholders on various issues. "We wanted to hear their views on the land acquisition law. We wanted an opinion from everyone, but they (BJP) didn't allow it," he told news agency PTI. Out of the 29 members of the committee, 14 members, including the chairman, were present, and a majority of them were from the BJP and its allies. The meeting's agenda was to hear from different stakeholders on the implementation and effectiveness of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, a UPA-era Act. Representatives of the Department of Land Resources (Ministry of Rural Development), the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, non-government organisations (NGOs), experts, and other stakeholders were to speak before the panel. Among those invited before the panel were officials from the Environment and Forest Ministry and activists, including Patkar and Prakash Raj, also an actor who has often criticised the BJP's politics. Former prime minister HD Deve Gowda also attended the meeting, according to PTI. A BJP MP said they were not told about the decision to ask Patkar to share her views with the committee. Generally, sources said, it is the chairman's prerogative to pick names, though members can make suggestions. A BJP member said their primary objection was to calling Patkar, who was the face of the 'Narmada Bachao Andolan' protest against a determined push by the Gujarat government, headed then by Narendra Modi as chief minister, to raise the height of Sardar Sarovar Dam. The state government's views finally prevailed, and Modi, who took over as prime minister in 2014, has often spoken about the efforts to stall the project since its foundation in the 1960s. As the BJP MPs walked out, Ulaka said he decided to end the meeting due to a lack of quorum. "As per rule, a quorum of 10 members is required. When the BJP MPs walked out, there was no quorum, and the meeting ended," he said. BJP MPs objected to Patkar appearing before the panel, and called her 'anti-national,' according to sources quoted by news agency PTI. A miffed MP also wondered if the prime minister of Pakistan could be called for questioning by the panel, the news agency report said. When the meeting started, opposition MPs were of the opinion that Patkar should be heard, to which the BJP MPs did not agree. Asked about the incident, Patkar said she was invited to appear before the panel, and while she and others were waiting, they saw some MPs leave. We wanted to hear their views on the land acquisition law. We wanted an opinion from everyone, but they (BJP) didn't allow it. She added that later, they were informed that the meeting had ended. Patkar said she had also appeared before parliamentary committees earlier. "I have never experienced anything like this before. It is important to talk about the land acquisition law," she said.
