Why J&K Deputy CM is turning up heat on L-G Sinha over ‘dual power centres'
Asking Sinha why he was not returning the file relating to the Transaction of Business Rules (TBR) that would define the respective powers of the L-G and the elected government, Choudhary said, 'We are pained that we are not able to provide jobs to our youth even eight months after assuming power.'
Choudhary was flagging off a bus from Jammu to the remote Daddal Kalasara village via Sunderbani in the border Rajouri district.
He said the Omar Abdullah-led J&K government, like other elected governments of the country, wanted to take 'big decisions' for the welfare of the youth and the elderly but was unable to do it due to 'dual power centres'.
The Deputy CM's bid to reiterate such remarks assumes political significance as he has been seen taking a more vocal stand on the issue as compared to Abdullah, who has been emphasising on 'cooperating' with the L-G for people's welfare since taking charge last October.
After having emerged as a giant killer in the 2024 J&K Assembly polls, when he defeated then state BJP chief Ravinder Rana, Choudhary's vociferous stance on issues like statehood, power distribution, and restoration of special status are aimed to claim that the people of Jammu, like their Kashmiri counterparts, are not happy with the Centre's move on August 5, 2019, when it abrogated Article 370 and downgraded J&K state to a UT.
Sources said Choudhary's position is meant to help the NC keep its vote base intact in Kashmir as well parts of Pir Panjal and Chenab Valley in Jammu while steering the party to take on the BJP in the latter's bastions of Jammu, Samba and Kathua.
The Deputy CM has raised these issues in the Assembly too. Amid protests by the BJP MLAs, it was Choudhary who moved a resolution in the House urging the Centre to hold dialogues with the elected representatives of J&K over restoration of Article 370.
After the NC-led government recently alleged that the L-G's move to transfer 48 officers of the Jammu and Kashmir Administrative Services (JKAS) violated the provisions of the J&K Reorganisation Act, it was from Choudhary's home in April that the ruling MLAs 'warned Delhi for the last time' against interference.
On Sunday, reminding Sinha of his recent statement that only 'the police came under him', Choudhary also urged the J&K BJP leaders to take up the issue with the L-G.
However, the BJP claimed that the powers of the L-G as well as the elected government were 'clearly defined' in the J&K Reorganisation Act. 'The issue concerns the L-G and the government. Both should take care of their respective domains and sort out any confusion instead of making the people suffer,' BJP vice-president and Jammu North MLA Sham Lal Sharma said.
On June 14, in an apparent bid to put the controversy over the existence of 'two power centres in the UT' to rest, Sinha had said that only the police came under him while the rest of the administrative departments fell under the purview of the elected government. He subsequently echoed this while responding to state Education and Health Minister Sakina Itoo's criticism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BRS to start rail blockade if BJP, Congress continue to delay implementation of Telangana OBC quota Bill: Kavitha
Blaming the Congress and the BJP for their delay in implementing a Bill passed by the Telangana Assembly to grant 42% reservation for other backward classes (OBCs), Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) leader K. Kavitha said on Tuesday (July 8, 2025) that her party will launch a rail blockade agitation on July 17 if a government order to implement the law is not issued in the next State Cabinet meeting. She asked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to direct Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy to issue the order using the provisions of the Constitution. Ms. Kavitha also urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to act so that the legislation, which is at present awaiting approval from President Droupadi Murmu, can be notified soon. 'If the Backward Classes Bill is not approved, not a single train wheel will be allowed to move forward from Telangana,' she said. 'Deceiving the backward classes' Ms. Kavitha accused both the Congress, in power at the State, and the BJP-ruled Central government of deceiving the backward classes (BCs). 'Opposition to BCs is ingrained in BJP's DNA. If the BC Bill is not approved, 2.5 crore BC children in Telangana will teach BJP a lesson,' she said. Talking to reporters in the national capital on Tuesday, the BRS leader said that she would write to all political parties seeking their support for the implementation of BC reservations. She said the State government is trying to wash its hands of the matter after sending the Bill to the President. 'Why isn't Rahul Gandhi making a phone call to Revanth Reddy to issue the Government Order? If he truly supports the Constitution, he should ensure that the Revanth government enforces the 42% reservation through a Government Order,' she said.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Maharashtra language war: Is it with an eye on Mumbai municipal polls? Experts debate
The language controversy in Maharashtra has escalated, with Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) workers protesting and allegedly assaulting non-Marathi speakers in Mumbai suburbs. This comes ahead of crucial municipal elections, raising questions about whether this is a genuine fight for Marathi pride or a political strategy. The Thackeray cousins, Uddhav and Raj, have united on this issue, while the BJP denies accusations of imposing Hindi. The Congress and NCP have taken a cautious approach so far. Critics argue this may be more about control of the BMC's large budget than language issues. The controversy has sparked debates about cultural identity, language policy, and political opportunism in Maharashtra. The issue of Marathi language and identity has resurfaced in Maharashtra politics, with opposition parties uniting against a government order on Hindi language education. Shiv Sena UBT leader stated the party's commitment to promoting Marathi while respecting other languages. The NCP accused the government of failing to address public concerns and provide concrete solutions for Marathi language promotion. BJP faces criticism over comments by MP Nishikant Dubey. The debate has reignited discussions on Marathi pride ahead of BMC elections, with speculation about potential alliances between Uddhav and Raj Thackeray. The issue highlights ongoing tensions between regional identity and centralized education policies.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Neither central nor state forces allowed in assembly'
1 2 Kolkata: The advocate general, in his submission to Calcutta High Court, on Tuesday denied BJP 's allegation of discrimination between central and state forces on the Bengal assembly precincts. AG Kishore Datta pleaded that neither central nor state forces were allowed as security to MLAs. "However, there are some policemen deployed in the House, without arms, on the directions of the high court," Datta said. He submitted that all other security personnel were made to wait in shelters. "The prayer made by the leader of opposition (Suvendu Adhikari) to allow central forces within the assembly precincts/House would result in an order of reverse discrimination," the AG said. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Adhikari's counsel and BJP chief whip Jaydip Kar had earlier cited a notification issued by the assembly speaker on May 6, 2021, preventing central security forces accompanying BJP MLAs from entering the premises. The AG urged the court of Justice Amrita Sinha to consider whether a direction to the legislature presided over by the speaker, who enjoys certain privileges and immunity under Articles 178, 194, 208, 212 and Entry 13 of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, was preferable and how far the functions of the legislature could be brought under the purview of judicial review. Senior counsel for Adhikari, Billwadal Bhattacharya, held that the point of the matter was whether constitutional provisions could be suspended by issuing an administrative letter from the speaker's office. Justice Sinha adjourned the hearing till July 21.
