Vitamin D: The best time to soak up sunlight without hurting your skin
But that's far from the truth. In fact, studies show that nearly 42% of adults in the United States are deficient in vitamin D.
The real kicker? Many individuals don't even realize that vitamin D is not just about strong bones. It's a hormone-like nutrient that helps regulate immunity, mental health, blood pressure, and even insulin levels. So the stakes are much higher than most people think. And while you can certainly take supplements, nothing beats the natural route—sunlight—if you can get it right.
When it comes to vitamin D, timing really is everything
But here's where things get tricky: the timing of your sun exposure matters more than most people realize. If you're heading out for a walk before work at 7:30 a.m. or catching a sunset jog after dinner, you're probably not making much vitamin D at all. That's because the body can only produce vitamin D when it gets hit with UVB rays—and those rays are strongest during a very specific window: roughly between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m.
Early morning and late afternoon sunlight may feel gentle and healthy, but they mostly deliver UVA rays, which do very little for vitamin D synthesis. In contrast, UVB rays during late morning and early afternoon can help your skin produce vitamin D efficiently—as long as you don't overdo it.
The fix isn't complicated, but it does require intention. If you can build a habit of stepping outside during the late morning or early afternoon—without sunscreen for just a short while—you'll be doing your health a huge favor.
This could mean taking your coffee break outdoors, going for a walk during your lunch hour, or eating outside in a sunny spot. The exposure doesn't need to be excessive. Even 10 minutes with your arms and legs exposed can make a meaningful difference over time, especially if your skin is fair.
Still, dermatologists advise balance
If you're staying out longer than 20 minutes or the UV index is particularly high, cover up. And if you have a family history of skin cancer or extremely sensitive skin, talk to your doctor. For many Americans, especially those over 60 or living in less sunny areas, supplements may still be necessary—but sunlight should be the foundation of your vitamin D strategy whenever possible.
So the next time you're on a Zoom call, look at the clock. If it's around 11:30 a.m., maybe step out on your porch, roll up your sleeves, and let the sun do its job.
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Fourth of July: New study warns there's ‘no safe amount' of hot dogs to eat
An all-new meta-analysis has suggested that there is no safe amount of hot dogs, or any other processed food, to consume. The study, led by Dr Demewoz Haile of the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, was published in the Nature Medicine journal on June 30. Researchers found that even small daily servings of processed meat hold the potential of significantly increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer, Newsweek reported. Why you should skip eating hot dogs this Fourth of July Why does this matter? This comes as Americans are celebrating Independence Day. Hot dogs remain a staple during the July 4 celebrations. According to the outlet, more than 150 million hot dogs are expected to be consumed across the United States during the Fourth of July weekend. The study contributes to the rising body of evidence that links processed meats to the risk of chronic disease. Notably, diet-related illnesses are already counted among the leading causes of death in the country. Key findings of the study As part of the analysis, the researchers took into consideration 77 different studies to find out the link between common chronic diseases and certain amounts of such food items. Dr Demewoz Haile told Fox News Digital that habitual consumption of 'even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer.' He suggested that there was 'no safe level of habitual consumption' of such food items and has advised people to refrain from adding these to their daily diet. In terms of processed meats, the team found out that eating even 0.6 to 57 grams of it on a daily basis was linked to an 11 per cent greater likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes. Moreover, daily consumption between 0.78 and 55 grams was discovered to be associated with a 7 per cent increase in colorectal cancer risk. A hot dog typically weighs around 50 grams and is made of almost entirely processed meat. Further, the study found that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, between 1.5 and 390 grams per day, might increase the risk for type 2 diabetes by 8 per cent. Also, there is a risk of ischemic heart disease if consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages ranges between 0 and 365 grams on a daily basis. FAQs: 1. What's the major takeaway from the University of Washington study? It found out that there is "no safe level of habitual consumption" of processed food items. 2. How do daily servings of processed meat affect our body? As per the study, it increases the risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer. 3. Is July 4 a federal holiday in the US? Yes. Americans are celebrating Independence Day on Friday.
Time of India
21 hours ago
- Time of India
From coverage to crisis? How Trump's tax package could strip millions of Medicaid benefit
With Trump's tax cuts extended and Medicaid restrictions tightened, the bill is poised to redraw the contours of America's healthcare landscape. Its long-term impact will depend on how states choose to implement the new rules. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Safety-Net Shake-Up: Medicaid in the Crosshairs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mandated Work Requirements and Eligibility Checks Changes to Medicaid Financing: States to Feel the Pinch Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Republican Defense: Work for Welfare Consumer Watchdogs Worry About Mounting Medical Debt A Step Backward from Universal Healthcare? FAQs What does the new law say about Medicaid? How many people could lose health coverage because of this bill? Millions of Americans enrolled in Medicaid are set to face significant changes as the U.S. Congress approved President Donald Trump's expansive tax and spending package this week. While the bill extends key components of Trump's tax cuts, it also includes deep reductions in federal healthcare support—prompting growing anxiety among health policy experts and consumer newly passed legislation, which cleared the U.S. Senate on July 1 and the House of Representatives on July 3, is expected to reduce federal healthcare expenditures by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade. A substantial portion of these cuts target Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) insurance to projections by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the law will result in 11.8 million Americans losing health coverage, with an additional 5 million affected by the discontinuation of pandemic-era tax credits that had subsidized ACA which provided health insurance to 78.6 million low-income Americans as of March 2025, will now come under stricter eligibility surveillance, including job verification requirements and reduced financial leeway for states to fund their share of the programme.A defining element of the bill is its imposition of work requirements on certain Medicaid recipients. Beginning in 2027, states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA must verify twice a year that "able-bodied" beneficiaries are employed for at least 80 hours per month or meet exemption criteria—such as being a caregiver, student, or of children above 13 years will also be subjected to these checks. States will be obligated to set up systems for regular job verification, though the Department of Health and Human Services can grant implementation delays through waivers for those acting in "good faith."During Trump's first term, 13 states sought similar waivers. Only Arkansas implemented them before a federal court halted the programme, which had disenrolled 18,000 people within seven months. Currently, Georgia operates the only state-approved Medicaid work requirement scheme, known as "Georgia Pathways," with fewer than 7,500 people eligibility criteria, the bill also reforms how states can finance Medicaid. Many states have used 'provider taxes'—fees on hospitals and other healthcare providers—to boost their federal Medicaid match. The new law freezes the current tax limit and then, beginning in 2028, lowers the allowable rate from 6% to 3.5%, as per a report by USA policy analysts believe this reduction could pressure states to reduce healthcare services or reconsider their expansion commitments under the ACA.'States are going to anticipate that loss of revenue and will be looking to make changes,' said Jennifer Tolbert, Deputy Director at KFF's Medicaid and Uninsured critics describe the bill as a rollback of Obama-era healthcare reforms, Republican lawmakers argue that the overhaul is a necessary realignment of federal assistance Mike Johnson, speaking before the House vote, defended the inclusion of work requirements, stating that they aim to 'restore dignity and purpose to those on taxpayer-funded benefits.'The bill also aligns with Trump's broader campaign promise to extend his 2017 tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, and ramp up border security—creating a sweeping fiscal package that redefines government spending advocacy groups warn that the new law could lead to a rise in medical debt, particularly among vulnerable populations who lose insurance debt already constitutes more than half of all debt in collections, as per a 2022 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). A Biden-era rule intended to ban medical debt from credit reports is now at risk, as the GOP-led bill includes funding cuts to the CFPB, potentially weakening its ability to implement consumer protections.'The combination of reduced healthcare access and a weakened consumer watchdog agency is a double blow,' said Sally Greenberg, CEO of the National Consumers League. 'Consumers are going to pay—and patients are going to pay big time.'Health policy researchers view the legislation as a significant departure from the universal coverage ambitions of the Obama-era ACA.'This is a giant step backwards from the vision of universal coverage that was President Obama's legacy,' said Joan Alker, Executive Director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Trump's tax cuts extended and Medicaid restrictions tightened, the bill is poised to redraw the contours of America's healthcare landscape. Its long-term impact will depend on how states choose to implement the new rules—and how millions of Americans adjust to a potentially leaner public health safety newly passed legislation includes nearly $1 trillion in federal healthcare cuts over the next decade, with a significant portion targeting Medicaid. The law introduces work requirements, tighter eligibility checks, and limits on how states fund to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 11.8 million Americans are projected to lose health insurance coverage due to the Medicaid reductions and the expiration of pandemic-era tax credits for ACA plans.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
Rural hospitals in US brace for financial hits, closure under Trump's $1 trillion Medicaid cut
OMAHA: Tyler Sherman, a nurse at a rural Nebraska hospital, is used to the area's aging farmers delaying care until they end up in his emergency room. Now, with Congress planning around $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over 10 years, he fears those farmers and the more than 3,000 residents of Webster County could lose not just the ER, but also the clinic and nursing home tied to the hospital. 'Our budget is pretty heavily reliant on the Medicaid reimbursement, so if we do see a cut of that, it'll be difficult to keep the doors open,' said Sherman, who works at Webster County Community Hospital in the small Nebraska town of Red Cloud just north of the Kansas border. If those facilities close, many locals would see their five-minute trip to Webster County hospital turn into a nearly hour-long ride to the nearest hospital offering the same services. 'That's a long way for an emergency,' Sherman said. 'Some won't make it.' Struggling hospitals will be hit hardest States and rural health advocacy groups warn that cutting Medicaid — a program serving millions of low-income and disabled Americans — would hit already fragile rural hospitals hard and could force hundreds to close, stranding some people in remote areas without nearby emergency care. More than 300 hospitals could be at risk for closure under the Republican bill, according to an analysis by the Cecil G. Sheps Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which tracks rural hospital closures. Even as Congress haggled over the controversial bill, a health clinic in the southwest Nebraska town of Curtis announced Wednesday it will close in the coming months, in part blaming the anticipated Medicaid cuts. Bruce Shay, of Pomfret, Connecticut, fears he and his wife could be among those left in the lurch. At 70, they're both in good health, he said. But that likely means that if either needs to go to a hospital, 'it's going to be an emergency.' Day Kimball Hospital is nearby in Putnam, but it has faced recent financial challenges. Day Kimball's CEO R. Kyle Kramer acknowledged that a Senate bill passed Tuesday — estimated to cut federal Medicaid spending in rural areas by $155 billion over 10 years — would further hurt his rural hospital's bottom line. Roughly 30% of Day Kimball's current patients receive Medicaid benefits, a figure that's even higher for specific, critical services like obstetrics and behavioral health. 'An emergency means I'm 45 minutes to an hour away from the nearest hospital, and that's a problem," Shay said. And he and his wife wouldn't be the only ones having to make that trip. 'You've got, I'm sure, thousands of people who rely on Day Kimball Hospital. If it closed, thousands of people would have to go to another hospital,' he said. 'That's a huge load to suddenly impose on a hospital system that's probably already stretched thin.' $50 billion fund for rural hospitals isn't enough Rural hospitals have long operated on the financial edge, especially in recent years as Medicaid payments have continuously fallen below the actual cost to provide health care. More than 20% of Americans live in rural areas, where Medicaid covers 1 in 4 adults, according to the nonprofit KFF, which studies health care issues. US President Donald Trump's $4.5 trillion tax breaks and spending cuts bill, which passed Thursday, would worsen rural hospitals' struggles by cutting a key federal program that helps states fund Medicaid payments to health care providers. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and other social safety net programs — cuts they insist only root out fraud and waste in the system. But public outcry over Medicaid cuts led Republicans to include a provision that will provide $10 billion annually to buttress rural hospitals over the next five years, or $50 billion in total. Many rural hospital advocates are wary that it won't be enough to cover the shortfall. Carrie Cochran-McClain, chief policy officer with the National Rural Health Association, said rural hospitals already struggle to break even, citing a recent American Hospital Association report that found that hospitals in 2023 got nearly $28 billion less from Medicaid than the actual cost of treating Medicaid patients. 'We see rural hospitals throughout the country really operating on either negative or very small operating margins," Cochran-McClain said. "Meaning that any amount of cut to a payer — especially a payer like Medicaid that makes up a significant portion of rural provider funding — is going to be consequential to the rural hospitals' ability to provide certain services or maybe even keep their doors open at the end of the day.' Kentucky is expected to be hit especially hard A KFF report shows 36 states losing $1 billion or more over 10 years in Medicaid funding for rural areas under the Republican bill, even with the $50 billion rural fund. No state stands to lose more than Kentucky. The report estimates the Bluegrass State would lose a whopping $12.3 billion — nearly $5 billion more than the next state on the list. That's because the bill ends Kentucky's unique Medicaid reimbursement system and reduces it to Medicare reimbursement levels. Kentucky currently has one of the lowest Medicare reimbursement rates in the country. It also has one of the highest poverty rates, leading to a third of its population being covered by Medicaid. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a two-term Democrat widely seen as a potential candidate for president in 2028, said the bill would close 35 hospitals in his state and pull health care coverage for 200,000 residents. 'Half of Kentucky's kids are covered under Medicaid. They lose their coverage and you are scrambling over that next prescription,' Beshear said during an appearance on MSNBC. 'This is going to impact the life of every single American negatively. It is going to hammer our economy."
