
EXCLUSIVE Library literally split down the middle of US-Canada border will have to pay $215K in war with Trump over ban
The Haskell Free Library & Opera House is not a border crossing and never has been, but in March, it became involved in a political argument it didn't ask to be in when US President Donald Trump installed new rules restricting Canadian access.
For 121 years, the quaint establishment has proudly sat both in Derby Line, Vermont, and Stanstead in Québec, Canada, with the entrance being on the US side.
A clear black line throughout the building shows the divide between the nations, which politically, has grown much larger since Trump took power in late January and began calling the nation the 51st State and trying to enact high tariffs on them.
Come October 1, the establishment will be forced to bar Canadians from entering its main entrance, and instead, make them to sneak through an emergency exit that is now being converted into a real one.
Sylvie Boudreau, the president of the board, told the DailyMail.com: 'We don't know the future, we don't know what's going to happen.'
But she exclusively revealed that the renovations the library must undergo in order to work around Trump's order will cost an estimated $300,000 CAD ($215,600 USD).
In order to accommodate the US' marching orders, the library will have to undergo a huge infrastructure overhaul so its Canadian guests can still access the facility, which is governed under both countries' law.
The overhaul includes making the side door handicap accessible and creating a separate parking lot for Canadians.
Right now, Canadians are required to show a library card to enter on the Vermont side, but come October 1, they will have to go through an official port of entry to access the main entrance.
Canadians, for more than 120 years, have been able to access the library through a sidewalk leading to the front door - something that both countries peacefully allowed.
But now, signs in the parking lot warn visitors that Canadians could face arrest or prosecution or 'removal from the United States' if they do not have their library card upon entering the Vermont side.
Guests will also have to leave through the same door they came in through, as the library is not a port of entry between the two once-friendly countries.
Besides the astronomical costs, the library faces even more challenges as they have to appease both historical and heritage rules of both Derby Line and Stanstead, meaning the back door needs to be made of oak and other areas require granite.
And before they can do anything, they need approval... after approval... after approval on both sides of the border.
'Everything needs to be in order to these requirements,' Sylvie told the DailyMail.com.
In order to accommodate the US' marching orders under the Trump Administration, the library will have to undergo a huge infrastructure overhaul so its Canadian guests can still access the facility, which is governed under both countries' law.
They're hoping to have a design plan 'very, very soon' and aim to have the construction done by the end of July.
'Our partners are trying to do it as fast as possible,' Sylvie said, saying the library will be prioritized when the ball gets rolling.
In order to make the changes coming down from the White House, the library has started a GoFundMe since it does not have the funds to adjust to the new laws.
Sylvie, who worked in customs for 20 years, knew the closure was coming for some time. For years, US Border Patrol wanted to 'restrict and control a little bit more' and after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem unexpectedly visited in January, she knew.
'I knew the next step was closing the entrance,' she said, before remarking that Noem was 'very cordial, to be honest.'
That didn't stop Noem from joking as she stepped over the thick black line showing the US-Canada border inside the library that she was stepping into the 51st State, a volunteer recalled to Stuck in Vermont.
'I worked at the border for 20 years,' Sylvie told the DailyMail.com. 'I understood their reason, but do I agree with them?
'We live in a scary world right now. It's the worst of the worst.'
She believes her past working near the border helps the library as authorities respect them since she does understand their job to a degree, but that doesn't mean they're willing to tell her what happens in the fall.
She's asked them if they plan on housing more border patrol agents outside the library and if they plan on asking patrons for identification upon entering and exiting the library.
However, she was quite firm that neither the US or Canadian agents will be allowed inside until invited and doesn't believe this is a political stunt.
'They can't do anything unless they're invited in,' she told the DailyMail.com. 'In the library, they have no jurisdiction.'
Haskell librarians and volunteers will not be checking passports or IDs of patrons.
'It's not up to the employees to check that,' she said. 'That's [border patrol's] job.'
They will be vigilant for crime happening in the library, as the Trump Administration has accused them of drug smuggling, which Sylvie said was false.
In 2018, the library did have a gun smuggling incident where at least two Americans hid weapons inside the bathroom for a Canadian to pick up.
Alexis Vlachos, of Montreal, pleaded guilty to smuggling backpacks full of guns into the North American country on at least two occasions. He was sentenced to 51 months.
During the pandemic, families unable to cross the border to see family used the library as a meet-up place - something that staff had to put an end to.
Since then, the library hasn't been the destination of crime, but 'every little incident gives them reason,' Sylvie said.
And the Haskell library is aware it won't win a war against the US government.
'It cannot be more in the middle of what happens at the border,' she said, referring to the fact that the library quite literally sits on it. 'I don't want to scare myself or my visitors, but we need to be aware.
'It's all new, this is a page in history.'
Despite being affected by the new president's border orders, the locals on both sides have been nothing but supportive.
'People are supporting us,' Sylvie told the DailyMail.com. 'People are rising above division.'
Many locals are irritated with the new changes, with Vermonters saying they don't like the upcoming changes.
'For the record, speaking on behalf of Vermont where the library is, nobody wants this. This administration doesn't represent anyone or anything that we stand for or believe in at this point and it gets worse day by day,' one person wrote in the comment section under a video about the library.
Jody Stone, the mayor of Stanstead, said the building is uniquely American and Canadian and 'something that everybody's grown up with.'
'The fact that Canadians could enter an American door without having to report at the border was something that was accepted and tolerated,' he told Stuck in Vermont.
'We need to make sure we keep it a friendly border.'
'I think it's awful that people are trying to separate books from anybody,' Beth Radcliffe, who is American but chose to enter on the Canadian side to avoid border agents, told Stuck in Vermont.
'So, trying to divide this library by nationality is just ridiculous.'
The new rules even brought together Stone and Newport Mayor Rich Ufford-Chase to figure out a way to keep the library a unified place.
'It really touched people on both sides of the border,' Stone said. 'If you live in a border community, you know the bonds that we have between our communities and this is a symbol of that.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
French police stand watching as boat load of migrants set off for UK
French police officers have been spotted idly watching on as a group of migrants attempted to cross the Channel in a small boat. A group of cops, decked out in full riot gear including helmets, shields and batons, seemingly stood by as people boarded a smuggler's inflatable dinghy on Gravelines beach in northern France earlier today. Shockingly, one officer even appeared to be taking a selfie moments after the boat set sail towards the English coast. As the sun begins to set, the officers then saunter off just as another group wearing fluorescent life jackets and carrying bags start making their way to the water's edge. French President Emmanuel Macron had promised a tougher approach to cracking down on small boat crossings to the UK following a three-day state visit to the country earlier this month. But police patrolling the French coast do not appear to be upholding the same sentiment. Earlier this month officers again appeared to make zero effort to stop one boat packed with migrants as they were instead seen handing out lifejackets to those on board before it motored off. Nearly 24,000 small boat migrants have arrived in the UK so far this year - sparking further condemnation towards Prime Minister Keir Starmer after he vowed to tackle smuggling gangs in the Labour's General Election manifesto. Last week it was revealed that officials are now planning to use AI to check migrants' ages after shocking figures showed four out of 10 who claimed to be children were lying. The Home Office last week announced testing on new technology will begin later this year with the hope it could be fully integrated into the asylum system in 2026. There have long been fears that some of those who cross the Channel in small boats - who often don't carry official documents such as passports - are wrongly claiming to be children. Unaccompanied minors are more likely to be granted asylum than adults, with some suspected to be faking their ages in a bid to boost their chances of staying in the UK. A staggering 1,305 of those caught lying about their age were from Afghanistan, in a bid to get special protection in the UK. Child refugees cannot be deported and have the right to the same healthcare, education and sustenance as British children. It comes as the number of people per small boat has reached record levels this year, with insiders warning it is 'a matter of time' before one sinks from overcrowding. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is worried about women and children being 'crushed at sea' and told the Daily Mail: 'If you storm a boat, trampling over the bodies of tiny children, you are complicit in putting other people in danger.'


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Nigel Farage and ‘lawless Britain': dangerous hyperbole has real-life consequences
During last year's general election campaign, Reform UK settled on 'Britain is broken' as a slogan. This summer, intending to dominate the news agenda during the long Westminster recess, Nigel Farage has decided to ramp up the dystopian rhetoric. 'Broken' has morphed into 'lawless', as Mr Farage tours the country deploying language reminiscent of the 'American carnage' speech delivered by Donald Trump at his first inauguration in 2017. Unfounded claims of a huge rise in crime have been breezily tossed out to bolster the assertion that Britain is 'facing nothing short of societal collapse'. The crisis of lawlessness on the streets, wrote Mr Farage in a recent article for the Daily Mail, was being compounded by the government-sponsored arrival of 'droves of unvetted men into our towns and cities'. Commenting on recent protests outside an Epping hotel accommodating asylum seekers, after a resident was charged with sexually assaulting a local teenage girl, he remarked that the country was close to 'civil disobedience on a vast scale'. According to the Crime Survey for England and Wales – which Mr Farage chooses to ignore but which is the most robust source of relevant evidence – incidents of theft, criminal damage and violence have been in long‑term decline since the 1990s. But Reform's leader is more interested in sinister mood music than data, as he seeks to foment a feelbad factor. His aim is to portray a country in which disinterested elites preside over a law and order crisis intimately connected to immigration, and where there is a yearning for an authoritarian response along the lines suggested by Mr Farage. Reform's pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act, made on Monday at a 'Britain is lawless' press conference, underlined its willingness to risk the further pollution of public discourse by disinformation and hate speech. As the chief constable of Essex reminded Mr Farage last week, after he falsely alleged that police had driven counter-protesters to the site of the Epping hotel, inflammatory talk has real‑life consequences. In an echo of last summer's riots after the appalling murder of three young girls in Southport, asylum seekers have reported being chased and attacked in the town. Having in many cases fled violent and unstable situations elsewhere, they now fear for their safety again. In Essex, and elsewhere in the country, far-right groups are seeking to create the conditions for another conflagration. These are worrying developments. But Britain's social fabric is not unravelling and the country is not on the verge of widespread civil conflict. A year ago, the vast majority of citizens backed a hardline response to the scenes of disorder that took place. Nevertheless, the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, was right to argue last week that much more needs to be done to enhance social cohesion in places buffeted by change and starved of resources. The problem with Mr Farage is that his hyperbolic claims are designed to heighten and sharpen tensions rather than truly address them. For a party that aspires to govern and claims to be in the mainstream, fuelling a sense of insecurity and anger in this way is deeply irresponsible. Britain is still a long way from being Mr Trump's America, and Reform's cynical opportunism may fail to yield the political dividends hoped for. But we have been served with another reminder of the darkness at the heart of Mr Farage's politics.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Poll: Obama would beat Trump in theoretical 2028 matchup
By A new poll reveals who would win in a fantasy matchup between President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama for president if they both ran for a third term. A new exclusive Daily Mail/J.L. Partners poll shows that Obama would win in a theoretical matchup. Of the respondents, 52 percent chose the former Democratic president and 41 percent chose Trump. Obama's 11-point majority over Trump stems from an enthusiastic Hispanic base, of which 73 percent selected Obama, and also 68 percent of black voters. Obama currently enjoys a 59 percent favorability rating while just 35 percent viewed him unfavorably. That's compared to Trump's 44 percent favorability mark. According to the exclusive poll, Trump has a 49 percent overall approval rating for his job performance as president, while 51 percent have an unfavorable view. American presidents are prevented from running for a third term, after the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was passed and ratified in 1951. Trump has teased the idea in interviews, although he has conceded he is not yet planning on running for a third term. 'I'm not joking,' Trump told NBC in March, when asked to clarify his comments on the idea. 'But I'm not — it is far too early to think about it.' When asked about how he would do so, Trump said cryptically, 'There are methods which you could do it.' He also said he would 'love' to run against Obama. 'I'd love that …. That would be a good one,' he said to Fox News reporter Peter Doocy in March. 'I'd like that. And no, people are asking me to run, and there's a whole story about running for a third term. I don't know, I never looked into it. They do say there's a way you can do it, but I don't know about that.' Trump supporters have mused on a possible loophole in the law, if Vice President JD Vance won a presidential race in 2028 with Trump as his running mate. Theoretically, a President Vance could swear in as president and then resign, allowing a vice president Trump to ascend back into power. Obama also joked about the idea of a third term as his second term was coming to a close. 'I actually think I'm a pretty good president. I think if I ran, I could win,' Obama joked during a 2015 speech in Ethiopia. 'There's a lot that I'd like to do to keep America moving. But the law is the law, and no person is above the law, not even the president.' In 2020, Obama also joked that he would be fine with a 'stand-in' president where 'they had an earpiece' and he could control them. "You know what? If I could make an arrangement where I had a stand-in, a front man or front woman, and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff, and then I could sort of deliver the lines, but somebody else was doing all the talking and ceremony, I'd be fine with that,' he joked in an interview with Stephen Colbert. The poll was conducted July 9 - July 10 among 1,013 registered voters. It has a 3.1 percent margin of error.