Golden Share in US Steel Deal Marks New Era of Public-Private Cooperation
On June 19, following the completion of Nippon Steel's acquisition of major United States steelmaker US Steel, Chairman Eiji Hashimoto held a press conference. He explained that the US government's possession of a so-called "golden share" — a key factor in the Donald Trump administration's approval — signals a broader shift in the global economy. According to Hashimoto, governments and private companies are entering a new era of strategic cooperation, driven largely by intensifying competition with China.
Reflecting on the year-and-a-half of negotiations with the US government over Nippon Steel's acquisition of US Steel, Hashimoto remarked, "The Trump administration's decisions weren't unique to the United States. They reflect a broader global trend. That's the key lesson I've taken away."
A golden share, a special class of stock that grants veto power over key corporate decisions, has raised concerns among some observers who fear it could constrain US Steel's management following the acquisition.
Surprisingly, it was Nippon Steel that proposed the golden share, a mechanism granting permanent oversight to the US government. Hashimoto dismissed concerns over the arrangement, calling the commitments "essentially common sense" and insisting they "pose no real harm." On the contrary, he suggested the move could help fast-track future capital investments with the support of the American administration. The signboard sits in front of the building that houses Nippon Steel headquarters in Tokyo's Chiyoda district. (©Kyodo )
The post–Cold War expansion of free trade, especially after China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, delivered enormous benefits to China, which has since become the United States' primary economic rival. Today, China accounts for more than half of global steel production.
Hashimoto argued that as Beijing increasingly favors state-owned enterprises through aggressive industrial policy, Washington's insistence on supervising US Steel signals a broader shift in global economics — away from pure market-driven capitalism and toward a new era of strategic alignment between governments and corporations. Decarbonization, he added, is another challenge that "cannot be solved without public-private cooperation."
In addition to the $14.1 billion USD acquisition, Nippon Steel plans to invest a further $11 billion by the end of 2028. While recouping such a massive outlay presents clear challenges, the acquisition cost breaks down to around ¥100,000 JPY ($625 USD) per ton of US Steel's production capacity, a bargain compared to the more than ¥200,000 ($1,250) per ton required to build new facilities in India. Hashimoto called it "an extremely rational deal."
If the golden share avoids becoming a vehicle for excessive political interference and instead serves to deepen US–Japan coordination in countering China, then, despite the uphill road ahead, Hashimoto's goal — "to reclaim our place as the world's number one steelmaker" — may no longer be out of reach.
Author: Noboru Ikeda, The Sankei Shimbun
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
The real vacancy in Canmore is leadership
Article content As Calgary and other Alberta towns wrestle with housing pressures, Canmore offers a cautionary tale in what not to do. The town's recent livability tax scapegoats second-homeowners as an existential threat — but that narrative obscures a more pressing reality: local leadership has failed to plan for long-term sustainability. Article content Second-homeowners, far from fuelling the affordability crisis, contribute significantly to Canmore's economy, culture and resilience. As noted in Joe Pavelka's and Dianne Draper's paper — Leisure negotiation within amenity migration (Annals of Tourism Research, 2015) — amenity migrants, including part-time owners, pay full property taxes, rely less on community services and have supported Canmore's transition from coal to tourism and post‑Olympic development. Article content Article content Yet, when council first floated the tax, its framing was punitive: either rent out a bedroom or move out to 'make room' for others. That tone — a thinly veiled eviction order disguised as policy — crumbled under public scrutiny. Instead of reassessing the tax, council regrouped behind closed doors, consulted a lobbyist and drafted a new narrative aligning the measure with short-term rental taxation. Article content This shift was not accidental. It was a deliberate rebranding tactic — equating vacation homes with income‑generating rental businesses to stoke moral panic and justify taxation. Article content Most second homes are not businesses. Conflating the two is lazy policy at best and disingenuous at worst. Article content Such policy drift reflects a deeper planning void. Canmore boasts more than 281 non-market housing units — projects including Spring Creek, Wolf Willow and Vital Homes — almost all initiated before 2021. But since the current council took office, no new affordable units have been completed. Article content Article content Future projects such as Palliser Lane and Moustache Lands remain promises, with construction not expected until 2026. In contrast, the mayor's ad claims that '100 per cent of the revenue' from the livability tax will fund 2,000 non-market homes. That dramatic gap between rhetoric and reality must be challenged. Article content Meanwhile, real-world solutions exist. Nearby Banff provides a powerful comparison. Instead of vilifying absentee owners, Banff has aggressively pursued housing via the federal Housing Accelerator Fund, restructured land-use bylaws and developed municipal employee accommodations. The result: an active strategy to house workers and create economic diversity — not scapegoats. Article content Canmore must similarly evolve. Its current model — tourism-driven, seasonal employment and inflated housing costs — has produced a self-fulfilling crisis. A real solution begins by diversifying the economy: drawing in professional sectors, encouraging remote-work hubs and enabling year-round employment. Second-homeowners, including Calgary professionals, would gladly join the full-time community if those opportunities existed.
.png&w=3840&q=100)
Montreal Gazette
3 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Charest talks Trump: ‘This is a wake-up call for Canada'
The Corner Booth Jean Charest has worn many hats in his political career, from Quebec premier to leader of the federal Progressive Conservative Party. These days as a member of Prime Minister Mark Carney's council on Canada-U.S. relations, Charest is focused on American President Donald Trump. Made up of leaders in business, innovation and policy, the council is tasked with advising the prime minister and his cabinet during this sensitive time in international relations. Fresh from Trump's latest tariff threats that risk devastating Quebec's economy, Charest joined hosts Aaron Rand and Bill Brownstein on the latest episode of The Corner Booth at Snowdon Deli to discuss his latest, and perhaps most critical, political battle yet. 'Mark Carney got a mandate to face up to Trump, but also to change our economy,' Charest said. 'And this is a wake-up call for Canada. And I'm of the school of those who really believe that we'll thank Trump in 20 years.' Although it happened in an unwanted way, Charest said Trump's tactics will 'force us to change the way our economy operates, to be more productive and get our act together to be able to build infrastructure, because we were fairly complacent.' Charest also discussed what leverage Canada has over the U.S. at the negotiating table, the 'only bad choices' Canada has when it comes to counter-tariffs, and what he learned from losing the 2022 Conservative Party leadership bid to Pierre Poilievre. And, of course, Brownstein and Rand had to ask if Charest had any interest in entering another race: the one for mayor of Montreal this November.
Ottawa Citizen
3 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Contrary to Trump's claims, Canadian border is not major source of fentanyl, U.S. report says
Article content Most of the fentanyl entering the United States continues to come from the southern border, not the northern one, according to a recent report by an American think-tank, despite President Donald Trump's statement on Thursday that Canadian authorities have failed 'to stop the drugs from pouring into our country.' Article content 'Countering supply effectively depends on understanding what the dominant drug-trafficking routes are,' says the report by the Manhattan Institute, which was published July 1. 'New data on fentanyl seizures presented here largely reinforce previous understanding that most IMF (illegally manufactured fentanyl) enters the U.S. from the south. These data call into question tariffs and other policies and policy justifications that treat the threat from the northern border as comparably severe.' Article content Donald J. Trump Truth Social 07.10.25 08:15 PM EST — Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) July 11, 2025 Article content Article content The report used new data regarding fentanyl seizures, which challenges public pronouncements made by Trump and the White House about the threats posed by the Canadian border. Authors Jon Caulkins and Bishu Giri write that such concerns are largely overstated and could even undermine America's ability to prioritize tightening the country's border with Mexico. Article content Article content The report looked at 'large' seizures of fentanyl — defined as over a kilogram of powder or more than 1,000 pills — that would suggest wholesale trafficking as opposed to smuggling for personal use. It found that officials made more large seizures in U.S. counties along the northern and southern borders when compared to the rest of the country. However, far more seizures were made in the south. Article content 'Counties along the Mexican border account for only 2.35 per cent of the U.S. population; but in 2023–24, they hosted about 40 per cent of the nationwide quantity of fentanyl appearing in large seizures, for both powder and pills,' says the executive summary of the Manhattan Institute's report. 'By contrast, counties in the lower 48 states that border Canada account for 3.1 per cent of the U.S. population but only 1.2 per cent of the powder and just 0.5 per cent of the pills obtained in large seizures.'
