logo
Car Deal of the Day: this Volkswagen ID.3 lease is the cheapest we've seen for ages

Car Deal of the Day: this Volkswagen ID.3 lease is the cheapest we've seen for ages

Auto Express2 days ago
Easy and comfortable to drive
241-mile range
Just £218.84 a month
It's by no means perfect, but time has done wonders to the ID.3. Volkswagen has been making gradual improvements to the electric hatchback since it arrived in 2020, and the car you can own today is worthy of that fabled badge on the nose.
Despite its size, VW's current smallest EV has been rather expensive on lease since the start of 2025. But, for the first time in months, you can get an ID.3 for less than £219 a month. Advertisement - Article continues below
Scouring the Auto Express Find a Car service, we found UK Carline is offering the ID.3 for just £218.84 a month right now. A £2,896.12 initial payment is all that's needed to kickstart the 24-month deal, while mileage is limited to 5,000 a year. If you need more flexibility, 8,000 miles a year will only cost you an extra £14.39 a month.
Naturally, at this price, this deal is for the entry-level ID.3 with the smallest battery pack. But the Essential Pure model offered here has all the, err, essentials covered. As standard, it comes with LED headlights, a 12.9-inch touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, plus 10-colour ambient lighting.
The ID.3 comes in three battery sizes, and here it's the smallest. Still, at 52kWh, Volkswagen reckons you'll be getting 241 miles, which isn't bad. Better still, based on our testing we think 220 miles is easily achievable, especially if most of your journeys are urban. An impressive 145kW DC maximum charging speed means roadside top-ups are complete within around 25 minutes, too.
The ID.3 is a very pleasant car to drive. Its light and accurate steering gives confidence, and the ride, although on the firm side, remains supple and refined.
The Car Deal of the Day selections we make are taken from our own Auto Express Find A Car deals service, which includes the best current offers from car dealers and leasing companies around the UK. Terms and conditions apply, while prices and offers are subject to change and limited availability. If this deal expires, you can find more top Volkswagen ID.3 leasing offers from leading providers on our Volkswagen ID.3 page.
Check out the Volkswagen ID.3 deal or take a look at our previous Car Deal of the Day selection here…
Find a car with the experts Car Deal of the Day: 717bhp BMW M5 Touring super-estate on a tasty lease deal
Car Deal of the Day: 717bhp BMW M5 Touring super-estate on a tasty lease deal
The BMW M5 Touring is M car royalty, with a thoroughly impressive PHEV powertrain. It's our Deal of the Day for 29 June Electric car appeal is at its lowest since 2019
Electric car appeal is at its lowest since 2019
From poor electric car sales to crashes in F1, Mike Rutherford thinks its been a crazy few weeks in the automotive world New 2026 Honda 0 SUV: Japanese brand to finally have an EV to rival Tesla and BYD
New 2026 Honda 0 SUV: Japanese brand to finally have an EV to rival Tesla and BYD
Honda EV plans are gathering momentum, and they'll be realised in the groundbreaking 0 SUV next year
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Popular restaurant chain to close city centre location for good – months after closing three other sites
Popular restaurant chain to close city centre location for good – months after closing three other sites

The Sun

time24 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Popular restaurant chain to close city centre location for good – months after closing three other sites

A POPULAR restaurant chain has closed one of its city centre locations for good just months after closing three other sites. The Botanist in Birmingham city centre has permanently closed with bosses saying it was a "difficult decision" to take. 2 2 It comes after the New World Trading Company (NWTC), who are responsible for the chain, closed sites in Coventry, Sheffield and Chester earlier this year. Diners have enjoyed a decade of cocktails, Sunday roasts and trademark hanging kebabs at the restaurant on Temple Street since April 2015. And customers have taken to social media in confusion after its sudden closure. One perplexed user said: "The Botanist in Birmingham (Temple Row) has just closed. "I had a booking and they just cancelled as they are permanently closing." The restaurant has disabled its social media profiles and is now listed as permanently closed on Google. It had earned a respectable 4.3 out of 5 stars on Google reviews from nearly 3,700 customers. One happy customer shared just two weeks ago: "This is my type of restaurant/bar. "I love the sophistication, dedication, decor, vibrancy, atmosphere and everything about this restaurant!" A spokesperson for New World Trading Company said: 'We have made the difficult decision to close our Birmingham, Temple Street site. "This decision has not been taken lightly, but we believe is in the best interests for the overall health of the business. 'We'd like to take this opportunity to thank all our customers for their support and custom over the years and we hope to welcome them to our other Birmingham site located at Gas Street Basin, soon.' The company also added that the closure only affects their Temple Street site. It comes as the NWTC closed sites in Coventry, Sheffield and Chester in January. And that followed the shuttering of three other sites in October 2024. The company has been undergoing a restructure after encountering difficulties and confirmed the bars were not profitable. In October 2024 New World Trading Centre agreed a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA), when it said it would refocus on its Botanist brand. Famous fast-food chain dubbed 'Britain's rudest restaurant' to close final UK branch and teases future plans A CVA is a restructuring measure that lets businesses continue to trade whilst also closing stores and pushing through rent cuts. The chain had experienced financial difficulties following the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, rising inflation and the cost-of-living crisis. As well as closing sites the group has rebranded others and opened a new Botanist site in Bournemouth in May. It currently operates 24 sites under the Botanist brand and also operates other brands including the Oast House, and the Trading House. A swathe of other restaurants are also shutting this month including a huge Asian chain and beloved fine-dining spot. It comes as the restaurant industry struggles amid high energy prices, wholesale costs and tax hikes. What is happening to the hospitality industry? By Laura McGuire, consumer reporter MANY Food and drink chains have been struggling in recently as the cost of living has led to fewer people spending on eating out. Businesses had been struggling to bounce back after the pandemic, only to be hit with soaring energy bills and inflation. Multiple chains have been affected, resulting in big-name brands like Wetherspoons and Frankie & Benny's closing branches. Some chains have not survived, Byron Burger fell into administration last year, with owners saying it would result in the loss of over 200 jobs. Pizza giant, Papa Johns is shutting down 43 of its stores soon. Tasty, the owner of Wildwood, said it will shut sites as part of major restructuring plans

Minister demands overhaul of UK's leading AI institute
Minister demands overhaul of UK's leading AI institute

The Guardian

time27 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Minister demands overhaul of UK's leading AI institute

The technology secretary has demanded an overhaul of the UK's leading artificial intelligence institute in a wide-ranging letter that calls for a switch in focus to defence and national security, as well as leadership changes. Peter Kyle said it was clear further action was needed to ensure the government-backed Alan Turing Institute met its full potential. In a letter to ATI's chair, seen by the Guardian, Kyle said the institute should be changed to prioritise defence, national security and 'sovereign capabilities' – a reference to nation states being able to control their own AI technology. The call for new priorities implies a downgrading of ATI's focus on health and the environment, which are two of three core subjects for the institute, alongside defence and security, under its 'Turing 2.0' strategy. 'Moving forward, defence and national security projects should form a core of ATI's activities, and relationships with the UK's security, defence, and intelligence communities should be strengthened accordingly,' Kyle wrote. Making clear that the Turing 2.0 strategy did not meet government requirements, Kyle indicated that he expected leadership changes at ATI. 'To realise this vision, it is imperative that the ATI's leadership reflects the institute's reformed focus,' he wrote in a letter first reported by Politico. 'While we acknowledge the success of the current leadership in delivering reform at the institute during a difficult period, careful consideration should be given to the importance of an executive team who possesses a relevant background and sector knowledge to lead this transition.' ATI is chaired by Doug Gurr, the former head of Amazon's UK operations and interim chair of the UK's competition watchdog. The institute is going through a restructuring under its chief executive, Jean Innes, which one in five staff have said puts ATI's credibility in 'serious jeopardy'. At the end of last year, ATI employed 440 staff, but it has since launched a redundancy process. Although the institute is nominally independent, it recently secured £100m from the government in a five-year funding deal. The letter said ATI's 'longer-term funding arrangement' could be reviewed next year. The government would maintain its current level of research and development from national security and defence for the next three years, Kyle wrote, and would increase the number of defence and national security staff embedded in the institute. Dame Wendy Hall, a professor of computer science at the University of Southampton and the co-chair of a 2017 government AI review, said ATI would cease to be a national institute under the government's proposed changes. 'If the institute focuses on defence and security it ceases to be a national institute on AI,' Hall said. 'It's not broad enough. If the government wants an AI institute that does defence and security then it should just call it that.' In February, the government indicated a focus on national security with its AI strategy by renaming its AI Safety Institute, established under the premiership of Rishi Sunak, the AI Security Institute. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Kyle's letter also referred to the government's 50-point AI action plan as a 'testament' to the UK's AI ambitions, The plan's targets include a 20-fold increase in the amount of AI computing power under public control by 2030, and embedding AI in the public sector. A spokesperson for ATI said the institute was focused on 'high-impact missions' that support the UK including in defence and national security. 'We share the government's vision of AI transforming the UK for the better, welcome the recognition of our critical role, and will continue to work closely with the government to support its priorities and deliver science and innovation for the public good,' said the spokesperson. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said the changes would be a 'natural next step' for ATI following the safety institute renaming. 'These proposed changes would not only ensure the Alan Turing Institute delivers real value for money – it would see it taking on a key role in safeguarding our national security,' said the spokesperson.

‘My husband is much richer than me but I still wanted a prenup'
‘My husband is much richer than me but I still wanted a prenup'

Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Times

‘My husband is much richer than me but I still wanted a prenup'

In the run-up to Elaine Foster's wedding in 2019, she had the typical to-do list of a bride-to-be: sort out the flowers, pick a caterer — and bring up the subject of a prenuptial agreement with her fiancé. Foster, 56, was determined to sign the legal contract known as a prenup before walking down the aisle. In fact, she said she wouldn't get married without one. 'It was nothing to do with protecting my wealth. My husband is substantially better off than me. I wanted to go into the marriage with us knowing that we were doing it for love, not financial gain,' said Foster, a lawyer at the Milton Keynes firm MacIntyre Law. 'I also wanted to ensure our families didn't worry that they would lose out financially later in life if we separated. I didn't want his children, or mine, from previous relationships to fear that they would lose what their parents had worked for.' Foster and her husband were ahead of their time. Prenuptial agreements are common in the United States, but were fairly rare in the UK, except among the ultra-wealthy. Now, though, lawyers say they are becoming more popular. The number of divorces has fallen dramatically over the past 20 years, but the number of prenups has risen. Edwards Family Law, which specialises in divorce, said that there had been a 50 per cent surge in the number of prenups it dealt with last year, compared with 2023. They are particularly relevant in second marriages where you are more likely to have built up wealth before you met. Without a prenup specifying otherwise, assets are often divided equally according to the 'sharing principle' unless there is good reason to do otherwise. However, a Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday (July 2) has suggested that this principle should not be applied to all assets accrued before the marriage. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of Clive Standish, 72, who had transferred almost £78 million of assets to his ex-wife, Anna, 57, while they were married for tax planning purposes. • Retired banker wins fight to keep majority of £80m 'gift' to wife The assets had been accrued before his marriage and, during a lengthy divorce battle, he argued that they should not be considered as matrimonial assets, even though they had been held in her name while they were together — and the courts, eventually, agreed. Vandana Chitroda from the law firm Broadfield said: 'It is likely that following this judgment, couples entering into pre and postnuptial agreements will be advised to ensure that non-matrimonial property is concisely defined.' Charlotte Lanning from Edwards Family Law said that the growing use of prenups was probably a result of people getting married later. 'The average age at marriage is higher, so you may have already bought a house or set up a business. When everyone was getting married in their early twenties, they had not had a chance to build up any wealth yet. 'The prevalence of second marriages plays a part too. If you've had a messy divorce and lost half your assets, you want to preserve what you have left.' Prenups are not legally binding in the UK, but an important Supreme Court decision in 2010 gave them more clout. A judge ruled that courts should take such agreements into account, provided that they were entered into freely by both parties; that there was 'full and frank' disclosure of their assets; that each party had independent legal advice and the agreement was not unfair. They typically outline how you would divide your assets in the event of a divorce and are often used to protect inherited money, business ownership or inheritance for children. At the time of divorce, a court will consider the prenup in the context that it was made and the effect it would have on the couple if it were enforced. 'If the agreement only provided you with £100,000 but you had been living in a £2 million house, the court is unlikely to think that was fair,' Lanning said. 'You might have agreed not to take any spousal maintenance, but if you had since been in an accident and were unable to work, then the court would probably rule that you are entitled to some financial support.' In the end, Foster's prenup was relatively straightforward. They agreed that what each had accrued before the marriage would remain their own, and that there would be no ongoing legal ties such as maintenance payments if they were to divorce. Anything they accrued after the marriage would be shared equally if they separated. Foster said that this did not include any inheritances, which would be kept separate from their joint finances. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Foster said: 'We are very straight down the line and didn't want to muddy the waters. Having been divorced before, we knew that it's always a possibility. It's good to talk about these things from a place of love, rather than bitterness or unfairness. 'The way I see it is, If I go and buy a new car, I'm going to insure that car. That's not because I want to crash it or I'm planning to crash it, but because I want to be protected. It's a similar thing for me here.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store