High Court finds something wrong with Tasmac
The court was hearing the petitions filed in 2022 by K. Mayakannan, S. Murugan and V. Ramasamy, who were salesmen in Tasmac shops. The case of the petitioners was that the then District Manager of Tasmac, Madurai South, Rajeswari, colluded with the then Supervisor of Tasmac, Tirumangalam, Selvam, and collected bribes every month from the shops under her control. There were also other allegations against Rajeswari.
The petitioners lodged a complaint with the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, which was forwarded to Tasmac authorities. An inquiry was ordered. The petitioners also submitted their representations.
Since, the grievances of the petitioners were not addressed, they gave an interview to the media. They were suspended by the management on the grounds that their conduct was against the Employees Code of Conduct circular. Challenging the order, the petitions were filed.
Justice B. Pugalendhi observed that the petitioners lodged a complaint, along with the recording of a conversation between Rajeswari and Selvam. The authorities conducted an inquiry and closed it stating that the corruption charges were without any materials and that the alleged conversation in the phone was denied by Supervisor Selvam.
The person against whom allegations were made was transferred to the parent department and it was reported that she had retired from service. However, the petitioners' complaint had been closed by recording the statement of Selvam that he was not part of the conversation. The available materials showed that there was something wrong in the government-run Corporation. The governemnt should not allow corruption in its funstioning. The corporation had to realise its mistake, the court observed.
Considering the manner in which the issue was handled, the court set aside the suspension orders with liberty to the Corporation to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioners for violating the circular.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
a day ago
- India Today
ED not a super cop or drone to probe everything at will: High Court
The Madras High Court has observed that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) cannot act at will, emphasising it was neither a "super cop" with infinite investigative powers nor a "loitering munition" capable of arbitrarily attacking financial institutions.A division bench comprising Justice M.S. Ramesh and Justice V. Lakshminarayanan made these strong remarks while hearing a petition from RKM Powergen Private Ltd, a Chennai-based company. The firm had challenged the ED's freezing of its fixed deposits worth Rs 901 crore in a money laundering probe agency's action came after an FIR was registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in 2014 over the allocation of coal blocks for a power plant in Chhattisgarh. However, in 2017, the CBI filed a closure, stating that no wrongdoing had been found in the allocation process. But, a special CBI court was not satisfied with the closure report and asked for further investigation. In 2023, the CBI filed a supplementary final report, which found there were sufficient incriminating materials warranting prosecution under sections of the the-then Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption this, the ED conducted searches in the premises of directors and holding companies associated with RKMP. On January 31 this year, an order was passed wherein the fixed deposit to the tune of Rs 901 crore was frozen by the ED. The company challenged the said order and the court set it note of these developments, the Madras High Court said that under Section 66(2) of PMLA, if the ED discovered violations of other provisions of law, it cannot assume the role of investigating those offences too. If the ED finds other types of legal breaches, it should inform the appropriate agency authorised to handle those matters, the court observed."It is to inform the appropriate agency, which is empowered by law to investigate that offence. If that agency, on the intimation of the ED, commences an investigation and registers a complaint, then certainly the ED can investigate into those aspects also, provided there are proceeds of crime," the bench said."In case, the investigating agency does not find any case with respect to the aspects pointed out by the ED, then the ED cannot proceed with the investigation and assume powers. The essential ingredient for the ED to seize jurisdiction is the presence of a predicate offence. It is like a limpet mine attached to a ship. If there is no ship, the limpet cannot work. The ship is the predicate offence and 'proceeds of crime'. The ED is not a loitering munition or drone to attack at will on any criminal activity," it court also noted that no separate complaint had been filed in relation to the supposed new offences the ED pointed to. "The ED is not a super cop to investigate anything and everything which comes to its notice," it added."There should be a 'criminal activity' which attracts the schedule to PMLA, and on account of such criminal activity, there should have been proceeds of crime," the bench said.- Ends(with inputs from PTI)Must Watch IN THIS STORY#Chennai
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
DMK collecting Aadhaar details illegally, says PIL
MADURAI: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition has been filed before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking action against the DMK and its functionaries for alleged unauthorised collection of Aadhaar and personal details of individuals under the guise of the political campaign Oraniyil Tamil Nadu. The petitioner, S Rajkumar of Thirupuvanam taluk in Sivaganga, accused the DMK cadre of trespassing and pasting posters with the CM's picture, along with the slogan 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu', without the residents' consent. They demanded personal identification documents of the residents and their family members, including Aadhaar, voter ID and passbook, he alleged. The functionaries also obtain the contact details of the residents, and without the former's permission and knowledge, enrol them as DMK members, after inputting the one-time password (OTP) sent to their phones. If anyone refuses, the cadre threaten them that all state benefits availed by the family will be permanently suspended, the petitioner claimed. The collection of such sensitive data is not just an invasion of privacy but can be used to manipulate voters, he said, and requested the court to declare the same as unconstitutional. Moreover, Rajkumar also wanted the party to destroy all information collected so far. He further sought a direction to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and the centre to initiate a thorough investigation into the matter and take legal action against the DMK. The petition has been listed for hearing on Monday.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
Tamil Nadu gets Madras HC pat for SOPs on EOW action
MADURAI: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court commended the state for issuing SOPs aimed at strengthening the Economic Offences Wing by streamlining its functions and by promoting transparent and time-bound action in financial fraud cases. Pointing to the G.O. passed to include 'economic offenders' under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 (Goondas Act), Justice B Pugalendhi called it a major policy shift that empowers the authorities to invoke preventive detention against habitual offenders operating fraudulent financial firms. Recalling that the court had earlier expressed concern over lack of preventive vigilance by the EOW, the judge acknowledged the state's submission regarding the steps being taken. However, noting that no outer time limit has been fixed for issuance of ad-interim attachment orders under Section 3 of the TNPID Act, the judge fixed 12 days from the receipt of proposal by the ADGP, EOW, as the maximum permissible period for issuing such directions. The observations were made on a contempt plea against the home secretary for non-implementation of the court's order in his petition seeking release of deposit from a frozen bank account of a firm involved in fraud.
