
EU wants to ease securitisation rules to boost lending to economy
It is the first Commission proposal under a new push by the EU executive arm to better integrate the 27-nation bloc's capital markets to provide more sources of financing for companies to better compete with China and the United States.
The proposal does not, however, address the problem of Europe's debt bias in corporate financing, an issue especially for small enterprises -- a vast majority of EU firms -- which often do not have sufficient collateral to secure a bank loan.
The Commission has said it would present ideas to increase equity financing, seen as more stable and beneficial, later.
The Commission proposal, which will have to be agreed among EU governments and the European Parliament before it enters into force, seeks to roll back some of the sharp tightening of securitisation rules in the wake of the sub-prime mortgage crisis in the United States after 2007.
"This was the root cause of the great financial crisis, but we should not confuse the instrument with its misuse," EU Financial Services Commissioner Maria Albuquerque said.
"We have revised the securitisation framework which entered into force in 2019, and which was focused on making sure that there were no risks," she said, adding too much focus on risk avoidance stifled the whole market.
"Risk is like everything else -- if you take risk to zero, you kill all activity. So now we are trying to find a better balance between risk and the positive outcome that should come from the use of this instrument," she said.
Securitisation means that banks can package loans to companies or households and sell them to investors, like insurance companies or asset managers, as securities.
This lets banks transfer the risk associated with the loans to the investors and use the bank capital they had to set aside to cover that risk, to make new loans.
But the Commission did not have any estimates of how much bank capital the relaxed rules could free up or how lending might increase as a result. "It is impossible to predict," one Commision official said.
The Commission said there was room for the securitisation market to grow because in the U.S. it was around $14 trillion while in the EU only 1.6 trillion euros ($1.85 trillion), still below the peak of 2 trillion euros from 2008, when the U.S. sub-prime crisis hit Europe.
"We've all learned the lesson, so the framework is more robust now," Albuquerque said. "We are still making sure that this is managed properly, hence the capital requirements and the floors that we are putting in place. We are lowering them, but we're not taking them off," she said.
Among the proposed changes, investors would no longer need to double-check from their side if the bank issuing the security fulfilled all the necessary requirements. Due diligence would also be more proportionate to the level of risk.
There would also be less paperwork, fewer details required to be disclosed and a lighter transparency regime for private deals compared to transactions with public entities.
"This isn't about returning to practices that led to financial turbulence," Albuquerque said. "Financial stability can never be endangered, but we think there is room to manage this better, increase the capacity and the efficiency of banks to lend to the economy and still preserve financial stability."
($1 = 0.8642 euros)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
What we know about Rachel Reeves' planned workplace pensions review
Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, is scheduled to announce a significant overhaul of the UK's pensions regime during her Mansion House speech on 15 July. The planned reforms include the appointment of a commission to assess the adequacy of the pensions system, covering savings among the self-employed, the state pension, and auto-enrolment rates. The overhaul is expected to shake up auto-enrolment rules, which currently require staff to contribute at least 8 per cent of earnings above £6,240 to their pension pot. Experts, such as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), warn that current contribution levels are insufficient, potentially leaving many private sector pensioners facing financial insecurity in retirement. The IFS recommends decisive action, including ensuring all employees receive at least 3 per cent of their total pay as employer contributions, and providing targeted support for those affected by increases in the state pension age.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Buy now, pay later loans will now affect US credit scores – what does that mean for consumers?
A new change to buy now, pay later loans means borrowers' credit scores may see a change, which has worried some users of the loans. 'I have a feeling that I'm just not going to have as much access to spending power and zero or really low APR rates,' said Nicole Nitta, a 31-year-old Las Vegas resident, who uses BNPL and shared that she already does not have great credit. Fico, the credit scoring company used by most US lenders, announced on 23 June that they would include BNPL loans, which play 'an increasingly important role in consumers' financial lives', to help lenders more 'accurately evaluate credit readiness'. For users of companies like Affirm, Afterpay and Klarna, the new calculation could benefit them because it allows them to build their credit – if, of course, they pay back the loans on time, experts say. Nitta first used BNPL for essentials in 2021, like non-perishable food items. She was out of work and 'basically living off of savings', she said. Now, working as an office manager for a private therapy practice and studying marriage and family therapy, Nitta is more stable financially but has significant student loan debt. She has since used BNPL for Christmas gifts and dishware when she moved into a new apartment, but said she always makes her payments on time. Ted Rossman, a senior industry analyst at the financial site Bankrate, says: 'if you're using buy now, pay later responsibly,' like Nitta, 'I would argue [the change] should help you as a steppingstone to improve your credit, and maybe it helps you get your first credit card or car loan. 'The main downside is if it dings you because you're paying late or racking up too much debt. I would say that's a fair consequence, because that is what happens on credit cards and other products,' he added. Companies like Affirm, Afterpay and Klarna were founded more than a decade ago, but their usage expanded significantly during the Covid-19 pandemic. These companies provided $180m in loans totaling more than $24bn in 2021, an almost tenfold increase from 2019, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Fumiko Hayashi, a vice-president at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City who conducts economic research on payments, noted that the change was due to a shift from purchasing in stores to buying online – in addition to an economic downturn during the pandemic. A typical BNPL loan allows consumers to divide a $50 to $1,000 purchase into four interest-free instalments. If a borrower does not make the required payments, then the lender charges them a late fee. Lenders also charge transaction fees to merchants. BNPL is most popular among people ages 33 and under, who represented 70% of borrowers of such loans in 2022, according to the financial protection bureau. Hayashi noted that a downside for the younger users is 'if they keep using BNPL only and they don't use a credit card at all, they cannot build credit history'. With Fico's change, using BNPL responsibly could be beneficial for some younger users with no previous credit history – but less so for those not as responsible. For most users, Fico and Affirm say, including BNPL data in credit reports produced higher scores or no score changes – a finding in a year-long report released in February that looked at 500,000 consumers. Still, there are people who could be hurt by Fico using BNPL data. People with sub-prime or deep sub-prime credit scores obtained more than 60% of new BNPL loans from 2021 to 2022, according to the financial protection bureau. And 24% of BNPL borrowers were late making a payment in 2024, a 6% increase from the prior year, according to the Federal Reserve. Among people who make $25,000 or less, the rate increased from 31% to 40%. Notably, BNPL access 'significantly reduces the sensitivity of spending relative to income', according to a Harvard Business School report. 'This effect is concentrated among individuals likely to be liquidity constrained, specifically, lower-income users and users without credit cards,' the report notes. Becca, a 26-year-old tech worker in New York who declined to use her last name, said she used BNPL for things like pricier beauty products – including a Chanel perfume. She said she might 'spend like 80 bucks this month on it and make two separate $40 payments, and then next month, I pay off the rest'. While the payment option has helped her, she is concerned about companies like DoorDash offering BNPL for minor purchases like a pizza delivery. 'It's just encouraging poor spending behavior from young people,' Becca said. 'All these items build up because you're using it again and again and again. You don't feel like you're spending a lot of money.' It may be some time before the economy feels the impact of the new credit score calculation, Rossman said. While Fico stated that it would make the new scores available in fall 2025, most lenders continue to use a credit score model from 2009, (despite Fico since releasing new versions). 'Change comes relatively slowly in the credit scoring world, so even if this becomes available in the fall, that doesn't mean everybody is going to be using it right away,' said Rossman. 'It's kind of like your phone. For instance, Apple has the iPhone 16, but a lot of people are still using the 15 or the 14 or even older models. Credit scoring works the same way.'


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Welfare, winter fuel payments and Trump: key markers of Labour's first year in power
The Labour party's first year in power has seen a determined and relatively successful approach to foreign policy coupled with a number of controversial domestic policies, such as the winter fuel payments and the welfare bill. One year on, we reflect on the moments that have marked the party's first 12 months in power