
List of US Imports From Russia as Trump Threatens Secondary Tariffs
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump issued a warning to Russia on Monday, threatening "very severe tariffs" if a peace agreement to end the war with Ukraine isn't reached within 50 days.
Speaking during an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said the new penalties would include "secondary tariffs" designed to target countries and companies that continue doing business with Russia.
What We Know: U.S. and Russia Trade
U.S. imports from Russia totaled $3 billion in 2024, a 34 percent decrease from the previous year, according to the United States Trade Representative. The drop continues a decline in trade that began following Russia's invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
Data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows that monthly imports from Russia reached a high of $438.5 million in May 2024.
While some energy products have disappeared from import lists under sanctions, a small group of critical non-energy commodities, like fertilizers, metals and chemicals, still enter the U.S. from Russia.
President Donald Trump shakes the hand of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a meeting in the Oval Office on July 14, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump shakes the hand of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a meeting in the Oval Office on July 14, 2025, in Washington.
Evan Vucci/AP
Trump Threatens 'Secondary Tariffs' for Russia
Trump's proposed "secondary tariffs" would likely expand the impact of U.S. sanctions by pressuring third-party nations, like China and Turkey, to stop trading with Russia.
Trump's remarks come as Russian strikes on Ukrainian cities have intensified.
"We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days," Trump said. "I use trade for a lot of things. But it's great for settling wars."
What Does the U.S. Import from Russia?
Before sanctions cut off most energy imports, the U.S. relied heavily on Russia for crude oil. In 2024, however, the top U.S. imports included:
Fertilizers : Among the most significant remaining imports, fertilizers were the most-imported item to the U.S. from Russia throughout most of 2024, per Statista.
: Among the most significant remaining imports, fertilizers were the most-imported item to the U.S. from Russia throughout most of 2024, per Statista. Non-ferrous metals, or metals that do not contain iron like palladium and aluminum, totaled $876.5 million in imports in 2024.
or metals that do not contain iron like palladium and aluminum, totaled $876.5 million in imports in 2024. Inorganic Chemicals: Contributed more than $683 million to 2024 import totals.
How Much Does the U.S. Export to Russia?
U.S. exports to Russia fell to $526 million in 2024, a 12.3 percent drop from 2023, per the United States Trade Representative.
The U.S. trade deficit with Russia was $2.5 billion in 2024, a $1.5 billion decrease over 2023.
What Happens Next
Trump's 50-day deadline for a peace agreement with Ukraine, coupled with the threat of new tariffs could escalate trade restrictions if no progress is made.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Justice Department ethics chief says he was fired
The Justice Department has fired at least a dozen employees in recent weeks who at one time worked with former special counsel Jack Smith, ranging from a senior ethics official to low-level support staff, sources familiar with matter tell CNN. The firings indicate that the Trump administration is still searching high and low for any person who had a hand in the special counsel's work, which resulted in two federal indictments against Donald Trump. Both cases were dismissed once he was reelected. Trump has long said that Smith's investigations amounted to a political 'witch hunt,' and vowed to go after anyone who led or helped in that effort. Several career prosecutors on the cases have already been fired. Joseph Tirrell, who until last week was responsible for advising Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche directly on ethics matters, posted a short letter advising him of his dismissal that did not provide a rationale for the termination. Tirrell had been director of the departmental ethics office since July 2023, according to DOJ. 'Until Friday evening, I was the senior ethics attorney at the Department of Justice responsible for advising the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General directly on federal employee ethics,' Tirrell wrote on LinkedIn. 'I was also responsible for the day-to-day operations of the ethics program across the Department.' He added: 'My public service is not over, and my career as a Federal civil servant is not finished. I took the oath at 18 as a Midshipman to 'support and defend the Constitution of the United States'… That oath did not come with the caveat that I need only support the Constitution when it is easy or convenient.' The Justice Department and Tirrell have not responded to CNN's requests for comment.


Washington Post
34 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Thomas Massie, GOP congressman who broke with Trump, reports strong fundraising
WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie has stockpiled more than $1.7 million for his re-election bid as the Kentucky Republican gears up to face President Donald Trump's vaunted political operation, Massie's campaign announced Monday. Massie was one of two House Republicans to vote against Trump's massive tax bill and he said Trump lacked authority to bomb nuclear sites in Iran without congressional approval.


Axios
34 minutes ago
- Axios
"Big beautiful bill" tax changes could cost Arizona hundreds of millions
Federal tax code changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill could cost the state nearly $400 million, legislative budget analysts estimate. Why it matters: The massive tax and spending legislation that President Trump signed this month could subvert the $17.6 billion budget agreement that Arizona lawmakers and Gov. Katie Hobbs reached after a protracted fight that threatened a government shutdown. How it works: Federally adjusted gross income serves as the basis for calculating individual state income taxes. When the federal tax code is amended, the state must also adopt those changes to maintain consistency, per the Arizona Department of Revenue. Arizona usually passes annual legislation to conform to federal tax code changes. The big picture: An analysis by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) last week concluded that conformity with federal tax changes would cost Arizona about $381 million this fiscal year. Those changes include reduced taxes on tips ($23.6 million in fiscal year 2026) and overtime pay ($76.5 million), increased federal deductions for state and local taxes ($79.7 million), and increased standard deductions for seniors ($53.7 million). Other non-conformity changes could cost the state nearly $57 million. What they're saying: Gubernatorial spokesperson Christian Slater declined to comment on whether Hobbs would be willing to sign a tax conformity bill next session if it means losing hundreds of millions, telling Axios, "We are still examining the full impacts of the bill that's anything but beautiful." The other side: Sen. John Kavanagh (R-Fountain Hills), who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, told Axios that non-compliance in 2026 would create "chaos," and he predicted that Hobbs would support tax conformity. He said conformity means Arizonans will be able to spend more of the money they earn. Kavanagh said he expects an improving economy will bring more tax revenue to the state, and even if that doesn't happen, he said the lost revenue could likely be offset by delaying budgeted infrastructure projects to the following year. Between the lines: Arizona can adopt some but not all changes, and Sen. J.D. Mesnard (R-Chandler) thinks partial adherence is likely the way to go. Mesnard, who often sponsors annual tax conformity bills, said it wouldn't make sense for Arizona to adopt all the changes, some of which, he noted, are only in effect federally for a few years.