Business bodies say budget lacks required incentives to revive struggling industries
The Businessmen Panel (BMP) declared the budget risks pushing the economy further off the recovery path, citing a critical absence of measures to stimulate industrial activity, reduce crippling energy costs, or ease the cost of doing business.
While the Pakistan Industrial and Traders Associations Front (PIAF) acknowledged some positive steps like tax simplification, it cautioned that overly optimistic revenue targets and the failure to address core issues like high electricity tariffs and interest rates overshadow these gains and hinder sustainable growth.
The BMP of the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has voiced serious reservations over the Federal Budget 2025-26, criticizing it for lacking any meaningful incentives to stimulate trade, investment, and industrial revival.
BMP Chairman Mian Anjum Nisar has urged the government to immediately rectify policy anomalies, cautioning that the budget, if left uncorrected, could push Pakistan further away from the path of economic recovery.
The BMP chairman maintained that 'while the budget may satisfy certain technical benchmarks, it does not reflect the pressing needs of the productive sectors of the economy.' He observed that the private sector had hoped for a more balanced and growth-oriented fiscal plan—one that would offer clear direction for industrial revitalization and export development—but instead received a document heavily focused on revenue collection and administrative compliance.
According to Anjum Nisar, the government has missed a crucial opportunity to send positive signals to investors and entrepreneurs. Despite challenging global conditions and domestic constraints, the budget does not contain a strategy to stimulate industrial activity, improve business competitiveness, or reduce the excessive cost burden on manufacturers and exporters. 'This is not the kind of budget that can revive economic momentum,' he said.
He warned that enforcing compliance without parallel incentives will dampen entrepreneurial energy. The increase in utility tariffs, particularly for gas—an essential input for various industries—without any relief measures, will directly affect export-oriented sectors and small businesses already battling high operational costs. He questioned the rationale behind burdening industries with unaffordable energy while speaking of industrial growth.
Anjum Nisar said the absence of targeted steps to boost local production capacity and attract investment shows a lack of clarity in the government's economic vision.
He stressed that the government needs to look beyond revenue targets and short-term fiscal adjustments. 'What the economy demands today are bold and focused steps to ease doing business, reduce energy costs, improve infrastructure, and enhance export potential.'
Highlighting the significance of industrial performance in determining national stability, the BMP leader stated that the government should have come up with a practical roadmap to strengthen domestic industries, support SMEs, and introduce tax simplifications to widen the base instead of squeezing the existing compliant segments. Unfortunately, the budget continues to rely on conventional tools without offering real innovation or long-term direction.
He was also disappointed by the limited allocation for public infrastructure development, pointing out that the proposed development expenditures fall short of what is required to uplift logistics, water supply, power transmission, and road connectivity—critical elements that facilitate business and trade. He emphasized that any meaningful strategy for growth must go hand in hand with investment in infrastructure, especially in urban industrial hubs.
The BMP chairman further criticized the absence of reforms to address credit access and financing issues faced by industries. High interest rates continue to choke expansion plans and discourage entrepreneurship. Without a clear pathway to affordable financing, real sector growth will remain constrained, he noted.
He questioned the logic behind setting overly ambitious targets for revenue and growth in the absence of a concrete enabling framework. 'The ground reality doesn't match the projections presented in the budget. Unless core challenges are addressed, the macroeconomic indicators cannot show lasting improvement,' he stated.
Anjum Nisar noted that 'Pakistan cannot continue to rely solely on remittances or external borrowing for economic survival. It must build an export-led model backed by value-added manufacturing, technology enhancement, and trade diversification. The budget, however, fails to initiate such transformation, lacking strategic sectoral planning or industrial deepening.'
He emphasized that the economy is at a stage where growth must take precedence over compliance. The private sector requires reassurance through facilitation, not surveillance. Instead, the tone of the budget sends a message of rigidity and pressure rather than cooperation and partnership with the business community.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Taxpayers: KCCI tells Senate body FBR can't be judge, jury and executioner
ISLAMABAD: Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) Thursday categorically conveyed to the Senate Standing Committee on Finance on Thursday that the business community cannot allow Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to simultaneously be the judge, jury and executioner of taxpayers. The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, chaired by Senator Saleem Mandviwalla, met Thursday to discuss the anomalies in Financial Budget 2025-26. The Committee had an extensive discussion on several anomalies in the Financial Budget 2025–26. Members of the Chambers of Commerce briefed the Committee on these anomalies, with specific focus on the clauses granting powers to the FBR to arrest on the basis of suspicion. They warned the Committee about the potential misuse of such clauses for the harassment of the business community. KCCI slams FBR for its 'authoritarian' conduct, 'indifference' In a presentation before the committee, President Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry (KCCI) Muhammad Jawed Bilwani highlighted that FBR has authorized Inland Revenue officers to arrest directors, CEOs, CFOs, and individuals involved in tax fraud under Section 37A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. We cannot allow FBR to be the judge, jury and executioner of tax payers. This is a democratic country where citizens rights are protected by the judiciary. This act will cause harassment and corruption on a level unseen before eventually leading to taxpayers closing their legitimate businesses, moving their Investments abroad and Ease of doing Business Index sinking. To an all time low. The whole point of this law is to catch people who issue fake or flying invoices so is it not easier to simply specify this law for this specific offence. Jawed Bilwani further specified that the Definition of tax fraud is too vague and extremely open ended and there are apprehension of its abuse. Therefore, the said definition be restricted to make it applicable only in cases of issuance of fake and flying invoices. President KCCI stated that the new section14AE gives FBR very scary powers to force taxpayers into registering for sales tax. This law should be made softer in stance and powers need to be curtailed to an understandable extent. The language of this law will scare anyone even thinking of registering as a Sales Tax filer from entering the regime. This is a classic example of carrot and stick. We do not endorse this measure and urge FBR to have a more reasonable approach. Jawed Bilwani added that e-bilty should be removed under section 40C to remove local transfer of goods within Pakistan from this act. Digital invoicing should be implemented in a phase wise manner starting from multinationals and Public Limited entity with a Turnover in excess of Rs10 billion and then moved to the medium and ultimately small sized taxpayers with respect to turnovers. The system should be made absolutely free. Currently only one integrator certified by FBR is free while others are at cost. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Policy reversal hits solar transition
Listen to article Pakistan's power sector stands at a critical juncture, as a growing mismatch between policy direction and implementation threatens to derail the country's clean energy transition. While the government once championed rooftop solar installations as a long-term solution to rising electricity costs and energy insecurity, it is now reversing course – particularly in the net metering regime – leaving citizens and the business community questioning the state's commitment to renewable energy. Electricity demand in the country hovers around 29,000 megawatts (MW) in peak summer, while the installed generation capacity exceeds 46,000 MW. However, generation remains inefficient due to underutilisation of capacity, poor grid infrastructure, and increasing reliance on imported fuels. Solar energy, once considered a promising alternative, now faces policy obstacles despite contributing around 5% of Pakistan's total electricity generation in 2025. Solar installations, particularly rooftop systems, surged between 2022 and 2024 as households and businesses invested in net metering, lured by generous buyback rates and government incentives. According to official data, net-metered capacity jumped from just over 300 MW in 2021 to 2,813 MW by the end of FY25, with over 280,000 households registered under the scheme. But the government's recent move to slash the buyback rate from Rs27 to Rs10 per unit has sent shockwaves across the solar community. "The solar transition, once seen as a cornerstone of Pakistan's energy future, is now treated like an inconvenience," said Mian Sohail Nisar, Patron-in-Chief of the Pakistan Industrial and Traders Associations Front. "The government encouraged this shift but now refuses to integrate it into the formal power system with a long-term view. This kind of policy inconsistency undermines both investor confidence and public trust." Energy experts argue that the revised net metering policy stems from mounting financial pressure on the national grid. With solar users reducing their dependence on grid electricity and selling surplus power back at high rates, utility companies claim they are struggling to cover fixed infrastructure costs. In 2024 alone, the cost burden shifted onto grid-dependent consumers was estimated at Rs159 billion. Projections suggest this imbalance could rise to over Rs4,000 billion in the next decade if left unchecked. A former power sector official said the problem is not solar energy, it's poor planning. "The government failed to upgrade the distribution network to handle reverse power flows. Now they are blaming solar users for losses that are actually rooted in technical mismanagement and outdated infrastructure." He believes the new gross metering model, which bills users separately for imported and exported electricity, may have merit in principle but has been introduced too abruptly. "Policies like these should be phased in with stakeholder consultation. Instead, we are seeing a knee-jerk reaction to financial strain, which could discourage future investments in clean energy." Consumers who installed solar panels under previous government encouragement feel betrayed. Many invested heavily in hybrid inverters and battery storage, hoping to reduce their dependence on grid electricity and benefit from favourable net metering tariffs. Now, they fear shrinking returns, uncertain billing structures, and even covert replacement of smart meters by distribution companies. The inconsistency in energy policy is not new. Over the past two decades, successive governments have announced ambitious plans, whether for hydropower, LNG terminals, or renewable energy, only to abandon or reverse them due to changing political climates, pressure from utility companies, or International Monetary Fund (IMF)-mandated reforms. Energy analyst Syed Farid Hussain said that the biggest failure is the lack of a unified transition roadmap. "You cannot expect a successful shift to clean energy without aligning grid upgrades, pricing mechanisms, and consumer protection. Piecemeal reforms are not a strategy." He added that with Pakistan's circular debt in the power sector crossing Rs2.6 trillion, pressure is mounting on the state to either raise tariffs or cut losses. Unfortunately, instead of reforming inefficiencies in distribution companies or tackling power theft, the government appears to be placing the burden on solar adopters, those who heeded its own advice, he said. A structural approach is the need of the hour, an approach which cannot be reversed in a couple of years for any reason. "Pakistan does not need policy U-turns; it needs energy clarity. Without that, we risk pushing away the very solutions that could power our future," added Sohail Nisar.
Business Recorder
7 days ago
- Business Recorder
Jubilee Spinning & Weaving Mills says soon to receive NOC from NBP to change company name
Jubilee Spinning & Weaving Mills Limited announced on Monday that it was in the process of soon receiving No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the National Bank of Pakistan (NBP) in order to change the name of the company. The company shared the development to the Pakistan Stock Exchange today. It said that getting the NOC was the only remaining requirement for the approval of Form-26 related to change of company name. 'As soon as we receive the NOC from NBP, we will submit the same to the SECP and then apply for Certified True Copy of Memorandum of Association to the SECP.' Further progress report will be submitted to you within 15th day of every quarter ended as per requirement of the listing regulations of the Exchange, read the notice to the bourse. Jubilee Spinning & Weaving Mills Limited was incorporated in Pakistan as a public limited company on 12 December 1973 under the Companies Act, 1913 (Now the Companies Act, 2017). The principal objective of the company is to engage in the business of manufacturing and selling of yarn, buying, selling and otherwise dealing in yarn and raw cotton.
