Labour Party confirms support for Catherine Connolly's presidential campaign
The party joins the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and a number of Independents in supporting Ms Connolly's run.
The meeting was told of a consultation process held with party members and a clear majority were in favour of supporting her.
Ms Connolly is a former member of the Labour Party but has been an Independent since 2006.
Labour TD for Dublin South West, Ciarán Ahern, has been chosen as the party coordinator with Ms Connolly's campaign.
Mr Ahern said the decision to support Deputy Connolly (68) is 'in the spirit of supporting the development and growth of the Left across the country and demonstrating that an alternative politics is possible here, a cause which our party leader Ivana Bacik has led and promoted over recent years'.
'While there are issues where we have differed with Deputy Connolly, we are determined that the social democratic values of equality, justice and tolerance should shape the Presidency over the next seven years and follow the legacy of Michael D Higgins,' Mr Ahern said in a statement.
'We believe that Catherine Connolly shares those values, and has put them into practice during her political career.
'Catherine will make an excellent President, campaigning and advocating for the common good.'
Ms Connolly has drawn support as a Left unity candidate since launching her campaign this month.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speaking at the launch of her campaign, Ms Connolly said she hopes to 'empower people' to find their own voices.
'I'm standing to enable people, to empower people to find their own voices, to stand up and be counted, to say there is a different way,' she said.
'We must deal with climate change. We must be a voice for peace. We have to stop the normalisation of war and violence.
'We have to stop the normalisation of homelessness. We have to say that these problems are not inevitable.'
First elected to the Dáil as an Independent in 2016, Deputy Connolly left the Labour Party in 2006 when she was denied the chance to be running mate for Michael D Higgins in Galway West in the 2007 general election.
She worked as a barrister and clinical psychologist before being elected to Galway City Council 17 years ago.
Former MEP, Mairéad McGuinness, has been chosen as Fine Gael's candidate for the presidential election, while Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to throw their support behind a candidate.
Last week, a court heard Riverdance star Micheal Flatley is planning to move back to Ireland to seek a nomination to run for the presidency.
MMA fighter Conor McGregor has expressed an interest in running for the office, however he is seen as unlikely to secure the necessary support from 20 Oireachtas members or four local authorities to get on the ballot.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election: How much does it cost to run for the Áras?
With the presidential election looming, just how much does it cost to run a successful campaign or otherwise? It is a question that parties and candidates are considering as they either enter the race or think about doing so. National poster campaigns, online advertising and campaign teams cost money and a lot of it. The six candidates in 2018 declared a total spend of €1.36 million in the race for the Áras. The 2011 election cost even more, with more than €2.3 million in spending across seven candidates. Fine Gael has decided to go for it and run a candidate – former European commissioner Mairead McGuinness – for an office the party has never held, and having been burned by presidential elections in the past. Independent left-wing Galway West TD Catherine Connolly is also in the race with the backing of smaller parties and Independents to get on the ballot paper. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to decide if they will enter the fray. Labour backs Connolly, and Flatley jumps the shark Listen | 50:26 Presidential elections are fraught with risks for candidates and political parties. Professor of politics at University College Dublin David Farrell says these risks are 'not just financial', but 'reputational' also. 'There have been plenty of examples of campaigns that have completely come unstuck in all sorts of ways that couldn't have been anticipated,' he says. 'It's a courageous person who puts themselves forward and I think particularly if they're representing one of the larger parties, that in itself could come home to bite them if they don't do particularly well.' Farrell suggests that Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin may face embarrassment if they do not enter the race, but could also look bad, temporarily at least, if they do and their candidates do not perform well. Independent TD Catherine Connolly has held a press conference outside Leinster House where she spoke about her plans to run for president. Video: Bryan O'Brien It may be a case of 'they're damned if they do and they're damned if they don't', he says. There is some State support when it comes to the costs, but only if a candidate wins or reaches more than 25 per cent of the quota. Under those circumstances, they are entitled to a reimbursement of election expenses up to a maximum of €250,000. However, there is no guarantee of getting any money back, as recent elections have shown. Just two of the six candidates in the 2018 election got refunds – the winner, President Michael D Higgins and the Independent candidate who came second, Peter Casey. Mr Higgins's re-election campaign cost just over €367,000, the most spent that year, and it was reimbursed up to the then-maximum sum of €200,000. Mr Casey, meanwhile, was refunded the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911. Sinn Féin spent some €209,716 on its 2018 candidate Liadh Ní Riada's campaign, but lost out on any reimbursement as her vote share was too low. The most expensive campaign of recent times was Fine Gael's unsuccessful attempt to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011. Mitchell's campaign – which cost €527,152 – did not qualify for any reimbursement after he secured only 6.4 per cent of the first preference votes. It was a disastrous result and one that Fine Gael – and the other two large parties deliberating on entering the upcoming election – will want to avoid. Two names in the race for the Áras: early-mover advantage or risky tactic? Listen | 28:04 Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin all had considerable costs last year as they fought local, European and Limerick mayoral elections in June and the general election in November. All three parties recorded deficits for 2024, according to financial statements. Fine Gael and Sinn Féin reported more cash reserves than Fianna Fáil. But this comes with the proviso that any of this that comes from State funding cannot be used for election purposes. Fine Gael remortgaged its Dublin headquarters last September to raise money in advance of the general election. The party did not offer an estimate on how much it will spend on McGuinness's election campaign. A statement indicated it will run 'a vigorous' campaign, which will be 'funded from the party's fundraising activities, the vast majority of which comes from the Fine Gael Superdraw'. It said all campaign spending 'will be in line with electoral guidelines and published with Sipo [Standards in Public Office Commission] after the election'. Fianna Fáil's financial statements for last year indicated 'net expenditure on election activity of €1,600,112 in 2024, contributing to a debt position at the end of the year of €1,527,288 which was in line with our projections at this point of the Dáil cycle'. The party said it will clear this debt and 'build an election fund for the future election cycles in this Dáil period'. It is understood that Fianna Fáil held a fundraising draw earlier this year that raised about €600,000. There are mixed views within Fianna Fáil on whether the cost of the presidential election will influence the decision on whether or not to contest it. One source suggested the party's finances will be a 'huge factor' and it is a reason 'not to run someone for the sake of running someone'. A different Fianna Fáil source said the identity of the candidate and strategy, not costs, will be what is taken into account in the decision-making. Another source said there is a strong view within the parliamentary party that Fianna Fáil should field a candidate, but it has to be the right one. 'There's no point in having a candidate and spending half a million euro and getting no positive result,' said the source. A separate source said the cost of the election 'is a factor' in Fianna Fáil's decision, but added: 'Is it a dominating factor? I don't believe it is. The party will want to see a viable candidate, one that can compete, and that will be the dominating factor.' There has been speculation about potential Fianna Fáil candidates, including former taoiseach Bertie Ahern, to ex-ministers Mary Hanafin and Éamon Ó Cuív. None appear to have been met with much enthusiasm within the party. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has ruled himself out and is consulting with the party on its approach to the election. It could be September before he makes a final decision on running a candidate. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald, meanwhile, surprised many recently by not ruling herself out as a candidate as her party continues its deliberations. The Irish Times previously reported there is little appetite within Sinn Féin for her to run, with sources saying they would prefer her to stay in the Dáil, leading efforts to get into government. Sinn Féin may yet join other left-wing parties in backing Connolly. On the extent to which the cost of a campaign is influencing its deliberations, a Sinn Féin source said: 'The internal party discussion on the approach to contesting the upcoming presidential elections are primarily political. Financing a campaign is not the determining factor.' At her campaign launch last month, Connolly said she self-funded her last two Dáil election campaigns, and it will be 'big shift for me to move up and look at a national campaign with a serious amount of money'. [ Fine Gael says Mairead McGuinness 'acted in full accordance' with medical advice after being injured in crash Opens in new window ] She said she would be asking for contributions and the parties backing her are also 'open to providing funds in whatever way they see fit'. The Social Democrats said they are 'proud' to be supporting Connolly, adding: 'While we envisage there will be a financial contribution from the party, the bulk of donations will come from individuals and fundraising efforts around the country.' The Labour Party – also supporting Connolly – said it is 'finalising our approach to the upcoming presidential campaign'. A statement noted: 'As is standard practice, a separate fundraising stream will be established specifically for the purposes of the presidential campaign.' [ Labour Party backs Catherine Connolly's bid for Áras Opens in new window ] The Connolly campaign has been fundraising through its website and a spokeswoman said: 'We're very encouraged by the support Catherine Connolly is getting from around the country. It's really going to be a grassroots campaign.' As of Monday afternoon, the campaign has raised almost €35,000 in less than three weeks. On the evidence of previous presidential elections, Connolly's campaign, and those of any rivals in the race, will need a lot more.
The Irish Sun
a day ago
- The Irish Sun
Brazen YouTube ‘coaches' teaching thousands of migrants how to bring their WHOLE families to UK using little-known visa
More than 25,000 migrants have come to the UK on small boats this year IMMIGRATION 'LOOPHOLE' Brazen YouTube 'coaches' teaching thousands of migrants how to bring their WHOLE families to UK using little-known visa BRAZEN Youtube coaches are teaching thousands of migrants on how to bring their whole family to the UK using a little-known visa scheme. It comes as 25,000 migrants have come to the UK on small boats this year, a record number since the crisis began in 2018. 4 More than 25,000 migrants have been recorded arriving across the Channel so far this year Credit: PA 4 Kelvin Ossai is a self proclaimed "lifestyle and relocation content creator" on YouTube who offers advice on the charity visa route Credit: Instagram/@officialkelvinossai/ Immigration lawyers are also posting videos online coaching potential migrants on how to submit asylum applications that almost "almost always win" by claiming they've changed religion. But the little-known charity visa allows foreigners to volunteer in the UK for up to a year. In a series of online videos it is explained how the charity visa can be used as "leverage" to bring dependents with them to stay for the long-term. The number of migrants arriving via the route is growing and the government has a list of 1,400 charities that sponsor visas with many being churches and other religious organisations. Kelvin Ossai from Nigeria is a self proclaimed "lifestyle and relocation content creator" on YouTube who offers advice on the charity visa route. In a video seen more than 23,000 times, he explains how it can be used as "leverage to bring your family into the UK". Ossai describes how dependants can work as a "catch" in the rules, detailing how those on the charity visas can get stipends and money from other sources. 'Most churches in the UK are charity organisations," he says. "Most of them have the license to sponsor you on a charity visa - don't say I told you this." He also explains in his videos that while charity workers cannot receive a formal salary, there are still ways for them to receive money. 25K migrants have arrived across the Channel so far this year despite Labour's promise to crackdown He says: 'Even if you're working for them for free, your employer can also give you stipends and pay for your transport. 'They can provide you free accommodation, give you stipends for feeding and all that but it will not be classed as a salary.' He also details how the year can be extended while people on student visa may find it easier to remain in the country via the charity route rather than a work visa. Ossai told The Sun: "My videos are created to inform and guide skilled professionals on how they can legally move to the UK through existing government-approved visa routes, particularly those targeting shortage occupations. "What I'm building is a community of skilled migrants who come to the UK legally, work in areas where they're needed, and live productive lives. I always encourage ethical migration. "Nothing in my content promotes shortcuts or misuse of the system. It's all about helping people find opportunities that already exist legally. "My goal has always been to support ethical migration—helping people understand the rules, follow them, and give back while building a life here." Each applicant via the charity visa, including their partner and any dependants, must pay £319 on top of an annual healthcare surcharge and prove they have at least £1,270 in savings. The YouTubers claim that it is cheaper than other routes and while the main applicant cannot do paid work, dependants can. Tochi Esther, another YouTuber with 180,000 subscribers, makes videos about "life in the UK". In one video she interviews a woman who moved her family into the country using the charity visa route. The woman explains that while the visa doesn't allow paid employment, there are still ways to make money and work towards staying in the UK permanently. In the video, the interviewee explains how charities will pay a stipend for food and transportation while some will even provide accommodation. They also outline how those on the visa can do 20 hours of voluntary work with organisations other than their visa sponsor. 'Luckily for me as a volunteer working in the nursery, I was being paid as a volunteer," they said. You still get paid as a volunteer, so I still get paid somehow. "My husband can do any type of work … he works anywhere and as many hours as possible.' The video has since been made private but The Sun contacted Esther who said her videos are based entirely on information published by the UK government. "I do not offer immigration advice, as my videos come with a disclaimer stating my content is strictly informational, summarizing official updates in a more accessible format, similar to what is already reported by public media outlets," she said. "While I do highlight changes to legal UK visa routes as announced by the government, I always emphasize that viewers should consult qualified immigration professionals or rely on official government guidance for any personal decisions." Immigration lawyers have also been coaching asylum seekers on how to submit applications that "almost always win". Sherissa Cupid-Bennett, who describes herself as a UK-based immigration lawyer, told her followers that one of the most reliable methods for claiming asylum was to submit a claim on the basis "you converted from Islam to another religion". One of her videos is titled "3 types of asylum claims with the best chance of success" where she explains how as long as immigration officers believe they are telling the truth about converting from Islam, they are almost always certain to win the claim. There is no indication that she is coaching applicants to lie or any other suggestion of wrongdoing. Cupid-Bennett has been contacted for comment as have the Home Office. The news of these brazen YouTubers comes amid protests over the weekend outside a controversial migrant hotel. Mothers and children dressed in pink protested outside the four-star Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf on Saturday — before masked yobs hijacked the event and clashed with police. 4 Women made their point on the peaceful pink protest march at the weekend Credit: Louis Wood
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Half of post-primary schools apply for phone pouch funding
Just over half of post-primary schools have applied for funding under the Government's phone pouches scheme. A total of 380 out of the country's 722 second-level schools have made applications under the €9 million plan, announced in the budget last year, to provide smartphone pouches or storage boxes to restrict the use of mobile phones by pupils during the school day. The initiative sparked criticism at the time and Opposition parties labelled it 'wasteful' and 'unnecessary' . But in reply to a parliamentary question from Labour education spokesman Eoghan Kenny, Minster for Education Helen McEntee confirmed that 380 schools had applied for funding of €25 per pupil by the June 24th deadline. READ MORE Payment has already been made to 304 schools and 'processing of the balance of those schools is under way, with funding to issue to eligible schools shortly'. The funding can only be used for pouches and phone lock boxes. Ms McEntee said the phone restriction policy 'will build on the existing school policies in this area and will enable children to disconnect from their online world and connect more with their peers for the duration of the school day. Consultation with the school community is a key feature of this measure'. However, Mr Kenny said phone pouches were far down the list of priorities for schools that had contacted him. 'The biggest issue for schools is the lack of funding for very basic things like electricity, heating, IT equipment, funding for caretakers, for example,' he said. He said they need funding to paint doors, walls and windows at the end of the year and 'there are so many additional costs that you need, to keep the school running as opposed to storing phones'. Mr Kenny, a former secondary school business studies and religion teacher said 'this amount of money could be used in a far better way than storing phones'. [ Schools told they cannot spend €9m phone pouch budget on other education needs Opens in new window ] He pointed to difficulties with the phone pouch policy. 'I'm not saying every child is going to do this but if you've a child of 15 or 16, they are going to bring in an old phone, put it into the phone pouch and then go off with their original phone. 'So it's not an effective way of actually stopping them from using their phones.' He acknowledged the Government's concerns about children's use of social media but said while there are issues in trying to keep students off phones, 'the majority of the time mobile phone policy in schools works'.
