Presidential election: How much does it cost to run for the Áras?
presidential election
looming, just how much does it cost to run a successful campaign or otherwise?
It is a question that parties and candidates are considering as they either enter the race or think about doing so.
National poster campaigns, online advertising and campaign teams cost money and a lot of it.
The six candidates in 2018 declared a total spend of €1.36 million in the race for the Áras.
The 2011 election cost even more, with more than €2.3 million in spending across seven candidates.
Fine Gael has decided to go for it and run a candidate – former European commissioner
Mairead McGuinness
– for an office the party has never held, and having been burned by presidential elections in the past.
Independent left-wing Galway West TD
Catherine Connolly
is also in the race with the backing of smaller parties and Independents to get on the ballot paper.
Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to decide if they will enter the fray.
Labour backs Connolly, and Flatley jumps the shark
Listen |
50:26
Presidential elections are fraught with risks for candidates and political parties.
Professor of politics at University College Dublin David Farrell says these risks are 'not just financial', but 'reputational' also.
'There have been plenty of examples of campaigns that have completely come unstuck in all sorts of ways that couldn't have been anticipated,' he says. 'It's a courageous person who puts themselves forward and I think particularly if they're representing one of the larger parties, that in itself could come home to bite them if they don't do particularly well.'
Farrell suggests that Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin may face embarrassment if they do not enter the race, but could also look bad, temporarily at least, if they do and their candidates do not perform well.
Independent TD Catherine Connolly has held a press conference outside Leinster House where she spoke about her plans to run for president. Video: Bryan O'Brien
It may be a case of 'they're damned if they do and they're damned if they don't', he says.
There is some State support when it comes to the costs, but only if a candidate wins or reaches more than 25 per cent of the quota. Under those circumstances, they are entitled to a reimbursement of election expenses up to a maximum of €250,000.
However, there is no guarantee of getting any money back, as recent elections have shown.
Just two of the six candidates in the 2018 election got refunds – the winner, President Michael D Higgins and the Independent candidate who came second, Peter Casey.
Mr Higgins's re-election campaign cost just over €367,000, the most spent that year, and it was reimbursed up to the then-maximum sum of €200,000.
Mr Casey, meanwhile, was refunded the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911.
Sinn Féin spent some €209,716 on its 2018 candidate Liadh Ní Riada's campaign, but lost out on any reimbursement as her vote share was too low.
The most expensive campaign of recent times was Fine Gael's unsuccessful attempt to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011. Mitchell's campaign – which cost €527,152 – did not qualify for any reimbursement after he secured only 6.4 per cent of the first preference votes.
It was a disastrous result and one that Fine Gael – and the other two large parties deliberating on entering the upcoming election – will want to avoid.
Two names in the race for the Áras: early-mover advantage or risky tactic?
Listen |
28:04
Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin all had considerable costs last year as they fought local, European and Limerick mayoral elections in June and the general election in November.
All three parties recorded deficits for 2024, according to financial statements.
Fine Gael and Sinn Féin reported more cash reserves than Fianna Fáil. But this comes with the proviso that any of this that comes from State funding cannot be used for election purposes.
Fine Gael remortgaged its Dublin headquarters last September to raise money in advance of the general election.
The party did not offer an estimate on how much it will spend on McGuinness's election campaign.
A statement indicated it will run 'a vigorous' campaign, which will be 'funded from the party's fundraising activities, the vast majority of which comes from the Fine Gael Superdraw'.
It said all campaign spending 'will be in line with electoral guidelines and published with Sipo [Standards in Public Office Commission] after the election'.
Fianna Fáil's financial statements for last year indicated 'net expenditure on election activity of €1,600,112 in 2024, contributing to a debt position at the end of the year of €1,527,288 which was in line with our projections at this point of the Dáil cycle'. The party said it will clear this debt and 'build an election fund for the future election cycles in this Dáil period'.
It is understood that Fianna Fáil held a fundraising draw earlier this year that raised about €600,000.
There are mixed views within Fianna Fáil on whether the cost of the presidential election will influence the decision on whether or not to contest it.
One source suggested the party's finances will be a 'huge factor' and it is a reason 'not to run someone for the sake of running someone'.
A different Fianna Fáil source said the identity of the candidate and strategy, not costs, will be what is taken into account in the decision-making.
Another source said there is a strong view within the parliamentary party that Fianna Fáil should field a candidate, but it has to be the right one. 'There's no point in having a candidate and spending half a million euro and getting no positive result,' said the source.
A separate source said the cost of the election 'is a factor' in Fianna Fáil's decision, but added: 'Is it a dominating factor? I don't believe it is. The party will want to see a viable candidate, one that can compete, and that will be the dominating factor.'
There has been speculation about potential Fianna Fáil candidates, including former taoiseach Bertie Ahern, to ex-ministers Mary Hanafin and Éamon Ó Cuív. None appear to have been met with much enthusiasm within the party.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has ruled himself out and is consulting with the party on its approach to the election. It could be September before he makes a final decision on running a candidate.
Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald, meanwhile, surprised many recently by not ruling herself out as a candidate as her party continues its deliberations.
The Irish Times previously reported there is little appetite within Sinn Féin for her to run, with sources saying they would prefer her to stay in the Dáil, leading efforts to get into government.
Sinn Féin may yet join other left-wing parties in backing Connolly.
On the extent to which the cost of a campaign is influencing its deliberations, a Sinn Féin source said: 'The internal party discussion on the approach to contesting the upcoming presidential elections are primarily political. Financing a campaign is not the determining factor.'
At her campaign launch last month, Connolly said she self-funded her last two Dáil election campaigns, and it will be 'big shift for me to move up and look at a national campaign with a serious amount of money'.
[
Fine Gael says Mairead McGuinness 'acted in full accordance' with medical advice after being injured in crash
Opens in new window
]
She said she would be asking for contributions and the parties backing her are also 'open to providing funds in whatever way they see fit'.
The Social Democrats said they are 'proud' to be supporting Connolly, adding: 'While we envisage there will be a financial contribution from the party, the bulk of donations will come from individuals and fundraising efforts around the country.'
The Labour Party – also supporting Connolly – said it is 'finalising our approach to the upcoming presidential campaign'.
A statement noted: 'As is standard practice, a separate fundraising stream will be established specifically for the purposes of the presidential campaign.'
[
Labour Party backs Catherine Connolly's bid for Áras
Opens in new window
]
The Connolly campaign has been fundraising through its website and a spokeswoman said: 'We're very encouraged by the support Catherine Connolly is getting from around the country. It's really going to be a grassroots campaign.'
As of Monday afternoon, the campaign has raised almost €35,000 in less than three weeks.
On the evidence of previous presidential elections, Connolly's campaign, and those of any rivals in the race, will need a lot more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Lobby other EU countries to allow Irish Central Bank to drop Israeli war bonds, TDs recommend
An Oireachtas committee has recommended the Government lobby other EU states to change rules that stop the Irish Central Bank from refusing to act as a competent authority in Europe for Israeli war bonds. Third-country issuers, such as Israel, can choose any EU state as their home member state and competent authority. That authority reviews its bond prospectus and, in this case, authorises Israel to sell bonds in the EU market. Before 2021, the UK was the EU home member state under the regulation for the state of Israel. Ireland was chosen as the new home member state following the UK's departure from the EU after Brexit in 2016. Politicians from all parties have expressed concern that Ireland is the competent authority that gives authority to Israel to sell bonds in the EU market, including what Israel markets as 'war bonds'. However, the committee has been told by the Central Bank that it is powerless to refuse to act as the competent authority under current rules. The rules and criteria that determine approval of the prospectus do not cover Israel's continuing military activities in Gaza , but rather include risk rules based on financial and fiscal criteria. The governor of the Central Bank, Gabriel Makhlouf, told the Oireachtas Committee on Finance in June that Ireland had no power to unilaterally remove itself from being the competent authority. Any decision to change that situation, he said, would be made by the third country, in this case Israel, and by that third country alone. The committee, chaired by Sinn Féin TD Mairéad Farrell , published a report on Tuesday, the main recommendation of which was that the Government engage at EU level with a 'view to amending the EU Prospectus regulations to permit each individual European Central Bank to refuse to act as a Competent Authority'. It has also recommended that the Central Bank conduct an immediate internal review in advance of any renewal in September of the Israeli bond prospectus. It said that review should determine whether it is in compliance with the levels of disclosure, accuracy and transparency required by the EU Prospectus. At the meeting in June, committee members expressed concern that the continuing destruction and deaths in Gaza were not being taken into consideration in determining the right of Israel to sell bonds, which several committee members pointed out were being openly marketed as 'war bonds'. The report states: 'In response to questions around whether enhanced scrutiny is applied to sovereign bond issuers involved in armed conflict or under international investigation, representatives of the Central Bank told the Committee that a judgement is made as to whether a prospectus is particularly complex and if there are issues that are challenging to articulate. 'Ultimately, however, the judgement rests on whether the disclosure is appropriate to the financial risk.' At the meeting, members expressed concern with regard to both the exposure of the EU financially to Israel and the current situation in Israel. 'Members further described the prospectus regulatory regime as 'narrow and arguably amoral ... Jesuitical in the way that it is interpreted and applied, which is mindful of only its basic, legalistic obligations in satisfying the regulatory framework in place', the report stated. Amid cross-party opposition to the Central Bank continuing in that role, the committee has also recommended that any future review of its role as the competent authority by the regulator should take into account the nature of the case taken by South Africa against Israel under the Genocide Convention and the interim findings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in that regard. It also said the illegal situation created by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories should also be taken into account.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EU halts retaliatory tariffs as Trump again raises spectre of higher tariffs on pharma
The EU on Tuesday said it would suspend its retaliatory tariffs on the United States even as the specifics of a trade deal reached last month, including lower tariffs on European cars, have yet to be signed off by Donald Trump . The US president last week signed an executive order that will implement as of Friday a 15 per cent tariff rate on most EU products, which European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen agreed to when the two leaders met in Scotland at the end of July. But Mr Trump again threatened on Tuesday to announce separate tariffs on semiconductor and pharmaceutical imports 'within the next week or so' and made particular mention of Ireland in doing so during an interview with CNBC 'We'll be putting a initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year – one and a half years, maximum – it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in out country,' he said. READ MORE 'They [pharmaceutical companies] make a fortune with pharmaceuticals, and they make in China and Ireland and everything else. 'This is a, you know, this is a separate class than the 15 per cent tariffs on sort of everything. These are excluded classes, I like to call them, like steel, aluminium, made in our country,' Mr Trump said. 'We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips, which is a separate category,' the president continued. The bloc had readied higher levies on €93 billion worth of US exports, which were due to enter into force as of Thursday had trade talks failed. 'The suspension [of retaliatory tariffs] is a reflection of the fact that a political agreement has been reached,' said a senior EU official, noting that both sides were now implementing that deal. The official added that the retaliatory measures were now being 'put back into the freezer and we can always take it out if needed'. Washington and Brussels are still negotiating the text of a joint statement which was expected soon after Mr Trump and Ms von der Leyen shook hands in Scotland. Clarity is still lacking on when the US will lower its 27.5 per cent rate on European cars to 15 per cent – a key export sector for Germany – as well as the categories of products that will be traded at zero tariffs. 'We worked very hard to ensure we have that immediate tariff relief also for cars. We are working hard to see that in practice,' said the EU official. One aspect yet to be agreed is how to treat EU car parts that come from outside the bloc, particularly from China. The EU official said that 'there might be further ways to restrict content from certain non-market economies', adding that negotiations are ongoing. As for the zero-tariff exemption, the EU is still pushing for wine and spirits to be included, a key ask from France, Italy and Ireland – even as Washington has flatly denied they could receive such a carve-out. Brussels is also pushing for chemicals and certain medical devices to be excluded from the 15 per cent rate, but it remains unclear whether it will succeed. 'We're trying to get as many products into the list of exemptions ... we have a certain number of sectors where we agree [such as] aircraft and aircraft components,' said the official, while admitting that 'not all products that we care to see ... will be on that list immediately'. Negotiations are also ongoing on European steel and aluminium exports, currently subject to a 50 per cent rate. The EU is aiming to secure 'tariff rate quotas' – meaning lower rates for exports matching what has historically been traded with the US, while accepting higher rates above those thresholds. But US officials have not yet signed off on this concept. The EU official said there was an 'understanding reached at political level' on steel, but that it would 'take a little bit more time' to iron out. A majority of EU countries would eventually have to approve parts of the deal, such as lowering of EU tariffs on certain US exports, but that will only happen 'after the final deal' has been agreed, the EU official said. The EU-US deal was harshly criticised by countries including France and Germany for giving in too much and accepting higher tariffs. German finance minister Lars Klingbeil on Monday said that the EU had been 'too weak' in negotiations with the US and that Germany 'can't be satisfied with the result that was achieved'. The commission, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of the bloc, pushed back on Tuesday saying that it was 'most surprising ... given that nothing has happened here ... without the clear signal received from our member states'. Officials also pointed out that the agreement averted an all-out trade war and Washington making good on its threat of pulling its security guarantees from Europe. Ms von der Leyen's trade agreement includes investment pledges and more purchases of US weapons and energy products. 'We chose the less bad option and we feel this is the better choice,' said the EU official. 'We're very clearly operating in a second best world.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025 / Bloomberg
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Presidential election: How much does it cost to run for the Áras?
With the presidential election looming, just how much does it cost to run a successful campaign or otherwise? It is a question that parties and candidates are considering as they either enter the race or think about doing so. National poster campaigns, online advertising and campaign teams cost money and a lot of it. The six candidates in 2018 declared a total spend of €1.36 million in the race for the Áras. The 2011 election cost even more, with more than €2.3 million in spending across seven candidates. Fine Gael has decided to go for it and run a candidate – former European commissioner Mairead McGuinness – for an office the party has never held, and having been burned by presidential elections in the past. Independent left-wing Galway West TD Catherine Connolly is also in the race with the backing of smaller parties and Independents to get on the ballot paper. Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have yet to decide if they will enter the fray. Labour backs Connolly, and Flatley jumps the shark Listen | 50:26 Presidential elections are fraught with risks for candidates and political parties. Professor of politics at University College Dublin David Farrell says these risks are 'not just financial', but 'reputational' also. 'There have been plenty of examples of campaigns that have completely come unstuck in all sorts of ways that couldn't have been anticipated,' he says. 'It's a courageous person who puts themselves forward and I think particularly if they're representing one of the larger parties, that in itself could come home to bite them if they don't do particularly well.' Farrell suggests that Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin may face embarrassment if they do not enter the race, but could also look bad, temporarily at least, if they do and their candidates do not perform well. Independent TD Catherine Connolly has held a press conference outside Leinster House where she spoke about her plans to run for president. Video: Bryan O'Brien It may be a case of 'they're damned if they do and they're damned if they don't', he says. There is some State support when it comes to the costs, but only if a candidate wins or reaches more than 25 per cent of the quota. Under those circumstances, they are entitled to a reimbursement of election expenses up to a maximum of €250,000. However, there is no guarantee of getting any money back, as recent elections have shown. Just two of the six candidates in the 2018 election got refunds – the winner, President Michael D Higgins and the Independent candidate who came second, Peter Casey. Mr Higgins's re-election campaign cost just over €367,000, the most spent that year, and it was reimbursed up to the then-maximum sum of €200,000. Mr Casey, meanwhile, was refunded the full amount of his expenses, which amounted to €119,911. Sinn Féin spent some €209,716 on its 2018 candidate Liadh Ní Riada's campaign, but lost out on any reimbursement as her vote share was too low. The most expensive campaign of recent times was Fine Gael's unsuccessful attempt to get former MEP Gay Mitchell elected in 2011. Mitchell's campaign – which cost €527,152 – did not qualify for any reimbursement after he secured only 6.4 per cent of the first preference votes. It was a disastrous result and one that Fine Gael – and the other two large parties deliberating on entering the upcoming election – will want to avoid. Two names in the race for the Áras: early-mover advantage or risky tactic? Listen | 28:04 Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin all had considerable costs last year as they fought local, European and Limerick mayoral elections in June and the general election in November. All three parties recorded deficits for 2024, according to financial statements. Fine Gael and Sinn Féin reported more cash reserves than Fianna Fáil. But this comes with the proviso that any of this that comes from State funding cannot be used for election purposes. Fine Gael remortgaged its Dublin headquarters last September to raise money in advance of the general election. The party did not offer an estimate on how much it will spend on McGuinness's election campaign. A statement indicated it will run 'a vigorous' campaign, which will be 'funded from the party's fundraising activities, the vast majority of which comes from the Fine Gael Superdraw'. It said all campaign spending 'will be in line with electoral guidelines and published with Sipo [Standards in Public Office Commission] after the election'. Fianna Fáil's financial statements for last year indicated 'net expenditure on election activity of €1,600,112 in 2024, contributing to a debt position at the end of the year of €1,527,288 which was in line with our projections at this point of the Dáil cycle'. The party said it will clear this debt and 'build an election fund for the future election cycles in this Dáil period'. It is understood that Fianna Fáil held a fundraising draw earlier this year that raised about €600,000. There are mixed views within Fianna Fáil on whether the cost of the presidential election will influence the decision on whether or not to contest it. One source suggested the party's finances will be a 'huge factor' and it is a reason 'not to run someone for the sake of running someone'. A different Fianna Fáil source said the identity of the candidate and strategy, not costs, will be what is taken into account in the decision-making. Another source said there is a strong view within the parliamentary party that Fianna Fáil should field a candidate, but it has to be the right one. 'There's no point in having a candidate and spending half a million euro and getting no positive result,' said the source. A separate source said the cost of the election 'is a factor' in Fianna Fáil's decision, but added: 'Is it a dominating factor? I don't believe it is. The party will want to see a viable candidate, one that can compete, and that will be the dominating factor.' There has been speculation about potential Fianna Fáil candidates, including former taoiseach Bertie Ahern, to ex-ministers Mary Hanafin and Éamon Ó Cuív. None appear to have been met with much enthusiasm within the party. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has ruled himself out and is consulting with the party on its approach to the election. It could be September before he makes a final decision on running a candidate. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald, meanwhile, surprised many recently by not ruling herself out as a candidate as her party continues its deliberations. The Irish Times previously reported there is little appetite within Sinn Féin for her to run, with sources saying they would prefer her to stay in the Dáil, leading efforts to get into government. Sinn Féin may yet join other left-wing parties in backing Connolly. On the extent to which the cost of a campaign is influencing its deliberations, a Sinn Féin source said: 'The internal party discussion on the approach to contesting the upcoming presidential elections are primarily political. Financing a campaign is not the determining factor.' At her campaign launch last month, Connolly said she self-funded her last two Dáil election campaigns, and it will be 'big shift for me to move up and look at a national campaign with a serious amount of money'. [ Fine Gael says Mairead McGuinness 'acted in full accordance' with medical advice after being injured in crash Opens in new window ] She said she would be asking for contributions and the parties backing her are also 'open to providing funds in whatever way they see fit'. The Social Democrats said they are 'proud' to be supporting Connolly, adding: 'While we envisage there will be a financial contribution from the party, the bulk of donations will come from individuals and fundraising efforts around the country.' The Labour Party – also supporting Connolly – said it is 'finalising our approach to the upcoming presidential campaign'. A statement noted: 'As is standard practice, a separate fundraising stream will be established specifically for the purposes of the presidential campaign.' [ Labour Party backs Catherine Connolly's bid for Áras Opens in new window ] The Connolly campaign has been fundraising through its website and a spokeswoman said: 'We're very encouraged by the support Catherine Connolly is getting from around the country. It's really going to be a grassroots campaign.' As of Monday afternoon, the campaign has raised almost €35,000 in less than three weeks. On the evidence of previous presidential elections, Connolly's campaign, and those of any rivals in the race, will need a lot more.
