logo
Trump to meet Netayahu at the White House as Israel and Hamas discuss ceasefire

Trump to meet Netayahu at the White House as Israel and Hamas discuss ceasefire

NBC News16 hours ago
On Friday, Hamas said it had responded to a U.S.-backed Gaza ceasefire proposa l in a 'positive spirit,' a few days after Trump said Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalize' a 60-day truce. It has also said it will free all the hostages in exchange for an end to the war and the full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza.
But Netanyahu has called for the full elimination of Hamas and asked the group to surrender, disarm, and go into exile — something it refuses to do.
While he travels to Washington, a separate Israeli negotiating team traveled to Qatar on Sunday for indirect talks with Hamas and Netanyahu said they had clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire agreement under conditions that Israel has accepted.
Inside Gaza, at least 80 were killed in Israeli strikes, Dr. Marwan Al-Hams, the Director of the enclave's field hospitals, told NBC News on Sunday. He added that the number was likely to increase due to the ongoing shelling and airstrikes on the Gaza Strip.
More than 56,000 people have been killed and thousands more seriously injured since Israel launched its offensive in Gaza following the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023 terror attacks, according to health officials in the enclave. Some 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostages that day.
Elsewhere, Israel on Sunday launched fresh strikes in areas of Yemen controlled by the Houthi militant group, targeting ports in Hodeida, Ras Isa, and Saif, along with the commercial ship Galaxy Leader that they hijacked in 2023.
'These ports are used by the Houthi terrorist regime to transfer weapons of the Iranian regime that are used to carry out terrorist plots against the State of Israel and its allies,' an Israel Defense Forces spokesperson said in a statement Sunday.
In a separate post on X, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said the strikes were part of 'Operation Black Flag,' adding that the Iran-backed militant group would 'continue to pay a heavy price for their actions.'
'The fate of Yemen is the same as the fate of Tehran,' Katz added, referring to the Iranian regime.
But a Houthi spokesperson downplayed the Israeli attack in a statement Monday, saying that the militant group's air defenses had "successfully countered" it by 'using locally manufactured surface-to-air missiles.'
The attacks on the Iran-backed Houthis came after Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made his first public appearance since the 12-day war with Israel. Iranian state television showed the Supreme Leader greeting worshippers at a mosque on Saturday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breakingviews - Trump's trade war promises no real endgame
Breakingviews - Trump's trade war promises no real endgame

Reuters

time16 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Breakingviews - Trump's trade war promises no real endgame

WASHINGTON, July 7 (Reuters Breakingviews) - The reward for negotiators from South Africa to Malaysia working to reach a deal with the White House: three more weeks in the pressure cooker. On Monday, President Donald Trump again extended his deadline to seal country-by-country trade agreements, this time until August 1. The announcement came posed as a threat, with letters sent to a group of world leaders declaring that their exports would be subject to levies ranging from 25% to 40% next month. Effectively a reminder of Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff threats, his whack-a-mole demands portend ill for any deals that are struck. Japan and South Korea provide cautionary tales. Trump's April trade announcement applied levies of 24% and 25%, respectively, only to be delayed for negotiations. He has since vented that Japan does not buy enough American rice, opens new tab and cars. Yet half of all the tariff-free rice Japan imports comes from the U.S. already. Meanwhile, U.S. rice exports to all countries account for a measly $2 billion, opens new tab, less than the $13 billion Japanese tourism, opens new tab contributed to the domestic economy in 2019, according to the State Department. Trump and spokesperson Karoline Leavitt nonetheless fixate on this one issue. South Korea shows the cost of failing to satisfy such whims. The country sealed a free trade agreement with the U.S. that came into force in 2012. It did nothing to prevent today's broadside. Now, Trump's agenda could slow Korean industrial giants' efforts to ramp production on American shores: recent cuts to electric-vehicle subsidies may ding the likes of battery maker SK On and automaker Hyundai. Tariff threats against smaller countries are particularly difficult to appease. Look at, say, Laos. Its goods imports from the U.S. amounted to, opens new tab $40 million, versus $803 million in goods exports, in 2024. This is infinitesimal in the scheme of the U.S.'s overall $1.2 trillion goods trade deficit, yet a promised 40% tariff on its exports would be extremely material to Laos's own $16 billion economy. Furthermore, what any country gets for reaching a 'deal' is still nebulous beyond lowering rates that have never been imposed. Look at Vietnam, where Trump announced a tentative agreement setting a 20% tariff and a levy designed to target products passing through the country from elsewhere. Monday's announcements for South Korea and Japan, where there is no deal, involve the same 'trans-shipment' charge plus a 25% baseline rate. According to the White House, Vietnam even dropped its tariffs on U.S. goods to zero. Meanwhile, new bugbears – like an additional threatened 10% duty on the BRICS nations – creep up. Whether the tumult can ever really end is unclear. The best outcome for any country might be the framework sealed with the UK, which softened some trade barriers but little else. It's a small win now, without relying on Trump not to simply change his mind in the future. Follow Gabriel Rubin on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.

Binyamin Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel peace prize
Binyamin Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel peace prize

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Binyamin Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel peace prize

President Trump has said it is 'very meaningful' to be considered for the Nobel peace prize after Binyamin Netanyahu presented him with a nomination letter on a visit to the White House. The Israeli prime minister said the accolade was 'well deserved' because Trump was 'forging peace' in 'one region after the another'. 'I want to express the appreciation and admiration not only of all Israelis but of the Jewish people and many, many admirers around the world for your leadership,' Netanyahu said during his visit to Washington on Monday. The two leaders discussed a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza. Under the proposed deal, Hamas would release ten living and 18 dead Israeli hostages in exchange for the withdrawal of Israeli troops to a buffer zone on the Gaza Strip's border. • Can Israel and Hamas co-exist? Trump's ceasefire depends on it Israel would allow international charities and the United Nations to resume aid deliveries to Gaza rather than entrusting the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American organisation mired in controversy, with alleviating Palestinian hunger. More than 700 Palestinians have been killed seeking food since the foundation started distributing aid, according to the territory's Hamas-run health authorities. Trump and Netanyahu had dinner together in the White House on Monday night, which marked the third visit by the Israeli prime minister to Washington since the start of Trump's second term. In a deft act of diplomacy — one that recalled Sir Keir Starmer's presentation of a letter from King Charles to Trump inviting the US president on a state visit — Netanyahu began the dinner by lauding Trump's achievements, describing his 'many admirers around the world'. The Israeli prime minister then produced a letter and reminded the gathered press of Trump's role negotiating the Abraham Accords during his first term. Under the accords, a handful of Arab countries recognised Israel for the first time. Efforts to incorporate Saudi Arabia into the agreement have stalled during Trump's second term amid widespread anger in the Middle East over the ongoing war in Gaza. Netanyahu said: 'He's forging peace as we speak in one country, one region after another. I want to present to you the letter I sent to the Nobel prize. It's nominating you for the peace prize, which is well deserved and you should get it.' Reaching over the dinner table for the letter, Trump said: 'Wow. Thank you very much. This I didn't know. Wow. Thank you very much. Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful, Bibi.' Trump has repeatedly criticised the decision to give the Nobel peace prize to Barack Obama in 2009 and has often appeared to covet the award himself. During a meeting with Netanyahu this year, he fumed: 'They will never give me a Nobel peace prize. It's too bad. I deserve it, but they will never give it to me.' Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy, will head to Qatar this week to continue mediated negotiations with Hamas over the ceasefire. 'We have an opportunity to finally get a peace deal, Mr Prime Minister,' Witkoff told Netanyahu at the dinner. An initial ceasefire deal collapsed this year amid anger in Israel over Hamas staging public handover ceremonies for the hostage releases and Netanyahu's refusal to completely withdraw Israeli troops from Gaza. Trump also said he had agreed to an Iranian request for talks after the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites last month. Witkoff said the meeting would be soon, perhaps in a week. 'We have scheduled Iran talks, and they want to … They want to talk,' Trump said. On Ukraine, Trump appeared to suggest he would allow weapons deliveries to resume. Asked if the US would keep arming Ukraine after the suspension of a crucial delivery of air defence missiles and other munitions, Trump said: 'We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now.' He added: 'I'm not happy with President Putin at all.' It came after Trump told President Zelensky of Ukraine he was not responsible for the weapons freeze in a call last week, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.

US air strikes on Iran were absolutely necessary, says Patel
US air strikes on Iran were absolutely necessary, says Patel

North Wales Chronicle

time2 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

US air strikes on Iran were absolutely necessary, says Patel

The Conservative frontbencher pressed Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer for details about the 'UK's response to the actions of the Iranian regime' in the Commons on Monday. It followed Operation Midnight Hammer last month, an air raid when US defence forces attacked Iranian nuclear sites near Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. UK Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies. 'Two weeks have passed since the US air strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities,' shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti said. 'Does the minister have an assessment of their impact, and what is his response to the Iranian regime now prohibiting co-operation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) and their inspectors leaving Iran? 'Given Tehran's refusal to co-operate, is the minister and the department in discussions with the partners about snapback sanctions being applied (by reinstating UN sanctions on Iran removed through the 2015 Iran nuclear deal) and other measures? 'Is he concerned that demonstrates that Iran will continue to pursue nuclear weapons and their entire programme? 'And with the information received from discussions with America, Israel and other intelligence partners, will the Government finally come off the fence about those strikes and agree with this side of the House that they were absolutely necessary?' Mr Falconer replied: 'I won't provide, I'm afraid, a detailed commentary from the despatch box on the extent of damage from the strikes, for reasons that I'm sure (Dame Priti) and the rest of the House will understand. 'I can confirm we are in discussions about the snapback mechanisms. As the Prime Minister (Sir Keir Starmer) has said, as the Foreign Secretary (David Lammy) has said, as I have said, we cannot see Iran get a nuclear weapon – snapback is an important lever. 'We're talking with our E3 partners and indeed the Americans about what role snapback can play. 'We hope to see a diplomatic solution. That is ultimately the most enduring way to ensure that Iran does not get a nuclear weapon, but we will continue to consider all diplomatic tools including snapback.' Andrew Murrison referred to comments which Defence Secretary John Healey made on social media website X, when the Cabinet minister said the 'US has taken action to alleviate the grave threat that Iran poses to global security'. The Conservative MP for South West Wiltshire told the Commons: 'The Defence Secretary correctly has said that Operation Midnight Hammer has alleviated a grave threat, but the Attorney General appears to be less clear and wonders if it was illegal, whilst the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary appear to sit on the fence. 'Sorry to put the minister on the spot – does he agree with the Attorney General or with the Defence Secretary?' Mr Falconer replied: 'The Defence Secretary and the Attorney General are doing rather different roles, and I don't think they're in disagreement – and in any case, collective responsibility would bind them both and indeed me.' The Foreign Office minister, whose portfolio includes the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan, also referred to a 'gap' in the law which independent reviewer of state threats legislation Jonathan Hall identified in a 2025 report. Mr Hall recommended that the Government should be able to issue 'statutory alert and liability threat notices' against foreign intelligence services. 'By way of example, this strong power would be available for use against the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps', he wrote, referring to the Iran-backed organisation. It would be a 'new proscription-type power', similar to existing terrorism legislation used to ban organisations such as Hamas and National Action, the reviewer said. When Labour MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme Adam Jogee asked Mr Falconer to 'elaborate a little more on what that means', the minister replied: 'A state in this case has proved a persistent threat in the UK using methods unlike those usually employed by a state.' He said the Government was 'seeking to fill' the gap in the law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store