logo
Slashed US Aid Showing Impact, As Congress Codifies Cuts

Slashed US Aid Showing Impact, As Congress Codifies Cuts

The United States' destruction of a warehouse worth of emergency food that had spoiled has drawn outrage, but lawmakers and aid workers say it is only one effect of President Donald Trump's abrupt slashing of foreign assistance.
The Senate early Thursday approved nearly $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid as well as public broadcasting, formalizing a radical overhaul of spending that Trump first imposed with strokes of his pen on taking office nearly six months ago.
US officials confirmed that nearly 500 tons of high-nutrition biscuits, meant to keep alive malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan, were incinerated after they passed their expiration date in a warehouse in Dubai.
Lawmakers of the rival Democratic Party said they had warned about the food in March. Senator Tim Kaine said that the inaction in feeding children "really exposes the soul" of the Trump administration.
Michael Rigas, the deputy secretary of state for management, acknowledged to Kaine that blame lay with the shuttering of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which was merged into the State Department after drastic cuts.
"I think that this was just a casualty of the shutdown of USAID," Rigas said.
The Atlantic magazine, which first reported the episode, said that the United States bought the biscuits near the end of Biden administration for around $800,000 and that the Trump administration's burning of the food was costing taxpayers another $130,000.
For aid workers, the biscuit debacle was just one example of how drastic and sudden cuts have aggravated the impact of the aid shutdown.
Kate Phillips-Barrasso, vice president for global policy and advocacy at Mercy Corps, said that large infrastructure projects were shut down immediately, without regard to how to finish them.
"This really was yanking the rug out, or turning the the spigot off, overnight," she said.
She pointed to the termination of a USAID-backed Mercy Corps project to improve water and sanitation in the turbulent east of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Work began in 2020 and was scheduled to end in September 2027.
"Infrastructure projects are not things where 75 percent is ok. It's either done or it's not," she said.
The Republican-led Senate narrowly approved the package, which needs a final green light from the House of Representatives, that, in the words of White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, will rescind funding for "$9 billion worth of crap."
The bill includes ending all $437 million the United States would have given to several UN bodies including the children's agency UNICEF and the UN Development Programme. It also pulls $2.5 billion from development assistance.
Under pressure from moderate Republicans, the package backs off from ending PEPFAR, the anti-HIV/AIDS initiative credited with saving 25 million lives since it was launched by former president George W. Bush more than two decades ago.
Republicans and the Trump-launched Department of Government Efficiency, initially led by tycoon Elon Musk, have highlighted spending by USAID on issues that are controversial in the United States, saying it does not serve US interests.
House Speaker Mike Johnson said that the Republicans were getting rid of "egregious abuses."
"We can't fund transgender operas in Peru with US taxpayer dollars," Johnson told reporters, an apparent reference to a US grant under the Biden administration for the staging of an opera in Colombia that featured a transgender protagonist.
The aid cuts come a week after the State Department laid off more than 1,300 employees after Secretary of State Marco Rubio ended or merged several offices, including those on climate change, refugees and human rights.
Rubio called it a "very deliberate step to reorganize the State Department to be more efficient and more focused."
Senate Democrats issued a scathing report that accused the Trump administration of ceding global leadership to China, which has been increasing spending on diplomacy and disseminating its worldview.
The rescissions vote "will be met with cheers in Beijing, which is already celebrating America's retreat from the world under President Trump," said Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US citizens freed as El Salvador returns Venezuelan migrants – DW – 07/18/2025
US citizens freed as El Salvador returns Venezuelan migrants – DW – 07/18/2025

DW

time20 minutes ago

  • DW

US citizens freed as El Salvador returns Venezuelan migrants – DW – 07/18/2025

The deal involved Venezuela taking men that the US President Donald Trump's administration had sent to El Salvador. El Salvador on Friday repatriated all Venezuelan migrants deported from the United States as part of a prisoner exchange with Venezuela. In return, Venezuela freed political prisoners and all American citizens it had been holding. "As was offered to the Venezuelan regime back in April, we carried out this exchange in return for a considerable number of Venezuelan political prisoners, people that regime had kept in its prisons for years, as well as all the American citizens it was holding as hostages," El Salvador President Nayib Bukele wrote on social media. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed Venezuela released 10 jailed Americans as part of the swap. "Every wrongfully detained American in Venezuela is now free and back in our homeland," Rubio said. At the heart of the deal were more than 250 Venezuelan migrants released by El Salvador. They had been detained in the country's Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. The migrants were held there after being expelled in March by the US President Donald Trump's administration to El Salvador. The CECOT detainees were deported from the US under the rarely used Alien Enemies Act after the Trump administration labeled the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua an invading force and used that designation to expedite removals of suspected affiliates. However, their families deny the claims. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Venezuela's government has condemned the detention of its citizens as a violation of human rights and international law. Long accused of human rights abuses himself, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro used the migrants' detention in El Salvador to flip the script on the United States, prompting even some of his strongest political opponents to agree with his condemnation. Separately, Venezuela hailed the return of seven migrant children who remained in the United States after their Venezuelan parents were expelled.

Trump Pushes MAGA Theory on Epstein Files But It Backfires: 'Then What's Stopping You From Releasing Everything?'
Trump Pushes MAGA Theory on Epstein Files But It Backfires: 'Then What's Stopping You From Releasing Everything?'

Int'l Business Times

time3 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Pushes MAGA Theory on Epstein Files But It Backfires: 'Then What's Stopping You From Releasing Everything?'

President Donald Trump tried pushing a popular MAGA theory as to why the files on Jeffrey Epstein have not been released yet, only for it to backfire online. President Donald Trump tried spinning a popular MAGA theory to help defend why the files on Jeffrey Epstein have not been released yet, only for it to backfire online. Trump took to Truth Social Thursday morning to rally his supporters against Democrats, seemingly suggesting that if there was anything on him in the Epstein files then they would have released the files already. "If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had Garland and Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!" the president declared. Popular conspiracy theories surrounding the Epstein case have caused some people to believe that the files in Epstein's case have not been released to the public because they implicate powerful people and public figures. However, following Trump's message, users were quick to point out that if he was not named in the files then they believed the president should have no problem with releasing them to the public. Well then, WHAT'S STOPPING YOU FROM RELEASING EVERYTHING, THEN??? — Steve Rosenberg (@stevemrosenbrg) July 18, 2025 "WHAT'S STOPPING YOU FROM RELEASING EVERYTHING, THEN???" one user angrily wrote on X. Another added, "If there's nothing then release the files." "If he were being honest he wouldn't constantly be freaking out about it. He has something to hide whether it just makes him look bad or makes him bad," another user wrote. The president's assertion was also met with disapproval from MAGA supporters, with one user writing, "Then show us. Keep in mind we don't follow you, we follow MAGA." Then show us. Keep in mind we don't follow you, we follow MAGA. — Brenda (@Brendakenzie) July 18, 2025 Others speculated that if the files did not name Trump himself, then there might be other people who do not want the files made public. "If they had nothing on you, why don't you release all the files? Maybe because there's something there that will show the true colors of both Republicans and Democrats?" one person suggested. If they had nothing on you, why don't you release all the files? Maybe because there's something there that will show the true colours of both Republicans and Democrats? — Backy (@pG6Z5GbT_U2rvL) July 18, 2025 Meanwhile, others took issue with the president's behavior towards the situation as a whole. During Trump's 2024 campaign he suggested that he would be open to investigations into the Epstein files. But since backlash to the Department of Justice and FBI's memo declaring that Epstein had no client list, Trump has since called the relentless pursuit of the files a "hoax" by Democrats. Can he try to make it make sense. First they were real and ready for reveal, next they were nonexistent, then they were real but fabricated by democrats, and now they're not real again? If he wants MAGA to calm down, he should've just said they were democrats made — Soap_Eater (@Soap_Eater71) July 18, 2025 "Can he try to make it make sense... If he wants MAGA to calm down, he should've just said they were Democrats made," one user replied. Trump's Thursday morning post came a day after the Wall Street Journal published a report alleging that Trump sent Epstein a note for his 50th birthday, which included a drawing of a naked woman with his signature near her private region. The president repeatedly denied the report's claims, and Vice President JD Vance has also come to Trump's defense, calling the report "complete and utter bulls***." Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans have continued to push for the release of the files, with New York Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Daniel Goldman calling for more photos and videos to be shared with the public. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

Democratic Lawmaker Demands 'the Evidence About Trump' Following Pam Bondi's Plans to Release of Epstein Case Transcripts
Democratic Lawmaker Demands 'the Evidence About Trump' Following Pam Bondi's Plans to Release of Epstein Case Transcripts

Int'l Business Times

time4 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Democratic Lawmaker Demands 'the Evidence About Trump' Following Pam Bondi's Plans to Release of Epstein Case Transcripts

A Democratic lawmaker is demanding more evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's case be released, which he believes could have something to do with President Donald Trump. Latin Times A Democratic lawmaker is demanding more evidence in the case of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein be released, which he believes could include President Donald Trump, following the Trump administration's intent to release grand jury testimony. New York Rep. Daniel Goldman urged Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to release physical evidence such as photos and videos, insisting that the testimony will not be enough. "Nice try @AGPamBondi. What about videos, photographs and other recordings? What about FBI 302's (witness interviews)? What about texts and emails?" Goldman wrote . "That's where the evidence about Trump and others will be. Grand jury testimony will only relate to Epstein and Maxwell." Nice try @ about videos, photographs and other recordings?What about FBI 302's (witness interviews)?What about texts and emails?That's where the evidence about Trump and others will be. Grand jury testimony will only relate to Epstein and Maxwell. — Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) July 18, 2025 Goldman's statement comes after President Donald Trump called for Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent grand jury testimony, subject to court approval" in a Truth Social post Thursday night. In turn, Bondi responded to the president's post on X , saying the DOJ is "ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts." Trump and Bondi's statements came after the Wall Street Journal published a report alleging that Trump wrote a note for Epstein's 50th birthday that included a drawing of a naked woman with his signature where the woman's pubic hair would have been. Trump has repeatedly denied the report's claims, calling it "fake" in another post to Truth Social. When the publication asked for comment on the report, Trump reportedly threatened to sue them "just like I sued everyone else." Grand jury testimonies are typically kept from public view out of protection for victims and accusers as the transcripts may include their statements, CNN reported. It will be up to a judge to determine how much — if any — of the testimonies can be released. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store