logo
The Tory newbies who fear they could be the last

The Tory newbies who fear they could be the last

Spectator2 days ago
It is a year today that the survivors of the 2024 Tory election disaster began to make their way to Westminster. Among the 121 Conservative MPs were 26 first-timers. Having lost so much talent last July, many of these now represent the party's best hopes for the future. But with the Tories down to just 17 per cent in the polls, some fear that the intake of 2024 could be the last one of any great size or significance. 'I didn't sign up to slog my guts out for five years, just to lose in 2029' says one.
From bitter defeats often emerge impressive figures. Tony Blair and Gordon Brown first won their seats in 1983; William Hague's defeat in 2001 gave us David Cameron, George Osborne and Boris Johnson. The nature of the 2024 result meant that most of those 26 newbies were chosen for traditionally safe seats, some of which were being vacated by retiring cabinet ministers. Many newbies have long cultivated a political career and harbour hopes of serving in ministerial office. More than half are ex-councillors. 'A good crop,' is the verdict of one veteran MP.
The first major decision made by this new intake was who to back for leader. Having only just arrived in parliament, they found themselves immediately buttonholed by various teams, asking for their support. Only one, Ben Obese-Jecty, decided to initially publicly back eventual victor Kemi Badenoch; Andrew Snowden later switched from Priti Patel. Seven of the group went for Robert Jenrick; five for James Cleverly. For some, this was an indication of a generational divide within the Conservative family. The Jenrick cluster remains close-knit in parliament: Jack Rankin and Katie Lam share an office while Lam and Nick Timothy work closely on grooming gangs.
Sensibly, Badenoch offered jobs to the new intake as soon as the contest finished in November. Nine became whips; the others made Parliamentary Private Secretaries (PPSs). Initially, there was an air of excitement among many, discovering parliament's novelties. One or two quickly became identified as 'characters'. Lincoln Jopp MC, is, at 57, the oldest. 'Great fun at the pub', is the verdict of one; 'A good future Chief Whip,' says another, 'because if he asked me to do something, I'd do it.' Shivani Raja, a 30-year-old former beauty queen, caused a stir by flipping Leicester East.
John Cooper, Alister Jack's old spad who replaced him in Dumfries and Galloway, is praised among the intake for his low-key style and sharp mind. 'There's a lot of love for John', says one MP. Two names are often cited as being stand out stars: Lam and Timothy. Both, unsurprisingly, have prior Westminster experience as special advisers in the Johnson and May governments. Rebecca Paul meanwhile earned plaudits opposing elements of Kim Leadbeater's Bill to legalise assisted dying – something which all but four of the new intake opposed at Third Reading. Obese-Jecty meanwhile switched from being a whip to a PPS and has become a vocal critic of Reform UK on social media.
An esprit de corps quickly developed. Aphra Brandreth, daughter of Gyles, has helped organise some of their regular dinners at favoured Italian haunts like Osteria and Sartoria. The eight new female Tory MPs formed a WhatsApp group too. Some 22 of the 26 signed a letter backed by the Next Generation Tories in September, urging the party to do more for young voters. Yet the subsequent pushback from senior Conservatives has frustrated those who feel they lack an outlet to channel their energies, at a time when older colleagues are less willing to play their part. Some have joined dining societies. Those on the right who are considered 'sound' were invited to attend the 92 Group dinner with Kemi Badenoch at the beginning of April.
The biggest psychological shift among the new MPs came, unsurprisingly, in May. 'Some colleagues had been deluding themselves', reflects one of their peers. But the spectacle of watching 676 Conservative councillors lose across the country shook those in parliament. In Kent, the six Tory MPs watched as they lost 57 of the 62 previously held wards. It has added to the jumpiness and unease among much of the new intake, whose average majority is just 2,616.
More than half have very marginal seats – a winning margin of five per cent or less – compared to one in five MPs across the House. Lam has the biggest, in Weald and Kent, with a majority of 8,422 and margin of 16.6 per cent. David Reed, MP for Exmouth and Exeter East meanwhile won by just 121 votes – a margin of 0.2 per cent. Both are on track to lose their seats to Reform, along with 14 of their peers, according to last month's YouGov MRP poll. In this scenario, just eight of the new intake hold on with Greg Stafford, MP for Farnham and Bordon, set to lose to the Lib Dems.
So will they stick with Badenoch or gamble on change? There is no clear consensus at present. Having survived a near wipeout, the emphasis on patience from the leadership has not landed well. 'It's not about promotion,' said one. 'We're genuinely worried about the future of the party.' Another new MP says that they are preparing to put a letter in, ahead of 2 November, when Badenoch can be subject to a challenge under the rules of the 1922 committee. Ambitious, uneasy and a little restless, expect the new intake to make even more waves in their second year of parliament.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scots cannot afford a third decade of SNP Government at Holyrood
Scots cannot afford a third decade of SNP Government at Holyrood

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Scots cannot afford a third decade of SNP Government at Holyrood

It's been one year since Scotland voted for change. We turned Scottish politics on its head, booted the Tories out of government and elected a Labour government with 37 Scottish Labour MPs at its heart. The difference a Labour Government makes has been clear. We have decisively ended the era of Tory austerity, delivering record funding for Scotland. We have delivered a pay rise for 200,000 of the lowest paid Scots and introduced legislation to provide the greatest boost to workers' rights in a generation. We have restored economic stability after years of Tory chaos and overseen four interest rate cuts, helping to lower mortgages by an average of £1000 a year. We have set up a publicly-owned GB Energy company here in Scotland so that we can reap the benefits of the green revolution. But Scotland is still being held back by a failing SNP government. The SNP runs our NHS and it is fighting for survival. In England waiting lists are falling as a result of Labour's action, but in Scotland they're not. The SNP is responsible for housing and Scotland is in the grips of a housing emergency. Angela Rayner is driving forward a game-changing programme of planning reforms and housebuilding, but SNP ministers are sitting on their hands. The SNP runs our schools and they are slipping down the international league tables. The SNP runs our justice system and it is stretched to breaking point. The SNP runs our transport system and it is in chaos. The SNP received record funding from the Labour government but managed to create a blackhole of almost £5bn in Scotland's finances. The list goes on and on. Almost all of what is broken in Scotland is run by the SNP. For years the Tories provided the SNP with cover for their own failures but that doesn't hold anymore. Labour has turned the page on Tory austerity and put an end to its economic chaos. The SNP has the powers and it has the money – it just lacks the ambition. After almost two decades in charge, the SNP has simply run out of steam. This is a tired government with no positive vision and no new ideas. At the Scottish Parliament election next year, Scotland will face a direct choice - more managed decline with an SNP government led by John Swinney or a new direction with a Scottish Labour government led by me. We cannot afford a third decade of the SNP. We need a Scottish Government with a plan to rebuild our NHS so Scots can count on it in their hour of need. We need a Scottish Government that will do right by the next generation and create opportunities for all. We need a Scottish Government that will end waste and treat public money with respect. That's what Scottish Labour will deliver. I'm ready to lead a Scottish Labour government that will renew our public services, bolster our economy and give Scotland the NHS it deserves. Legal aid system on 'verge of collapse' Eyebrows were raised last week when it emerged that former SNP CEO Peter Murrell will receive legal aid at taxpayer expense after being charged with embezzlement. Putting the political drama aside, this episode shines a light on an important issue. Legal aid is a lifeline for many Scots, from women fleeing abusive relationships to families seeking the truth in Fatal Accident Inquiries. It is a fundamental part of our legal system – a way to make sure that access to justice isn't determined by wealth. It is how we ensure that the principle of equality under the law is upheld in practice as well as on paper. But the system is on the brink of collapse under the SNP. The Law Society of Scotland has warned that 'legal aid deserts' are growing as lawyers move away from a broken system, and looming strikes threaten to make a bad picture worse. If the SNP fails to fix this crisis it will cause chaos in the courts and deprive Scots of the legal representation they are entitled to. We cannot tolerate a system where your income is a barrier to justice. Peter Murrell has been able to access legal aid in his hour of need – but too many people can't and that's not good enough

Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave
Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave

Rhyl Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Parents who lose pregnancy before 24 weeks to be entitled to bereavement leave

Ministers are set to amend the Employment Rights Bill so that people will be entitled to protected time off in the event of a pregnancy loss, regardless of the stage at which it happens. Angela Rayner has said that the change will give 'people time away from work to grieve'. Under current rules, parents are entitled to up to two weeks of bereavement leave if a child dies before they turn 18, or they experience a stillbirth after 24 weeks of pregnancy. Amendments to the Employment Rights Bill, will see the right to 'at least one week's leave' expanded to people who lose a pregnancy before 24 weeks. The exact length of the leave will be specified in later legislation after a consultation. The Bill already makes provision to expand bereavement leave, giving employees protected time off to grieve the loss of a loved one. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that the amendments will offer 'dignity and respect'. 'For many families, including mine, that have been affected by pregnancy loss, the decision around returning to work or taking sick leave to grieve properly can make an already painful experience even more difficult,' he said. 'Grief doesn't follow a timetable, and expanding rights to leave for pregnancy loss will ensure every family gets the time they need to heal without worrying about their job.' Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner similarly said that 'no-one who is going through the heartbreak of pregnancy loss should have to go back to work before they are ready'. 'I am proud that this Government is introducing a day-one right to protected time off work after experiencing pregnancy loss, giving people time away from work to grieve and spend time with their families,' she said. Vicki Robinson, chief executive of the Miscarriage Association, welcomed the announcement, saying it was 'a hugely important step that acknowledges the often very significant impact of pre-24-week loss, not only for those experiencing the physical loss, but for their partners too'. It comes after ministers announced they would review the system of parental leave, declaring that the current system is 'not working' for families. Mr Reynolds said the Government will investigate the whole system for supporting new parents to take time off work when they have a baby, including maternity leave, paternity leave and shared arrangements.

Redress process for Post Office Horizon victims could go on for years
Redress process for Post Office Horizon victims could go on for years

Rhyl Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Redress process for Post Office Horizon victims could go on for years

Many victims of the scandal are still awaiting full redress, as one of the final reports from the long-running inquiry – looking at the impact on those who had their lives destroyed and compensation – is set to be published on Tuesday. More than 900 subpostmasters were wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts. The previous Conservative government said those who had their convictions quashed were eligible for £600,000 payouts – with victims such as Amanda and Norman Barber accepting the fixed offer. Despite losing their business and home, the Warrington couple said they found it 'almost impossible' to provide the details required to have their case individually assessed so did not want to risk 'getting less'. Unexplained shortfalls in their accounts at Thelwall Post Office eventually led to them being prosecuted over a deficit of £5,600 – despite using around £200,000 of their own money to attempt to balance the books. Both received a community order of 12 months and 100 hours' community service. Speaking about the redress process, Amanda, 55, said: 'We were being asked to produce evidence we simply couldn't get our hands on with regards to our losses as we are talking going back 15 years. 'We found it almost impossible to provide the details needed to go down the route of having our case individually assessed. 'It just didn't seem worth it. I think subpostmasters are still being left in an impossible situation when it comes to seeking true and full redress. 'Given the time it would take we simply couldn't risk a full assessment and getting less, particularly because the lack of documents we had. 'It got to the stage where, when the £600,000 was offered, it seemed the best way to bring years of torture to an end.' Redress has been a key issue for subpostmasters since the scandal came to light, with many finding the various compensation schemes difficult to navigate. Lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates previously described the various processes as 'quasi-kangaroo courts', telling The Sunday Times that the Department for Business and Trade 'sits in judgment of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses'. The chairman of the Horizon IT inquiry, Sir Wyn Williams, is due to publish his findings on redress on Tuesday, with Amanda Barber saying she will join other subpostmasters in attending the report's publication event. She said: 'We feel we just need to be there to hear what is said. 'Lives were ruined and compensation has been made too hard to get, and too little by far.' One law firm involved in securing redress for victims, Hudgell Solicitors, said it still had more than 700 ongoing compensation cases to resolve. Solicitor Neil Hudgell said the firm had agreed damages for more than 300 people, totalling £170 million, but said the redress process had 'far too much red tape to get through'. He said: 'We have seen inconsistencies between the various compensation schemes, which remain over-engineered and over-legalistic, with far too much red tape to get through. 'There has also been a repeated failure to give the benefit of the doubt to subpostmasters in appropriate circumstances. 'It's made it far too long a process for so many people who have been through so much, and are now in the latter stages of their lives. 'It has been retraumatising for many, and increasing numbers are sadly passing away without seeing redress.' Addressing how long it could take for all claims to be settled, the solicitor added: 'At the current speed, we are looking at another two to three years.' Mr Hudgell said one client who was initially offered £50,000 has seen their offer rise to £500,000. He added: 'It is not a one-off glitch, but a stark illustration of a very common issue. 'It has been a painful process for all, and ended with a new appeals process being confirmed earlier this year, in recognition that many people had been under-compensated.' In a statement, the Department for Business and Trade said: 'We are grateful for the inquiry's work, which has revealed the immeasurable suffering that victims of the scandal have endured. 'This Government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to over 7,300 claimants.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store