logo
Buckingham palace confirms Trump's second UK state visit in September

Buckingham palace confirms Trump's second UK state visit in September

Economic Times4 days ago
Buckingham palace confirms Trump's second UK state visit in September
Synopsis Donald Trump is poised for a second state visit to the UK in September, invited by King Charles III, despite past clashes with London's mayor, Sadiq Khan. The visit's timing may prevent Trump from addressing Parliament, unlike President Macron's recent visit. Trump has also announced new tariffs on goods from Mexico and the EU, citing border security and trade imbalances. Washington: US President Donald Trump is set to make a historic second state visit to the UK, likely in September, following a formal invitation from King Charles III, The New York Times reported, citing Buckingham Palace's statement.
ADVERTISEMENT The King extended the invitation through a letter delivered by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer during a visit to the Oval Office in February.
According to The New York Times, Trump relished his last state visit to Britain in 2019, when Queen Elizabeth II hosted him.
The queen threw him a lavish banquet at Buckingham Palace and gave him a royal artillery salute. In a documentary about his political comeback, "The Art of the Surge," Trump showed off a book of photos of himself and the queen, "who was fantastic, by the way," he said.
But Trump picked a fight with London's mayor, Sadiq Khan, who is Muslim, just before his arrival, calling him a "stone-cold loser" on social media and accusing him of doing a terrible job of running Britain's capital city, as per The New York Times.
ADVERTISEMENT Khan had described Trump as "just one of the most egregious examples of a growing global threat," likening the president's language to that used by "fascists of the 20th century."He remains mayor, and there is little indication that their mutual antipathy has softened.
ADVERTISEMENT The timing of Trump's visit makes it unlikely he will be accorded the honour of delivering a speech to Parliament, several British papers reported.It is usually not in session in late September because the country's political parties hold their annual policy conferences during that period.
ADVERTISEMENT
That could set up an awkward contrast with the visit of President Emmanuel Macron of France, who spoke to Parliament during his state visit last week.Like Macron, Trump will be hosted at Windsor Castle rather than Buckingham Palace, which is undergoing major renovations.
ADVERTISEMENT Meanwhile, recently, Trump on Saturday announced a 30 per cent tariff on goods from Mexico and the European Union starting August 1, intensifying trade tensions with two of the country's top economic partners,In separate letters posted on Truth Social, Trump informed Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen about the tariff decision, citing border security and trade imbalances as key reasons, according to The Hill.In his letter to Sheinbaum Pardo, Trump referenced the ongoing fentanyl crisis as a major concern behind the decision. "Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done is not enough," the president wrote.
As The Hill noted, the US had previously imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Mexican goods, though Trump later exempted items covered under the 2020 US-Mexico-Canada Agreement. It remains unclear whether those exemptions will still apply after the new tariffs take effect on August 1.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
(Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates.
NEXT STORY
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What does the August 2025 U.S. Visa Bulletin mean for Indian applicants?
What does the August 2025 U.S. Visa Bulletin mean for Indian applicants?

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

What does the August 2025 U.S. Visa Bulletin mean for Indian applicants?

The U.S. Department of State has released the Visa Bulletin for August 2025, outlining key changes in employment-based and family-sponsored green card categories. The update shows notable forward movement in the EB-5 unreserved investor category for India and China, while EB-2 applicants in all countries except India and China face retrogression. Most family-based visa categories remain unchanged. Editorial | Pivot away: On U.S. student visas, Trump administration EB-5 India and China see significant forward movement In the employment-based fifth preference (EB-5) unreserved category, the Final Action Date for India has moved forward by over six months to November 15, 2019, from the previous cutoff of May 1, 2019. This shift represents a substantial gain for Indian applicants waiting in the EB-5 investor queue. China also saw a notable advancement in this category, with its Final Action Date progressing to December 15, 2015. Applicants from all other countries in the unreserved EB-5 category remain current, meaning there are no cut-off dates and applications can be processed immediately. EB-2 retrogresses globally except for India and China The employment-based second preference (EB-2) category has experienced retrogression for all countries except India and China. The Final Action Date for these countries has been revised to September 1, 2023, from July 1, 2024, as stated in the previous bulletin. The bulletin attributes the change to high demand and the approaching fiscal year's annual visa limits. For India, the EB-2 category remains at a Final Action Date of March 1, 2012, unchanged from the July 2025 bulletin. China's EB-2 cutoff also remains static on February 1, 2020. EB-3 India sees modest advancement In the employment-based third preference (EB-3) category, India's Final Action Date has advanced by one month, moving from April 22, 2013, to May 22, 2013. This modest forward movement may provide limited relief to Indian professionals in the EB-3 queue. Other countries in this category, including China, the Philippines, and Mexico, show no changes and remain current. Also Read: How the new U.S. visa rules affect your online privacy | Explained Family-sponsored categories remain mostly unchanged All family-sponsored visa categories reflect no significant changes in the August bulletin. The Final Action Dates for most categories remain the same as in July 2025. Notably, the F2A category (for spouses and children of permanent residents) continues to show a Final Action Date of April 1, 2021, for all countries, unchanged from the previous month. Category India All Other Countries Change for India F1 (Unmarried Sons/Daughters of U.S. Citizens) Sept 1, 2015 Sept 1, 2015 No change F2A (Spouses/Children of Green Card Holders) April 1, 2021 April 1, 2021 No change F2B (Unmarried Sons/Daughters of Green Card Holders) Jan 1, 2016 Jan 1, 2016 No change F3 (Married Sons/Daughters of U.S. Citizens) Sept 8, 2009 Sept 8, 2009 No change F4 (Siblings of U.S. Citizens) Oct 15, 2005 March 1, 2007 No change The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that it will continue using the 'Dates for Filing' chart for all family-sponsored adjustment of status applications in August 2025. Visa availability and application guidance The August 2025 Visa Bulletin indicates that EB-2 and EB-3 categories may become unavailable in the coming months if demand continues to exceed the annual visa limits. Applicants are advised to monitor the monthly visa bulletin closely to track changes and plan their filings accordingly. For employment-based categories, the USCIS will use the Final Action Dates chart to determine eligibility for submitting Form I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status). For family-sponsored categories, the Dates for Filing chart will continue to be used to determine eligibility for filing adjustment applications. Summary of key changes for India

India welcomes U.S. listing of The Resistance Front as global terrorist outfit
India welcomes U.S. listing of The Resistance Front as global terrorist outfit

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

India welcomes U.S. listing of The Resistance Front as global terrorist outfit

India on Friday (July 18, 2025) welcomed the U.S. designating Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) proxy The Resistance Front (TRF), which claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attack, as a global terrorist outfit. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar described Washington's decision on The Resistance Force (TRF) as a "strong affirmation" of India-U.S. counter-terrorism cooperation. In a social media post, he specially complimented U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio for designating the proxy of Pakistan-based LeT. A strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation. Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF—a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the… — Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) July 18, 2025 "Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF — a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy — as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack," the external affairs minister said. Earlier, the U.S. State Department said it is adding TRF as a designated Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). The U.S. State Department also noted that the TRF claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack which killed 26 civilians. "This was the deadliest attack on civilians in India since the 2008 Mumbai attacks conducted by LeT," it said. "TRF has also claimed responsibility for several attacks against Indian security forces, including most recently in 2024," The State Department said its actions demonstrates the Trump Administration's commitment to "protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack".

Trump mired in Epstein controversy as Wall Street Journal reports on 2003 letter
Trump mired in Epstein controversy as Wall Street Journal reports on 2003 letter

New Indian Express

time20 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Trump mired in Epstein controversy as Wall Street Journal reports on 2003 letter

WASHINGTON: The controversy over President Donald Trump 's handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation entered a new dimension Thursday as his administration struggles to make good on its promises to release details on the sex trafficking case involving a one-time friend of the now-president. Trump promised a lawsuit after The Wall Street Journal described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump denied writing the letter, calling it 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' It came after Trump in recent days has berated as 'weaklings' supporters vying for more records from the Epstein probe, after years of courting political support from those who have stoked claims of a coverup in the case to protect wealthy friends of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 awaiting trial on federal charges of trafficking of underage girls. Trump has also shielded his attorney general from being questioned about the case after she walked back claims of the existence of a 'client list' of elites who participated in Epstein's crimes, and has even taken to claiming without evidence that files were doctored by Democrats. In an administration that prides itself on changing the narrative on negative storylines, the Epstein saga has had remarkable staying power, thanks in part to infighting at high levels of government, Trump's blistering criticism of his own base and the head-scratching mystery of why documents his own administration promised to unlock will remain buried — seemingly for good. Thursday's disclosure — coupled with frustration from Trump-allied lawmakers on Capitol Hill — pushed Trump to abruptly reverse course and direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to try to make some of the documents in the case public. Bondi said she would seek court permission Friday to release grand jury information, but it would require a judge's approval, and she and Trump were silent on the additional evidence collected by federal law enforcement in the sprawling investigation that Bondi last week announced she would not release.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store