Water projects worth R50bn to be constructed in Limpopo while progress on older projects stalls
Although construction of some of the bulk water projects began years ago, most are yet to get off the ground.
The Limpopo provincial government is working with the department of water and sanitation (DWS) to construct new bulk water projects worth more than R50 billion, while many of the province's other water projects are either stalled or progressing at a snail's pace.
Outlining some of the long-term bulk water projects at The Ranch Hotel, near Polokwane last weekend, Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation David Mahlobo said he was worried that the completion of Limpopo's water projects had been delayed for extended periods.
'The DWS does not have the capacity to implement water services projects directly. We are not provided with funding to establish this capacity because water services are a municipal function and not a DWS function,' he said.
ALSO READ: R213m down the drain as Limpopo residents still have no water
Mahlobo said progress meetings with all the water services authorities are held every month.
'But despite these measures, projects are still often delayed, primarily due to poor performance by contractors and payment service providers.'
Limpopo's water projects delayed
The Citizen understands that although construction of some of these long-term bulk water projects began many years ago, most are yet to get off the ground. For example, the Giyani water treatment works is still appointing an implementing agent and construction is only expected to start in July 2025.
The Giyani bulk water project began in 2014 with a budget of R900 million. It was meant to be completed in August 2017, but the project is still not complete. It has so far cost the government more than R4.5 billion.
The Mooihoek/Tubatse bulk water supply project is almost complete, with the contractor currently addressing a snag list to finalise the project. The Nebo bulk water supply is still in the scoping phase. Offtake to Schoonoord (Phase 3C) and Marulaneng (Phase 3B) is complete, but functionality depends on the completion of Malekana to the Jane-Furse pipeline.
The R129 Mametja/Sekororo bulk water supply Phase 1 is delayed due to Eskom power connections, while RM04 experienced the same electricity problems for the water treatment works and boreholes.
ALSO READ: Multi-billion Limpopo mega-project has ground to a halt
Addressing a South African Local Government Association (Salga) lekgotla in Polokwane last week, Mahlobo said many water and sanitation projects in Limpopo have been subjected to lengthy delays.
Mahlobo blamed corruption in the DWS and implementing agents, poor planning, poor performance of contractors, weak project and contract management by implementing agents, vandalism and theft, and illegal connections.
Investigations into the Giyani water project by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) are ongoing.
The former CEO and CFO of Lepelle Northern Water (LNW), a state-owned water utility responsible for bulk water provision in Limpopo, resigned. One LNW manager has been charged and dismissed.
The SIU is also filing criminal and civil litigation to recover funds.
New water projects
Some of the long-term bulk water projects to begin between 2025 and 2030 are the N'wamitwa Dam, with an estimated budget of R6 billion, the Beitbridge/Musina intergrated water supply scheme, with an estimated R2 billion budget and the 10-year R25 billion Olifants management model water project.
This massive project is meant to supply water to three municipalities, Jane Furse, Mogalakwena and Polokwane. Phase 1 of the project began last year. When complete, it is expected to provide water to 39 000 households.
Phase 1 of the Olifants/Ebenezer bulk water scheme began last year with an estimated cost of R18 billion. The project is scheduled to start pumping 114 megalitres of water per day in 2027 and ultimately 270 megalitres of water per day in 2029.
NOW READ: R3bn allocated to fix Limpopo's roads and build new ones
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
16 hours ago
- The Citizen
Water projects worth R50bn to be constructed in Limpopo while progress on older projects stalls
Although construction of some of the bulk water projects began years ago, most are yet to get off the ground. The Limpopo provincial government is working with the department of water and sanitation (DWS) to construct new bulk water projects worth more than R50 billion, while many of the province's other water projects are either stalled or progressing at a snail's pace. Outlining some of the long-term bulk water projects at The Ranch Hotel, near Polokwane last weekend, Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation David Mahlobo said he was worried that the completion of Limpopo's water projects had been delayed for extended periods. 'The DWS does not have the capacity to implement water services projects directly. We are not provided with funding to establish this capacity because water services are a municipal function and not a DWS function,' he said. ALSO READ: R213m down the drain as Limpopo residents still have no water Mahlobo said progress meetings with all the water services authorities are held every month. 'But despite these measures, projects are still often delayed, primarily due to poor performance by contractors and payment service providers.' Limpopo's water projects delayed The Citizen understands that although construction of some of these long-term bulk water projects began many years ago, most are yet to get off the ground. For example, the Giyani water treatment works is still appointing an implementing agent and construction is only expected to start in July 2025. The Giyani bulk water project began in 2014 with a budget of R900 million. It was meant to be completed in August 2017, but the project is still not complete. It has so far cost the government more than R4.5 billion. The Mooihoek/Tubatse bulk water supply project is almost complete, with the contractor currently addressing a snag list to finalise the project. The Nebo bulk water supply is still in the scoping phase. Offtake to Schoonoord (Phase 3C) and Marulaneng (Phase 3B) is complete, but functionality depends on the completion of Malekana to the Jane-Furse pipeline. The R129 Mametja/Sekororo bulk water supply Phase 1 is delayed due to Eskom power connections, while RM04 experienced the same electricity problems for the water treatment works and boreholes. ALSO READ: Multi-billion Limpopo mega-project has ground to a halt Addressing a South African Local Government Association (Salga) lekgotla in Polokwane last week, Mahlobo said many water and sanitation projects in Limpopo have been subjected to lengthy delays. Mahlobo blamed corruption in the DWS and implementing agents, poor planning, poor performance of contractors, weak project and contract management by implementing agents, vandalism and theft, and illegal connections. Investigations into the Giyani water project by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) are ongoing. The former CEO and CFO of Lepelle Northern Water (LNW), a state-owned water utility responsible for bulk water provision in Limpopo, resigned. One LNW manager has been charged and dismissed. The SIU is also filing criminal and civil litigation to recover funds. New water projects Some of the long-term bulk water projects to begin between 2025 and 2030 are the N'wamitwa Dam, with an estimated budget of R6 billion, the Beitbridge/Musina intergrated water supply scheme, with an estimated R2 billion budget and the 10-year R25 billion Olifants management model water project. This massive project is meant to supply water to three municipalities, Jane Furse, Mogalakwena and Polokwane. Phase 1 of the project began last year. When complete, it is expected to provide water to 39 000 households. Phase 1 of the Olifants/Ebenezer bulk water scheme began last year with an estimated cost of R18 billion. The project is scheduled to start pumping 114 megalitres of water per day in 2027 and ultimately 270 megalitres of water per day in 2029. NOW READ: R3bn allocated to fix Limpopo's roads and build new ones
The South African
16 hours ago
- The South African
Here's WHAT happens if you breach the SASSA income threshold
Here's a first-hand account of what grant recipients who break the SASSA income threshold must go through. At the start of May, the agency warned that any suspect/unverified accounts would not have their grants paid. And beneficiaries would be notified by text to validate their profiles in-person at a SASSA office. Initially, SASSA made this sound largely like an identity verification process. However, we're now aware that thousands of grants were overturned due to breaches of the SASSA income threshold. All grant recipient should be aware of the income and asset limits that apply to their specific monthly stipend, as these differ for Old Age and Childcare grants. It appears the three-month notice period is being ignored when it comes to SASSA income threshold breaches. Image: File Nevertheless, it appears the South African Social Security Agency is finally taking a hardline approach to enforcement. According to The Citizen , anyone who exceeds the SASSA income threshold is being forced to repay their ill-gotten money. At last count, nearly 45% of the population is receiving some form of social welfare payment each month. 4 million of these are SASSA Old-Age grants, 13 million are SASSA Child Support beneficiaries and there are nearly 10 million SRD recipients each month. Qualifying parents are allowed to receive Child Support for a newborn right up to their 18th birthday. Image: File That's a lot of people who need their SASSA income threshold and identities verified. Previously, the agency was mandated to serve a written notice of upcoming SASSA grant reviews. Moreover, you were given three months to rectify your finances to comply with any asset and income requirements. Now, however, it appears a new precedent has been set from last month onwards, in which the grant is overturned first and clients must rectify afterwards. According to reports, a child support beneficiary who breached the SASSA income threshold last month is in the process of repaying R3 360. Considering the grant pays out only R560 per month, that's more than five months' worth of assistance owing. Debit orders from your bank account or in-person visits are accepted by SASSA as forms of repayment. Image: File Reports suggest one mother suddenly stopped receiving Child Support payments in May and June. She was alerted via text to visit an agency office in-person and was told to bring a recent bank statement, payslip and copy of her and her child's ID. It came to light that she got a job in January, and her employment income had exceeded the SASSA income threshold. In turn, the agency offered her two options to repay the ill-gotten government assistance. Either pay R3 360 in full before the end of June or make the payment over six months at R560 per month – plus interest. The latter would essentially negate the job she's just secured, costing her more over six months. Tough budget constraints mean the agency is trying to reduce costs wherever it can. Image: File SASSA provides several options for beneficiaries to repay grants: In-person at any SASSA branch office. Bank transfers to SASSA regional accounts. Debit orders arranged through the beneficiaries' bank. Note that when beneficiaries cannot afford to repay funds within a certain timeframe, extensions can be approved by SASSA officials. Although interest charges on outstanding amounts will still accrue. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Are lay-by graves un-African? Cultural clash over burial solution
For residents considering lay-by grave services, existing consumer protection laws provide important safeguards. As Johannesburg grapples with a shortage of burial space, a new industry offering lay-by grave services has emerged – but cultural leaders are asking whether this modern solution fundamentally contradicts African traditions and values. The City of Johannesburg faces an escalating burial space crisis, with several cemeteries approaching or reaching full capacity despite earlier projections of adequate space for decades. This shortage, driven by population growth, urban migration, and cultural resistance to cremation, has forced the city to actively promote alternative burial methods, including cremation and reburials. In this gap, companies like Calgro M3 Memorial Parks, have stepped in. It offers what it calls 'dignified funerals and easy to afford burials' through lay-by monthly payment plans ranging from R500 to R1 625. The company operates cemeteries across Bloemfontein, Fourways, Nasrec, Durbanville, and Enokuthula Springs, with plans for a Randburg facility. When The Citizen attempted to contact Calgro M3 for comment, the company engaged in a week-long series of evasive responses, delaying any meaningful communication before stating on Thursday that their designated spokesperson was unavailable, with no timeline for a response. ALSO READ: Westpark Cemetery limits burials as it is set to reach capacity in four months The grave cultural resistance But the concept of purchasing burial services in advance has sparked fierce opposition from traditional leaders who question whether such practices align with African cultural values. Chief Mathupha Mokoena, President of Contralesa, has been particularly vocal in his criticism. 'Contralesa is aware of strange things that are contrary to our usual practices that relate to how we conduct funerals in our country, South Africa,' Mokoena stated. 'The question of memorial parks, including pre-paid burial sites, is foreign in our culture.' Mokoena argues that these services represent a fundamental departure from traditional practices, suggesting they transform burial customs into commercial enterprises. He contends that paying for burial arrangements in advance violates core African cultural principles. 'Paying for burial rites in advance, even buying a coffin in advance, is totally against our cultural norms and practice as Africans,' he explained. 'By doing this, we are directly inviting bad luck and curses that might follow those who are remaining behind.' The traditional leader warns that such practices could have severe spiritual consequences for families, describing potential 'strange things' that 'cannot be healed and will cause pain to members of the family.' His organisation has called upon communities to resist what they view as foreign influences on traditional burial practices. ALSO READ: Damaged graves: JPCZ urges residents to check resting places of loved ones Expert analysis on lay-by graves' cultural impact Cultural expert Isaac Muthethwa offers additional perspective on why these modern burial arrangements conflict with traditional African customs. However, he also states that such practices are not significantly different from paying for funeral cover, Muthethwa says Africans are not even supposed to be using coffins because of the belief that the body must go back to the soil. He explains that the practice of preparing graves in advance goes against fundamental beliefs about death and the afterlife. His concern extends beyond the spiritual realm to practical family dynamics. Muthethwa argues that investing in death-related expenses while alive diverts resources from living family members who might need support for education, healthcare, or other essential needs. He observes a troubling shift in community priorities, where people plan extensively for death while neglecting to celebrate life's milestones. 'When people are buying cars cash, you are bringing your best respected funeral cover so that everybody can see that 'this is how you buried your mom', but the following day the family is hungry because the money was meant for the burial and not for living,' he explained. City's regulatory framework Despite the cultural controversy, the City of Johannesburg recognises memorial parks as legitimate businesses operating within established regulatory frameworks. Jenny Moodley, spokesperson for Johannesburg City Parks and Zoo, confirms that private cemeteries must comply with municipal bylaws and national environmental regulations. 'Memorial parks that operate as private cemeteries within the City of Johannesburg are recognised and are required to comply with all applicable municipal bylaws and national regulations,' Moodley stated. The city requires proper zoning and adherence to health, environmental, and town planning regulations. Regarding Calgro M3 specifically, Moodley notes that the company has received necessary approvals and currently faces no formal complaints. 'The City is aware of Calgro M3 Memorial Parks as one of the private operators currently offering memorial park services within Johannesburg,' she confirmed. Officials emphasise that while these services are legal, consumers should conduct thorough research before committing to pre-paid burial arrangements. ALSO READ: Cemetery crisis: Burial space is shrinking Consumer protections and rights For residents considering these services, existing consumer protection laws provide important safeguards. The Consumer Protection Act ensures that lay-by payments remain the consumer's property until full payment is completed, with specific provisions for refunds and compensation if services cannot be delivered. Companies must maintain payment security and provide either equivalent alternatives or financial compensation if burial services become unavailable. In cases where unavailability results from supplier fault, consumers are entitled to double compensation. For residents considering pre-paid burial services, city officials recommend thorough research and due diligence. Moodley advised consumers to 'verify that the memorial park is legally zoned as a cemetery, compliant with City bylaws, and that the service provider is registered and transparent about its terms and conditions.' Under Section 62 of the Act, retailers must safeguard both consumer payments and reserved goods with appropriate care and diligence. If goods become unavailable, companies must offer consumers equivalent or superior alternatives or provide refunds with interest. In cases where unavailability results from the supplier's fault, consumers are entitled to double their payment amount as compensation. ALSO READ: Do you purchase goods on lay-by? These are your rights as a consumer A question of cultural evolution The debate over lay-by graves raises broader questions about cultural adaptation in modern urban environments. While practical pressures demand innovative solutions to genuine infrastructure challenges, the strong opposition from cultural leaders highlights the complex relationship between tradition and necessity. Some might argue that urban realities require pragmatic approaches to age-old challenges, while others contend that certain cultural principles should remain inviolate regardless of practical pressures. The question remains: can traditional burial practices evolve to meet contemporary urban needs while maintaining their essential cultural and spiritual significance? As Johannesburg continues to wrestle with its burial space crisis, the tension between modern solutions and traditional values reflects a broader challenge facing rapidly urbanising African communities. Muthethwa says whether lay-by graves represent a necessary adaptation or an unwelcome departure from cultural norms may ultimately depend on how communities themselves choose to balance practical needs with cultural preservation. READ NEXT: Criminals vandalise cemetery in search of valuables
